Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 58
Filter
1.
Braz J Psychiatry ; 2024 Feb 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343357

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a leading cause of disability-adjusted life years in young adults. Complications during prenatal periods have been associated with BD previously. The study aims to examine the association between perinatal factors and BD in order to prevent the risk of developing BD. METHODS: 3,794 subjects from the 1993 Pelotas population-based birth cohort study were included. We assessed 27 initial variables at birth and modelled BD onset at 18 and 22 years. We performed bivariate analysis, using binomial logistic regression models. The variables with p-value smaller than 0.05 were included into a multiple regression with confounding variables. RESULTS: Maternal smoking was associated with a 1.42-fold increased risk of BD at 18 or 22 years old (95% CI: 1.091-1.841), and maternal passive exposure to tobacco with a 1.43-fold increased risk (95% CI: 1.086-1.875). No association was found between other perinatal factors and BD after controlling for confounding factors. CONCLUSION: The results of this cohort corroborate with previous findings in the literature that already indicate the negative outcomes of maternal smoking during pregnancy. They may now be linked to other studies to target these factors for preventing the development of BD.

2.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 149(4): 340-349, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38378931

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bipolar disorder is a chronic condition affecting millions of people worldwide. Currently, there is some evidence to suggest that cannabis use during adolescence may be an environmental risk factor for its onset, however inconsistencies have been observed across the literature. Considering this, we aimed to assess whether early lifetime cannabis is associated with subsequent bipolar disorder in young adults between 18 and 22 years of age. METHODS: Using data from the 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) birth cohort (n = 5249), cannabis exposure was examined at age 18 by self-report, and bipolar disorder diagnosis was measured at age 22 using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). In order to control the analysis, we considered socioeconomic status index, sex, skin color, physical abuse by parents and lifetime cocaine use. RESULTS: A total of 3781 individuals were evaluated in 2015 aged 22 years, of whom 87 were diagnosed with the bipolar disorder onset after the age of 18. Lifetime cannabis use predicted bipolar disorder onset at 22 years old (OR 1.82, 95% CI [1.10, 2.93]), and the effect remained after adjusting for socioeconomic status, sex, skin color, and physical abuse by parents (OR 2.00, 95% CI [1.20, 3.25]). However, this association was attenuated to statistically non-significant after further adjustment for all available covariates, including lifetime cocaine use (OR 1.79, 95% CI [0.95, 3.19]). We also found similar results for early cocaine use, where the association with bipolar disorder onset did not maintain significance in the multivariate model (OR 1.35, 95% CI [0.62, 2.86]). Otherwise, when we considered cannabis or cocaine lifetime use as a unique feature, our findings showed that the adolescent exposure to cannabis or cocaine increased the odds by 1.95 times of developing bipolar disorder at 22 years age, even when controlling for all other study variables (OR 2.14, 95% CI [1.30, 3.47]). Finally, our models suggest that cocaine use may potentially exert a major influence on the effect of lifetime cannabis use on bipolar disorder onset, and that physical abuse by parents and sex may modify the effect of cannabis use for later bipolar disorder onset. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, early cannabis exposure predicted bipolar disorder onset in young adults, but this association was confounded by cocaine use. Contrary to schizophrenia, cannabis as a sole exposure was not associated with bipolar disorder onset after adjusting for control variables.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Cannabis , Cocaine , Hallucinogens , Adolescent , Young Adult , Humans , Adult , Cannabis/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Brazil/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology
3.
J Psychiatr Res ; 169: 160-165, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38039690

ABSTRACT

Mood disorders significantly impact global health, with MDD ranking as the second leading cause of disability in the United States and BD ranking 18th. Despite their prevalence and impact, the relationship between premorbid intelligence and the subsequent development of BD and MDD remains inconclusive. This study investigates the potential of premorbid Intelligence Quotient (IQ) and school failure frequency as risk factors for Bipolar Disorder (BD) and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in a birth cohort setting. We analyze data from the Pelotas population-based birth cohort study, comprising 3580 participants aged 22, who had no prior mood disorder diagnoses. Utilizing regression models and accounting for potential confounders, we assess the impact of IQ and school failure, measured at age 18, on the emergence of BD and MDD diagnoses at age 22, using individuals without mood disorders as comparators. Results reveal that lower IQ (below 70) at 18 is associated with an increased risk of BD (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.75, 95%CI: 1.00-3.09, p < 0.05), while higher IQ (above 120) is linked to MDD (AOR 2.16, 95%CI: 1.24-3.75, p < 0.001). Moreover, an elevated number of school failures is associated with increased BD risk (AOR 1.23, 95%CI: 1.11-1.41, p < 0.001), particularly for BD type 1 (AOR 1.36, 95% CI: 1.17-1.58, p < 0.001). These findings offer insights into the distinct premorbid intellectual characteristics of BD and MDD and contribute to a deeper understanding of their developmental trajectories, potentially informing the development of risk assessment tools for mood disorders.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Depressive Disorder, Major , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Intelligence , Schools
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37463340

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite previous literature, the superiority of Second-generation Antipsychotics (SGAs) relative to First-generation Antipsychotics- especially haloperidol - on cognitive management in schizophrenia is still controversial. Thus, we aimed to compare the effects of haloperidol versus SGAs on the cognitive performance of individuals with schizophrenia or related disorders. METHODS: We conducted an updated systematic review and nine pairwise meta-analyses of double-blinded randomized controlled trials published up to October 30th, 2022, using Medline, Web of Science, and Embase. RESULTS: Twenty-eight trials were included, enrolling 1,932 individuals. Compared to SGAs, haloperidol performed worse on cognitive composite (MD -0.13; 95% CI: -0.33 to -0.03; MD = mean difference, CI = confidence interval), processing speed (MD -0.17; 95% CI: -0.28 to -0.07), attention (MD -0.14; 95% CI: -0.26 to -0.02), motor performance (MD -0.17; 95% CI: -0.31 to -0.03), memory and verbal learning (MD -0.21; 95% CI: -0.35 to -0.08), and executive function (MD -0.27; 95% CI: -0.43 to -0.11). In contrast, there were no significant differences between SGAs and haloperidol on working memory (MD 0.10; 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.27), visual learning (MD 0.08; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.21), social cognition (MD 0.29; 95% CI: -0.30 to 0.88), and visuoconstruction (MD 0.17; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.39). CONCLUSION: Haloperidol had poorer performance in global cognition and in some cognitive domains, but with small effect sizes. Therefore, it was not possible to conclude that haloperidol is certainly worse than SGAs in the long-term cognitive management of schizophrenia.

5.
Psychol Med ; 52(9): 1728-1735, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33050962

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Subjects with bipolar disorder (BD) show heterogeneous cognitive profile and that not necessarily the disease will lead to unfavorable clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify clinical markers of severity among cognitive clusters in individuals with BD through data-driven methods. METHODS: We recruited 167 outpatients with BD and 100 unaffected volunteers from Brazil and Spain that underwent a neuropsychological assessment. Cognitive functions assessed were inhibitory control, processing speed, cognitive flexibility, verbal fluency, working memory, short- and long-term verbal memory. We performed hierarchical cluster analysis and discriminant function analysis to determine and confirm cognitive clusters, respectively. Then, we used classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm to determine clinical and sociodemographic variables of the previously defined cognitive clusters. RESULTS: We identified three neuropsychological subgroups in individuals with BD: intact (35.3%), selectively impaired (34.7%), and severely impaired individuals (29.9%). The most important predictors of cognitive subgroups were years of education, the number of hospitalizations, and age, respectively. The model with CART algorithm showed sensitivity 45.8%, specificity 78.4%, balanced accuracy 62.1%, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.61. Of 10 attributes included in the model, only three variables were able to separate cognitive clusters in BD individuals: years of education, number of hospitalizations, and age. CONCLUSION: These results corroborate with recent findings of neuropsychological heterogeneity in BD, and suggest an overlapping between premorbid and morbid aspects that influence distinct cognitive courses of the disease.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Biomarkers , Cognition , Humans , Neuropsychological Tests , Phenotype
6.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev ; 126: 265-275, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33812977

ABSTRACT

Cognitive deficits are a core aspect of psychotic disorders; however, it is not clear to which extent different pharmacological treatments could distinctly impact these outcomes. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and ten network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials to compare the effect of antipsychotics on cognitive performance of individuals with psychotic disorders. Fifty-four trials were included in the analyses, enrolling 5866 patients. Compared to other antipsychotics, amisulpride performed better on verbal learning; quetiapine on composite score, attention and verbal learning; lurasidone on composite score; olanzapine on composite score and most cognitive domains; perphenazine on composite score, executive function, working memory, and verbal learning; risperidone on executive function and verbal learning; sertindole on processing speed; and ziprasidone on composite score, working memory, and verbal learning. Oppositely, haloperidol performed poorer on all cognitive domains, occupying the last positions in all rankings; and clozapine performed poorer on composite score, executive function, verbal learning, and visuoconstruction. We hope that these results should be taken into account when assessing and treating individuals with psychosis.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Psychotic Disorders , Schizophrenia , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Cognition , Humans , Network Meta-Analysis , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Schizophrenia/drug therapy
8.
Can J Psychiatry ; 65(4): 245-252, 2020 04.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31958979

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The potential of clozapine in severe bipolar disorder is suggested by its efficacy in refractory schizophrenia, but the evidence is limited thus far. This report utilizes data from the standard care pathway of the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program to examine the clinical impact of clozapine in bipolar disorder, comparing it to two groups, one that received olanzapine and an additional group that received neither drug. METHOD: A total of 4,032 outpatients were available for this analysis. Groups for longitudinal analyses are based on the medication used at each visit. Outcomes assessed were clinical status, symptoms subscales, hospitalizations, and death. We utilized mixed models and generalized estimating equations to adjust for baseline differences and investigate longitudinal differences in symptoms, clinical status, and hospitalization rates between groups. RESULTS: During the study, 1.1% (n = 43) of the patients used clozapine at any time. Those on clozapine had significantly fewer manic and depressive symptoms during follow-up as compared with those on neither clozapine nor olanzapine, while those on olanzapine had more symptoms. The use of clozapine was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization. No deaths were recorded for clozapine group during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: Although prescribed to very few patients, the impact of clozapine was notable, with fewer symptoms in patients who had more severe illnesses at baseline. Clozapine could prove to be as successful an intervention for late-stage bipolar disorder as it has been in schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacology , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Clozapine/pharmacology , Olanzapine/pharmacology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Clozapine/administration & dosage , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Olanzapine/administration & dosage , Outpatients , Program Development , United States
9.
Behav Brain Res ; 378: 112245, 2020 01 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31539575

ABSTRACT

Prolonged activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and sustained increase of glucocorticoids have been evidenced in major depression and are related to changes involving neurotrophins and markers of oxidative stress in response to inflammation. This study aimed to evaluate central measures of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), oxidative damage and total antioxidant capacity in rats submitted to chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS), as well as to investigate the relationship between BDNF levels and differentially processes. For this purpose, male Wistar rats were submitted to CUMS for six weeks. Based on a sucrose preference test (SPT), the animals were divided into anhedonic or non-anhedonic clusters. Afterwards, forced swim test (FST) and open field test (OFT) were performed, and the animals were euthanized. Brain tissue was collected, followed by quantification of oxidative damage, total antioxidant capacity and BDNF levels. Anhedonic behavior was evidenced in stress-susceptible animals through decreased sucrose preference. No differences were found in FST or OFT results. We observed increased BDNF levels in the hippocampus (HPC) of animals exposed to the CUMS protocol, accompanied by decreased total antioxidant capacity, despite the absence of oxidative damage to lipids and proteins. Moreover, we used a bioinformatics approach to identify proteins involved in oxidative stress and inflammation pathways, which were differentially expressed in anhedonic animals from other studies with similar experimental protocol. expressed proteins (DEP) involved in oxidative stress and inflammatory biological Anhedonic behavior was associated with peroxiredoxin-1 (PRDX-1) up-regulation and down-regulation of proteins involved with apoptotic and inflammation signaling (RELA, ASK-1 and TAK-1) in the HPC. Taken together, these data suggest that BDNF and PRDX-1 might be involved in initial stress response, playing a compensatory role by preventing oxidative damage to lipids and proteins through the modulation of antioxidant defense after CUMS in anhedonic animals.


Subject(s)
Anhedonia/physiology , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/metabolism , Hippocampus/metabolism , Oxidative Stress/physiology , Peroxiredoxins/metabolism , Stress, Psychological/metabolism , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology , Animals , Behavior, Animal/physiology , Disease Models, Animal , Down-Regulation , Male , Proteomics , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Up-Regulation
11.
J Psychopharmacol ; 33(4): 502-510, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30835152

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of tianeptine as an adjunctive maintenance treatment for bipolar depression. METHODS: This is a multicenter double-blind randomized placebo-controlled maintenance trial of adjunctive tianeptine 37.5 mg/day. Participants ( n=161) had a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale ⩾12 at entry. After eight weeks of open-label tianeptine treatment, those who responded to tianeptine ( n=69) were randomized to adjunctive tianeptine ( n=36) or placebo ( n=33) in addition to usual treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimates and the Mantel-Cox log-rank test were used to evaluate differences in time to intervention for a mood episode between the tianeptine and placebo groups. We also assessed overall functioning, biological rhythms, quality of life, rates of manic switch and serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels. RESULTS: There were no differences between adjunctive tianeptine or placebo regarding time to intervention or depression scores in the 24-week double-blind controlled phase. Patients in the tianeptine group showed better performance in the letter-number sequencing subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale at the endpoint ( p=0.014). Tianeptine was well tolerated and not associated with higher risk for manic switch compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Tianeptine was not more effective than placebo in the maintenance treatment of bipolar depression. There is preliminary evidence suggesting a pro-cognitive effect of tianeptine in working memory compared to placebo.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Thiazepines/therapeutic use , Adult , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/adverse effects , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/blood , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/blood , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Memory, Short-Term/drug effects , Thiazepines/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Wechsler Scales/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
12.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 54(7): 857-860, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30895355

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in standardized suicide rates in Brazil between 2000 and 2016, stratified by sex and age. METHODS: Descriptive analyses of data from the Brazilian Mortality Information System were performed. RESULTS: 156,292 suicides were registered in the period, with a standardized rate of 4.82/100,000. The risk for males was 3.81 times higher than for females, without meaningful regional variations. This ratio was 8.2 at the 80+ group. An increase from 2000 to 2016 was demonstrated in nearly all subgroups over the 17, especially men aged 20-39 and women aged 40-59. CONCLUSIONS: Suicide rates continue to rise in Brazil, especially among young men and middle-aged women. Older men remain exposed to the highest absolute risk.


Subject(s)
Suicide/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Distribution , Young Adult
13.
J Psychiatr Res ; 113: 1-9, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30878786

ABSTRACT

In many international studies, rates of completed suicide and suicide attempts have a seasonal pattern that peaks in spring or summer. This exploratory study investigated the association between solar insolation and a history of suicide attempt in patients with bipolar I disorder. Solar insolation is the amount of electromagnetic energy from the Sun striking a surface area on Earth. Data were collected previously from 5536 patients with bipolar I disorder at 50 collection sites in 32 countries at a wide range of latitudes in both hemispheres. Suicide related data were available for 3365 patients from 310 onset locations in 51 countries. 1047 (31.1%) had a history of suicide attempt. There was a significant inverse association between a history of suicide attempt and the ratio of mean winter solar insolation/mean summer solar insolation. This ratio is smallest near the poles where the winter insolation is very small compared to the summer insolation. This ratio is largest near the equator where there is relatively little variation in the insolation over the year. Other variables in the model that were positively associated with suicide attempt were being female, a history of alcohol or substance abuse, and being in a younger birth cohort. Living in a country with a state-sponsored religion decreased the association. (All estimated coefficients p < 0.01). In summary, living in locations with large changes in solar insolation between winter and summer may be associated with increased suicide attempts in patients with bipolar disorder. Further investigation of the impacts of solar insolation on the course of bipolar disorder is needed.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Seasons , Suicide, Attempted/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , Sunlight , Age Factors , Age of Onset , Bipolar Disorder/complications , Climate , Female , Humans , Internationality , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology
14.
Perspect Psychiatr Care ; 55(1): 119-125, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30189115

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the effects of deep breathing exercises in subjects with bipolar disorder. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an open-label, uncontrolled clinical trial with three assessments: preintervention, postintervention, and follow-up. FINDINGS: The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, BECK-A, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and Young Mania Rating Scale had significant preintervention, postintervention, and follow-up differences. The results indicated that the deep breathing protocol was effective in reducing anxiety levels in patients with bipolar disorder. The deep breathing protocol has no negative side effects and might be applied to decrease anxiety symptoms in individuals with bipolar disorder. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The results provide direction for providing quality care that reduces anxiety levels in patients with bipolar disorder.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/therapy , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Relaxation Therapy/methods , Respiration , Adult , Brazil , Exercise , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
15.
Trends Psychiatry Psychother ; 40(4): 318-325, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30570103

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to compare patients with bipolar disorder (BD), their first-degree relatives and a group of healthy controls in terms of use of adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies, exploring differences between specific types of strategies and their correlations with clinical variables. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study enrolling 36 euthymic patients with BD, 39 of their first-degree relatives and 44 controls. Coping strategies were assessed using the Brief COPE scale. RESULTS: Significant differences were detected in the use of adaptive and maladaptive strategies by patients, their first-degree relatives and controls. Patients used adaptive strategies less often than the patients' relatives (p<0.001) and controls (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference between first-degree relatives and controls (p=0.707). In contrast, patients (p<0.001) and their relatives (p=0.004) both exhibited higher scores for maladaptive coping than controls. There was no significant difference regarding the use of maladaptive strategies between patients and their relatives (p=0.517). CONCLUSIONS: First-degree relatives were at an intermediate level between patients with BD and controls regarding the use of coping skills. This finding supports the development of psychosocial interventions to encourage use of adaptive strategies rather than maladaptive strategies in this population.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Family , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
16.
Trends psychiatry psychother. (Impr.) ; 40(4): 318-325, Oct.-Dec. 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-979436

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare patients with bipolar disorder (BD), their first-degree relatives and a group of healthy controls in terms of use of adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies, exploring differences between specific types of strategies and their correlations with clinical variables. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study enrolling 36 euthymic patients with BD, 39 of their first-degree relatives and 44 controls. Coping strategies were assessed using the Brief COPE scale. Results: Significant differences were detected in the use of adaptive and maladaptive strategies by patients, their first-degree relatives and controls. Patients used adaptive strategies less often than the patients' relatives (p<0.001) and controls (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference between first-degree relatives and controls (p=0.707). In contrast, patients (p<0.001) and their relatives (p=0.004) both exhibited higher scores for maladaptive coping than controls. There was no significant difference regarding the use of maladaptive strategies between patients and their relatives (p=0.517). Conclusions: First-degree relatives were at an intermediate level between patients with BD and controls regarding the use of coping skills. This finding supports the development of psychosocial interventions to encourage use of adaptive strategies rather than maladaptive strategies in this population.


Resumo Introdução: O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os pacientes com transtorno bipolar (TB), seus familiares de primeiro grau e um grupo de controles saudáveis em termos de uso de estratégias adaptativas e não adaptativas, explorando diferenças entre tipos específicos de estratégias e suas correlações com variáveis clínicas. Métodos: Estudo transversal, envolvendo 36 pacientes com TB eutímicos, 39 familiares de primeiro grau e 44 controles. As estratégias de enfrentamento foram avaliadas usando a escala Brief COPE. Resultados: Foram detectadas diferenças significativas no uso de estratégias adaptativas e não adaptativas por pacientes, seus familiares e controles. Os pacientes usaram estratégias adaptativas com menos frequência do que os familiares (p<0,001) e controles (p=0,003). Não houve diferença significativa entre familiares dos pacientes e controles (p=0,707). Por outro lado, os pacientes (p<0,001) e seus familiares (p=0,004) exibiram pontuações mais elevadas para coping não adaptativo em relação aos controles. Não houve diferença significativa quando os pacientes foram comparados com seus familiares (p=0,517). Conclusões: Familiares de primeiro grau estavam em um nível intermediário entre pacientes com TB e controles no que diz respeito ao uso de habilidades de enfrentamento. Esta descoberta apoia o desenvolvimento de intervenções psicossociais para incentivar o uso de estratégias adaptativas em vez de estratégias inadequadas nessa população.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Family/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged
17.
Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) ; 40(2): 163-168, Apr.-June 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-959223

ABSTRACT

Objective: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients with bipolar disorder. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with positive coronary calcium score (CCS) in individuals with bipolar disorder type 1. Methods: Patients from the Bipolar Disorder Program at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil, underwent computed tomography scanning for calcium score measurement. Clinical and sociodemographic variables were compared between patients according to their CCS status: negative (CCS = 0) or positive (CCS > 0). Poisson regression analysis was used to examine the association of CCS with number of psychiatric hospitalizations. Results: Out of 41 patients evaluated, only 10 had a positive CCS. Individuals in the CCS-positive group were older (55.2±4.2 vs. 43.1±10.0 years; p = 0.001) and had more psychiatric hospitalizations (4.7±3.0 vs. 2.6±2.5; p = 0.04) when compared with CCS- negative subjects. The number of previous psychiatric hospitalizations correlated positively with CCS (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Age and number of psychiatric hospitalizations were significantly associated with higher CCS, which might be a potential method for diagnosis and stratification of cardiovascular disease in bipolar patients. There is a need for increased awareness of risk assessment in this population.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Bipolar Disorder/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Time Factors , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Poisson Distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Factors , Analysis of Variance , Age Factors , Vascular Calcification/complications , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data
18.
Braz J Psychiatry ; 40(2): 163-168, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28977070

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients with bipolar disorder. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with positive coronary calcium score (CCS) in individuals with bipolar disorder type 1. METHODS: Patients from the Bipolar Disorder Program at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil, underwent computed tomography scanning for calcium score measurement. Clinical and sociodemographic variables were compared between patients according to their CCS status: negative (CCS = 0) or positive (CCS > 0). Poisson regression analysis was used to examine the association of CCS with number of psychiatric hospitalizations. RESULTS: Out of 41 patients evaluated, only 10 had a positive CCS. Individuals in the CCS-positive group were older (55.2±4.2 vs. 43.1±10.0 years; p = 0.001) and had more psychiatric hospitalizations (4.7±3.0 vs. 2.6±2.5; p = 0.04) when compared with CCS- negative subjects. The number of previous psychiatric hospitalizations correlated positively with CCS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Age and number of psychiatric hospitalizations were significantly associated with higher CCS, which might be a potential method for diagnosis and stratification of cardiovascular disease in bipolar patients. There is a need for increased awareness of risk assessment in this population.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Risk Assessment/methods , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Poisson Distribution , Predictive Value of Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Vascular Calcification/complications
19.
Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) ; 38(4): 275-280, Oct.-Dec. 2016. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-798081

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess cognitive performance and psychosocial functioning in patients with bipolar disorder (BD), in unaffected siblings, and in healthy controls. Methods: Subjects were patients with BD (n=36), unaffected siblings (n=35), and healthy controls (n=44). Psychosocial functioning was accessed using the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST). A sub-group of patients with BD (n=21), unaffected siblings (n=14), and healthy controls (n=22) also underwent a battery of neuropsychological tests: California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), Stroop Color and Word Test, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance or the chi-square test; multivariate analysis of covariance was used to examine differences in neuropsychological variables. Results: Patients with BD showed higher FAST total scores (23.90±11.35) than healthy controls (5.86±5.47; p < 0.001) and siblings (12.60±11.83; p 0.001). Siblings and healthy controls also showed statistically significant differences in FAST total scores (p = 0.008). Patients performed worse than healthy controls on all CVLT sub-tests (p < 0.030) and in the number of correctly completed categories on WCST (p = 0.030). Siblings did not differ from healthy controls in cognitive tests. Conclusion: Unaffected siblings of patients with BD may show poorer functional performance compared to healthy controls. FAST scores may contribute to the development of markers of vulnerability and endophenotypic traits in at-risk populations.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Cognition/physiology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Siblings/psychology , Verbal Learning , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Multivariate Analysis , Cognition Disorders/physiopathology , Endophenotypes , Learning Disabilities/diagnosis , Memory Disorders/diagnosis
20.
Braz J Psychiatry ; 38(4): 275-280, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27096411

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:: To assess cognitive performance and psychosocial functioning in patients with bipolar disorder (BD), in unaffected siblings, and in healthy controls. METHODS:: Subjects were patients with BD (n=36), unaffected siblings (n=35), and healthy controls (n=44). Psychosocial functioning was accessed using the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST). A sub-group of patients with BD (n=21), unaffected siblings (n=14), and healthy controls (n=22) also underwent a battery of neuropsychological tests: California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), Stroop Color and Word Test, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance or the chi-square test; multivariate analysis of covariance was used to examine differences in neuropsychological variables. RESULTS:: Patients with BD showed higher FAST total scores (23.90±11.35) than healthy controls (5.86±5.47; p < 0.001) and siblings (12.60±11.83; p 0.001). Siblings and healthy controls also showed statistically significant differences in FAST total scores (p = 0.008). Patients performed worse than healthy controls on all CVLT sub-tests (p < 0.030) and in the number of correctly completed categories on WCST (p = 0.030). Siblings did not differ from healthy controls in cognitive tests. CONCLUSION:: Unaffected siblings of patients with BD may show poorer functional performance compared to healthy controls. FAST scores may contribute to the development of markers of vulnerability and endophenotypic traits in at-risk populations.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Cognition/physiology , Siblings/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Cognition Disorders/physiopathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Endophenotypes , Female , Humans , Learning Disabilities/diagnosis , Male , Memory Disorders/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Verbal Learning
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...