Return to work following knee arthroplasty: a retrospective review in urban Asian population.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of working adults undergo knee arthroplasty in Singapore. There is limited data concerning Southeast Asian patients returning to work (RTW) following knee replacement surgery. Our aim was to identify and study factors influencing patients RTW following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: Patients who underwent TKA or UKA between August 2017 and March 2020 in our center were included in this study. Outcomes include RTW and duration prior to RTW. RESULTS: 441 patients underwent TKA (295 women, 146 men, mean age 67.3 years) and 69 underwent UKA (48 women, 21 men, mean age 61.1 years). Patients who underwent TKA returned to work earlier (mean 83.7 ± 27.1 days) compared to UKA (mean 94.4 ± 42.3 days). 90.0% of TKA patients RTW compared to 95.5% who underwent UKA. Of patients who RTW, 94.3% of the TKA group returned to employment of the same nature compared to 92.9% of UKA patients. Patients who RTW were of a younger age (p = 0.03), white collared workers (p = 0.04), and had independent preoperative ambulatory status (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Younger and independently ambulating patients may have better capacity for rehabilitation and RTW post arthroplasty surgery.

Comparing Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Neck of Femur Fractures in Elderly Patients Utilizing Dual Mobility Cups and Conventional Implants: A Single Center Retrospective Study of 129 Patients.

Introduction: Studies comparing the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with conventional implants and hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures (DFNF) have reported better patient satisfaction scores and outcomes in the former, but also significant dislocation rates (6.9-13%).The total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cup (THA-DMC) design is mechanically proven to increase the hip range of motion and jump distance to dislocation relative to conventional implants. Despite its potential benefit, clinical studies analyzing the use of THA-DMC in the treatment of DFNF in comparison to conventional THA within the Asian population are still limited. Our study aims to compare the rate of complications and functional outcomes between the 2 implants in the treatment of DFNF. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single tertiary care institution. From January 2015 to May 2020, data from 129 consecutive patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria and underwent either a THA or THA-DMC for DFNF were collected and divided into 2 groups. All patients received a standardized post-operative treatment and follow-up regime. Both groups of patients were assessed for post-operative complications such as dislocation, peri-prosthetic fractures, surgical site infections, medical complications. Their functional outcomes as well as patient-reported outcome scores were also assessed via the SF-36 score and Oxford hip score questionnaires at 6 months and 1 year. Results: A total of 42 patients with dual mobility implants and 87 patients with conventional implants were recruited. There was no dislocation in the THA-DMC group while there were 4 cases (4/87, 4.6%) of dislocation in the THA group. Regarding post-operative function, both groups had comparable functional outcomes. There were no statistically significant differences between the patient-reported outcome scores (Oxford hip score and SF-36) at 6 months and 1 year. Conclusion: We report promising short-term outcomes utilizing dual mobility implants in total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of DFNFs.

An Orthopaedic Surgeon Led Osteoporosis (OSLO) Model of Care reduces early recurrent fracture rates and improves treatment compliance in patients treated for osteoporotic fractures.

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an Orthopaedic Surgeon Led Osteoporosis Model of Care (OSLO-MoC) in improving care of patients with primary osteoporotic fractures. The OSLO-MOC has shown to be effective in improving osteoporotic medication initiation and compliance and reducing secondary fracture rates in patients. PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an Orthopaedic Surgeon Led Osteoporosis Model of Care (OSLO-MoC) as compared to a Case Manager Led Osteoporosis Model of Care (CMLO-MoC) in reducing early osteoporotic re-fracture rates and treatment compliance in patients. METHODS: This was a single centre, retrospective, comparative cohort study of all patients screened and treated for secondary osteoporotic fracture prevention from the 2008 to 2018 at an orthopaedic surgical unit. From the 2008 to 2013, patients were recruited under the CMLO-MoC and from 2014 to 2018, under the OSLO-MOC. Logistics regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors such as OSLO-MOC implementation, gender, ethnicity, marital status and education level for patient recruitment, treatment compliance and secondary fracture rates at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, 7388 patients were screened of which 2855 patients were eligible for analysis. A total of 1234 patients were recruited under CMLO-MoC and 1621 patients under OSLO-MOC. Implementation of the OSLO-MOC was associated with greater patient recruitment, OR 1.26 (95%CI 1.06-1.49, P = 0.007). Of the 2855 patients recruited, OSLO-MOC implementation, OR 2.61 (95%CI 2.03-3.36, P < 0.001), and a higher level of education, OR 1.428 (95%CI 1.02-1.43, P = 0.037), were associated with improved compliance to medication at 12 months. OSLO-MOC implementation was the only factor associated with reduced risk of secondary fractures at 12 months, OR 0.14 (95%CI 0.03-0.66, P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: The OSLO-MOC has shown to be effective in reducing the rate of re-fracture and osteoporotic medication initiation and compliance of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Is unicompartmental knee arthroplasty truly contraindicated in an obese patient? A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Obesity has long been considered a relative contraindication to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, with improved implants and techniques, the criteria for UKAs have been challenged. This paper aims to assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) on revision rates and functional outcomes in UKAs. METHODS: Databases of Pubmed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINHL and the Cochrane registries were systematically searched following the PROSPERO protocol. Studies comparing implant survival and functional outcome scores between obese and non-obese patients after a UKA were included. RESULTS: Twenty-five articles reported revision rates or functional outcomes in 42,434 UKA surgeries. There was a trend to higher revision rates in patients with BMI > 30 kg/m2 (odds ratio [OR] 0.91 [0.79-1.05]), BMI >35 kg/m2 (OR 0.70 [0.48, 1.01]) or BMI >40 kg/m2 (OR 0.66 [0.41, 1.07]), although the difference was not significant. There was a significant larger improvement in Oxford Knee Scores in obese patients after a UKA (OR 2.68 [1.79, 3.57], p < 0.00001), but no difference in Knee Society Scores or Visual Analogue Scale scores. CONCLUSION: With no significant increase in revision rates after a UKA, a significantly greater improvement in Oxford Knee Scores and no differences Knee Society Scores or Visual Analogue Scales, obesity should no longer be viewed as a relative contraindication when performing unicompartmental knee replacements.

A Simple Technique for Removal of Interlocking Screw from an Intramedullary Nail: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Difficulties encountered during removal of implants present a common technical challenge in orthopedic surgery, for which a number of factors have been implicated. A variety of techniques and instruments have been used to overcome this. However, some of these may prove to be time consuming, expensive, and inaccessible to many surgical setups. We describe a technique used for the removal of a jammed interlocking screw from an intramedullary nail that allows for minimal damage to the hardware, bone, and surrounding soft tissue, with the added advantage of being relatively quick and technically uncomplicated with the use of simple instruments. CASE REPORT: We describe the case of an 81-year-old female with a history of surgical fixation for a left femur intertrochanteric fracture, who presented with groin pain 13 months post-fixation. Radiographs were suggestive of avascular necrosis of the femoral head with resultant cut-in of the blade, and the patient was eventually taken up for the removal of implants and total hip replacement. Intraoperatively, difficulties were encountered in the removal of the distal interlocking screw, with failure of conventional techniques initially. A high-speed burr was then employed to shape the screw head so as to achieve better grip with extraction devices, which facilitated smooth removal. CONCLUSION: We describe a simple method for difficult screw removal involving the use of a high-speed burr and vise grip pliers. This technique provides a quick and inexpensive option with commonly available surgical tools and may be considered when encountering difficulties with screw extraction.

The MeNT-OS Score for Orthopaedic Surgery: An Objective Scoring System for Prioritisation of Orthopaedic Elective Surgeries During a Pandemic.

Introduction: The reintroduction of elective Orthopaedic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to occur in phases, dictated by resource limitations and loco-regional pandemic status. Guidelines providing a general framework for the prioritisation of surgery have largely been based on surgical urgency, while scoring systems such as the MeNTS score may have limited applicability in the setting of Orthopaedic Surgery. We, therefore, propose an Orthopaedic-specific algorithm ('MeNT-OS'), based on a modification of the MeNTS scoring system, that may be used to objectively triage and prioritise Orthopaedic cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We developed a scoring algorithm modified from the Medically Necessary Time-Sensitive Procedure (MeNTS) score with 13 unique variables, reflecting human and physical resource utilisation, surgical complexity, functional status of patients, as well as COVID-19 transmission risk. This score was then trialled in a sample of 118 cases, comprising 69 completed and 49 postponed cases. A higher overall score was intended to correlate with lower surgical prioritisation. Results: The use of our scoring system resulted in higher average scores for postponed cases compared to completed cases, as well as higher median, 25th and 75th percentile scores. These results were statistically significant and showed concordance with the ad hoc decisions made before the scoring system was used, with the lower scores for completed cases suggesting a more favourable risk-benefit ratio for being performed as compared to the postponed cases. Conclusion: The utility of the proposed 'MeNT-OS' scoring system has been assessed using data from our institution and offers an objective and systematic approach that is geared towards Orthopaedic procedures. We believe this scoring tool can provide Orthopaedic surgeons a safe and equitable approach to making difficult decisions on prioritisation of surgery during the COVID-19 period, and possibly other resource-limited settings in the future.

The COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore: what does it mean for arthroplasty?

Background and purpose - The ongoing Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has taken a toll on healthcare systems around the world. This has led to guidelines advising against elective procedures, which includes elective arthroplasty. Despite arthroplasty being an elective procedure, some arthroplasties are arguably essential, as pain or functional impairment maybe devastating for patients, especially during this difficult period. We describe our experience as the Division of Arthroplasty in the hospital at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore.Patients and methods - The number of COVID-19 cases reported both nationwide and at our institution from February 2020 to date were reviewed. We then collated the number of arthroplasties that we were able to cope with on a weekly basis and charted it against the number of new COVID-19 cases admitted to our institution and the prevalence of COVID-19 within the Singapore population.Results - During the COVID-19 pandemic period, a significant decrease in the volume of arthroplasties was seen. 47 arthroplasties were performed during the pandemic period from February to April, with a weekly average of 5 cases. This was a 74% reduction compared with our institutional baseline. The least number of surgeries were performed during early periods of the pandemic. This eventually rose to a maximum of 47% of our baseline numbers. Throughout this period, no cases of COVID-19 infection were reported amongst the orthopedic inpatients at our institution.Interpretation - During the early periods of the pandemic, careful planning was required to evaluate the pandemic situation and gauge our resources and manpower. Our study illustrates the number of arthroplasties that can potentially be done relative to the disease curve. This could serve as a guide to reinstating arthroplasty as the pandemic dies down. However, it is prudent to note that these situations are widely dynamic and frequent re-evaluation is required to secure patient and healthcare personnel safety, while ensuring appropriate care is delivered.

Time-sensitive ambulatory orthopaedic soft-tissue surgery paradigms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: Timing of surgery for orthopaedic injuries continues to evolve, as an improved understanding of biology, healing, and technological advances continues to challenge historical norms. With the growing COVID-19 pandemic stretching limited healthcare resources, postponing surgery becomes an inevitable and unenviable task for most orthopaedic surgeons, and a shift in outpatient paradigms is required to mitigate poor outcomes in patients. METHODS: A scoping review of five databases on surgical timing and orthopaedic soft-tissue injuries was performed. All randomized controlled trials, longitudinal cohort studies, retrospective case series, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and expert opinions were included for review, with 65 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Better outcomes appear to be associated with early surgery for subluxations (< 1 week), recurrent dislocations (> 2 episodes), ligamentous and tendinous injuries (< 2 weeks), and bony avulsion injuries (< 3 weeks). Spinal conditions with neurological compromise should be operated on within 24 hours and spinal instability within 72 hours to reduce the risk of complications and poor outcomes. CONCLUSION: Most soft-tissue orthopaedic injuries can be managed with outpatient ambulatory surgery in a semi-elective setting. As the paradigm for outpatient surgery shifts due to technological advances and the COVID-19 pandemic, it is critical for surgeons to time their surgery appropriately to maintain the high standards of orthopaedic practice.

Surgical Management of Symptomatic Adult Pes Planovalgus Secondary to Stage 2B Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction: A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Treatments.

BACKGROUND: This study compares radiological and functional outcomes of patients with symptomatic Adult Acquired Flat Foot Deformity (AFFD) secondary to stage 2B Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction (PTTD) treated with either a Subtalar Arthroereisis (SA) implant or a Lateral Column Lengthening (LCL) procedure. The aim of the study is to determine if the Subtalar Arthroereisis procedure is an acceptable surgical adjunct in our treatment armamentarium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 21 patients (22 feet) were evaluated. 12 consecutive patients (n = 12) underwent a Subtalar Arthroereisis procedure while 9 patients (n = 10) underwent a Lateral Column Lengthening procedure. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) midfoot score, Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Visual Analog of Pain Scale (VAS), preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. 10 radiological parameters were analyzed. All complications were tabulated. RESULTS: Significant improvements in functional outcomes were noted in both groups of patients. Radiographically, some loss of correction was noted in the SA group and no loss of correction in the LCL group, respectively. In the SA group, 6 patients complained of sinus tarsi pain in the postoperative period and 4 required removal of implants. No implants were removed in the LCL group. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that subtalar arthroereisis may be a reasonable procedure to utilize in the treatment of AAFD, albeit with a relatively high implant-removal rate.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With the Hindfoot Arthrodesis Nail: A Prospective Consecutive Series From a Single Institution.

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is a salvage procedure. We report a series of 20 patients who underwent TTCA using an intramedullary nail. Of the 20 patients, 7 (35%) had diabetes mellitus. The patient experiences and outcomes were analyzed. Their mean age was 61.1 (range 39 to 78) years. The minimum follow-up period was 13 (mean 28, range 13 to 49) months. Surgical indications included diabetic Charcot arthropathy in 7 (35%), hindfoot osteoarthritis in 10 (50%), and severe equinovarus deformity in 3 (15%). A calcaneal spiral blade was used in 2 patients (10%). Significant improvements (p < .05) were observed in 5 of 8 Short-Form 36-item Health Survey components, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot scale (p < .001), and visual analog scale for pain (p < .001). The mean length of the hospital stay was 6.7 (range 1 to 27) days. Of the 20 patients, 76.9% had improvement in their activity postoperatively. Also, 81.8% were able to resume their preoperative work after a mean of 7.89 (range 3 to 24) months. Overall, 19 patients (95%) reported favorable outcomes. Superficial wound infection (n = 4; 20%) and deep wound infection (n = 3; 15%) were the most common complications (35%), with 1 case (5%) culminating in a below-the-knee amputation. Radiographic union was achieved in 16 of the tibiotalar joints (80%), 16 subtalar joints (80%), and 4 tibiocalcaneal fusions (20%). In a subgroup analysis of 7 patients with diabetes mellitus (35%), the incidence of wound complications and fusion was comparable to that of the primary cohort. TTCA performed with an intramedullary nail appears to offer a reliable and safe alternative for patients with severe ankle and hindfoot pathologic entities, including those with diabetes mellitus.

Hallux Rigidus: Nonoperative Treatment and Orthotics.

Hallux rigidus, the most common degenerative disorder of the foot, is accountable for abnormality of gait and restriction of activity levels and daily function. This article describes and reviews the available literature on nonoperative modalities available in the treatment of hallux rigidus, including manipulation and intra-articular injections, shoe modifications and orthotics, physical therapy, and experimental therapies.