Assessment of the Most Optimal Control Tissue for Intracranial Aneurysm Gene Expression Studies.

Background and Purpose- Finding adequate control tissue for intracranial aneurysm (IA) pathophysiological studies, including gene expression studies, can be challenging. We compared gene expression profiles of superficial temporal, cortical, and circle of Willis (CoW) arteries and IA in search of the most optimal control tissue for future experiments. Methods- We compared RNA-sequencing data of IA samples and of superficial temporal, cortical, and CoW artery samples using Pearson correlation, Euclidean distance, and principal component analysis. We used the Mann-Whitney U test for comparison of Pearson correlation coefficients and Euclidean distances, to assess which control tissue is most similar to IA in terms of gene expression. Other unrelated tissues were used as negative controls. Results- The cortical and the CoW arteries were more similar to IA in terms of gene expression than the superficial temporal artery. This was based on Pearson correlation (+0.023 [90% CI, 0.017/0.029; P=1.9E-09] for the cortical artery and +0.034 [90% CI, 0.028/0.040; P=6.0E-15] for the CoW artery compared with the superficial temporal artery), Euclidean distance (-25.71 [90% CI, -31.54/-20.02; P=1.9E-11] for the cortical artery and -38.09 [90% CI, -44.08/-32.19; P<2.2E-16] for the CoW artery compared with the superficial temporal artery) and principal component analysis. In all analyses, the unrelated tissues formed separate groups compared with IA and the 3 control arteries. Conclusions- The cortical arteries and the CoW arteries are better controls for gene expression studies on IA than the superficial temporal artery. This probably relates to differences in anatomy of these tissues, such as the presence of an external elastic lamina in the extracranial vasculature and absence in the intracranial vasculature, because IAs, cortical arteries, and CoW arteries are all intracranial while the superficial temporal artery is extracranial. Since CoW arteries can only be obtained postmortem, cortical arteries are preferred over CoW arteries.

Histological Differences of the Vascular Wall Between Sites With High and Low Prevalence of Intracranial Aneurysm.

Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) develop more often on bifurcations compared with the rest of the circle of Willis (CoW). We investigated histological differences between 2 high IA prevalence sites (anterior communicating artery [AcomA] and basilar tip) and 2 corresponding low IA prevalence sites (anterior cerebral artery [ACA] and basilar artery [BA]) using histological sections of 10 CoWs without IAs. Medial defect density in the AcomA was 0.24 medial defects/mm compared with 0.02 for the A1 part and 0.03 for the A2 part of the ACA. In the basilar tip we found 0.15 medial defects/mm compared with 0.14 in the BA. Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were more often disorganized in both high-prevalence sites (AcomA: 10/10, basilar tip: 5/10) compared with low-prevalence sites (both ACA and BA: 1/10). Intima thickening was more severe in the high-prevalence sites. Vascular wall thickness was not significantly different between high- and low-prevalence sites, but had a larger variance in high- compared with low-prevalence sites (AcomA vs ACA: p = 6.8E-12, basilar tip vs BA: p = 0.02). Disorganized VSMCs at high-prevalence sites likely result in a higher susceptibility to hemodynamic stress, leading to more vascular remodeling (such as intima thickening), which could increase the likelihood of IA formation.

Chromatin Conformation Links Putative Enhancers in Intracranial Aneurysm-Associated Regions to Potential Candidate Genes.

Background We previously showed that intracranial aneurysm ( IA )-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms are enriched in promoters and putative enhancers identified in the human circle of Willis, on which IA s develop, suggesting a role for promoters and enhancers in IAs . We further investigated the role of putative enhancers in the pathogenesis of IA by identifying their potential target genes and validating their regulatory activity. Methods and Results Using our previously published circle of Willis chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing data, we selected 34 putative enhancers in IA -associated regions from genome-wide association studies. We then used a chromatin conformation capture technique to prioritize target genes and found that 15 putative enhancers interact with the promoters of 6 target genes: SOX 17, CDKN 2B, MTAP , CNNM 2, RPEL 1, and GATA 6. Subsequently, we assessed the activity of these putative enhancers in vivo in zebrafish embryos and confirmed activity for 8 putative enhancers. Last, we found that all 6 target genes are expressed in the circle of Willis, on the basis of RNA sequencing data and in situ hybridization. Furthermore, in situ hybridization showed that these genes are expressed in multiple cell types in the circle of Willis. Conclusions In 4 of 6 IA -associated genome-wide association study regions, we identified 8 putative enhancers that are active in vivo and interact with 6 nearby genes, suggesting that these genes are regulated by the identified putative enhancers. These genes, SOX 17, CDKN 2B, MTAP , CNNM 2, RPEL 1, and GATA 6, are therefore potential candidate genes involved in IA pathogenesis and should be studied using animal models in the future.

Intracranial Aneurysm-Associated Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms Alter Regulatory DNA in the Human Circle of Willis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Genome-wide association studies significantly link intracranial aneurysm (IA) to single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 6 genomic loci. To gain insight into the relevance of these IA-associated SNPs, we aimed to identify regulatory regions and analyze overall gene expression in the human circle of Willis (CoW), on which these aneurysms develop. METHODS: We performed chromatin immunoprecipitation and sequencing for histone modifications H3K4me1 and H3K27ac to identify regulatory regions, including distal enhancers and active promoters, in postmortem specimens of the human CoW. These experiments were complemented with RNA sequencing on the same specimens. We determined whether these regulatory regions overlap with IA-associated SNPs, using computational methods. By combining our results with publicly available data, we investigated the effect of IA-associated SNPs on the newly identified regulatory regions and linked them to potential target genes. RESULTS: We find that IA-associated SNPs are significantly enriched in CoW regulatory regions. Some of the IA-associated SNPs that overlap with a regulatory region are likely to alter transcription factor binding, and in proximity to these regulatory regions are 102 genes that are expressed in the CoW. In addition, gene expression in the CoW is enriched for genes related to cell adhesion and the extracellular matrix. CONCLUSIONS: CoW regulatory regions link IA-associated SNPs to genes with a potential role in the development of IAs. Our data refine previous predictions on SNPs associated with IA and provide a substantial resource from which candidates for follow-up studies can be prioritized.