[Efficacy of fecal detection of Helicobacter pylori with the HpSA technique in patients with upper digestive hemorrhage]. / Eficacia de la determinación fecal de Helicobacter pylori mediante la técnica HpSA en enfermos con hemorragia digestiva alta.

BACKGROUND: The rapid urease test is the most commonly used test in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. However, some studies have suggested that results of this test are frequently false negative when blood is present. An effective new enzyme immunoassay for determining H. pylori antigens in stools has recently begun to be used. AIM: To determine the efficacy of the H. pylori stool antigen test (HpSAT) in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage were prospectively studied from November 1998 to April 1999. In all patients the following tests were performed in the first 72 hours after onset of bleeding and 24 hours after hospital admission: upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, biopsy samples for the rapid urease test and histological study, blood samples for serology, stool samples for HpSAT, and the 13C urea breath test. Criteria for infection was a positive result in at least two of the four diagnostic techniques, except in the case of HpSAT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 32 patients, 23 (71.8%) were infected. The results of four HpSAT (12.5%) were negative and 28 were positive (87.5%). HpSAT showed high sensitivity (95.6%) but low specificity (33.3%). The PPV and NPV were 78.5% and 75% respectively. Of the 32 HpSAT, 25 (78.1) were performed in melenic stools: 22 were positive and 3 were negative. Seventy-five percent of negative HpSAT and 78.5% of positive HpSAT corresponded to melenic stools. CONCLUSIONS: HpSAT is a rapid, non-invasive technique that does not appear to be influenced by the presence of blood. Consequently, it can be applied in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. The rapid urease test showed high sensitivity, specificity and PPV and should remain the first-line test in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. HpSAT is appropriate as a second-line technique and is useful when the rapid urease test is negative and infection is strongly suspected, when no samples for the rapid urease test have been taken and when endoscopy cannot be performed. The result obtained in the present study should be confirmed in future studies with larger samples.

[Evaluation of the efficacy of the endoscopic treatment in volvulus of the colon]. / Evaluación de la eficacia del tratamiento endoscópico en el vólvulo de colon.

Volvulus of the colon mainly affects the elderly and early surgery, with high morbidity and mortality, is often required. The efficacy of endoscopic devolvulization as an alternative is evaluated herein. From January 1993 to April 1999, 25 patients diagnosed with volvulus of the colon were retrospectively reviewed. Endoscopic devolvulization was not performed in one patient who showed signs of necrosis but was carried out in the remaining 24. The mean follow-up was 35.3 months. In all patients the procedure was initially effective. After the first attempt, 9 of the 24 patients (37%) relapsed, 4 out of 7 (57%) after a second attempt and 2 out of 2 (100%) after a third attempt. No morbidity or mortality was associated with the endoscopy. Six patients underwent surgery. Of these, none relapsed but two presented complications associated with the surgery. Mean hospital stay of the patients undergoing surgery was 30.8 days and that of those undergoing endoscopic devolvulization was 9.1 days. We conclude that endoscopic devolvulizatio is an effective therapeutic option when the mucosa is viable, with a high percentage of initial success, few complications inherent to the technique and with the possibility of carrying out a maximum of two attempts in cases of relapse. In the majority of patients, this technique is a valid alternative to urgent surgery, which has higher morbidity and mortality and longer mean hospital stay.

[Study of 13 cases of anisakiasis in the province of Cordoba]. / Estudio de 13 casos de anisakiasis en la provincia de Córdoba.

Anisakiasis, or anisakidosis, is a parasitic zoonosis due to the infestation by nematodes of the Anisakidae family, mainly by Anisakis simplex. Notwithstanding its world wide distribution, in our country its appearance is quite recent (1991) with only 19 cases previously reported. We refer 13 cases diagnosed in different hospitals in the province of Córdoba, Spain, from September 1994 to July 1998 which represents the biggest series described in Spain so far. All the patients had a clinical onset as acute abdomen, so that they required early surgery in which a narrowing and inflammatory intestinal segment was observed and subsequently resected. Pathology revealed in such segments an intense eosinophilic infiltrate in the mucosa. Only in one of the cases parasitic fragments were detected in the intestinal mucosa and in the 12 remaining cases the diagnosis was immunological by IgE specific for Anisakis simplex determination and antigens detection of the nematode with monoclonal antibodies. As interesting epidemiologic antecedent we shall mention the fact that all patients referred a usual raw fish consumption (mainly anchovy with vinegar) which is host of third-stage larval of the parasite.

[Resident physician training in the digestive system. The point of view of the residents]. / Formación MIR en aparato digestivo. El punto de vista de los residentes.

AIM: To evaluate various aspects of current training of Spanish residents in gastroenterology. METHOD: An anonymous postal questionnaire was sent to fourth-year resident physicians in Spanish hospitals with accredited gastroenterology residency programs. RESULTS: Forty residents in the fourth year (53% offered positions), four from the second year and one from the first year (20 men, 25 women) answered the survey. Mean age was 29.7 years (26-42 years). Fifty-one percent of the departments did not have ultrasonography facilities apart from those in the radiology department. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was available in all the departments but in 55% of these, residents did not receive training in this technique. Forty-one percent of residents did not know the objectives of the various training periods. Eighty-four percent evaluated the pressure of clinical work as "intense" or "very intense" with 67% reporting that it disturbed their training "seriously" or "very seriously" and 71% that it disturbed their personal lives. Supervision in ultrasonography, endoscopy and clinical work were mainly evaluated as "good" or "very good". Supervision was rated lower in outpatient departments and while on duty. Forty-two percent of residents rated the supervision of the personal tutor as "average". Seventy-six percent were "fairly" or "very interested" in the introduction of "areas of specific training". CONCLUSIONS: The quality of residents' training in general and of gastroenterology training in particular is high. There are, however, several aspects which could be improved.