The impact of microfluidics sperm processing on blastocyst euploidy rates compared with density gradient centrifugation: a sibling oocyte double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the euploidy rates among blastocysts created from sibling oocytes injected with sperm and processed using microfluidics or density gradient centrifugation. DESIGN: Sibling oocyte randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Single university-affiliated infertility practice. PATIENTS: A total of 106 patients aged 18-42 years undergoing fresh in vitro fertilization treatment cycles with preimplantation genetic testing between January 2021 and April 2022 contributed 1,442 mature oocytes, which were injected with sperm and processed using microfluidics or density gradient centrifugation. INTERVENTION(S): The sperm sample is divided and processed using a microfluidics device and density gradient centrifugation for injection into sibling oocytes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was the embryo euploidy rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization, high-quality blastulation, and ongoing pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): The blastocyst euploidy rate per mature oocyte was not significantly different in the study group compared with the control group (22.9% vs. 20.5%). The blastocyst euploidy rate per biopsied embryo was also similar between the 2 groups (53.0% vs. 45.7%). However, the fertilization rate per mature oocyte injected was found to be significantly higher in the study group compared with the control group (76.0% vs. 69.9%). The high-quality blastulation rate per mature oocyte injected was similar between the 2 groups, as was the total number of embryos frozen. There were no differences in the number of participants with no blastocysts for biopsy or the number of participants with no euploid embryos between the 2 groups. Among the male factor infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss subgroups, there were no differences in euploidy rates, fertilization rates, blastulation rates, or total numbers of blastocysts frozen, although the study was underpowered to detect these differences. Seventy-seven patients underwent frozen embryo transfer; there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION(S): Microfluidics processing did not improve embryo euploidy rates compared with density gradient centrifugation in this sibling oocyte study, although fertilization rates were significantly higher. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04744025.

Rationale and study design of a double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial comparing euploidy rates among embryos created from sibling oocytes injected with sperm processed by microfluidics or by density gradient centrifugation.

BACKGROUND: During the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process, sperm must be processed prior to insemination. While the most common method, density gradient centrifugation, can potentially damage sperm during centrifugation, a recent advancement in sperm processing uses a microfluidics system which selects for the most highly motile sperm. In selecting for these sperm which may be of higher quality, the euploidy rates of embryos created as a result may also be improved. The primary aim of this study is to compare the euploidy rates per mature oocyte between embryos created from sibling oocytes injected with sperm processed by microfluidics sorting or by density gradient centrifugation. METHODS: This is a double-blinded prospective randomized sibling oocyte study including patients undergoing treatment with IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). After controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, oocytes from each patient will be separated into two groups. Each group will be randomized to sperm processed using either microfluidics or density gradient centrifugation and embryos biopsied for PGT to assess euploidy rates. A sample size of 686 oocytes in each group for a total of 1372 oocytes will provide 80% power to detect a significant difference in the euploidy rates per mature oocyte between the two groups. An ancillary study examining the relationship between sperm processing method and sperm DNA fragmentation will be assessed. CONCLUSION: This study will offer insight into the sperm's contribution to embryo euploidy, and has the potential to provide an alternative method of improving euploidy rates in clinical practice.

Embryologic outcomes among patients using a microfluidics chip compared to density gradient centrifugation to process sperm: a paired analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate embryologic outcomes among paired IVF cycles in which a microfluidics chip was utilized compared to density gradient centrifugation for sperm processing. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 88 paired IVF cycles from patients aged 18-44 years at a university-affiliated IVF center. Fresh cycles from patients undergoing ICSI with sperm processed by a microfluidics chamber (microfluidics cycles) were compared to the same patients' previous ICSI cycles in which sperm was processed via density gradient centrifugation (control cycles). The primary outcome was the high-quality blastulation rate. RESULTS: High-quality blastulation rate per oocyte retrieved was significantly higher in the microfluidics group compared to the control group (21.1% versus 14.5%, p < 0.01) as was the blastulation rate per 2PN (42.7% versus 30.8%, p < 0.01). Fertilization rates were significantly higher in the microfluidics group. The euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved was significantly higher in the microfluidics group compared with the control group (8.5% versus 4.3%, p = 0.04), while the euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was comparable (32.6% versus 21.8%, p = 0.09). In patients with male factor infertility, the high-quality blastulation rate was similar between the control and microfluidics cycles. There was a significantly higher blastulation rate among microfluidics cycles in patients without a diagnosis of male factor infertility (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In this study, several embryologic outcomes, including fertilization rate, high-quality blastulation rate, and euploidy rate, were significantly higher in the microfluidics group compared to the control group. Microfluidics sperm processing may be a way to improve embryologic outcomes.