Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Urol Oncol ; 42(8): 246.e1-246.e5, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679529

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the actual cost of hematuria evaluation using nationally representative claims data, given that the workup for hematuria burdens the healthcare system with significant associated costs. We hypothesized that evaluation with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) confers more cost to hematuria evaluation than renal ultrasound (US). METHODS: Using a national, privately insured database (MarketScan), we identified all individuals with an incident diagnosis of hematuria. We included patients who underwent cystoscopy and upper tract imaging within 3 months of diagnosis. We tabulated the costs of the imaging study as well as the total healthcare cost per patient. A multivariable model was developed to evaluate patient factors associated with total healthcare costs. RESULTS: We identified 318,680 patients with hematuria who underwent evaluation. Median costs associated with upper tract imaging were $362 overall, $504 for CT with contrast, $163 for US, $680 for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), $283 for CT without contrast, and $294 for retrograde pyelogram. Median cystoscopy cost was $283. Total healthcare costs per patient were highest when utilizing MRI and CT imaging. When adjusted for comorbidities, the use of any imaging other than ultrasound was associated with higher costs. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationally representative analysis, hematuria evaluation confers a significant cost burden, while the primary factor associated with higher costs of screening was imaging type. Based upon reduced cost of US-based strategies, further investigation should delineate its cost-effectiveness in the diagnosis of urological disease.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Hematuria , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Hematuria/economics , Hematuria/diagnostic imaging , Hematuria/diagnosis , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Aged , Ultrasonography/economics , Ultrasonography/methods , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Young Adult , Cystoscopy/economics , Adolescent , United States
2.
Res Sq ; 2024 Jan 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38260550

ABSTRACT

Purpose: A medical record-level cohort study to investigate demographic and socioeconomic factors influencing treatment, timing of care, and survival outcomes in pediatric patients diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Methods: Using electronic health records of patients at Children's Hospital Colorado from 1986-2020, we identified 898 patients treated for CNS tumors. The primary outcomes of interest were 5-year survival, timing of diagnosis, and treatment. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression were used to identify covariates associated with our outcomes of interest. Results: We found that age, race, tumor type, diagnosis year, and social concerns influenced receipt and timing of treatment. Age, race, patient rural vs. urban residence, and tumor impacted survival outcomes. Time to presentation and treatment were significantly different between White and minority patients. American Indian/Alaska Native and Black patients were less likely to receive chemo compared to White patients (OR 0.28, 0.93 p = 0.037, < 0.001). Patients with 3 + social concerns were more likely to survive after 5 years than children with no or unknown social concerns (OR 1.84, p = 0.011). However, with an adjusted hazards ratio, children with 2 social concerns were less likely to survive to 5 years than children with no or unknown concerns (OR 0.58, p = 0.066). Conclusions: Demographic and socioeconomic factors influence timing of care and survival outcomes in pediatric patients with CNS tumors. Minority status, age, social factors, rural, and urban patients experience differences in care. This emphasizes the importance of considering these factors and addressing disparities to achieve equitable care.

3.
Eur J Cancer ; 196: 113426, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38000217

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is more aggressive as compared to other subtypes of breast cancer with characteristic metastatic patterns and a poor prognosis. The standard of care for early-stage TNBC is historically anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy (ATAX). Despite the effectiveness of this regimen, anthracyclines carry a small but important risk of cardiotoxicity, which is specifically a concern in the older population. This study evaluates major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in older women with TNBC treated with ATAX compared to taxane-based chemotherapy (TAX). METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we identified women aged 66 and older with TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 (N = 2215). We compared patient and clinical characteristics according to adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy and ATAX versus TAX). Logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to estimate three-year overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze OS and CSS while controlling for patient and tumor characteristics. MACE was defined as acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, potentially fatal arrhythmia, and cerebral vascular incidence. Few patients experienced a cardiac death and therefore this was excluded in the analysis. RESULTS: Of the 2215 patients in our cohort, most patients (n = 1334; 60.26%) received TAX compared to ATAX (n = 881; 39.78%). Patients who received ATAX were not statistically significantly more likely than those who received TAX to experience acute myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident (CVA), or potentially fatal arrhythmia when controlling for traditional risk factors. Among patients who experienced MACE, there was no difference in OS or CSS in patients who received TAX vs ATAX. Patients who received ATAX were less likely to develop heart failure than those who received TAX (OR 0.63, 95% CI [0.45-0.88], p < 0.01). Patients who developed MACE and who were > 76 years old had worse OS compared to those who experienced MACE and were age 66-75 years old (HR 1.67, 95% CI [1.07-2.62], p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Among older women with TNBC, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy with ATAX was not associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. For those who experienced a cardiac event, there was no difference in survival amongst those who received TAX vs ATAX. Other factors including additional chemotherapy toxicities should be investigated as a potential etiology for the inferior OS previously observed with ATAX vs TAX in older women with node negative or 1-3 positive lymph nodes.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Heart Failure , Myocardial Infarction , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , United States/epidemiology , Aged , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Anthracyclines , Medicare , Taxoids/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Heart Failure/chemically induced , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Myocardial Infarction/chemically induced , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
4.
J Cancer Surviv ; 2023 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38135830

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Electronic health records (EHR) and data warehouses contain large amounts of data that hold promise for understanding and improving population health management. Utilizing the Health Data Compass (HDC) warehouse, a comprehensive and novel database of adult Coloradans who have completed curative-intent cancer treatment within a health care system was created. By analyzing patient demographics and health care utilization among this group, gaps in and barriers to coordinated care post-active cancer treatment may be identified and better understood. METHODS: A survivorship database (HDC-SD) was built from the Health Data Compass (HDC) warehouse by identifying individuals with histories of cancer who received treatment summary care plans (TSCPs) through the University of Colorado Cancer Center (UCCC) between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. Patient sociodemographic characteristics, disease characteristics, and health maintenance were described and compared between urban and rural settings using chi-square tests. RESULTS: The HDC-SD includes 1933 records representing 13 categories of cancers. The majority live in an urban setting (89.8%). Patients in HDC-SD living in urban areas had higher rates of completing recommended colorectal screening, mammography, Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) tests, flu shots, and COVID-19 vaccination. Additionally, emergency department visits occurred at a statistically significant higher level for those living in urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: Creating and analyzing a comprehensive database of individuals who have completed active cancer treatment may highlight gaps in care within complex health care systems. Engaging different stakeholders to address these issues may help improve and enhance systematic population management for cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Completed treatment summary care plans may be used to increase the completion of individual health maintenance recommendations and potentially population health maintenance recommendations.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...