Quality of Tissue Samples Obtained by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Liver biopsy (LB) remains essential for the diagnosis and staging of parenchymal liver diseases. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided LB (EUS-LB) has emerged as an attractive alternative to percutaneous and transjugular routes. We aimed at comparing the adequacy of samples obtained by EUS-LB with percutaneous LB. METHODS: A single-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial was designed. Patients undergoing LB were randomly assigned to EUS-LB or percutaneous LB groups. EUS-LB was performed with a 19-gauge Franseen core needle through a transduodenal and transgastric route. Percutaneous LB was performed with a 16-gauge Tru-Cut needle. The main outcome was the percentage of adequate samples obtained. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of accurate histologic diagnosis, number of complete portal tracts (CPT), total and longest specimen length (TSL and LSL), sample fragmentation, adverse events, and patients' satisfaction. An adequate specimen was defined as TSL ≥20 mm and including ≥11 CPT. RESULTS: Ninety patients were randomized (44 to EUS-LB and 46 to percutaneous LB) and included in the analysis. The percentage of adequate tissue samples was 32.6% and 70.4% for percutaneous LB and EUS-LB, respectively ( P < 0.001). A final histologic diagnosis was provided in all cases but one. TSL was longer after EUS-LB (23.5 vs 17.5 mm, P = 0.01), whereas the number of CPT was similar in both groups. Sample fragmentation occurred more often after EUS-LB ( P < 0.001). No differences in adverse events were found. Satisfaction reported with both procedures was high. DISCUSSION: EUS-LB is safe and accurate and may be considered an alternative to percutaneous LB for the evaluation of parenchymal liver diseases.

Jaundice in relation to immune activation during Epstein-Barr virus-induced infectious mononucleosis.

BACKGROUND: Liver involvement during infectious mononucleosis is common, but jaundice is considered rare. This study aimed to investigate serum bilirubin concentrations in patients with infectious mononucleosis and immune abnormalities associated with jaundice. METHODS: We report on an adult patient with monoclonal B lymphocytosis and IgM-lambda gammopathy who developed a severe icteric hepatitis during infectious mononucleosis. We then reviewed the clinical records of 389 patients admitted to the hospital with infectious mononucleosis between 1995 and 2018 (51.7% male patients; median age, 19 years; range, 15-87 years) with focus on liver abnormalities and associated factors. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (15.1%) had serum bilirubin concentrations between 1.5 and 3 mg/dL, and 47 patients (12.0%) had serum bilirubin >3 mg/dL. Patients with increased bilirubin concentrations had a distinct clinical presentation, with more frequent abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, and less frequent sore throat than patients with normal bilirubin. Age and sex were not significantly different for the patients with increased and normal serum bilirubin concentrations. The patients with increased serum bilirubin concentrations showed higher levels of immune activation markers than the patients with normal bilirubin, including blood lymphocyte counts, serum IgM, and ß2-microglobulin concentrations. Heterophile antibody-positive patients (88.6%) showed similar bilirubin concentrations but higher aspartate aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase levels than their heterophile-negative counterparts. Serum bilirubin elevations normalized quickly during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Transient hyperbilirubinemia is common during severe (in-hospital) infectious mononucleosis in adult patients. Patients with hyperbilirubinemia have less frequent pharyngitis symptoms and more frequent abdominal symptoms. Hyperbilirubinemia during infectious mononucleosis is associated with immune activation markers.

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in the evaluation of lymph nodes enlargement in the absence of on-site pathologist.

AIM: To evaluate factors that influence the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition for lymph node enlargement in the absence of an on-site pathologist. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent EUS-guided tissue acquisition for the pathological diagnosis of lymph node enlargement between April 2012 and June 2015 is reported. Tissue acquisition was performed with both cytology and biopsy needles of different calibers. The variables evaluated were lymph node location and size, number of passes and type of needle used. Final diagnosis was based on surgical histopathology or, in non-operated cases, on EUS-guided tissue acquisition and imaging assessment with a minimum clinical follow-up of 6 mo. RESULTS: During the study period, 168 lymph nodes with a median size of 20.3 mm (range 12.5-27) were sampled from 152 patients. Ninety lymph nodes (53.6%) were located at mediastinum, and 105 (62.5%) were acquired with biopsy needles. The final diagnosis was benign/reactive origin in 87 cases (51.8%), malignant in 65 cases (38.7%), and lymphoma in 16 cases (9.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the detection of malignancy were 74.1%, 100%, 100% and 80.6%, respectively. The overall accuracy was 87.5% (95%CI: 81.7-91.7). No variables were independently associated with a correct final diagnosis according to the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided tissue acquisition is a highly accurate technique for assessing lymph node enlargement. None of the variables evaluated were associated with diagnostic accuracy.