Comorbidities and personal burden of urgency urinary incontinence: a systematic review.

AIMS: Studies on the burden and comorbidities associated with urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) are difficult to compare, partly because of the evolution of definitions for lower urinary tract symptoms and the various instruments used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL). This article summarises published evidence on comorbidities and the personal burden associated specifically with UUI to provide clinicians with a clear perspective on the impact of UUI on patients. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted using the terms: (urgency urinary incontinence OR urge incontinence OR mixed incontinence OR overactive bladder) AND (burden OR quality of life OR well-being OR depression OR mental health OR sexual health OR comorbid), with limits for English-language articles published between 1991 and 2011. RESULTS: Of 1364 identified articles, data from 70 retained articles indicate that UUI is a bothersome condition that has a marked negative impact on HRQL, with the severity of UUI a predictor of HRQL. UUI is significantly associated with falls in elderly individuals, depression, urinary tract infections, increased body mass index, diabetes and deaths. The burden of UUI appears to be greater than that of stress urinary incontinence or overactive bladder symptoms without UUI. UUI adversely impacts physical and mental health, sexual function and work productivity. CONCLUSIONS: UUI is associated with numerous comorbid conditions and inflicts a substantial personal burden on many aspects of patients' lives. Healthcare providers should discuss UUI with patients and be aware of the impact of UUI and its associated comorbidities on patients' lives.

Delayed initiation of subcutaneous insulin therapy after failure of oral glucose-lowering agents in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a population-based analysis in the UK.

AIMS: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to estimate the time to insulin initiation in patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral glucose-lowering agents (OGLAs). METHODS: Insulin-naïve patients failing on OGLAs were identified from The Health Improvement Network database, which collects records from general practices throughout the UK. Patients were included if they were aged > or = 40 years, had concomitant prescriptions for > or = 2 OGLAs, and > or = 1 year of available records prior to the first occurrence of HbA(1c) > or = 8.0% after > or = 90 days of OGLA polytherapy at > or = 50% of maximum recommended dosages. RESULTS: A total of 2501 eligible patients with Type 2 diabetes who had an HbA(1c) above the OGLA failure threshold of > or = 8.0% were identified (54.0% male; 30.9% aged 60-69 years). It was estimated that if all the eligible patients were followed for 5 years, 25% would initiate insulin within 1.8 years of OGLA failure (95% CI 1.6-2.0), and 50% within 4.9 years (95% CI 4.6-5.8). The presence of diabetes-related complications had no substantial impact on the time to insulin initiation. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that 25% of patients with Type 2 diabetes had insulin initiation delayed for at least 1.8 years, and 50% of patients delayed starting insulin for almost 5 years after failure of glycaemic control with OGLA polytherapy, even in the presence of diabetes-related complications. Interventions that reduce this delay to insulin initiation are required to help achieve and maintain recommended glycaemic targets in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: A critique of a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To replicate and to critique a recently published meta-analysis[1] of the incidence of nonpreventable serious and fatal adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in hospitalized patients, to better understand its results and conclusions. METHODS: The published methods described in the meta-analysis of Lazarou and colleagues were followed.[1] This meta-analysis reviewed 30 original publications describing 39 prospective studies. In each study, the numbers of patients with nonpreventable ADRs, probably or definitely related to drugs, were sought to allow calculation of the incidence of "all-severities," serious and fatal, ADRs. In the original meta-analysis, these ADR incidences were then pooled to provide estimates of the incidence in all hospitalized patients. In our analysis, the original studies were examined by 2 investigators for consistency with the study search and inclusion criteria of the meta-analysis by Lazarou and colleagues, as well as accuracy and appropriateness of data extraction, meta-analysis, and conclusions. RESULTS: Multiple sources of heterogeneity among studies and data were found and include important differences in populations and hospital wards monitored, surveillance techniques, ADR definitions, determination of preventability of ADRs, distinguishing relationship to drugs, and in formats of reporting ADRs (by numbers of events or by patients). Imputations of event numerators made by the authors of the original meta-analysis were questionable and may overestimate the results of any individual study. With regard to fatal ADRs, the problem of small numbers of events is likely to introduce large errors in incidence estimates. Simple pooling of fatal event frequencies from only those studies specifically reporting the number of fatal ADRs, as was done in the meta-analysis of Lazarou and colleagues, is likely to dramatically overestimate the death rate. CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis was invalid because of heterogeneity of the studies. Most of these studies did not report the data needed for incidence calculations. The methodology used was seriously flawed, and no conclusions regarding ADR incidence rates in the hospitalized population in the United States should be made on the basis of the original meta-analysis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature regarding the diagnosis of sleep apnea.

To establish the evidence base for the diagnosis of sleep apnea (SA) in adult patients, a systematic review of the literature from 1980 through November 1, 1997 was performed. Diagnostic studies were included if they reported results of any test to establish or support a diagnosis of SA, in comparison to a diagnosis from a full polysomnogram (PSG). Test results were meta-analyzed using fixed effects models and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) to examine consistency of tests within and between diagnostics vs. the "gold standard" of PSG. From a total of 937 studies, 249 fit the broad eligibility criteria for inclusion in the clinical trial database and its data were extracted from these reports; useable data for statistical analyses were reported in 71 studies (7,572 patients). The sensitivity and specificity of partial channel and partial time PSGs appeared most promising as replacements for full PSG in patients suspected of obstructive SA. Clinical prediction rules (multivariate models) were also promising. Studies of portable sleep monitors, radiologic or morphologic features, and focused questionnaires were too heterogeneous to be meta-analyzed. In general, the diversity of study designs and objectives were very high and the methodological rigor of these studies as assessments of diagnostic tests was very low. Thus, we are still not in a position to recommend standardization of diagnostic methodology for sleep apnea. Instead, our recommendations for future research include standardization of terms and diagnostic criteria, and consistently reported statistics to enhance the utility of this literature.