A preliminary study on rectal dose reduction associated with hyaluronic acid implantation in brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Objectives: Hydrogel spacer (HS) was developed to reduce rectal toxicities caused by radiotherapy, but has been reported to cause major adverse events. Our institute has attempted to introduce a hyaluronic acid (HA) as an alternative spacer. This study aimed to compare rectal doses and geometric distributions between the HS and HA implantation in prostate cancer. Methods: HS and HA were inserted in 20 and 18 patients undergoing high-dose brachytherapy, respectively. The rectum spacer volumes injected were 10 mL and 22 mL, respectively. In the treatment planning system, 13.5 Gy was administered with common catheter positions. The rectal dose indices were assessed between the spacer groups for dosimetry evaluation. Distances between the prostate and rectum and configurations of the spacers were compared. Results: The mean doses irradiated to 0.1 and 2 mL of the rectum were 10.45 Gy and 6.71 Gy for HS, and 6.73 Gy and 4.90 Gy for HA (p<0.001). The mean minimum distances between the prostate and rectum were 1.23 cm and 1.79 cm for HS and HA, respectively (p<0.05). Geometrical configuration comparisons revealed that HA has a higher ability to expand the space than HS. Conclusion: The rectal dose reduction ability of HA is significantly greater than that of HS, suggesting its potential as a new spacer.

Assessment of intrafractional motion of the cervix-uterus by MR-guided radiotherapy system†.

The uterus is known as one of the moving organs. We evaluated the movement of the uterus during irradiation and the effects of changes in the surrounding organs using a magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy system. Seven patients with cervical cancer underwent pre- and posttreatment MR imaging to assess changes in the positioning of the uterus and cervix as well as the alterations in bladder and rectal volume. The study revealed that the movements of the uterus were greater than that of the cervix and showed a tendency to correlate with the bladder rather than the rectum. We also examined whether intrafractional motion could lead to insufficient dose coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV), specifically focusing on the D98% of the CTV in the uterine body and cervix. The impact of intrafractional motion on the D98% varied among patients, with one out of the seven patients experiencing an average dosimetric change of -2.6 Gy in the uterus, although larger planning target volume margins of 1.5 cm were applied, therefore, indicating the need for individualized optimal margins in each case. Online adaptive radiotherapy offers the advantage of modifying the treatment plan when irradiating moving organs, such as the uterus. However, it should be noted that this approach may result in longer overall treatment times compared with the traditional methods. Therefore, we must carefully consider the influence of intrafractional organ motions when opting for such a treatment.

Film measurement and analytical approach for assessing treatment accuracy and latency in a magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy system.

PURPOSE: We measure the dose distribution of gated delivery for different target motions and estimate the gating latency in a magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) system. METHOD: The dose distribution accuracy of the gated MRgRT system (MRIdian, Viewray) was investigated using an in-house-developed phantom that was compatible with the magnetic field and gating method. This phantom contains a simulated tumor and a radiochromic film (EBT3, Ashland, Inc.). To investigate the effect of the number of beam switching and target velocity on the dose distribution, two types of target motions were applied. One is that the target was periodically moved at a constant velocity of 5 mm/s with different pause times (0, 1, 3, 10, and 20 s) between the motions. During different pause times, different numbers of beams were switched on/off. The other one is that the target was moved at velocities of 3, 5, 8, and 10 mm/s without any pause (i.e., continuous motion). The gated method was applied to these motions at MRIdian, and the dose distributions in each condition were measured using films. To investigate the relation between target motion and dose distribution in the gating method, we compared the results of the gamma analysis of the calculated and measured dose distributions. Moreover, we analytically estimated the gating latencies from the dose distributions measured using films and the gamma analysis results. RESULTS: The gamma pass rate linearly decreased with increasing beam switching and target velocity. The overall gating latencies of beam-hold and beam-on were 0.51 ± 0.17 and 0.35 ± 0.05 s, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Film measurements highlighted the factors affecting the treatment accuracy of the gated MRgRT system. Our analytical approach, employing gamma analysis on films, can be used to estimate the overall latency of the gated MRgRT system.

Identifying risk characteristics using failure mode and effect analysis for risk management in online magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy.

Background and purpose: Online magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) is a new technology of radiotherapy and requires a new quality control program in many aspects. This study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of risks in online MRgART through the application of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) for more enhanced and effective quality assurance (QA) programs. Materials and methods: We present an FMEA conducted by a multidisciplinary team with more than two years of experience. A process map describing the whole process of online MRgART was developed and potential failure modes were identified. High-risk failure modes and their potential causes and corrective measures were also identified. Failure modes were classified into three categories, MRgRT, online ART, and conventional RT, to investigate their features. A comparison with previous studies was also conducted to gain a general perspective. Results: In total, 153 failure modes and 49 high risks were identified. Among all failure modes, 51, 63, and 66 were related to MRgRT, online ART, and conventional RT, respectively. The hazardous processes were structure segmentation, treatment planning, and treatment beam delivery. Lists of failure modes identified in this study and previous studies were presented. Based on the results, characteristics and general aspects of the risks were discussed. Conclusion: Exploring the results of the FMEA enhanced our understanding of risk characteristics to improve QA program of online MRgART.

Evaluation of auto-segmentation accuracy of cloud-based artificial intelligence and atlas-based models.

BACKGROUND: Contour delineation, a crucial process in radiation oncology, is time-consuming and inaccurate due to inter-observer variation has been a critical issue in this process. An atlas-based automatic segmentation was developed to improve the delineation efficiency and reduce inter-observer variation. Additionally, automated segmentation using artificial intelligence (AI) has recently become available. In this study, auto-segmentations by atlas- and AI-based models for Organs at Risk (OAR) in patients with prostate and head and neck cancer were performed and delineation accuracies were evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with prostate cancer and 30 patients with head and neck cancer were evaluated. MIM Maestro was used to apply the atlas-based segmentation. MIM Contour ProtégéAI was used to apply the AI-based segmentation. Three similarity indices, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and mean distance to agreement (MDA), were evaluated and compared with manual delineations. In addition, radiation oncologists visually evaluated the delineation accuracies. RESULTS: Among patients with prostate cancer, the AI-based model demonstrated higher accuracy than the atlas-based on DSC, HD, and MDA for the bladder and rectum. Upon visual evaluation, some errors were observed in the atlas-based delineations when the boundary between the small bowel or the seminal vesicle and the bladder was unclear. For patients with head and neck cancer, no significant differences were observed between the two models for almost all OARs, except small delineations such as the optic chiasm and optic nerve. The DSC tended to be lower when the HD and the MDA were smaller in small volume delineations. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of efficiency, the processing time for head and neck cancers was much shorter than manual delineation. While quantitative evaluation with AI-based segmentation was significantly more accurate than atlas-based for prostate cancer, there was no significant difference for head and neck cancer. According to the results of visual evaluation, less necessity of manual correction in AI-based segmentation indicates that the segmentation efficiency of AI-based model is higher than that of atlas-based model. The effectiveness of the AI-based model can be expected to improve the segmentation efficiency and to significantly shorten the delineation time.

Dosimetric effect of the intestinal gas of online adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy on target and critical organs without online electron density correction for pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the dosimetric effect of intestinal gas of stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) on target and critical organs for pancreatic cancer without online electron density correction (EDC). METHODS: Thirty pancreatic cancer patients who underwent online SMART were selected for this study. The treatment time of each stage and the total treatment time were recorded and analyzed. The concerned dose-volume parameters of target and organs-at-risk (OAR) were compared with and without an intestinal gas EDC using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test. Analysis items with p value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The relationships between dosimetric differences and intestinal gas volume variations were investigated using the Spearman test. RESULTS: The average treatment time was 82 min, and the average EDC time was 8 min, which accounted for 10% of the overall treatment time. There were no significant differences in CTV (GTV), PTV, bowel, stomach, duodenum, and skin (p > 0.05) with respect to dose volume parameters. For the Dmax of gastrointestinal organs (p = 0.03), the mean dose of the liver (p = 0.002) and kidneys (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04 for the left and right kidneys, respectively), there may be a risk of slight overestimation compared with EDC, and for the Dmax of the spinal cord (p = 0.02), there may be a risk of slight underestimation compared with EDC. A weak correlation for D95 in the PTV and D0.5 cc in the duodenum was observed. CONCLUSION: For patients with similar inter-fractional intestinal gas distribution, EDC had little dosimetric effects on the D0.5 cc of all GI organs and dose volume parameters of target in most plans. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: By omitting the EDC of intestinal gas, the online SMART treatment time can be shortened.

A dosimetric and centeredness comparison of the conventional and novel endobronchial applicators: A preliminary study.

PURPOSE: This study compared the applicator position relative to the tracheal wall and dosimetric parameters between conventional and novel applicators among patients receiving endobronchial brachytherapy (EBBT) for intratracheal tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from 7 patients who received EBBT for intratracheal tumors were retrospectively analyzed; 4 and 3 patients were treated with conventional (2-wing) or novel (5-wing) applicators, respectively. Applicator centrality was evaluated using the distance between the center of the trachea and main bronchus (TMB) lumen and path of source (L). Dosimetric parameters, including plans normalized to D2cc of the TMB = 45 Gy (normalized plan), were compared between the applicators. RESULTS: The mean and maximum values of L in cases of the 2-wing applicator group were approximately 5.0 mm and 10.0 mm, respectively. In the novel applicator group, the corresponding values were approximately 3.0 and 6.0 mm, respectively. In the normalized plan of the 2-wing applicator group, the ranges of median V90% of clinical target volume (CTV) and D0.1cc of the TMB in all cases were 23.0-91.9% and 66.3-153.1 Gy, respectively. In the 5-wing applicator group, the corresponding values were 69.2-83.8% and 60.4-84.5 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the 5-wing applicator group, the range was narrow in all dose-volume parameters except for D2cc of the TMB. Compared to the conventional applicator, the 5-wing applicator can give a stable dose to the CTV and can reduce the maximum dose of the TMB. This suggests that stable EBBT can be given to any patient using the 5-wing applicator.

Configuration analysis of the injection position and shape of the gel spacer in gynecologic brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: In this single-institution retrospective study, configuration analysis was performed to determine the optimal location and volume of hyaluronic acid gel spacer injection into the rectovaginal or vesicovaginal septum for effective dose reduction (DR) to the organs at risk (OARs), the rectum and bladder. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 70 and 50 intracavitary brachytherapy treatment plans used only vaginal cylinders with gel spacers for the rectal and bladder sides, respectively, whereas 28 did not use spacers. Correlation analysis was performed between the geometrical parameters and injection position of the gel spacers and the 2-cm3 covering doses of the OARs for each treatment. RESULTS: A higher DR was predicted for hyaluronic acid gel spacer injection within ±5 mm and ±2.5 mm in the lateral-medial direction from the midpoint on the rectal and bladder sides, and ±10 mm in the cranial-caudal direction from the midpoint on the rectal side. There were correlations between 2-cm3 covering doses and the gel spacer parameters: the volume on the rectal (p = 0.02) and bladder (p = 0.04) sides; the craniocaudal length on the rectal side (p << 0.05); and ventrodorsad thickness on each OAR (p << 0.05) sides. There was no significant difference in the DR between a volume of ∼10 cm3 and that of a higher volume (p >> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A gel spacer volume of ∼10 cm3 provides sufficient OAR DR if its gravity point is on the midpoint between the cylinder applicator and OAR, and its craniocaudal length covers the active length of the cylinder applicator.

[On-line Adaptive Radiotherapy Using MRI-Guided Technique].

In our institution, we installed MRI-guided radiotherapy system (MRIdian, ViewRay Inc.), allowing to perform on-line adaptive radiotherapy (ART). The MRIdian has three 60Co sources with 120 degrees apart, equipped with MRI system using a static magnetic field of 0.35 T. The tumor can be monitored and identified in real-time Cine-MRI during treatments, and gated-radiotherapy is possible based on the boundaries. On-line ART can provide the optimum delivery where high dose coverages to the tumor and sparing dose to health organs can be achieved. However, patient specific QA in on-line ART has a limitation of activities, because patients stay in the couth while planning. In this report, we summarized the commissioning of the MRIdian, and the patient specific QA established in on-line ART was described.

Optimization of Couch Modeling in the Change of Dose Calculation Methods and Their Versions.

In external radiotherapy, the X-ray beam passes through the treatment couch, leading to the dose reduction by the attenuation of the couch. As a method to compensate for the reduction, radiation treatment planning systems (RTPS) support virtual couch function, namely "couch modeling method". In the couch modeling method, the computed tomography (CT) numbers assigned to each structure should be optimized by comparing calculations to measurements for accurate dose calculation. Thus, re-optimization of CT numbers will be required when the dose calculation algorithm or their version changes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the calculation accuracy of the couch modeling method in different calculation algorithms and their versions. The optimal CT numbers were determined by minimizing the difference between measured transmission factors and calculated ones. When CT numbers optimized by Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) Ver. 8.6 were used, the maximum and the mean difference of transmission factor were 5.8% and 1.5%, respectively, for Acuros XB (AXB) Ver. 11.0. However, when CT numbers optimized by AXB Ver. 11.0 were used, they were 2.6% and 0.6%, respectively. The CT numbers for couch structures should be optimized when changing dose calculation algorithms and their versions. From the comparison of the measured transmission to calculation, it was found that the CT numbers had high accuracy.

Dosimetric shield evaluation with tungsten sheet in 4, 6, and 9MeV electron beams.

In electron radiotherapy, shielding material is required to attenuate beam and scatter. A newly introduced shielding material, tungsten functional paper (TFP), has been anticipated to become a very useful device that is lead-free, light, flexible, and easily processed, containing very fine tungsten powder at as much as 80% by weight. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric changes due to TFP shielding for electron beams. TFP (thickness 0-15mm) was placed on water or a water-equivalent phantom. Percentage depth ionization and transmission were measured for 4, 6, and 9MeV electron beams. Off-center ratio was also measured using film dosimetry at depth of dose maximum under similar conditions. Then, beam profiles and transmission with two shielding materials, TFP and lead, were evaluated. Reductions of 95% by using TFP at 0.5cm depth occurred at 4, 9, and 15mm with 4, 6, and 9MeV electron beams, respectively. It is found that the dose tend to increase at the field edge shaped with TFP, which might be influenced by the thickness. TFP has several unique features and is very promising as a useful tool for radiation protection for electron beams, among others.