An international multicenter cohort study on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for the treatment of symptomatic children with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) may cause sudden cardiac death (SCD) despite medical therapy. Therefore, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are commonly advised. However, there are limited data on the outcomes of ICD use in children. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of arrhythmic events in pediatric patients with CPVT with and without ICD. METHODS: We compared the risk of SCD in patients with RYR2 (ryanodine receptor 2) variants and phenotype-positive symptomatic patients with CPVT with and without ICD who were younger than 19 years and had no history of sudden cardiac arrest at phenotype diagnosis. The primary outcome was SCD; secondary outcomes were composite end points of SCD, sudden cardiac arrest, or appropriate ICD shocks with or without arrhythmic syncope. RESULTS: The study included 235 patients, 73 with ICD (31.1%) and 162 without ICD (68.9%). Over a median follow-up of 8.0 years (interquartile range 4.3-13.4 years), SCD occurred in 7 patients (3.0%), of whom 4 (57.1%) were noncompliant with medications and none had an ICD. Patients with ICD had a higher risk of both secondary composite outcomes (without syncope: hazard ratio 5.85; 95% confidence interval 3.40-10.09; P < .0001; with syncope: hazard ratio 2.55; 95% confidence interval 1.50-4.34; P = .0005). Thirty-one patients with ICD (42.5%) experienced appropriate shocks, 18 (24.7%) inappropriate shocks, and 21 (28.8%) device-related complications. CONCLUSION: SCD events occurred only in the no ICD group and in those not on optimal medical therapy. Patients with ICD had a high risk of appropriate and inappropriate shocks, which may be reduced with appropriate device programming. Severe ICD complications were common, and risks vs benefits of ICDs need to be considered.

Limited Relationship Between Echocardiographic Measures and Electrocardiographic Markers of Left Ventricular Size in Healthy Children.

Pediatric ECG standards have been defined without echocardiographic confirmation of normal anatomy. The Pediatric Heart Network Normal Echocardiogram Z-score Project provides a racially diverse group of healthy children with normal echocardiograms. We hypothesized that ECG and echocardiographic measures of left ventricular (LV) dimensions are sufficiently correlated in healthy children to imply a clinically meaningful relationship. This was a secondary analysis of a previously described cohort including 2170 digital ECGs. The relationship between 6 ECG measures associated with LV size were analyzed with LV Mass (LVMass-z) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV-z) along with 11 additional parameters. Pearson or Spearman correlations were calculated for the 78 ECG-echocardiographic pairs with regression analyses assessing the variance in ECG measures explained by variation in LV dimensions and demographic variables. ECG/echocardiographic measurement correlations were significant and concordant in 41/78 (53%), though many were significant and discordant (13/78). Of the 6 ECG parameters, 5 correlated in the clinically predicted direction for LV Mass-z and LVEDV-z. Even when statistically significant, correlations were weak (0.05-0.24). R2 was higher for demographic variables than for echocardiographic measures or body surface area in all pairs, but remained weak (R2 ≤ 0.17). In a large cohort of healthy children, there was a positive association between echocardiographic measures of LV size and ECG measures of LVH. These correlations were weak and dependent on factors other than echocardiographic or patient derived variables. Thus, our data support deemphasizing the use of solitary, traditional measurement-based ECG markers traditionally thought to be characteristic of LVH as standalone indications for further cardiac evaluation of LVH in children and adolescents.

Flecainide Is Associated With a Lower Incidence of Arrhythmic Events in a Large Cohort of Patients With Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: In severely affected patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, beta-blockers are often insufficiently protective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether flecainide is associated with a lower incidence of arrhythmic events (AEs) when added to beta-blockers in a large cohort of patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. METHODS: From 2 international registries, this multicenter case cross-over study included patients with a clinical or genetic diagnosis of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in whom flecainide was added to beta-blocker therapy. The study period was defined as the period in which background therapy (ie, beta-blocker type [beta1-selective or nonselective]), left cardiac sympathetic denervation, and implantable cardioverter defibrillator treatment status, remained unchanged within individual patients and was divided into pre-flecainide and on-flecainide periods. The primary end point was AEs, defined as sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock, and arrhythmic syncope. The association of flecainide with AE rates was assessed using a generalized linear mixed model assuming negative binomial distribution and random effects for patients. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients (123 [50%] females; median age at start of flecainide, 18 years [interquartile range, 14-29]; median flecainide dose, 2.2 mg/kg per day [interquartile range, 1.7-3.1]) were included. At baseline, all patients used a beta-blocker, 70 (28%) had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and 21 (9%) had a left cardiac sympathetic denervation. During a median pre-flecainide follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range, 0.4-7.2), 41 patients (17%) experienced 58 AEs (annual event rate, 5.6%). During a median on-flecainide follow-up of 2.9 years (interquartile range, 1.0-6.0), 23 patients (9%) experienced 38 AEs (annual event rate, 4.0%). There were significantly fewer AEs after initiation of flecainide (incidence rate ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.38-0.83]; P=0.007). Among patients who were symptomatic before diagnosis or during the pre-flecainide period (n=167), flecainide was associated with significantly fewer AEs (incidence rate ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.31-0.77]; P=0.002). Among patients with ≥1 AE on beta-blocker therapy (n=41), adding flecainide was also associated with significantly fewer AEs (incidence rate ratio, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.14-0.45]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, adding flecainide to beta-blocker therapy was associated with a lower incidence of AEs in the overall cohort, in symptomatic patients, and particularly in patients with breakthrough AEs while on beta-blocker therapy.

When Do Smartwatch Heart Rate Concerns in Children Indicate Arrhythmia?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and predictors of true arrhythmia in pediatric patients presenting with concerns about smartwatch cardiac data. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of children aged 10-18 years who had presented to a pediatric cardiology clinic between January 2018 and December 2021 with concerns related to smartwatch cardiac data. The primary study outcome was diagnosis of arrhythmia based on clinical evaluation or documentation of arrhythmia by clinical testing. RESULTS: There were 126 patients (mean age 15.6 ± 2.4 years) who presented with a smartwatch-based rhythm concern, with tachycardia in 89%. In all, 19 of 126 (15%) patients were diagnosed with true arrhythmia. The odds of a true arrhythmia diagnosis with symptoms vs no symptoms were 3.2 (95% CI 0.7-14.5), and with heart rate (HR) ≥190 beats/min vs HR <190 beats/min, it was 14.3 (95% CI 3.8-52.8). The positive predictive value of HR ≥190 beats/min and symptoms together to predict arrhythmia was only 39% (95% CI 28-52). The negative predictive value for arrhythmia having neither symptoms nor HR >190 was 95% (95% CI 75-99). CONCLUSION: The likelihood of a true arrhythmia in pediatric patients presenting with a smartwatch-based HR concern was low. Rarely, smartwatch electrograms or trend data were sufficient for arrhythmia diagnosis.

Outcomes of Infant Supraventricular Tachycardia Management Without Medication.

Most infants presenting with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) are treated with an antiarrhythmic, primarily to prevent unrecognized future episodes that could lead to tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. A common practice at our institution is to not treat after the first presentation of infant SVT and instead educate parents on heart rate monitoring and reasons to present to care. The goal of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of non-pharmacologic treatment of infant SVT at first presentation and compare to outcomes of infants treated with an antiarrhythmic. This was a retrospective single center study of all infants presenting with a first episode of SVT from 2014 to 2021. Excluded were patients with a non-reentry type tachyarrhythmia, atrial flutter, long-RP tachycardia, congenital heart disease, or abnormal ventricular function. Sixty-four infants were included in the study. Thirty-six were managed without an antiarrhythmic. SVT recurred in 28% of the non-treatment group vs 50% in those treated with antiarrhythmics, p = 0.12. Of the patients admitted to the hospital, those in the non-treatment group had a shorter length of stay, 1(IQR 1-1) vs 3(IQR 2-4) days, p < 0.01. Non-treated patients were less likely to present to the emergency department for recurrent SVT, 6% vs 32%, p < 0.01. Neither group had a patient develop tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy. For infants with structurally and functionally normal hearts, non-treatment combined with parental education after the first episode of SVT does not lead to worse outcomes. This approach avoids the burden of medication administration in an infant and may have the added benefit of empowering parents to feel comfortable managing clinically insignificant tachycardia at home.

Nurse Practitioner Delivered Virtual Care in a Pediatric Specialty Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Virtual care in pediatric specialty practice has become widely used to increase access to care, one in which nurse practitioners (NPs) can play a vital role. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of virtual care provided by pediatric cardiology and electrophysiology (EP) NPs for pediatric and congenital heart disease patients. METHOD: Retrospective review of all virtual care visits performed by pediatric EP NPs between October 2019 and October 2021 at a single tertiary care center. RESULTS: NPs delivered virtual care for 287 pediatric EP evaluations for 276 patients; 132 (45%) independently, with the remaining 155 collaborating with an electrophysiologist as a shared visit. The mean age was 15.2 ± 8.9 years. DISCUSSION: NPs performed a significant subset of these visits independently and were a vital part of all visits in this study. The role of the NP in specialty pediatric virtual care should continue to be supported and advanced.

Relation of Norwood Shunt Type and Frequency of Arrhythmias at 6 Years (from the Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial).

The Norwood procedure with a right ventricular to pulmonary artery shunt (RVPAS) decreases early mortality, but requires a ventriculotomy, possibly increasing risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) compared with the modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (MBTS). The effect of shunt and Fontan type on arrhythmias by 6 years of age in the SVRII (Single Ventricle Reconstruction Extension Study) was assessed. SVRII data collected on 324 patients pre-/post-Fontan and annually at 2 to 6 years included antiarrhythmic medications, electrocardiography (ECG) at Fontan, and Holter/ECG at 6 years. ECGs and Holters were reviewed for morphology, intervals, atrioventricular conduction, and arrhythmias. Isolated VA were seen on 6-year Holter in >50% of both cohorts (MBTS 54% vs RVPAS 60%), whereas nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was rare and observed in RVPAS only (2.7%). First-degree atrioventricular block was more common in RVPAS than MBTS (21% vs 8%, p = 0.01), whereas right bundle branch block, QRS duration, and QTc were similar. Antiarrhythmic medication usage was common in both groups, but most agents also supported ventricular function (e.g., digoxin, carvedilol). Of the 7 patients with death or transplant between 2 and 6 years, none had documented VAs, but compared with transplant-free survivors, they had somewhat longer QRS (106 vs 93 ms, p = 0.05). Atrial tachyarrhythmias varied little between MBTS and RVPAS but did vary by Fontan type (lateral tunnel 41% vs extracardiac conduit 29%). VAs did not vary by Fontan type. In conclusion, at 6-year follow-up, benign VAs were common in the SVRII population. However, despite the potential for increased VAs and sudden death in the RVPAS cohort, these data do not support significant differences or increased risk at 6 years. The findings highlight the need for ongoing surveillance for arrhythmias in the SVR population.

Approach to Wide Complex Tachycardia in Paediatric Patients.

Wide complex tachycardia (WCT) is an infrequently encountered condition in paediatric patients and may be due to a variety of causes including supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant conduction, ventricular activation via an accessory pathway, ventricular pacing, or ventricular tachycardia. Immediate tachycardia termination is required in haemodynamically unstable patients. After stabilization or in those with haemodynamically tolerated WCT, a careful review of electrocardiographic tracings and diagnostic manoeuvres are essential to help elucidate the cause. Subacute and chronic management for WCT will depend on the underlying cause as well as features of the patient and the tachycardia presentation. This article will review the epidemiology, potential causes, and management of WCT in children. A detailed review of the pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and diagnostic and treatment options is provided to enable the reader to develop a practical approach to managing this condition in young patients.

La tachycardie à complexes QRS larges est rare en pédiatrie et peut avoir diverses causes, notamment une tachycardie supraventriculaire avec trouble de la conduction, l'activation ventriculaire par une voie accessoire, une stimulation ventriculaire ou une tachycardie ventriculaire. La suppression immédiate de la tachycardie est primordiale lorsque l'état hémodynamique du patient est instable. Une fois l'état du patient stabilisé, ou en cas de tachycardie à complexes QRS larges tolérée sur le plan hémodynamique, l'examen minutieux des tracés électrocardiographiques et des manœuvres diagnostiques est crucial pour en élucider la cause. La prise en charge des cas subaigus et chroniques de tachycardie à complexes QRS larges dépend de sa cause sous-jacente ainsi que des caractéristiques du patient et du tableau clinique de la tachycardie. Cet article porte sur l'épidémiologie, les causes possibles et la prise en charge de la tachycardie à complexes QRS larges chez les enfants. Un examen approfondi de la physiopathologie, du diagnostic différentiel et des options diagnostiques et thérapeutiques est présenté pour permettre au lecteur d'élaborer une approche pratique pour la prise en charge de cette affection chez leurs jeunes patients.

Clinical and Functional Characterization of Ryanodine Receptor 2 Variants Implicated in Calcium-Release Deficiency Syndrome.

Importance: Calcium-release deficiency syndrome (CRDS), which is caused by loss-of-function variants in cardiac ryanodine receptor 2 (RyR2), is an emerging cause of ventricular fibrillation. However, the lack of complex polymorphic/bidirectional ventricular tachyarrhythmias during exercise stress testing (EST) may distinguish it from catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT). Recently, in the first clinical series describing the condition, mouse and human studies showed that the long-burst, long-pause, short-coupled ventricular extra stimulus (LBLPS) electrophysiology protocol reliably induced CRDS ventricular arrhythmias. Data from larger populations with CRDS and its associated spectrum of disease are lacking. Objective: To further insight into CRDS through international collaboration. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter observational cohort study, probands with unexplained life-threatening arrhythmic events and an ultrarare RyR2 variant were identified. Variants were expressed in HEK293 cells and subjected to caffeine stimulation to determine their functional impact. Data were collected from September 1, 2012, to March 6, 2021, and analyzed from August 9, 2015, to March 6, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The functional association of RyR2 variants found in putative cases of CRDS and the associated clinical phenotype(s). Results: Of 10 RyR2 variants found in 10 probands, 6 were loss-of-function, consistent with CRDS (p.E4451del, p.F4499C, p.V4606E, p.R4608Q, p.R4608W, and p.Q2275H) (in 4 [67%] male and 2 [33%] female probands; median age at presentation, 22 [IQR, 8-34] years). In 5 probands with a documented trigger, 3 were catecholamine driven. During EST, 3 probands with CRDS had no arrhythmias, 1 had a monomorphic couplet, and 2 could not undergo EST (deceased). Relatives of the decedents carrying the RyR2 variant did not have EST results consistent with CPVT. After screening 3 families, 13 relatives were diagnosed with CRDS, including 3 with previous arrhythmic events (23%). None had complex ventricular tachyarrhythmias during EST. Among the 19 confirmed cases with CRDS, 10 had at least 1 life-threatening event at presentation and/or during a median follow-up of 7 (IQR, 6-18) years. Two of the 3 device-detected ventricular fibrillation episodes were induced by a spontaneous LBLPS-like sequence. ß-Blockers were used in 16 of 17 surviving patients (94%). Three of 16 individuals who were reportedly adherent to ß-blocker therapy (19%) had breakthrough events. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that calcium-release deficiency syndrome due to RyR2 loss-of-function variants mechanistically and phenotypically differs from CPVT. Ventricular fibrillation may be precipitated by a spontaneous LBLPS-like sequence of ectopy; however, CRDS remains difficult to recognize clinically. These data highlight the need for better diagnostic tools and treatments for this emerging condition.

An International Multicenter Cohort Study on ß-Blockers for the Treatment of Symptomatic Children With Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic children with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for recurrent arrhythmic events. ß-Blockers decrease this risk, but studies comparing individual ß-blockers in sizeable cohorts are lacking. We aimed to assess the association between risk for arrhythmic events and type of ß-blocker in a large cohort of symptomatic children with CPVT. METHODS: From 2 international registries of patients with CPVT, RYR2 variant-carrying symptomatic children (defined as syncope or sudden cardiac arrest before ß-blocker initiation and age at start of ß-blocker therapy <18 years), treated with a ß-blocker were included. Cox regression analyses with time-dependent covariates for ß-blockers and potential confounders were used to assess the hazard ratio (HR). The primary outcome was the first occurrence of sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, or syncope. The secondary outcome was the first occurrence of any of the primary outcomes except syncope. RESULTS: We included 329 patients (median age at diagnosis, 12 [interquartile range, 7-15] years, 35% females). Ninety-nine (30.1%) patients experienced the primary outcome and 74 (22.5%) experienced the secondary outcome during a median follow-up of 6.7 (interquartile range, 2.8-12.5) years. Two-hundred sixteen patients (66.0%) used a nonselective ß-blocker (predominantly nadolol [n=140] or propranolol [n=70]) and 111 (33.7%) used a ß1-selective ß-blocker (predominantly atenolol [n=51], metoprolol [n=33], or bisoprolol [n=19]) as initial ß-blocker. Baseline characteristics did not differ. The HRs for both the primary and secondary outcomes were higher for ß1-selective compared with nonselective ß-blockers (HR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.31-3.17]; and HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.20-3.30], respectively). When assessed separately, the HR for the primary outcome was higher for atenolol (HR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.44-4.99]), bisoprolol (HR, 3.24 [95% CI, 1.47-7.18]), and metoprolol (HR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.08-4.40]) compared with nadolol, but did not differ from propranolol. The HR of the secondary outcome was only higher in atenolol compared with nadolol (HR, 2.68 [95% CI, 1.30-5.55]). CONCLUSIONS: ß1-selective ß-blockers were associated with a significantly higher risk for arrhythmic events in symptomatic children with CPVT compared with nonselective ß-blockers, specifically nadolol. Nadolol, or propranolol if nadolol is unavailable, should be the preferred ß-blocker for treating symptomatic children with CPVT.

2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients: Developed in collaboration with and endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients.

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.

2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients.

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.

The impact of CIEDs with automatic "wireless" remote monitoring on efficiency.

BACKGROUND: A benefit of automatically transmitting or "wireless" CIEDs (W-CIED) is the prompt detection of device malfunction and arrhythmias. We hypothesized that the use of W-CIEDs would improve the efficiency of remote monitoring by decreasing unnecessary CIED remote transmissions because of the automatic detection of abnormalities. OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of patient-initiated transmissions in patients with W-CIEDs versus non-wireless CIEDs (NW-CIED) at a single pediatric and congenital heart center. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with W-CIEDs followed over a 2-year period compared to a similar cohort of patients with NW-CIED. All CIED remote transmissions during were reviewed for indication and outcome. RESULTS: The W-CIED cohort had 87 patients; mean age 20 ± 13 years; NW-CIED cohort had 220 patients; mean age 22 ± (13) years. The mean number of symptomatic patient-initiated transmissions per patient was 0.93 ± 2.65 in the W-CIED cohort versus 0.39 ± 0.64 in the NW-CIED cohort (p ≤ .001). The mean number of asymptomatic patient-initiated transmission sent per patient in the W-CIED cohort was 1.86 ± 2.59 versus 0.81 ± 1.41 in the NW-CIED cohort (p ≤ .0001). Type of device, age, and presence of congenital heart disease were not significantly associated with the incidence of patient-initiated remote monitoring transmissions. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of patient-initiated transmission was higher in the W-CIED cohort, contradictory to the study hypothesis. This may reflect a lack of patient understanding of the benefit or functionality of W-CIEDs and may be mitigated by education to both providers and patients.

Evaluation of age at symptom onset, proband status, and sex as predictors of disease severity in pediatric catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Children with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are at risk for sudden death, and a risk stratification tool does not exist. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether proband status, age at symptom onset, and/or sex are independent predictors of cardiac events. METHODS: A multicenter, ambispective, cohort of pediatric CPVT patients was categorized by sex, proband status, and age at symptom onset (D1: first decade of life [symptom onset <10 years] or D2: second decade of life [symptom onset 10-18 years, inclusive]). Demographics, therapy, genetics, and outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients were included and stratified into 58 D1 and 75 D2 patients (68 female and 65 male; 106 probands and 27 relatives). Localization of RYR2 variants to hotspots differed based on proband status and age at symptom onset. The cardiac event rate was 33% (n = 44/133), inclusive of a 3% (n = 4/133) mortality rate, over a median of 6 years (interquartile range 3-11) after time of symptom onset. Proband status, rather than age at of symptom onset or sex, was an independent predictor of time to first cardiac event (P = .008; hazard ratio = 4.4). The 5-, 10- and 15-year event-free survival rates for probands were 77%, 56%, and 46%, respectively, and for relatives were 96%, 91%, and 86%, respectively. Event risk after diagnosis was 48% (32/67) in patients on ß-blocker or flecainide alone vs 10% (5/48) in patients on ß-blocker plus flecainide and/or left cardiac sympathetic denervation (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Proband status, but not age at symptom onset or male sex, independently predicted an earlier onset of cardiac events. A larger sample size would enable a comprehensive investigation of other risk factors.

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients: Executive summary.

Guidelines for the implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have evolved since publication of the initial ACC/AHA pacemaker guidelines in 1984 [1]. CIEDs have evolved to include novel forms of cardiac pacing, the development of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and the introduction of devices for long term monitoring of heart rhythm and other physiologic parameters. In view of the increasing complexity of both devices and patients, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. In 2018, the ACC/AHA/HRS published Guidelines on the Evaluation and Management of Patients with Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay [2], which were specific recommendations for patients >18 years of age. This age-specific threshold was established in view of the differing indications for CIEDs in young patients as well as size-specific technology factors. Therefore, the following document was developed to update and further delineate indications for the use and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, with recognition that there is often overlap in the care of patents between 18 and 21 years of age. This document is an abbreviated expert consensus statement (ECS) intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease/diagnostic categories. This document will also provide guidance regarding the management of lead systems and follow-up evaluation for pediatric patients with CIEDs. The recommendations are presented in an abbreviated modular format, with each section including the complete table of recommendations along with a brief synopsis of supportive text and select references to provide some context for the recommendations. This document is not intended to provide an exhaustive discussion of the basis for each of the recommendations, which are further addressed in the comprehensive PACES-CIED document [3], with further data easily accessible in electronic searches or textbooks.