Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Surg Res ; 200(1): 1-7, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26602037

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One-quarter to one half of pediatric appendicitis patients present with ruptured appendicitis and about 3%-25% go on to form postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses. The optimal timing of postoperative imaging for suspected abscess formation has been a subject of debate. METHODS: All patients who underwent appendectomy for complex appendicitis and were not discharged before postoperative day (POD) #5 from April 2012-October 2014 were identified. Patients were stratified into groups for comparison as follows: group 1 had postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans before POD#7 (n = 26) and group 2 did not (n = 169). Group 2 was further divided into those who were afebrile (group 2a, n = 106) or febrile (group 2b, n = 63) at POD#5. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients met criteria. Early use of CT scans resulted in more drainage procedures (group 1, 73.1% versus group 2b, 28.6%, P < 0.001) and a higher recurrent CT scan rate (38.5% versus 9.5%). The groups had equivalent lengths of stay (11.9 versus 9.8 d, P = 0.10) and readmission rates due to abscesses (19.2% group 1 versus 6.3%, group 2b, P = 0.12) with no septic events. In total, 130 of the 169 patients (76.9%) in group 2 had resolution of symptoms before discharge without intervention with readmission for abscess in only 5.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Waiting until POD#7 before scanning led to fewer drainage procedures and recurrent CT scans without increasing length of stay or readmission rates. Most complex appendicitis patients still admitted at POD#5 had resolution of symptoms without need for intervention.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Abscess/diagnostic imaging , Appendectomy , Appendicitis/surgery , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Abdominal Abscess/etiology , Abdominal Abscess/therapy , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Drainage/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
2.
Pediatrics ; 136(5): e1345-52, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26459654

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this project was to implement a protocol facilitating discharge from the emergency department (ED) after successful radiologic ileocolic intussusception reduction in a pediatric referral center. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team identified drivers for successful quality improvement including educational brochures, a standardized radiologic report, an observation period in the ER with oral hydration challenges, and follow-up phone calls the day after discharge. Patient outcomes were tracked, and quarterly feedback was provided. RESULTS: Of 80 patients identified over a 24-month period, 34 (42.5%) did not qualify for discharge home due to need for surgical intervention (n = 9), specific radiologic findings (n = 11), need for additional intravenous hydration (n = 4), or other reasons (n = 7). Of 46 patients who qualified for discharge, 30 (65.2%) were successfully sent home from the ED. One patient returned with recurrent symptoms that required repeat enema reduction. Sixteen patients were observed and discharged within 23 hours. Adherence with discharge from the ED improved over time. Discharge from the ED was associated with cost savings and improved net margins at the hospital level for each encounter. CONCLUSIONS: A sustainable multidisciplinary quality improvement project to discharge intussusception patients from the ED after air-contrast enema reduction was successfully integrated in a high-volume referral center through education, standardized radiologic reporting, and protocoled follow-up.


Subject(s)
Enema , Ileal Diseases/therapy , Intussusception/therapy , Patient Discharge , Quality Improvement , Child , Clinical Protocols , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Remission Induction , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Qual Manag Health Care ; 24(2): 84-90, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25830617

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatments of soft-tissue abscesses (STAs) include packing and ring drain (RD) and straight drain (SD) placement. Potential benefits of SDs include a single incision, less scarring, and no need for a follow-up appointment. We used a multidisciplinary quality improvement (QI) process to promote surgeon adoption of an STA drainage technique to improve efficiency and quality of care. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Outcome measures included the proportion of STAs drained using SDs, the number of postoperative clinic visits, the proportion of patients requiring follow-up with a pediatric surgeon and other providers, and the postoperative complication rate, defined as need for an additional drainage procedure. RESULTS: After beginning the QI initiative, the proportion of STAs drained by SDs increased from 23% to 78% (P < .00001) and the proportion of patients requiring a surgical follow-up clinic appointment decreased from 71% to 32% (P < .00001). The mean number of surgical clinic visits per patient decreased from 0.79 to 0.39 visits per patient (P < .00001). Complication rates were similar between drain types (RD: 2.4%; SD: 1.7%; P = .57). This QI initiative produced a rapid sustained shift in surgeon practice with increased use of SDs, decreased number of follow-up visits, and no increase in complications.


Subject(s)
Abscess/surgery , Drainage/methods , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Quality Improvement , Soft Tissue Infections/surgery , Abscess/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Male , Ohio , Pediatrics/methods , Postoperative Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Soft Tissue Infections/diagnosis , Tertiary Care Centers , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Med Syst ; 39(2): 8, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25631842

ABSTRACT

Electronic health records (EHR) have been adopted across the nation at tremendous effort and expense. The purpose of this study was to assess improvements in accuracy, efficiency, and patient safety for a high-volume pediatric surgical service with adoption of an EHR-generated handoff and rounding list. The quality and quantity of errors were compared pre- and post-EHR-based list implementation. A survey was used to determine time spent by team members using the two versions of the list. Perceived utility, safety, and quality of the list were reported. Serious safety events determined by the hospital were also compared for the two periods. The EHR-based list eliminated clerical errors while improving efficiency by automatically providing data such as vital signs. Survey respondents reported 43 min saved per week per team member, translating to 372 work hours of time saved annually for a single service. EHR-based list users reported higher satisfaction and perceived improvement in efficiency, accuracy, and safety. Serious safety events remained unchanged. In conclusion, creation of an EHR-based list to assist with daily handoffs, rounding, and patient management demonstrated improved accuracy, increased efficiency, and assisted in maintaining a high level of safety.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records/organization & administration , Hospitals, Pediatric/organization & administration , Patient Handoff/organization & administration , Perioperative Period , Teaching Rounds/organization & administration , Humans , Patient Care Team
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...