ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated Ricinus communis and sodium hypochlorite solutions in terms of biofilm removal ability, remission of candidiasis, antimicrobial activity, and participant satisfaction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It was conducted a controlled clinical trial, randomized, double-blind, and crossover. Sixty-four denture wearers with (n=24) and without candidiasis (n=40) were instructed to brush (3 times/day) and immerse their dentures (20 min/day) in different storage solutions (S1 / S2: 0.25% / 0.5% sodium hypochlorite; S3: 10% R. communis; S4: Saline).The trial period for each solution was seven days and a washout period of seven days was used before starting the use of another solution. The variables were analyzed at baseline and after each trial period. The biofilm of inner surfaces of maxillary dentures was disclosed, photographed, and total and dyed areas were measured (Image Tool software). The percentage of biofilm was calculated. Remission of candidiasis was assessed by visual scale and score were attributed. Antimicrobial activity was assessed by the DNA-Checkerboard hybridization method. Patient satisfaction was measured using a questionnaire. RESULTS: S1 (4.41±7.98%) and S2 (2.93±5.23%) were more effective then S3 (6.95±10.93%) in biofilm remotion(P<0.0001). All solutions were different from the control (11.07±11.99%). S3 was the most effective solution in remission of candidiasis (50%), followed by S1 (46%). Concerning antimicrobial action, S1/S2 were similar and resulted in the lowest microorganism mean count (P=0.04), followed by S3. No significant differences were found with patient's satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: 10% R. communis and 0.25% sodium hypochlorite were effective in biofilm removal, causing remission of candidiasis and reducing the formation of microbial colonies in denture surfaces. All solutions were approved by patients.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local , Biofilms/drug effects , Candidiasis, Oral/drug therapy , Denture Cleansers , Denture, Complete, Upper/microbiology , Ricinus/chemistry , Sodium Hypochlorite , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Colony Count, Microbial , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Patient Satisfaction , Reproducibility of Results , Surface Properties , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Abstract The development of opportunistic infections due to poor denture hygiene conditions justified the search for effective hygiene protocols for controlling denture biofilm. Objective This study evaluated Ricinus communis and sodium hypochlorite solutions in terms of biofilm removal ability, remission of candidiasis, antimicrobial activity, and participant satisfaction. Material and Methods It was conducted a controlled clinical trial, randomized, double-blind, and crossover. Sixty-four denture wearers with (n=24) and without candidiasis (n=40) were instructed to brush (3 times/day) and immerse their dentures (20 min/day) in different storage solutions (S1 / S2: 0.25% / 0.5% sodium hypochlorite; S3: 10% R. communis; S4: Saline).The trial period for each solution was seven days and a washout period of seven days was used before starting the use of another solution. The variables were analyzed at baseline and after each trial period. The biofilm of inner surfaces of maxillary dentures was disclosed, photographed, and total and dyed areas were measured (Image Tool software). The percentage of biofilm was calculated. Remission of candidiasis was assessed by visual scale and score were attributed. Antimicrobial activity was assessed by the DNA-Checkerboard hybridization method. Patient satisfaction was measured using a questionnaire. Results S1 (4.41±7.98%) and S2 (2.93±5.23%) were more effective then S3 (6.95±10.93%) in biofilm remotion(P<0.0001). All solutions were different from the control (11.07±11.99%). S3 was the most effective solution in remission of candidiasis (50%), followed by S1 (46%). Concerning antimicrobial action, S1/S2 were similar and resulted in the lowest microorganism mean count (P=0.04), followed by S3. No significant differences were found with patient's satisfaction. Conclusions 10% R. communis and 0.25% sodium hypochlorite were effective in biofilm removal, causing remission of candidiasis and reducing the formation of microbial colonies in denture surfaces. All solutions were approved by patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Ricinus/chemistry , Sodium Hypochlorite , Candidiasis, Oral/drug therapy , Biofilms/drug effects , Denture Cleansers , Denture, Complete, Upper/microbiology , Anti-Infective Agents, Local , Surface Properties , Time Factors , Colony Count, Microbial , Logistic Models , Double-Blind Method , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Treatment Outcome , Patient SatisfactionABSTRACT
ABSTRACT To preserve oral health and to maintain the prosthetic devices, it is important not only to improve the properties of commonly known hygiene products, but also to investigate new materials with antimicrobial action. Objectives This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite (0.25% and 0.50%) and 10% Ricinus communis’ solutions against specific microorganisms. Material and Methods Sixty four maxillary complete denture wearers were instructed to brush their dentures three times a day and to soak them (20 min/day) in the solutions: SH1: 0.25% sodium hypochlorite; SH2: 0.5% sodium hypochlorite; RC: 10% R. communis oil; and C: 0.85% saline (control). The solutions were used for 7 days in a randomized sequence. Following each period of use, there was a 1-week washout period. Antimicrobial activity was determined by Colony Forming Units (CFU) counts of Streptococcus mutans, Candida spp., and gram-negative microorganisms. For collecting biofilm, the internal surface of maxillary dentures was brushed with saline solution, and biofilm suspension obtained. After dilutions (100 - 10-3), aliquots were seeded in Mitis salivarius, CHROMagar Candida®, and MacConkey agar for detecting S. mutans, Candida spp., or gram-negative microorganisms, respectively. After incubation, colonies were counted, and CFU/mL values were calculated. Then, transformation - log10 (CFU+1) - data were analyzed using the Friedman test (α=0.05). Results showed significant differences between the solutions (p<0.001). Results All three solutions showed antimicrobial activity against S. mutans. Against Candida spp., RC and SH1 solutions showed similar effect while SH2 showed superior activity. SH1 and SH2 solutions showed antimicrobial action against gram-negative microorganisms. The Candida species most frequently isolated was C. albicans, followed by C. tropicalis and C. glabrata. Conclusions The 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution was the most effective and might be used to control denture biofilm. C. albicans was the most frequently isolated Candida sp.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Biofilms/drug effects , Denture Cleansers/pharmacology , Denture, Complete/microbiology , Ricinus/chemistry , Sodium Hypochlorite/pharmacology , Candida/drug effects , Candida/isolation & purification , Castor Oil/pharmacology , Colony Count, Microbial , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Statistics, Nonparametric , Streptococcus mutans/drug effects , Streptococcus mutans/isolation & purification , Time FactorsABSTRACT
To evaluate, in vitro, the effect of brushing with a Ricinus communis-based experimental toothpaste on color stability and surface roughness of artificial teeth. Methods: Ninety artificial teeth (maxillary central incisors) in different shades, light and dark (NatusDent Triple Pressing, Dentbras) were used. Initial color (Spectrophotometer Easyshade, VITA) and surface roughness (Rugosimeter Surfcorder SE 1700, Kosakalab) readouts were performed. After baseline measurements, samples were assigned to 10 groups (n=9) according to the artificial tooth shade and type of toothpaste used during the mechanical brushing test (Pepsodent, MAVTEC): Sorriso Dentes Brancos - SDB, Colgate Luminous White - CLW (Colgate-Palmolive), Close up White Now - CWN (Unilever), Trihydral - THL (Perland Pharmacos) and Ricinus communis - RCE (Experimental). After 29,200 cycles of brushing, corresponding to 2 years of brushing by a healthy individual, new color and roughness readouts of the specimens were performed. Data (before and after the tests) were statistically analyzed (2-way repeated measures ANOVA, Tukey, p<0.05). Results: RCE toothpaste produced the greatest color stability for dark tooth shade and the second best color stability for light tooth shade. For surface roughness alteration, there was no difference (p>0.05) for any tested toothpaste regardless of tooth shade. Conclusions: The experimental Ricinus communis toothpaste did not cause color and surface roughness alteration in the artificial teeth, and it may be considered a suitable option for denture cleaning...
Subject(s)
Color , Toothpastes/therapeutic use , Denture Cleansers , Dentures , Dentifrices/therapeutic use , Oral Hygiene , Ricinus , Tooth, Artificial , ToothbrushingABSTRACT
Abstract Aim: To evaluate the sorption, solubility and color change in two lining materials after 120 days of immersion in either sodium perborate or artificial saliva. Methods: Thirty disk-shaped specimens (15×3 mm) of each material, Mucopren(r) soft (MS) and Elite(r) soft (ES) were manufactured and divided into two groups. The specimens in the control group (CG, n=15) were stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C. The specimens in the experimental group (EG, n=15) were stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C and immersed in sodium perborate daily for 5 min. The analysis of sorption and solubility was based on the initial dry weight and on the wet and dry weights after immersion. The color was assessed with a portable spectrophotometer and the NBS system. ANOVA and Tukey test (p<0.05) were used to analyze color and sorption. The solubility was analyzed by KruskalWallis test (p<0.05). Results: Sorption was higher in the EG group (0.31±0.08) than in the control group (0.26±0.05), and higher in Elite(r) soft relining (0.34±0.07) than in Mucopren(r) soft (0.23±0.06). There was no interaction between the factors. Elite(r) Soft presented a higher solubility when immersed in artificial saliva (CG: 0.16±0.07 and EG: 0.13±0.06; p=0.00). Mucopren(r) soft showed no solubility in either treatment. Regarding the color changes, there was a significant difference between the groups (CG: 9.2±1.2 and EG: 9.9±1.2; p=0.025) but not between the materials (Mucopren(r) soft: 9.4±1.3 and Elite(r)soft: 9.7±1.0; p=0.34). Using the NBS system, we verified that both materials presented a high color change. Conclusions: The daily use of sodium perborate promoted changes in the liners' sorption and color. Elite(r) soft relining was more prone to changes than Mucopren(r) soft.
Subject(s)
Hygiene , Physical Phenomena , Denture, Complete , Denture LinersABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: To preserve oral health and to maintain the prosthetic devices, it is important not only to improve the properties of commonly known hygiene products, but also to investigate new materials with antimicrobial action. Objectives This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite (0.25% and 0.50%) and 10% Ricinus communis' solutions against specific microorganisms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty four maxillary complete denture wearers were instructed to brush their dentures three times a day and to soak them (20 min/day) in the solutions: SH1: 0.25% sodium hypochlorite; SH2: 0.5% sodium hypochlorite; RC: 10% R. communis oil; and C: 0.85% saline (control). The solutions were used for 7 days in a randomized sequence. Following each period of use, there was a 1-week washout period. Antimicrobial activity was determined by Colony Forming Units (CFU) counts of Streptococcus mutans, Candida spp., and gram-negative microorganisms. For collecting biofilm, the internal surface of maxillary dentures was brushed with saline solution, and biofilm suspension obtained. After dilutions (100 - 10-3), aliquots were seeded in Mitis salivarius, CHROMagar Candida, and MacConkey agar for detecting S. mutans, Candida spp., or gram-negative microorganisms, respectively. After incubation, colonies were counted, and CFU/mL values were calculated. Then, transformation - log10 (CFU+1) - data were analyzed using the Friedman test (α=0.05). Results showed significant differences between the solutions (p<0.001). RESULTS: All three solutions showed antimicrobial activity against S. mutans. Against Candida spp., RC and SH1 solutions showed similar effect while SH2 showed superior activity. SH1 and SH2 solutions showed antimicrobial action against gram-negative microorganisms. The Candida species most frequently isolated was C. albicans, followed by C. tropicalis and C. glabrata. CONCLUSIONS: The 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution was the most effective and might be used to control denture biofilm. C. albicans was the most frequently isolated Candida sp.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Biofilms/drug effects , Denture Cleansers/pharmacology , Denture, Complete/microbiology , Ricinus/chemistry , Sodium Hypochlorite/pharmacology , Aged , Candida/drug effects , Candida/isolation & purification , Castor Oil/pharmacology , Colony Count, Microbial , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Male , Statistics, Nonparametric , Streptococcus mutans/drug effects , Streptococcus mutans/isolation & purification , Time FactorsABSTRACT
This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of a Ricinus communis-based experimental dentifrice for denture hygiene against the following standard strains: Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay was performed with R. communis in pure oil at 2.5%. Only E. coli was not inhibited by R. communis, but the MIC (0.0781%) was effective against the other microorganisms. From these results it was determined the R. communis concentrations for experimental dentifrices, 1, 2, 5 and 10%, which were evaluated by the test-well diffusion in agar. The commercial dentifrices Colgate, Trihydral and Corega Brite were tested for comparative purposes. The diameter of the zones of bacterial growth inhibition produced around the wells was measured (in mm) with a rule under reflected light. Data were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test (α=0.05). Neither the commercial nor the experimental dentifrices were effective against E. coli. The experimental dentifrices containing R. communis at 2, 5 and 10% presented action against S. mutans, S. aureaus and E. faecallis. The experimental dentifrices showed no antimicrobial activity against Candida spp. and E. coli in any of the tested concentrations. Trihydral was the most effective. Comparing the experimental dentifrices, the product with 10% R. communis produced the largest zones of bacterial growth inhibition and had similar antimicrobial activity to the commercial dentifrices, except against S. aureus.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Dentifrices , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Ricinus/chemistry , In Vitro Techniques , Microbial Sensitivity TestsABSTRACT
This study evaluated the antimicrobial activity of a Ricinus communis-based experimental dentifrice for denture hygiene against the following standard strains: Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay was performed with R. communis in pure oil at 2.5%. Only E. coli was not inhibited by R. communis, but the MIC (0.0781%) was effective against the other microorganisms. From these results it was determined the R. communis concentrations for experimental dentifrices, 1, 2, 5 and 10%, which were evaluated by the test-well diffusion in agar. The commercial dentifrices Colgate, Trihydral and Corega Brite were tested for comparative purposes. The diameter of the zones of bacterial growth inhibition produced around the wells was measured (in mm) with a rule under reflected light. Data were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance and Tukey's post-hoc test (α=0.05). Neither the commercial nor the experimental dentifrices were effective against E. coli. The experimental dentifrices containing R. communis at 2, 5 and 10% presented action against S. mutans, S. aureaus and E. faecallis. The experimental dentifrices showed no antimicrobial activity against Candida spp. and E. coli in any of the tested concentrations. Trihydral was the most effective. Comparing the experimental dentifrices, the product with 10% R. communis produced the largest zones of bacterial growth inhibition and had similar antimicrobial activity to the commercial dentifrices, except against S. aureus.
Este estudo avaliou a atividade antimicrobiana de um dentifrício experimental a base de Ricinus communis para higiene de prótese contra as seguintes cepas padrão: Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans e Candida glabrata. O ensaio de concentração inibitória mínima foi realizado com R. communis em óleo puro a 2,5 % . Apenas a E. coli não foi inibida por R. communis, no entanto, a concentração mínima (0,0781%) foi eficaz contra os outros microrganismos. A partir destes resultados foram determinadas as concentrações dos dentifrícios experimentais: 1, 2, 5 e 10 %, as quais foram avaliadas pelo teste de difusão em Agar. Os dentifrícios comerciais Colgate, Trihydral e Corega Brite foram testados para fins comparativos. O diâmetro dos halos de inibição do crescimento bacteriano, em torno dos poços, foi medido (em mm) com uma régua sob uma luz refletida. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente por meio de análise de variância e teste post-hoc de Tukey (α=0,05). Nem os dentifrícios comerciais nem os experimentais foram eficazes contra E. coli. Os dentifrícios experimentais contendo R. communis a 2 , 5 e 10 % apresentaram ação contra S. mutans, S. aureaus e E. faecallis. Os dentifrícios experimentais não mostraram atividade antimicrobiana contra Candida spp e E. coli em nenhuma das concentrações testadas . O Trihydral foi o mais eficaz. Comparando os dentifrícios experimentais, o produto com 10% de R. communis produziu os maiores halos de inibição do crescimento microbiano e apresentou atividade antimicrobiana.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Dentifrices , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Ricinus/chemistry , In Vitro Techniques , Microbial Sensitivity TestsABSTRACT
This study evaluated the Shore A hardness, colour and microstructural alterations of an experimental silicone for maxillofacial prostheses. As a control, the MDX 4-4210 silicone was used. Eighty specimens of each material were randomly divided into groups of pigmentation and ageing. For microstructural analysis by Thermogravimetry, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Differential Scanning Calorimetry, three specimens of each group were used. Anova and Tukey test (p < 0.05) was used in statistical analysis. There was significant difference in hardness depending on the materials, pigmentation and ageing and interaction between all the factors evaluated (p = 0.00). The colour change was significant due to ageing (p = 0.00) and the interaction between the factors evaluated (p = 0.00). The microstructural analyses have shown that ageing methods and pigmentations did not cause structural alterations. The results suggest that the alterations in hardness and colour do not represent important structural changes.
Subject(s)
Dimethylpolysiloxanes/chemistry , Materials Testing/methods , Maxillofacial Prosthesis , Silicone Elastomers/chemistry , Color , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , ThermogravimetryABSTRACT
Este estudo avaliou a alteração de cor do silicone Ortho Pauher, tendo como padrão ouro o silicone MDX 4 - 4210, frente ao envelhecimento e à pigmentação. Foram obtidos sessenta espécimes para cada material, os quais receberam pigmentação intrínseca ou pigmentação intrínseca e extrínseca. Como pigmento, foi utilizado pó de maquiagem. Os espécimes foram distribuídos aleatoriamente em três grupos e submetidos ao envelhecimento ou por termociclagem, luz ultravioleta ou para compor o grupo controle. Como controle, espécimes foram mantidos em um recipiente hermeticamente fechado na ausência de luz. O envelhecimento simulou um período de uso de 12 meses. Os testes ANOVA e Tukey (p < 0,05) indicaram diferença significante entre o grupo controle e osgrupos envelhecidos por termociclagem e luz ultravioleta, sendo que estes se mostraram iguais. Em relação aos materiais, não houve diferença entre eles. Houve diferença entre as pigmentações. Na interação, o Ortho Pauher sofreu maior variação de cor causada pela luz ultravioleta, enquanto o MDX, pela termociclagem. Comparando-seos materiais com pigmentação intrínseca, nos três grupos de envelhecimento houve diferença entre o controle e a luz ultravioleta, sendo que a maior alteração foi encontrada para o Ortho Pauher. Para os materiais com pigmentação intrínseca e extrínseca, houve diferença nos três grupos de envelhecimento, com maior variação para o MDX.Notam-se comportamentos distintos dos materiais em função da pigmentação e do envelhecimento, devendo-se considerar a associação entre material, tipo de pigmento e tipo de exposição para que se faça a indicação clínica corretamente, podendo-se considerar o Ortho Pauher na confecção de próteses maxilofaciais.
This study evaluated the color change of the silicone Ortho Pauher, with the standard gold silicone MDX 4 - 4210, facing the aging and pigmentation. Sixty specimens were obtained for each material, which received intrinsic or intrinsic and extrinsic pigmentation. Powder makeup was used as pigment. The specimens were randomly dividedinto three groups and subjected to aging or thermal cycling, ultraviolet light or to compose the control group. As control, specimens were kept in an airtight container in the absence of light. Aging simulated a period of 12 months. ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05) indicated a significant difference between control group and the groups aging by thermal cycling and ultraviolet light, which were equal. In relation to materials, there was no difference between them. There was a difference between pigmentation. In the interaction, Ortho Pauher suffered major color changescaused by ultraviolet light, while the MDX, by thermocycling. Comparing the materials with intrinsic pigmentation, the aging in the three groups was difference between control and ultraviolet light, and the greatest change was found for the Ortho Pauher. For materials with intrinsic pigmentation and extrinsic, there were differences between the three groups of the aging, with greater variation for the MDX. Note the different behavior of materials as a function of pigmentation and aging, one should considered the relationship between material, pigment type and type ofexposure in order to do properly the clinical indication, and may be considered silicone Ortho Pauher in making of the maxillofacial prosthesis.