Effect of pre-transplantation use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker in kidney transplant recipients-propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARBs) can cause acute kidney injury under dehydratation or in hemodynamically unstable conditions. Regarding kidney transplantation (KT), the risk of using ACEi/ARBs before surgery is not well established. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical outcomes to determine the effect of preoperative use of ACEi/ARBs on KT. METHODS: We retrospectively collected 1187 patients who received living-donor KT between January 2017 and December 2021. We conducted a propensity score-matched analysis between the ACEi/ARB(+) and ACEi/ARB(-) groups and evaluated the effects of ACEi/ARBs on delayed graft function, post-KT renal function, hyperkalemia events, rejection, and graft survival. RESULTS: The ACEi/ARB(+) group showed a similar incidence of delayed graft function as the ACEi/ARB(-) group (1.8% vs. 1.0%, P = 0.362). The risk of delayed graft function was not upregulated in the ACEi/ARB(+) group after propensity score-matching (odds ratio: 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-2.00). Postoperative creatinine levels and the slope of creatinine levels after KT also were not significantly different between the two groups (creatinine slope from POD#0 to POD#7: - 0.73 ± 0.35 vs. - 0.75 ± 0.32 mg/dL/day, P = 0.464). Hyperkalemia did not occur more often in the ACEi/ARB(+) group than in the ACEi/ARB(-) group during perioperative days. Rejection-free survival (P = 0.920) and graft survival (P = 0.621) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In KT, the preoperative use of ACEi/ARBs did not significantly affect clinical outcomes including delayed graft function, postoperative renal function, hyperkalemia events, incidence of rejection, and graft survival rates compared to the patients who did not receive ACEi/ARBs.

Immunoprotective Effect of Liver Allograft on Patients with Combined Liver and Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) and kidney transplantation (KT) after liver transplantation (LT) provide potential treatment options for patients with end-stage liver and kidney disease. There is increasing attention being given to liver-kidney transplantation (LTKT), particularly regarding the immune-protective effects of the liver graft. This retrospective, single-center, observational study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of KT in LTKT patients - either SLKT or KT after LT (KALT) - compared to KT alone (KTA). MATERIAL AND METHODS We included patients who underwent KT between January 2005 and December 2020, comprising a total of 4312 patients divided into KTA (n=4268) and LTKT (n=44) groups. The LTKT group included 11 SLKT and 33 KALT patients. To balance the difference in sample sizes between the 2 groups, we performed 3: 1 propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS There was no significant difference in graft survival between the groups. However, the LTKT group exhibited significantly superior rejection-free survival compared to the KTA group (P.

Association of metformin with cardiovascular and graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with posttransplantation diabetes mellitus.

Background: Posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a crucial problem after kidney transplantation. We aimed to determine whether metformin affects cardiovascular and graft outcomes in patients with PTDM. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1,663 kidney transplant recipients without preexisting diabetes mellitus. The patients were divided into metformin and non-metformin groups, with matched propensity scores. We also estimated metformin's effect on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), acute rejection, and graft failure. Results: Of 634 recipients with PTDM, 406 recipients were treated with metformin. The incidence of PCI was 2.4% and 7.1% in the metformin and non-metformin groups, respectively (p = 0.04). The metformin group exhibited a lower risk of PCI in Cox regression analyses (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.77; p = 0.014), especially in subgroups with male sex, age over 49 years (median), long-term metformin use (mean of ≥1,729 days), and simultaneous tacrolimus administration. Long-term metformin use was also associated with lower incidence of MACEs (HR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.67; p = 0.02). Incidence of graft failure was 9.9% and 17.0% in the metformin and non-metformin groups, respectively (p = 0.046). Both long-term use and higher dose of metformin, as well as tacrolimus administration with metformin, were associated with a lower risk of graft failure (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.75; p = 0.01; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.85; p = 0.02; and HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.79; p = 0.009, respectively). Conclusion: Metformin use is associated with a decreased risk of developing coronary artery disease and better graft outcomes in PTDM.

Robot-assisted kidney transplantation in a morbidly obese patient with incisional hernia reconstruction and abdominoplasty: a case report.

Performing kidney transplantations in patients with morbid obesity presents unique challenges using the conventional retroperitoneal approach. Robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) offers several advantages, such as better access to hard-to-reach areas. A 56-year-old morbidly obese woman presented with end-stage renal disease due to diabetic nephropathy. The patient had a history of obesity for over 20 years, with a peak body mass index (BMI) of 46.9 kg/m2. Before transplantation, she successfully reduced her BMI to 28.9 kg/m2, but was left with excessive skin folds. The surgery began with the removal of the sac from the incisional hernia and umbilical hernia, which was then used as the site for the GelPOINT port. The da Vinci X robot system was utilized to perform RAKT. After completing RAKT, the plastic surgery team initiated abdominal reconstruction involving panniculectomy, followed by hernial reconstruction and abdominoplasty. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and she was discharged on postoperative day 7. Her creatinine level was 0.69 mg/dL, and she did not experience any episodes of rejection during the 16 months following RAKT. This case report describes the successful combination of RAKT with incisional hernia reconstruction and abdominoplasty in a patient with morbid obesity.

Evaluating anti-thymocyte globulin induction doses for better allograft and patient survival in Asian kidney transplant recipients.

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is currently the most widely prescribed induction regimen for preventing acute rejection after solid organ transplantation. However, the optimal dose of ATG induction regimen in Asian kidney recipients is unclear. Using the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry, we performed a retrospective cohort study of 4579 adult patients who received renal transplantation in South Korea and divided them into three groups according to the induction regimen: basiliximab group (n = 3655), low-dose ATG group (≤ 4.5 mg/kg; n = 467), and high-dose ATG group (> 4.5 mg/kg; n = 457). We applied the Toolkit for Weighting and Analysis of Nonequivalent Groups (TWANG) package to generate high-quality propensity score weights for intergroup comparisons. During four-year follow-ups, the high-dose ATG group had the highest biopsy-proven acute rejection rate (basiliximab 20.8% vs. low-dose ATG 22.4% vs. high-dose ATG 25.6%; P < 0.001). However, the rates of overall graft failure (4.0% vs. 5.0% vs. 2.6%; P < 0.001) and mortality (1.7% vs. 2.8% vs. 1.0%; P < 0.001) were the lowest in the high-dose ATG group. Our results show that high-dose ATG induction (> 4.5 mg/kg) was superior to basiliximab and low-dose ATG induction in terms of graft and patient survival in Asian patients undergoing kidney transplant.

Transplant-associated Kaposi's sarcoma in a kidney allograft: a case report.

Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is a disease that is not widely known among the general public, but has a high prevalence among organ transplant recipients. Here, we present a rare case of intragraft KS after kidney transplantation. A 53-year-old woman who had been on hemodialysis due to diabetic nephropathy underwent deceased-donor kidney transplantation on December 7, 2021. Approximately 10 weeks after kidney transplantation, her creatinine level increased to 2.99 mg/dL. Upon examination, ureter kinking was confirmed between the ureter orifices and the transplanted kidney. As a result, percutaneous nephrostomy was performed, and a ureteral stent was inserted. During the procedure, bleeding occurred due to a renal artery branch injury, and embolization was performed immediately. Subsequently, kidney necrosis and uncontrolled fever developed, leading to graftectomy. Surgical findings revealed that the kidney parenchyma was necrotic as a whole, and lymphoproliferative lesions had formed diffusely around the iliac artery. These lesions were removed during graftectomy, and a histological examination was performed. The kidney graft and lymphoproliferative lesions were diagnosed as KS based on a histological examination. We report a rare case in which a recipient developed KS in the kidney allograft as well as in adjacent lymph nodes.

Different antibody responses between liver and kidney transplant recipients elicited by third doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

Background: Solid organ transplant recipients exhibit decreased antibody responses, mainly due to their weakened immune systems. However, data are limited on antibody responses after the primary series of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines among recipients of various solid organ transplant types. Thus, we compared the antibody responses after three COVID-19 vaccine doses between liver transplant (LT) and kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Methods: We prospectively enrolled solid organ transplant recipients who received three COVID-19 vaccine doses from June 2021 to February 2022 and measured S1-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: Seventy-six LT and 17 KT recipients were included in the final analysis. KT recipients showed consistently lower antibody responses even after the third vaccine dose (86.2% vs. 52.9%, P=0.008) and lower antibody titers (median, 423.0 IU/mL [interquartile range, 99.6-2,057 IU/mL] vs. 19.7 IU/mL [interquartile range, 6.9-339.4 IU/mL]; P=0.006) than were observed in LT recipients. Mycophenolic acid was a significant risk factor for a seropositive antibody response after the third vaccine dose in the multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 0.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.39; P=0.02). Conclusions: We found a weaker antibody response despite the completion of the primary series of COVID-19 vaccines in KT recipients than in LT recipients. Mycophenolic acid use in KT recipients might be the main contributor to this observation.

A prospective, randomized, non-blinded, non-inferiority pilot study to assess the effect of low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin with low-dose tacrolimus and early steroid withdrawal on clinical outcomes in non-sensitized living-donor kidney recipients.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) as an induction regimen in Asian living-donor kidney recipients is unclear. METHODS: This is a pilot study in which 36 consecutive patients undergoing living-donor kidney transplantation were randomly assigned to receive either 4.5 mg/kg (n = 19) or 6.0 mg/kg (n = 17) of ATG; all patients had corticosteroid withdrawal within 7 days. The primary end point was a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, de novo donor-specific antibody formation, and graft failure. RESULTS: At 12 months post-transplant, biopsy-proven acute rejection was more common in the ATG4.5 group (21.1%) than in the ATG6.0 group (0%)(P = .048). Importantly, the rate of the composite end point was significantly higher in the ATG4.5 group (36.8% vs 0%)(P = .006). There were significant differences in neither the renal function nor adverse events between the two groups. One case of death-censored graft failure occurred in the ATG4.5 group and no mortality was observed overall. Compared with pre-transplantation, T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and natural killer T (NKT) cells were significantly decreased in the first week post-transplantation except for B cells. Although T and NKT cells in both groups and NK cells in the ATG4.5 group had recovered to the pre-transplant levels, NK cells in the ATG6.0 group remained suppressed until six months post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ATG 6.0 mg/kg, ATG 4.5 mg/kg with early corticosteroid withdrawal and low dose maintenance regimen was associated with higher rates of acute rejection in non-sensitized Asian living-donor kidney recipients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02447822.

Metformin Use and Long-term Clinical Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Metformin has been recommended for some patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. However, the value of metformin in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with pretransplant diabetes mellitus (DM) or posttransplant DM is uncertain. We investigated the clinical effects of metformin in KTRs. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,995 KTRs with diabetes from 6 tertiary referral centers in the Republic of Korea. EXPOSURE: Metformin usage was defined as the use of metformin for>90 days after kidney transplantation; 1,193 KTRs were metformin users, and 802 KTRs did not use metformin. Changing usage of metformin among those exposed for >90 days was also characterized. OUTCOME: Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and death-censored graft failure (DCGF). Secondary outcomes were biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and lactic acidosis events. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Survival analyses were conducted using multivariable Cox regression and competing risk analyses using Fine and Gray models. Changes in metformin use over time were modeled using a time-varying covariate. Metformin usage, mean daily dose, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) changes were considered in the landmark analysis to address time-varying confounding. RESULTS: Metformin use was associated with a lower risk of DCGF (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.47 [95% CI, 0.23-0.96], P=0.038); there was no significant association with all-cause mortality (AHR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.32-2.76], P=0.915) or BPAR (AHR 0.98 [95% CI, 0.62-1.54], P=0.942). In the subgroup analysis, metformin usage was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality and a lower risk of DCGF for both pretransplantation DM and posttransplant DM groups. Metformin usage was associated with a lower risk of BPAR in the posttransplant DM group, although it was less effective in the pretransplantation DM group. There was no confirmed case of metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) in the present cohort. A higher dose of metformin was correlated with lower risks of DCGF and BPAR. LIMITATIONS: Data on newer antidiabetic drugs such as SGLT2 inhibitors are limited, and there is potential limited generalizability to other populations. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin usage may benefit KTRs, as evidenced by its association with a reduced risk of DCGF and the absence of MALA events. Randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these observational findings.

Post-operative recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis according to pre-transplant treatment after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) after kidney transplantation (KT) is a serious complication and a significant risk factor for graft failure. However, there is no clear evidence of the effectiveness of pre-transplant treatment using plasmapheresis (PP) or rituximab in preventing post-operative FSGS recurrence after KT. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 99 adult patients with biopsy-proven primary FSGS who underwent KT between 2007 and 2018. The patients were divided into the pre-treatment group (N = 53, 53.5%) and no pre-treatment group (N = 46, 46.5%). In the pre-transplant group, prophylactic PP was administered before KT in patients undergoing living donor transplantation and the day after KT in those undergoing deceased donor transplantation. RESULTS: The rate of immediate post-operative recurrence was significantly higher in the no pre-treatment group (16 [34.8%]) than in the pre-treatment group (5 [9.4%]; P = 0.002). There were three cases of graft failure due to recurrent FSGS, all of which were in the no pre-treatment group. After adjusting for possible confounding factors, age (per 10-year increase; OR = 0.61, CI, 0.42-0.90; P = 0.012) and pre-transplant treatment (vs. no pre-transplant treatment; OR = 0.17, CI, 0.05-0.54; P = 0.003) were identified as significant factors associated with FSGS recurrence. The rate of death-censored graft survival was significantly superior in the pretransplant treatment group (P = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Pre-transplant treatment with PP was associated with beneficial effects on preventing FSGS recurrence after KT.

Risk factors for Pneumocystis pneumonia with acute respiratory failure among kidney transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: One of the rare life-threatening fungal infections is pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP). Immunocompromised patients are the main vulnerable population. We investigate the risk factors associated with the development of severe PCP infection with acute respiratory failure after kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center, case-control study. PCP patients who are kidney transplant recipients and required high-flow oxygen support or mechanical ventilation between March 2009 and February 2017 were included in the study. The comparison was conducted between the non-severe and severe PCP groups. To identify associated risk factors, we performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the total 2,330 kidney transplant recipients, 50 patients (2.1%) were diagnosed with PCP. Of these, 27 patients (54.0%) had severe PCP and 7 patients (14.0%) died, all of them were severe PCP patients. In the severe PCP group, the time from transplantation to PCP diagnosis (23.4 ± 24.9 months vs. 13.7 ± 9.9 months, p = 0.090) was insignificantly faster than in the non-severe PCP group. According to multiple logistic regression analysis, the significant risk factors associated with severe PCP were as follows, age (odds ratios (OR) 1.07; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.01-1.13; p = 0.027), time from transplantation to PCP diagnosis (odds ratios (OR) 0.92; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.86-0.99; p = 0.024), lymphopenia (OR 6.48; 95% CI: 1.05-40.09; p = 0.044), and history of acute rejection within 1 year (OR 8.28; 95% CI: 1.29-53.20; p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Patients who have lymphopenia at the time of hospital admission or have been recently treated with acute rejection are more likely to progress to severe PCP, requiring intensive monitoring and aggressive treatment.

Comparison of long-term outcomes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant versus simultaneous deceased donor pancreas and living donor kidney transplant.

Simultaneous deceased donor pancreas and living donor kidney transplant (SPLK) has certain advantages over conventional simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) and may be beneficial for overcoming the paucity of organs needed for diabetic patients requiring transplant. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent either SPK (n = 149) or SPLK (n = 46) in terms of pre- and post-transplantation variables, development of de novo DSA, occurrence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), and graft survival rates. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the SPK and SPLK groups except for the shorter cold ischemic time of kidney grafts, shorter duration of diabetes, older age of pancreas graft-donors, and younger age of kidney graft-donors in the SPLK group. Our results showed that the death-censored pancreas graft survival rate was lower in the SPLK group. In addition, the incidence of BPAR of the pancreas graft was higher in the SPLK group. There was no significant difference in the presence of de novo DSA and the rates of kidney graft failure, kidney BPAR, and mortality. Our results show that SPLK can be considered an alternative option for SPK although higher incidences of BPAR and graft failure of pancreas after SPLK need to be overcome.

Urinary Exosomal Cystatin C and Lipopolysaccharide Binding Protein as Biomarkers for Antibody-Mediated Rejection after Kidney Transplantation.

We aimed to discover and validate urinary exosomal proteins as biomarkers for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) after kidney transplantation. Urine and for-cause biopsy samples from kidney transplant recipients were collected and categorized into the discovery cohort (n = 36) and a validation cohort (n = 65). Exosomes were isolated by stepwise ultra-centrifugation for proteomic analysis to discover biomarker candidates for ABMR (n = 12). Of 1820 exosomal proteins in the discovery cohort, four proteins were specifically associated with ABMR: cystatin C (CST3), serum paraoxonase/arylesterase 1, retinol-binding protein 4, and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP). In the validation cohort, the level of urinary exosomal LBP was significantly higher in the ABMR group (n = 25) compared with the T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) group and the no major abnormality (NOMOA) group. Urinary exosomal CST3 level was significantly higher in the ABMR group compared with the control and NOMOA groups. Immunohistochemical staining showed that LBP and CST3 in the glomerulus were more abundant in the ABMR group compared with other groups. The combined prediction probability of urinary exosomal LBP and CST3 was significantly correlated with summed LBP and CST3 intensity scores in the glomerulus and peritubular capillary as well as Banff g + ptc scores. Urinary exosomal CST3 and LBP could be potent biomarkers for ABMR after kidney transplantation.

The Efficacy and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitor in Diabetic Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have not been investigated in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with diabetes. We evaluated the impact of SGLT2i in a multicenter cohort of diabetic KTRs. METHODS: A total of 2083 KTRs with diabetes were enrolled from 6 transplant centers in Korea. Among them, 226 (10.8%) patients were prescribed SGLT2i for >90 d. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, death-censored graft failure (DCGF), and serum creatinine doubling. An acute dip in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over 10% was surveyed after SGLT2i use. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up of 62.9 ± 42.2 mo, the SGLT2i group had a lower risk of primary composite outcome than the control group in the multivariate and propensity score-matched models (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.78; P = 0.006 and adjusted hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.85; P = 0.013, respectively). Multivariate analyses consistently showed a decreased risk of DCGF and serum creatinine doubling in the SGLT2i group. The overall eGFR remained stable without the initial dip after SGLT2i use. A minority (15.6%) of the SGLT2i users showed acute eGFR dip during the first month, but the eGFR recovered thereafter. The risk factors for the eGFR dip were time from transplantation to SGLT2i usage and mean tacrolimus trough level. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2i improved a composite of all-cause mortality, DCGF, or serum creatinine doubling in KTRs. SGLT2i can be used safely and have beneficial effects on preserving graft function in diabetic KTRs.

Prognostic Value of Pre- and Post-Serum Alkaline Phosphatase Among Renal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that high levels of serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) are associated with all-cause and cardiovascular death among patients undergoing hemodialysis. However, there is limited knowledge on the effect of ALP level in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The aim of this study was to evaluate if serum ALP levels before and after transplant and the changes in ALP levels are associated with graft failure and mortality. METHODS: Between January 1997 and December 2012, 3029 KTRs were enrolled in a multicenter cohort. We examined the association of pre- and posttransplant serum ALP levels and long-term outcomes in KTRs. RESULTS: Pretransplant serum ALP level >80 IU/L was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) for graft failure of 1.571 in a fully adjusted model. The graft failure rate gradually increased with ALP level increments of 20 IU/L in KTRs with ALP levels >60 IU/L. An increase in serum ALP level by 40 IU/L during the first 3 months after kidney transplant was associated with higher rates of graft failure (HR, 2.353) and higher rates of mortality (HR, 2.733). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated pre-and posttransplant serum ALP levels and increases in the serum ALP levels after kidney transplant increase the risk of graft failure and mortality among KTRs.

Parathyroidectomy versus cinacalcet in the treatment of tertiary hyperparathyroidism after kidney transplantation: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperparathyroidism is common in patients with chronic kidney disease with reduced renal function and has been observed after kidney transplantation. The optimal treatment for cases in which hyperparathyroidism persists after kidney transplantation has not been determined. METHODS: This retrospective study included 83 patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism who underwent kidney transplantation between 2000 and 2018 at a single tertiary center in Korea. Sixty-four patients underwent parathyroidectomy and 19 patients were treated with cinacalcet following renal transplantation. Biochemical parameters and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Serum calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels improved in both the parathyroidectomy and cinacalcet groups. One year after treatment, parathyroidectomy resulted in a lower mean serum calcium level than cinacalcet (9.7 ± 0.7 mg/dL vs. 10.5 ± 0.7 mg/dL, p = 0.001). Regarding serum PTH, the parathyroidectomy group showed a significantly lower PTH level than the cinacalcet group at 6 months (129.1 ± 80.3 pg/mL vs. 219.2 ± 92.5 pg/mL, p = 0.002) and 1 year (118.8 ± 75.5 pg/mL vs. 250.6 ± 94.5 pg/ mL, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of kidney transplant rejection, graft failure, cardiovascular events, fracture risk, or bone mineral density changes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Parathyroidectomy appears to reduce PTH and calcium levels effectively in tertiary hyperparathyroidism. However, creatinine level and allograft rejection should be monitored closely.

Outcome of ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation According to ABO Type of Transfused Plasma: Comparative Analysis Between "Universal" AB and Donor-Type Plasma.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical outcomes of recipients of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation (KT) according to the blood group of the plasma transfused. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 60 recipients of ABOi-KT with blood type O and A or B donors. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between 2 groups of recipients: 1 group received AB plasma regardless of the donor's blood type (n = 30), and the other group received donor-type plasma (n = 30). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics. Transfusion of donor-type plasma was noninferior to transfusion of type AB plasma in terms of both rejection-free survival and rejection rate (P = .455, P = .335). CONCLUSION: There was no significant prognostic difference between the 2 groups. In terms of blood supply and inventory management, we suggest that the blood group of the plasma should match the donor's type.

Hepatocellular carcinoma and cancer-related mortality after kidney transplantation with rituximab treatment.

PURPOSE: There are increased therapeutic usages of rituximab in kidney transplantation (KT). However, few studies have evaluated the effect of rituximab on cancer development following KT. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of rituximab on the cancer occurrence and mortality rate according to each type of cancer. METHODS: Five thousand consecutive recipients who underwent KT at our center were divided into era1 (1990-2007) and era2-rit- (2008-2018), and era2-rit+ (2008-2018) groups. The era2-rit+ group included patients who received single-dose rituximab (200-500 mg) as a desensitization treatment 1-2 weeks before KT. RESULTS: The 5-year incidence rates of malignant tumors after KT were 3.1%, 4.3%, and 3.5% in the era1, era2-rit-, and era2-rit+ group, respectively. The overall incidence rate of cancer after transplantation among the 3 study groups showed no significant difference (P = 0.340). The overall cancer-related mortality rate was 17.1% (53 of 310). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) had the highest mortality rate (61.5%) and relative risk of cancer-related death (hazard ratio, 8.29; 95% confidence interval, 2.40-28.69; P = 0.001). However, we found no significant association between rituximab and the incidence of any malignancy. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that single-dose rituximab for desensitization may not increase the risk of malignant disease or cancer-related mortality in KT recipients. HCC was associated with the highest risk of cancer-related mortality in an endemic area of HBV infection.

Hyperacute rejection in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation: Significance of isoagglutinin subclass.

INTRODUCTION: ABO-incompatible transplantation has expanded the limited donor pool for kidney transplantation. Despite the successful desensitization protocols and immunosuppression, undesirable cases of hyperacute rejection occurs. OBJECTIVE: Flow cytometry was used to measure isoagglutinin titer and its IgG subclasses in assessment of the cause of hyperacute rejection in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The recipient was admitted for kidney transplantation due to end-stage renal disease. Pre-transplantation work-up for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation included blood group typing, HLA DNA typing and HLA antibody analyses. HLA crossmatch analysis was conducted using donor lymphocytes and anti-HLA antibody assay using Luminex panel reactive antibody test (One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA). Desensitization protocol was composed of therapeutic plasma exchange sessions and rituximab. RESULTS: Despite negative HLA crossmatch results, a case of hyperacute rejection occurred after living donor kidney transplantation. Rejection resulted in immediate removal of graft, and the patient later received a second kidney transplantation. Retrospective evaluation of isoagglutinin titer and its subclasses using flow cytometry identified the cause of rejection to increased IgG1 subclass. Desensitization protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation now implements further caution for blood group O recipients. DISCUSSION: Hyperacute rejection resulting from increased IgG1 isoagglutinin subclass has not been previously confirmed using flow cytometry. Unfortunate outcome of this rejection case provides insight to how we should approach and ensure successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

Beneficial effects of posttransplant dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor administration after pancreas transplantation to improve ß cell function.

PURPOSE: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors lower blood glucose levels and enhance the function of pancreatic ß cells. Yet, it is unknown whether posttransplant administration of DPP4 inhibitors is beneficial for pancreas transplant recipients. METHODS: We thus retrospectively analyzed the records of 312 patients who underwent pancreas transplantation between 2000 and 2018 at Asan Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) and compared the metabolic and survival outcomes according to DPP-4 inhibitor treatment. RESULTS: The patients were divided into the no DPP-4 inhibitor group (n = 165; no treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors or treated for <1 month) and the DPP-4 inhibitor group (n = 147; treated with DPP-4 inhibitors for ≥1 month). There were no significant differences in levels of glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and insulin between the 2 groups during 36 months of follow-up. However, the level of C-peptide was significantly higher in the DPP-4 inhibitor group at 1, 6, and 24 months posttransplant (all P < 0.05). Moreover, the DPP-4 inhibitor group had significantly higher rates of overall (log-rank test, P = 0.009) and death-censored (log-rank test, P = 0.036) graft survival during a 15-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Posttransplant DPP-4 inhibitor administration may help improve the clinical outcomes including ß cell function after pancreas transplantation.