ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring for voriconazole is recommended for its optimum pharmacotherapy. Although the feedback of the measurement result of serum voriconazole concentration by outsourcing needs a certain time (days within a 1 week), there was no medical equipment for the measurement available in clinical practice. Recently, a medical equipment based on high performance liquid chromatography, named LM1010, has been developed and authorized for clinical use. In this study, to validate the clinical performance of LM1010, we compared the measured serum voriconazole concentrations by LM1010 with those by outsourcing measurement using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. METHODS: We conducted the observational study approved by the institutional review board of Kumamoto University Hospital (No. 1786). Residual serum samples harvested for therapeutic drug monitoring were separated. Measured concentrations by LM1010 by the standard filter method (needs serum volume of > 400 µL) or the dilute method (needs serum volume of 150 µL) were compared with those by outsourcing, respectively. Acceptable measurement error range of 0.72-1.33 was considered. There were 69 serum samples, where the 35 or 34 samples were employed for evaluation of the standard filter method or the dilute method, respectively. RESULTS: The measured concentration using the standard filter method/outsourcing was 2.22/2.10 µg/mL as the median, 1.57-3.40/1.53-3.62 as the interquartile range, < 0.2-10.76/< 0.2-11.46 µg/mL as the range, while those using the dilute method/outsourcing was 2.36/2.29 µg/mL as the median, 1.08-2.94/1.03-3.06 as the interquartile range, 0.24-10.00/< 0.2-10.85 µg/mL as the range. The regression line for the standard filter method or the dilute method were y = 0.935x + 0.154 or y = 0.933x + 0.162, respectively. The standard filter method or the dilute method showed 11.4% samples (4/35, 95%CI 3.2-26.7%) or 8.8% samples (3/34, 95%CI 1.9-23.7%) out of the acceptable measurement error range, respectively. CONCLUSION: Measurement of serum voriconazole concentration by LM1010 can be acceptable in clinical TDM practice.
ABSTRACT
(1) Background: multiple myeloma patients have benefited from bortezomib therapy, though it has often been discontinued owing to diarrhea. The objective of this study was to verify serum bortezomib concentration in the emergence of diarrhea. (2) Methods: this prospective, observational case-control, and monocentric study was performed with an approval by the Ethics Committee of Kumamoto University Hospital in 2015 (No. 1121) from February 2015 to April 2017. (3) Results: twenty-four patients with bortezomib therapy were recruited; eight patients (33.3%) developed diarrhea at day 3 as median. Median measured trough bortezomib concentration at 24 h after first or second dose for patients with or without diarrhea was 0.87 or 0.48 ng/mL, respectively (p = 0.04, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Receiver operation characteristic (ROC) analysis produced the cut-off concentration of 0.857 ng/mL (area under the ROC curve of 0.797, sensitivity of 0.625, specificity of 0.875). The survival curves between patients with and without diarrhea were similar (p = 0.667); those between patients with higher and lower concentration than median value (0.61 ng/mL) were also similar (p = 0.940). (4) Conclusions: this study indicated the possible involvement of serum bortezomib concentration in the emergence of diarrhea in bortezomib therapy in patients with multiple myeloma.