A Multicenter Observational Study Comparing Virtual with In-Person Morning Reports during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted how educational conferences were delivered, leaving programs to choose between in-person and virtual morning report formats. The objective of our study was to describe morning reports during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the use of virtual formats, attendance, leadership, and content. METHODS: A prospective observational study of morning reports was conducted at 13 Internal Medicine residency programs between September 1, 2020 and March 30, 2021, including a follow-up survey of current morning report format in January 2023. RESULTS: In total, 257 reports were observed; 74% used virtual formats, including single hospital, multiple hospital, and a hybrid format with both in-person and virtual participants. Compared with in-person reports, virtual reports had more participants, with increased numbers of learners (median 21 vs 7; P < 0.001) and attendings (median 4 vs 2; P < 0.001), and they were more likely to involve medical students (83% vs 40%; P < 0.001), interns (99% vs 53%; P < 0.001), and program directors (68% vs 32%; P < 0.001). Attendings were less likely to lead virtual reports (3% vs 28%, P < 0.001). Virtual reports also were more likely to be case based (88% vs 69%; P < 0.001) and to use digital presentation slides (91% vs 36%; P < 0.001). There was a marked increase in the number of slides (median 20 vs 0; P < 0.001). As of January 2023, all 13 programs had returned to in-person reports, with only 1 program offering an option to participate virtually. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual morning report formats predominated. Compared with traditional in-person reports, virtual report increased attendance, favored resident leadership, and approached a similar range of patient diagnoses with a greater number of case-based presentations and slides. In spite of these characteristics, all programs returned to an in-person format for morning report as pandemic restrictions waned.

Missing Voices: What Early Career Hospitalists View as Essential in Hospital Medicine-Focused Education.

OBJECTIVES: Acknowledging that a successful career in hospital medicine (HM) requires specialized skills, residency programs have developed hospital medicine-focused education (HMFE) programs. Surveys of Internal Medicine residency leaders have described HMFE curricula but are limited to that specialty and lack perspectives from early career hospitalists (ECHs) who recently completed this training. As such, we surveyed multispecialty ECHs to evaluate their preferences for HMFE and to identify gaps in standard residency training and career development that HMFE can bridge. The objectives of our study were to describe multispecialty ECH needs and preferences for HMFE and to identify gaps in standard residency training and career development that HMFE can bridge. METHODS: From February to March 2021, ECHs (defined as hospitalists within 0-5 years from residency) were surveyed using the Society of Hospital Medicine's listserv. Respondents identified as having participated in HMFE or not during residency (defining them as HMFE participants or non-HMFE participants). RESULTS: From 257 respondents, 84 (33%) ECHs met inclusion criteria. Half (n = 42) were HMFE participants. ECHs ranked clinical hospitalist career preparation (86%) and mentorship from HM faculty (85%) as the most important gaps in standard residency training and career development that HMFE can bridge. Other key components of HMFE included exposure to quality improvement, patient safety, and high-value care (67%); provision of autonomy through independent rounding (54%); and preparation for the job application process (70%). CONCLUSIONS: Multispecialty ECHs describe HMFE as positively influencing their decision to pursue a hospitalist career and increasing their preparedness for practice. HMFE may be particularly well suited to foster advanced clinical skills such as independent rounding, critical thinking, and self-reflection. We propose an organizing framework for HMFE in residency that may assist in the implementation and innovation of HMFE programs nationwide and in the development of standardized HMFE competencies.

What internal medicine attendings talk about at morning report: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Morning report is a core educational activity in internal medicine resident education. Attending physicians regularly participate in morning report and influence the learning environment, though no previous study has described the contribution of attending physicians to this conference. This study aims to describe attending comments at internal medicine morning reports. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study of morning reports conducted at 13 internal medicine residency programs between September 1, 2020, and March 30, 2021. Each attending comment was described including its duration, whether the comment was teaching or non-teaching, teaching topic, and field of practice of the commenter. We also recorded morning report-related variables including number of learners, report format, program director participation, and whether report was scripted (facilitator has advance knowledge of the case). A regression model was developed to describe variables associated with the number of attending comments per report. RESULTS: There were 2,344 attending comments during 250 conferences. The median number of attendings present was 3 (IQR, 2-5). The number of comments per report ranged across different sites from 3.9 to 16.8 with a mean of 9.4 comments/report (SD, 7.4). 66% of comments were shorter than one minute in duration and 73% were categorized as teaching by observers. The most common subjects of teaching comments were differential diagnosis, management, and testing. Report duration, number of general internists, unscripted reports, and in-person format were associated with significantly increased number of attending comments. CONCLUSIONS: Attending comments in morning report were generally brief, focused on clinical teaching, and covered a wide range of topics. There were substantial differences between programs in terms of the number of comments and their duration which likely affects the local learning environment. Morning report stakeholders that are interested in increasing attending involvement in morning report should consider employing in-person and unscripted reports. Additional studies are needed to explore best practice models of attending participation in morning report.

A case of profound neutropenia and agranulocytosis associated with off-label use of ceftaroline.

PURPOSE: A case of profound neutropenia and agranulocytosis associated with the off-label use of ceftaroline is reported. SUMMARY: A 67-year-old Caucasian man arrived at the emergency room with right shoulder pain and weakness that radiated to his right chest, back, and right arm. A review of symptoms was notable for two days of burning with urination associated with decreased urinary output and decreased appetite. Multiple tests revealed the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) septic arthritis, which was treated with an off-label dosage of ceftaroline (600 mg intravenously every eight hours). At the start of ceftaroline therapy, the patient's baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was 6640 cells/µL and decreased to 816 cells/µL by day 19, eventually falling to 0 cells/µL on day 21 of therapy. Ceftaroline was then discontinued due to the suspicion that the neutropenia was secondary to maturation arrest of the bone marrow. The patient was switched to i.v. daptomycin to finish a six-week course of antibiotics. Interventional radiology placed a drain in the patient's right shoulder during the hospital stay, with symptom improvement. His white blood cell count continued to increase after ceftaroline discontinuation, reaching 6.5×10(3) cells/µL with a differential of 56.6% segmented neutrophils and 28.4% lymphocytes after nine days off of ceftaroline. CONCLUSION: A 67-year-old man developed profound neutropenia and agranulocytosis after three weeks of high-dose ceftaroline therapy for the treatment of MRSA septic arthritis. His neutropenia resolved after ceftaroline discontinuation and treatment with an alternative antibiotic.

Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone associated with aripiprazole.

PURPOSE: A probable case of aripiprazole-induced syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) is reported. SUMMARY: A 65-year-old Caucasian man arrived in the emergency department (ED) with dizziness, headache, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. There had been no recent additions or changes to the patient's medication regimen except for an increase in the daily dose of aripiprazole (from 10 to 20 mg) about two months prior. On admission, the patient's serum sodium concentration was 108 meq/L, prompting discontinuation of aripiprazole use and fluid restrictions. Over the next 72 hours, the serum sodium level increased to a near-normal concentration (127 meq/L), and the man was discharged back to a nursing facility. Three days later, the patient was readmitted to the ED with recurrent symptoms and a serum sodium concentration of 118 meq/L, a serum osmolality of 254 mOsm/kg, a urine osmolality of 575 mOsm/kg, and a urine sodium concentration of 101 meq/L. It was learned that aripiprazole use had been inappropriately resumed at the nursing facility. Aripiprazole was again discontinued, and fluid restrictions were imposed, with subsequent abatement of hyponatremia over four days. Application of the adverse drug reaction probability scale of Naranjo et al. in this case yielded a score of 7, indicating probable aripiprazole-associated SIADH. CONCLUSION: A 65-year-old man developed severe hyponatremia after an aripiprazole dosage increase. Hyponatremia resolved promptly with the discontinuation of aripiprazole. After discharge from the hospital, the patient inadvertently received aripiprazole again and was subsequently readmitted with another episode of severe hyponatremia.