Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF.

PURPOSE: Patient response to hematopoietic progenitor-cell mobilizing regimens seems to vary considerably, making comparison between regimens difficult. To eliminate this inter-patient variability, we designed a cross-over trial and prospectively compared the number of progenitors mobilized into blood after granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) days 1 to 12 plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) days 7 to 12 (regimen G) with the number of progenitors after cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF days 3 to 14 (regimen C) in the same patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were randomized to receive either regimen G or C first (G1 and C1, respectively) and underwent two leukaphereses. After a washout period, patients were then crossed over to the alternate regimen (C2 and G2, respectively) and underwent two additional leukaphereses. The hematopoietic progenitor-cell content of each collection was determined. In addition, toxicity and charges were tracked. RESULTS: Regimen C (n = 50) resulted in mobilization of more CD34(+) cells (2.7-fold/kg/apheresis), erythroid burst-forming units (1.8-fold/kg/apheresis), and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (2.2-fold/kg/apheresis) compared with regimen G given to the same patients (n = 46; paired t test, P<.01 for all comparisons). Compared with regimen G, regimen C resulted in better mobilization, whether it was given first (P =.025) or second (P =.02). The ability to achieve a target collection of > or =2x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg using two leukaphereses was 50% after G1 and 90% after C1. Three of the seven patients in whom mobilization was poor after G1 had > or =2x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg with two leukaphereses after C2. In contrast, when regimen G was given second (G2), seven out of 10 patients failed to achieve the target CD34(+) cell dose despite adequate collections after C1. Thirty percent of the patients (nine of 29) given regimen C were admitted to the hospital because of neutropenic fever for a median duration of 4 days (range, 2 to 10 days). The higher cost of regimen C was balanced by higher CD34(+) cell yield, resulting in equivalent charges based on cost per CD34(+) cell collected. CONCLUSION: We report the first clinical trial that used a cross-over design showing that high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF results in mobilization of more progenitors then GM-CSF plus G-CSF when tested in the same patient regardless of sequence of administration, although the regimen is associated with greater morbidity. Patients who fail to achieve adequate mobilization after regimen G can be treated with regimen C as an effective salvage regimen, whereas patients who fail regimen C are unlikely to benefit from subsequent treatment with regimen G. The cross-over design allowed detection of significant differences between regimens in a small cohort of patients and should be considered in design of future comparisons of mobilization regimens.

Determination and validation of a predictive model for Clostridium difficile diarrhea in hospitalized oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile colitis in the cancer patient receiving chemotherapy is a frequent cause of morbidity which may prolong hospitalization. Techniques for identifying infection often delay the initiation of therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective case-control analysis, we identified predictors for C. difficile-associated diarrhea in 29 patients hospitalized from 1988 to 1993 on a hematologic malignancy/bone marrow transplant unit (hospital A). We then validated our model with 58 C. difficile cases and 74 controls admitted to an oncology unit from a different institution (hospital B). RESULTS: We found that low intensity of chemotherapy (P < 0.001), lack of parenteral vancomycin use (P = 0.03) and hospitalization within the past two months (P = 0.05) were independently predictive of C. difficile colitis by multivariate analysis. These variables were weighted for predictive capability using a receiver operator characteristic score; low intensity chemotherapy was assigned two points, lack of parenteral vancomycin received one point and prior hospitalization one point (P < 0.001 by chi 2 for trend). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve areas were 0.78 for patients at hospital A and 0.70 at hospital B indicating moderate drop off in discrimination. Compared to hospital A patients, hospital B patients hospitalized between 1989 and 1994 were more often women (P = 0.04), received less systemic vancomycin (P = 0.01), were less frequently neutropenic (P < 0.05), and received less intense chemotherapy regimens (P < 0.05). Despite these differences in demographics in patients between these institutions, our predictive model was validated in hospital B patients (P = 0.02 by chi 2 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study may help clinicians predict the risk of C. difficile disease in the hospitalized immunocompromised oncology patient and may help guide empiric therapy while awaiting results of stool toxin assays.

Autologous CD34+ cell transplantation for patients with advanced lymphoma: effects of overnight storage on peripheral blood progenitor cell enrichment and engraftment.

In order to demonstrate the feasibility of mobilization, enrichment and engraftment of autologous peripheral blood CD34+ cells in patients with relapsed lymphoma, 59 peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections from 21 patients were enriched for CD34+ cells using CEPRATE SC (CellPro, Bothell, WA, USA) immunoaffinity column. Following high-dose chemotherapy, a mean of 17 x 10(8) (range, 3-34) nucleated cells/kg containing 8.7 x 10(6) (0.3-26) CD34+ cells/kg were re-infused. Blood cell recovery in these patients was compared to engraftment capacity of unenriched PBPCs in a cohort of lymphoma patients treated with an identical high-dose chemotherapy regimen. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was rapid in both groups including five patients who received < or = 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. After infusion of CD34+ enriched cells, neutrophils exceeded 0.5 x 10(9)/l in 11 (8-14) days and platelets exceeded 20 x 10(9)/l (untransfused) in 15 (9-39) days. In order to optimize the immunoaffinity column utilization we stored the first PBPC collections overnight at 4 degrees C and combined them with the next day's collection prior to the CD34+ enrichment procedure in 11 patients. This maneuver resulted in a significant decrease in the CD34+ cell recovery (resulting in reinfusion of a mean of 42% less CD34+ cells). Although overnight storage did not affect neutrophil engraftment, platelet engraftment was prolonged in this group of patients even when > 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were re-infused. The overnight storage procedure should be further evaluated for its effects on the CD34+ immunoaffinity enrichment procedure, megakaryocyte progenitors and platelet engraftment. We conclude that CD34+ cells enriched from peripheral blood result in rapid engraftment after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with advanced lymphoma that is comparable to that of patients receiving unenriched PBPCs.

A phase II multicenter trial of high-dose sequential chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation as initial therapy for patients with high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of front-line high-dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Thirty-two patients with high-risk NHL (defined by the age-adjusted international index) underwent HDS chemotherapy followed by PBSC transplantation and consolidative radiotherapy. Twenty-eight patients (88%) had intermediate/high grade NHL and four patients (12%) had small noncleaved or lymphoblastic lymphoma. Twenty-four patients were classified as high-intermediate-risk (two risk factors) and eight patients were classified as high-risk (three risk factors). The five phases of HDS (see Fig. 1) consisted of Phase I (adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone); Phase II (cyclophosphamide, filgrastim [G-CSF], and PBSC harvest); Phase III (methotrexate, leucovorin, vincristine; Phase IV (etoposide, filgrastim [G-CSF]); and Phase V (mitoxantrone, melphalan, autologous peripheral blood stem cell infusion, and filgrastim [G-CSF]). Radiation therapy was given to sites of previous bulk disease, 2400 cGy, (D + 30-100)]. Toxicity, engraftment, hospital utilization, overall survival, and relapse-free survival were evaluated. The high-dose sequential chemotherapeutic regimen was well tolerated. Treatment-related mortality was 6.25% with two deaths occurring secondary to sepsis and one death was caused by progressive disease. The major toxicity in Phase I-IV was grade 3 nausea/vomiting. The major toxicity in Phase V was grade 3 or 4 nausea/vomiting and mucositis. The median follow-up is 18.8 months (range 4-44 months). The overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) at 18 months for all patients were 78% (95% CI 37-90%) and 67% (95% CI 46-88%), respectively. The OS at 18 months for all patients, excluding the four patients with either small noncleaved or lymphoblastic lymphoma, was 82% (95% CI 65-98%) vs. 30% (95% CI 0-86%) (p = 0.0059). One patient in this latter group remains alive at 6 months follow-up. The RFS for all patients, excluding the four patients with either small noncleaved or lymphoblastic lymphoma, was 78% (95% CI 58-97%) vs. 0% (95% CI 0-0%) (p = 0.0004). High-dose sequential chemotherapy with initial PBSC transplantation is well tolerated and appears effective in high-risk NHL. Superior results were noted in patients with intermediate grade versus those with small noncleaved or lymphoblastic NHL.