Evidence-based clinical recommendations for hypofractionated radiotherapy: exploring efficacy and safety - Part 1. Brain and head and neck.

Advances in radiotherapy (RT) techniques, including intensity-modulated RT and image-guided RT, have allowed hypofractionation, increasing the fraction size over the conventional dose of 1.8-2.0 Gy. Hypofractionation offers advantages such as shorter treatment times, improved compliance, and under specific conditions, particularly in tumors with a low α/ß ratio, higher efficacy. It was initially explored for use in RT for prostate cancer and adjuvant RT for breast cancer, and its application has been extended to various other malignancies. Hypofractionated RT (HFRT) may also be effective in patients who are unable to undergo conventional treatment owing to poor performance status, comorbidities, or old age. The treatment of brain tumors with HFRT is relatively common because brain stereotactic radiosurgery has been performed for over two decades. However, re-irradiation of recurrent lesions and treatment of elderly or frail patients are areas under investigation. HFRT for head and neck cancer has not been widely used because of concerns regarding late toxicity. Thus, we aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of the current evidence for HFRT for brain tumors and head and neck cancer and to offer practical recommendations to clinicians faced with the challenge of choosing new treatment options.

The impact of boost radiation therapy after hysterectomy on cervical cancer patients with close or positive resection margins

Purpose We investigated the effect of boost radiation therapy (RT) in addition to whole pelvis RT (WPRT) on treatment outcome and safety of cervical cancer patients following hysterectomy with close/positive resection margins (RM). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients with cervical cancer who received WPRT with or without boost-RT as adjuvant treatment between July 2006 and June 2022. Twenty patients (39.2%) were treated with WPRT-alone, and 31 (60.8%) received boost-RT after WPRT using brachytherapy or intensity-modulated RT. Results The median follow-up period was 41 months. According to RT modality, the 4-year local control (LC) and locoregional control (LRC) rates of patients treated with WPRT-alone were 61% and 61%, respectively, whereas those in LC and LRC rates in patients who underwent WPRT with boost-RT were 93.2% and 75.3%, with p-values equal to 0.005 and 0.090, respectively. Seven patients (35.0%) had local recurrence in the WPRT-treated group compared to only two out of the 31 patients (6.5%) in the WPRT with boost-RT-treated counterparts (p = 0.025). Boost-RT was a significantly good prognostic factor for LC (p = 0.013) and LRC (p = 0.013). Boost-RT did not result in statistically-significant improvements in progression-free survival or overall survival. The acute and late toxicity rates were not significantly different between groups. Conclusion Boost RT following WPRT is a safe and effective treatment strategy to improve LC without increasing toxicity in patients with cervical cancer with close/positive RM after hysterectomy (AU)

The impact of boost radiation therapy after hysterectomy on cervical cancer patients with close or positive resection margins.

PURPOSE: We investigated the effect of boost radiation therapy (RT) in addition to whole pelvis RT (WPRT) on treatment outcome and safety of cervical cancer patients following hysterectomy with close/positive resection margins (RM). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 51 patients with cervical cancer who received WPRT with or without boost-RT as adjuvant treatment between July 2006 and June 2022. Twenty patients (39.2%) were treated with WPRT-alone, and 31 (60.8%) received boost-RT after WPRT using brachytherapy or intensity-modulated RT. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 41 months. According to RT modality, the 4-year local control (LC) and locoregional control (LRC) rates of patients treated with WPRT-alone were 61% and 61%, respectively, whereas those in LC and LRC rates in patients who underwent WPRT with boost-RT were 93.2% and 75.3%, with p-values equal to 0.005 and 0.090, respectively. Seven patients (35.0%) had local recurrence in the WPRT-treated group compared to only two out of the 31 patients (6.5%) in the WPRT with boost-RT-treated counterparts (p = 0.025). Boost-RT was a significantly good prognostic factor for LC (p = 0.013) and LRC (p = 0.013). Boost-RT did not result in statistically-significant improvements in progression-free survival or overall survival. The acute and late toxicity rates were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Boost RT following WPRT is a safe and effective treatment strategy to improve LC without increasing toxicity in patients with cervical cancer with close/positive RM after hysterectomy.

Is reduced-dose whole-brain radiotherapy also feasible in primary CNS lymphoma for curative or salvage purpose?

PURPOSE: Recently, reduced-dose whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been used to treat primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). However, whether reduced-dose WBRT is also an acceptable option for curative or salvage purposes has not yet been reported. We analyzed the clinical outcomes of patients with PCNSL who received radiotherapy for curative or salvage purposes and compared the clinical outcomes according to the WBRT dose. METHODS: A total of 66 patients were divided into two groups: those treated with 30 Gy (2 Gy per fraction) or less WBRT (low-dose WBRT, n = 34) and those treated with more than 30 Gy WBRT (high-dose WBRT, n = 32). The median WBRT dose was 25.2 and 49.6 Gy in low-dose and high-dose WBRT groups, respectively. The median total radiotherapy dose, including the boost dose, was 50 Gy (range, 36.0-55.8 Gy). RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 77.8% and 29.8%, respectively. Intracranial relapse occurred in 31 patients (47.0%) at a median of 27 months after RT. Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ between the two groups. The 3-year intracranial disease control rate did not differ between the two groups (35.2% vs. 41.6%, p = 0.300). Grade 3 or higher neurological toxicities were observed in six patients, of whom five were in the high-dose WBRT group. CONCLUSION: Reduced-dose WBRT in curative and salvage treatments for PCNSL had no significant negative effect on the intracranial disease control rate or survival. Therefore, without impaired efficacy, use of reduced-dose WBRT appears promising for reduction of neurotoxicity.

Reduced volume intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for patients with high-grade glioma: A retrospective observational study.

Radiotherapy (RT) is an essential treatment for patients with high-grade gliomas. however, a consensus on the target area of RT has not yet been achieved. In this study, we aimed to analyze progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence patterns, and toxicity in patients who received reduced volume intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (rvSIB-IMRT). In addition, we attempted to identify prognostic factors for recurrence. Twenty patients with high-grade gliomas who received rvSIB-IMRT between July 2011 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. For rvSIB-IMRT, clinical target volume 1/2 was set at a 5 to 10 mm margin on each gross tumor volume (GTV) 1 (resection cavity and enhanced lesion) and GTV2 (high-signal lesion of T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery). RT doses were prescribed to 60 Gy/30 fractions (fxs) for planning target volume (PTV)1 and 51 to 54 Gy/30 fxs for PTV2. The median PFS and overall survival of the total cohorts were 10.6 and 13.6 months, respectively. Among the 12 relapsed patients, central, in-field, and marginal recurrences were identified in 8 (66.7%), 2 (16.7%), and 1 patient (8.3%), respectively. Distant recurrence was identified in 3 patients. Gross total resection (GTR) and high Ki-67 index (>27.4%), and subventricular involvement (SVI) were identified as significant factors for PFS in the multivariate analysis. During the follow up, 4 patients showed pseudoprogression and 1 patient showed radiation necrosis. The rvSIB-IMRT for high-grade gliomas resulted in comparable PFS and tolerable toxicity. Most recurrences were central/in-field (10 cases of 12, 83.4%). GTR, high Ki-67 index (>27.4%), and SVI were significant factors for recurrence.

Re-Irradiation with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Recurrent Cervical Cancer in the Pelvis: An Analysis of Outcomes and Toxicity.

Background and Objectives: Treatment options for most patients with recurrent cervical cancer within the previously irradiated field are limited. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of re-irradiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with cervical cancer who experienced intrapelvic recurrence. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 22 patients with recurrent cervical cancer who were treated with re-irradiation for intrapelvic recurrence using IMRT between July 2006 and July 2020. The irradiation dose and volume were determined based on the range considered safe for the tumor size, location, and previous irradiation dose. Results: The median follow-up period was 15 months (range: 3-120) and the overall response rate was 63.6%. Of the symptomatic patients, 90% experienced symptom relief after treatment. The 1- and 2-year local progression-free survival (LPFS) rates were 36.8% and 30.7%, respectively, whereas the 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 68.2% and 25.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the interval between irradiations and gross tumor volume (GTV) were significant prognostic factors for LPFS. The response to re-irradiation showed borderline statistical significance for LPFS. The GTV and response to re-irradiation were also independent prognostic factors for OS. Grade 3 late toxicities were observed in 4 (18.2%) of the 22 patients. Recto- or vesico-vaginal fistula occurred in four patients. The irradiation dose was associated with fistula formation with borderline significance. Conclusions: Re-irradiation using IMRT is a safe and effective treatment strategy for patients with recurrent cervical cancer who previously received RT. Interval between irradiations, tumor size, response to re-irradiation, and radiation dose were the main factors affecting efficacy and safety.

Non-endometrioid endometrial cancer: analysis of recurrence pattern and identification of prognostic and treatment factors affecting recurrence and survival.

PURPOSE: We investigated the characteristics of recurrence pattern and survival of patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer (NEEC) and attempted to identify prognostic and treatment factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of these patients. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with histologically confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA-IVA NEEC from February 2003 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The 5­year DFS and OS rates of the total cohort were 50.6% and 56.1%, respectively. Recurrence occurred in 28 patients (49.1%) during follow-up, and the most common recurrence pattern was distant metastasis (DM; 78.6% of total recurrences). The occurrence of relapse significantly reduced 5­year OS (recurrence group vs. non-recurrence group: 12.5% vs. 100%; p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) group showed significantly higher 5­year DFS (56.7% vs. 37.9%; p = 0.04), local recurrence-free survival (91.6% vs. 50.5%; p = 0.01), and regional recurrence-free survival (88.2% vs. 56.5%; p < 0.01) than the non-RT group. In multivariate analysis, advanced FIGO stage was identified as a negative prognostic factor for DFS and OS. Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and adjuvant RT were independent prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSION: The most common recurrence pattern observed in patients with NEEC was DM. FIGO stage and LVSI were identified as prognostic factors for survival, and RT was identified as a therapeutic modality that could increase DFS. To improve the OS of patients with NEEC, the addition of effective chemotherapy that can reduce DM may be important.

Current Evidence of a Deintensification Strategy for Patients with HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer differs from HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer in terms of etiology, epidemiology, and prognosis. Younger and lower comorbidity patient demographics and favorable prognosis allow HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer patients to anticipate longer life expectancy. Reducing long-term toxicities has become an increasingly important issue. Treatment deintensification to reduce toxicities has been investigated in terms of many aspects, and the reduction of radiotherapy (RT) dose in definitive treatment, replacement of platinum-based chemotherapy with cetuximab, response-tailored dose prescription after induction chemotherapy, and reduction of adjuvant RT dose after transoral surgery have been evaluated. We performed a literature review of prospective trials of deintensification for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer. In phase II trials, reduction of RT dose in definitive treatment showed comparable survival outcomes to historical results. Two phase III randomized trials reported inferior survival outcomes for cetuximab-based chemoradiation compared with cisplatin-based chemoradiation. In a randomized phase III trial investigating adjuvant RT, deintensified RT showed noninferior survival outcomes in patients without extranodal extension but worse survival in patients with extranodal extension. Optimal RT dosage and patient selection require confirmation in future studies. Although many phase II trials have reported promising outcomes, the results of phase III trials are needed to change the standard treatment. Since high-level evidence has not been established, current deintensification should only be performed as part of a clinical study with caution. Implementation in clinical practice should not be undertaken until evidence from phase III randomized trials is available.

Application of real-time MRI-guided linear accelerator in stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: one step forward to precise targeting.

PURPOSE: Tumor motion is a major challenge in stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), causing excessive irradiation to compensate for this motion. Real-time tumor tracking with a magnetic resonance imaging-guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) could address this problem. This study aimed to assess the effects and advantages of MR-Linac in SABR for the treatment of lung tumors. METHODS: Overall, 41 patients with NSCLC treated with SABR using MR-Linac between March 2019 and December 2021 were included. For comparison, 40 patients treated with SABR using computed tomography-based modalities were also enrolled. The SABR dose ranged from 48 to 60 Gy in 3-5 fractions. The primary endpoint was a lower radiation volume compared to CT-based SABR. The secondary endpoint was the local control rate of SABR using the MR-Linac. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 19 months (range: 3-105 months). There was no significant difference in the gross tumor volume between the MR and CT groups (7.1 ± 9.3 cm3 vs 8.0 ± 6.8 cm3, p = 0.643), but the planning target volume was significantly smaller in the MR group (20.8 ± 18.8 cm3 vs 34.1 ± 22.9 cm3, p = 0.005). The 1-year local control rates for the MR and CT groups were 92.1 and 75.4%, respectively (p = 0.07), and the 1-year overall survival rates were 87.4 and 87.0%, respectively (p = 0.30). CONCLUSION: Lung SABR with MR-Linac can reduce the radiation field without compromising the local control rate. Further follow-up is needed to assess the long-term effects.

Linear Tumor Regression of Rectal Cancer in Daily MRI during Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: An Insight of Tumor Regression Velocity for Personalized Cancer Therapy.

Objective: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is current standards of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. The precise and thorough investigation of a tumor during the full course of CCRT by means of daily MRI can provide an idea on real-time treatment sensitivity in addition to tumor biology. Tumor volumetry from daily MRI during CCRT may allow patient-driven treatment decisions. Material and Methods: Patients diagnosed with cT3-4 and/or cN+ rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing preoperative CCRT with capecitabine on the pelvis up to 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions from November 2018 to June 2019 were consecutively included. Rectal tumor volume was uniformly measured by a single physician (YKK) in daily 0.35T MRI obtained with MR-guided linear accelerator. Primary endpoint was to assess the pattern of tumor volume regression throughout the full course of CCRT using daily registration MRI. Secondary endpoint was to assess the effect of tumor regression velocity on disease-free survival (DFS). Tumor regression velocity (cc) per fraction of each patient was calculated using the simple regression analysis of tumor volumes from fraction 1 to fraction 25. Results: Twenty patients were included. Daily tumor volumetry demonstrated linear tumor regression during CCRT. The tumor regression velocity of all 20 patients was 2.40 cc per fraction (R2 = 0.93; p < 0.001). The median tumor regression velocity was 1.52 cc per fraction. Patients with tumor regression velocity ≥ 1.52 cc per fraction were grouped as rapid regressors (N = 9), and those with tumor regression velocity < 1.52 cc per fraction were grouped as slow regressors (N = 11). Rapid regressors had greater tumor regression velocity (4.58 cc per fraction) compared to that of slow regressors (0.78 cc per fraction) with statistical significance (p < 0.001). The mean DFS of rapid regressors was 36.8 months, numerically longer than the 31.9 months of slow regressors (p = 0.400) without statistical significance. Rapid regressors had numerically superior DFS rate compared to slow regressors without statistical significance. The 2-year DFS was 88.9% for rapid regressors and 72.7% for slow regressors, respectively (p = 0.400). Conclusion: This study is the first observation of linear tumor regression in daily MRI during the preoperative CCRT of locally advanced rectal cancer. Daily tumor regression velocity discriminated DFS, although without statistical significance. This study with a phenomenal approach is hypothesis-generating. Nevertheless, the potential of CCRT from therapeutics to a newer level, the "theranostics", has been inceptively suggested. Further validation studies for the value of daily tumor volumetry on treatment decisions are warranted.

MRI-guided radiotherapy for PVTT in HCC patients: evaluation of the efficacy and safety.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided tumor tracking hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the twelve cases of unresectable HCC with tumor thrombus in the main trunk or first branch of the portal vein that were treated with MRI-guided tumor tracking HFRT or SBRT using the ViewRay Linac MRIdian system between June 2019 and January 2021. The HFRT was performed with a total of 50 Gy in 10 fractions, and SBRT performed in a range of 36-50 Gy with 4-5 fractions. The median biologic effective dose (BED) with an a/b ratio of 10 was 75 Gy10 (range 68.4-100 Gy10). RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 5.0 months (range 1.9-12.8 months). Ten patients (83.3%) showed an objective response of PVTT. At the time of analysis, ten patients (83.3%) showed local control. The 1-year intrahepatic control rate was 48.9%. Three patients (25%) showed mild gastrointestinal symptoms, and there were no cases of grade 3 or higher toxicity. For hepatic toxicity, there were no cases in which the Child-Pugh score increased by more than two points after RT without disease progression. CONCLUSION: MRI-guided tumor tracking HFRT and SBRT was a feasible, effective, and safe treatment option in HCC patients with tumor thrombi in the main trunk or first branch of the portal vein.

Analysis of PET parameters predicting response to radiotherapy for myeloid sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Positron-emission tomography (PET)-CT has recently been used for diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy for myeloid sarcoma, but there is little research on predicting the response of radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between PET-CT variables and the response to radiotherapy in patients with myeloid sarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted in myeloid sarcoma patients who received radiotherapy and PET-CT before and after radiotherapy. The response to radiotherapy was evaluated based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer PET response criteria, and binary regression analysis was performed to assess the factors predicting reductions in the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). RESULTS: Twenty-seven sites in 12 patients were included in the study. Complete metabolic responses were seen in 24 patients after radiotherapy, a partial metabolic response in one, and progressive metabolic disease in two patients. The prescribed dose of more than 3000 cGy10 was significantly greater in the treatment control group (P = 0.024). In binary logistic regression analysis predicting reductions in the SUVmax of more than 70% after radiotherapy, the pretreatment SUVmax (≥ 7.5) and further chemotherapy after radiotherapy showed significant differences in univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Good metabolic responses (complete or partial) to radiotherapy were achieved in 92.6% of the myeloid sarcoma patients. Radiation doses < 3000 cGy10 and increased SUVmax were related to treatment failure and high SUVmax before radiotherapy was a factor influencing SUVmax reduction. Further large-scale studies are needed.

Upfront radiosurgery plus targeted agents followed by active brain control using radiosurgery delays neurological death in non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastasis.

The role of radiosurgery has become further accentuated in the era of targeted agents (TA). Thus, the neurologic outcome of radiosurgery in brain metastasis (BM) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was reviewed. We analyzed 135 patients with BM of NSCLC who were administered Cyberknife radiosurgery (CKRS) as either initial or salvage therapy. We evaluated local failure (LF), intracranial failure (IF), and neurological death (ND) due to BM. Primary outcome was neurological death-free survival (NDFS). Median follow-up was 16.2 months. Median CKRS dose of 22 Gy was administered to median 2 targets per patient. Among 99 deaths, 14 (14%) were ND. Upfront treatment for BM included CKRS alone in 85 patients (63%), CKRS + TA in 26 patients (19%), and WBRT in 24 patients (18%). No patients or tumor related factors were associated with ND. However, the type of upfront treatment for BM was significantly associated with ND [HR 0.07 (95% CI 0.01-0.57) for CKRS + TA, HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.19-1.68) for CKRS alone] compared with the WBRT group (P = 0.01). The 2-year NDFS rates for the CKRS + TA, CRKS alone, and WBRT groups were 94%, 87%, and 78%, respectively (P = 0.03). Upfront CKRS showed significantly higher 2-year LF-free survival rate (P < 0.01). IF rate was insignificantly lower in the WBRT group compared with CKRS group (P = 0.38). Upfront CKRS + TA was associated with the best neurological outcome with high NDFS. Active brain control by early delivery of radiosurgery could achieve better neurological outcome in NSCLC with BM.

SUVmax Predicts Disease Progression after Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is gaining evidence as a predictive factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard treatment in early-stage NSCLC when a patient is unsuitable for surgery. We performed a study to assess the prognostic clinical significance of PET-CT after SABR in early-stage NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients with stage I NSCLC treated with SABR were investigated. Total radiation dose ranged from 36 to 63 Gy in three to eight fractions depending on tumor location and size. Respiratory motion control was implemented at simulation and during treatment. PET-CT prior to SABR was performed in 66 patients (86.8%). RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 32 months (range, 5 to 142 months). Local control rate at 1, 2, and 5 years were 95.9%, 92.8%, and 86.7%, respectively. Overall survival (OS) at 1, 2, and 5 years were 91.0%, 71.3%, and 52.1% respectively. Cause-specific survival at 1, 2, and 5 years were 98.6%, 93.1%, and 84.3% respectively. Tumor size and pre-SABR maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) demonstrated statistical significance in the Kaplan-Meier survival analyses with log-rank test. In multivariate analyses pre-SABR SUVmax remained statistically significant in correlation to OS (p=0.024; hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 8.8) and with marginal significance in regards to regional progression-free survival (p=0.059; HR, 32.5; 95% CI, 2.6 to 402.5). CONCLUSION: Pre-SABR SUVmax demonstrated a predictive power in statistical analyses. Tumors with SUVmax above 6 at diagnosis were associated with inferior outcomes.

Lymphovascular Invasion Increases the Risk of Nodal and Distant Recurrence in Node-Negative Stage I-IIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Despite complete surgical resection, 30-40% of patients with stage I-IIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have recurrences. We aimed to elucidate the effect of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) on the prognosis and patterns of recurrence in patients with pathologically confirmed T1-2N0 NSCLC. METHODS: We evaluated 381 patients who underwent complete resection and were diagnosed with pathologic T1-2N0 NSCLC between March 2000 and January 2012. Local recurrence, nodal recurrence, and distant metastasis were defined and analyzed. RESULTS: LVI was present in 72 patients (18.9%). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) for all patients was 69.9%. Patients with LVI showed a significant decrease in 5-year DFS (47.3 vs. 74.4%, p < 0.001). LVI was a significant prognostic predictor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.003). The patients with LVI showed a significantly increased 5-year cumulative incidence of nodal recurrence (22.5 vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001) and distant metastasis (30.4 vs. 14.9%, p = 0.004). However, no difference was shown between the two groups in the 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence (p = 0.416). CONCLUSIONS: LVI is a negative prognostic factor in patients with stage I-IIA NSCLC. The presence of LVI significantly increases the risk of nodal and distant recurrence.

Intracranial control and survival outcome of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) alone versus TKI plus radiotherapy for brain metastasis of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with and without radiotherapy (RT) has not been determined in patients with brain metastases from epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant TKI naïve non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Between 2008 and 2016, 586 patients were diagnosed with NSCLC and treated with TKIs at a hospital in Seoul, South Korea; 81 of these patients met the eligibility criteria for our study. Outcomes analyzed included intracranial progression (ICP), neurological death, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The 2-year cumulative incidence of ICP was 36.5% in the TKI plus RT group and 62.2% in the TKI alone group (P = 0.006). The chronological pattern analysis indicated that 64.3% of ICP developed within 12 months of the start of TKI treatment in the TKI alone group. The multivariate analysis revealed that treatment group (P = 0.003) and duration of TKI treatment ≤ 12 months (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with ICP. However, no significant differences were observed in the 2-year OS rate (P = 0.267) or the 2-year cumulative incidence of neurological death (P = 0.740). CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative incidence of ICP was significantly lower with TKI plus RT than with TKI alone; however, there was no significant difference in OS or neurological death. Deferring brain RT may not compromise neurologic and survival outcome in selected patients, but close magnetic resonance imaging follow-up is recommended for patients who defer brain RT.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduces gastrointestinal toxicity in pelvic radiation therapy with moderate dose.

This retrospective study was performed to evaluate and compare gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities caused by conventional radiotherapy (cRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 136 cancer patients treated with pelvic radiotherapy (RT) with moderate radiation dose in a single institution. A matched-pair analysis of the two groups was performed; each group included 68 patients. Conventional RT was delivered using the four-field box technique and IMRT was delivered with helical tomotherapy. The median daily dose was 1.8 Gy and the median total dose was 50.4 Gy (range 25.2-56 Gy). Primary end point was GI toxicity during and after RT. Secondary end point was factors that affect toxicity. Patients treated with IMRT had lower incidence of grade ≥ 2 acute GI toxicity compared to the patients treated with cRT (p = 0.003). The difference remained significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.01). The incidence of chronic GI toxicity was not statistically different between the two groups, but the cRT group had higher incidence of grade 3 chronic GI toxicity. Based on our results, IMRT can reduce GI toxicity compared to cRT in the treatment of pelvic radiotherapy even with moderate radiation dose and this will enhance patients' quality of life and treatment compliance.

Treatment outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma involving the head and neck: Two-institutional study for the significance of radiotherapy after R-CHOP chemotherapy.

This study was performed to analyze the treatment outcome for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) involving the head and neck and to evaluate the role of radiotherapy in the rituximab era. Fifty-six patients diagnosed with DLBCL involving the head and neck were assessed. All patients were treated with 6 cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP). After chemotherapy, radiation was delivered to the head and neck area in a median dose of 36 Gy. Radiation was delivered using 3-dimensional radiotherapy (n  =  25) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (n  =  31). Primary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and local control rate. After median follow-up time of 45 months, the 5-year RFS and OS rates were 72% and 61%, respectively. Fourteen (25%) of 56 patients relapsed; 1 had a local relapse, 11 had distant relapses, and 2 had both local and distant relapses. The final local control rate after radiotherapy was 94%. Age, performance status, international prognostic index score, and radiotherapy response were significant prognostic factors for both RFS and OS in the multivariate analysis. Incidence of acute grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicity was 9% and 4%, respectively. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity occurred in 2 (4%) patients, and there was no grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity for the irradiated patients. Excellent local control and survival rates can be achieved with R-CHOP followed by radiotherapy in patients with DLBCL involving the head and neck. Treatment-related toxicity after the introduction of modern radiotherapy was acceptable and limited.

Radiotherapy as an alternative treatment option for primary central nervous system lymphoma patients who are noncandidates for chemotherapy.

The standard treatment for primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is based on chemotherapy. However, there are patients who are not indicated for chemotherapy and when left untreated, the expected functional outcomes for these patients are devastating since the disease causes various neurologic symptoms. Therefore, we assessed the effects of radiotherapy as an alternative therapy in primary CNS lymphoma. Thirty-two patients were diagnosed with primary CNS lymphoma and treated with radiotherapy alone. Patients received whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) to a median dose of 30 Gy (range, 14.4-50 Gy) and the median total radiotherapy dose was 50 Gy (range, 30-54 Gy). The status on neurologic symptoms before and after radiotherapy was inquired during the regular follow-ups. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for the enrolled patients were calculated. The median follow-up time was 21 months. All but one of the patients presented with neurologic symptoms. The most common symptoms were hemiparesis and headache. After radiotherapy, these symptoms were relieved in 27 patients (84.4%). The median PFS and OS rates were 15.8 and 16.3 months, respectively. Twenty patients (62.5%) experienced recurrent disease at follow up and among them, fifteen patients (46.9%) had intracranial recurrence. The median intracranial PFS was 19.3 months. Untreated primary CNS lymphoma causes neurologic deficits and the survival after only supportive care is poor. Therefore, when chemotherapy is unfeasible, an alternative treatment should be applied and radiotherapy can be a practical option.

Timely tumor response analysis after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: A multi-institutional study for optimal surgical timing in rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The definite surgical timing in rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has not yet been fully examined. We assess the tumor response and identify the optimal operation timing after preoperative CRT in rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study included data of 1786 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4N0-2M0). They received preoperative CRT followed by total mesorectal excision. Total radiation dose was 50.4Gy in 28 fractions. Interval time between preoperative CRT and surgery ranged from 2 to 26weeks, with a median interval of 7.2weeks. Primary endpoint was to evaluate the period of highest downstaging and pathological complete response (ypCR) rates to determine the optimal timing for curative surgery after CRT. RESULTS: Downstaging rates peaked between 6 and 7weeks after CRT and declined afterward. ypCR rates increased from 5 to 6weeks after CRT and decreased after 9 to 10weeks. Downstaging rates were similar between the two arms showing 36.9% in the early arm (⩽7weeks) and 37.0% in the delayed arm (>7weeks). ypCR rates were significantly higher in the delayed arm, as compared to the early arm (12.3% vs. 8.6%, p=0.011). The delayed arm had higher sphincter preservation rates than the early arm with a marginal significance (92.4% vs. 89.9%, p=0.078). There was no statistically significant difference regarding relapse-free survival and overall survival between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: ypCR rates increased after 5weeks and decreased after 10weeks and the delayed (>7weeks after CRT) group showed significantly increased ypCR rates than the early arm (⩽7weeks after CR). The optimal timing for curative surgery in rectal cancer when tumor response is maximal is after 7weeks and before 10weeks following preoperative CRT.