Reasons for scaphoid non-union: Analysis of behavior of health care providers and patients.

To assess factors related to health-system and patient behavior in scaphoid fracture non-union, a retrospective analysis of 134 patients treated by scaphoid reconstruction was performed. Mean age at the accident was 26 years (range, 9-75 years), and the mean age at surgery was 28 years (range, 13-75 years). Mean time to first consultation was 233 days (range, 0-12,136 days), and time to surgery 740 days (range, 19-12,362 days). The physician was mainly a general practitioner (52.2%), or an orthopedist/traumatologist (17.9%), general surgeon (12.7%), or hand surgeon (17.2%). The initial diagnostic procedure was X-ray in 76.9% of cases, computed tomography (CT) in 20.9%, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 13.4%, and none in 11.2%. A fracture was diagnosed in 32.8% of cases, and non-union in 14.9%. Patients mainly presented late: 63% within 3 weeks, and a minority on the day of the accident (39%). In 11% of cases, healthcare providers performed either no or inadequate imaging (77%) and missed correct diagnosis in 52% of cases. 128 patients had a second consultation, and 77 a third, with the same or different physicians, before surgery, leading to increased healthcare costs due to delayed diagnosis and treatment. Delayed presentation and lack of suspicion by attending physicians were the main reasons. Speeding up diagnosis and improving physician training are vital and could significantly reduce health care costs. CT or MRI should be performed if scaphoid fracture is suspected.

[Malunion of the distal radius: 3D planning and performance of intra- and extra-articular corrective osteotomy]. / Malunion der distalen Radiusfraktur: 3-D-Planung und Durchführung von intra- und extraartikulären Korrekturosteotomien.

OBJECTIVE: Restoration of the original anatomy with reduction of both current symptoms and risk of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. INDICATIONS: Symptomatic intra- or extra-articular malunion due to limitation of movement and/or painful function, intra-articular step of > 1 mm, instability of the distal radioulnar joint. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Minimal deformity. Pre-existing osteoarthritis Knirk and Jupiter II or higher. Simpler surgical alternative, e.g., ulna shortening osteotomy. Smoking or advanced age are not contraindications. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Preoperative assessment and performance of a bilateral computed tomography (CT). Three-dimensional (3D) malposition analysis and calculation of the correction. Planning of the corrective osteotomy on the 3D model and creation of patient-specific drilling and sawing guides. Performing the 3D-guided osteotomy. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Early functional unloaded mobilization with the splint for 8 weeks until consolidation control with CT. RESULTS: Significant reduction of the step to < 1 mm (p ≤ 0.05) can be achieved with intra-articular corrections. In extra-articular corrective osteotomies, a mean residual rotational malalignment error of 2.0° (±â€¯2.2°) and a translational malalignment error of 0.6 mm (±â€¯0.2 mm) is achieved. Single-cut osteotomies in the shaft region can be performed to within a few degrees for rotation (e.g., pronation/supination 4.9°) and for translation (e.g., proximal/distal, 0.8 mm). After surgery, a mean residual 3D angle of 5.8° (SD 3.6°) was measured. Furthermore, surgical time for 3D-assisted surgery is significantly reduced compared to the conventional technique (140 ± 37 vs 108 ± 26 min; p < 0.05). Thus, the progression of osteoarthritis can be reduced in the medium term and improved mobility and grip strength are achieved. The clinical outcome parameters based on patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores are roughly comparable.

Surgical fixation techniques in four-corner fusion of the wrist: a systematic review of 1103 cases.

BACKGROUND: Four-corner fusion (4CF) is a known treatment option for degenerative wrist conditions. Different techniques may be used and there is no general consensus on best implant. As such, it was the purpose of the current systematic review to compare fusion rates and outcomes depending on the fixation technique. METHODS: The systematic review was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42020164301. It followed the PRISMA guidelines. Original articles were screened using the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies reporting on outcome for 4CF surgery were included. Studies with a minimum Level IV of evidence were considered eligible. Quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies met the inclusion criteria, for a total of 1103 wrists. The mean age was 41.8 years (range 19-83). Mean follow-up overall was 43.5 months (range 24-146 months). Reported fusion weighted rates were >90% and did not differ significantly between techniques. Reoperations due to different reasons occurred in 135 (12%) of all 1103. There was significant data heterogeneity regarding fusion rates (I2 = 70%). Inconsistency and heterogeneity in data reporting did not allow meta-analysis with direct data pooling and comparison of subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory fusion rates (over 90%) can be achieved independent of the fixation technique used in 4-corner arthrodesis. Due to the high data heterogeneity and reporting inconsistency across studies, no statements regarding PROMs, ROM or grip strength can be made. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review of Level IV Studies.

[Differential therapeutic Approaches in the prosthetic Arthroplasty of Finger Joints]. / Differentialtherapeutische Zugänge bei der prothetischen Versorgung von Fingergelenken.

Degenerative changes of the finger joints often lead to various surgical treatments such as arthrodesis or artificial joint replacement. There are a lot of surgical approaches for surgeons to choose from. The different approaches with their characteristic advantages and disadvantages during surgery and for the postoperative treatment should be selected and applied based on patient-, implant- and aftercare-specific indications. This article presents a short review of possible approaches and associated surgical techniques for finger joint replacement.

Bioabsorbable poly-L/D-lactide (96/4) scaffold arthroplasty as a salvage procedure in the metacarpophalangeal joint.

We report the case of a 69-year-old female patient, who developed an impressive foreign body reaction around broken metacarpophalangeal silicone implants, including serious axillary lymphadenopathy 3 years after surgery. Possible revision arthroplasties were evaluated but, due to poor bone stock, no regular implants could be used. Instead, a double RegJoint™ (Scaffdex Oy, Finland), a bioabsorbable poly-L/D-lactide implant, was used for each of the 4 metacarpophalangeal joints. At follow-up, we observed no recurrence of synovitis, lymphadenopathy, or any other adverse events. The patient was highly satisfied with the results of the surgery, and painless functional joint movement could be achieved. The restorable RegJoint™ implant seems to be a valid revision option in case of failed silicone arthroplasty.

[The use of intraoperative fascicle-topographic electromyography in peripheral nerve surgery: review of the literature and clinical experience]. / Die intraoperative Faszikel-topografische Elektromyografie in der peripheren Nervenchirurgie ­ Übersichtsarbeit und Fallbeispiele.

The intraoperative assessment of a pathological nerve segment is crucial in peripheral nerve surgery. Based on different techniques the function of a peripheral nerve is analyzed and either a neurolysis alone or a resection with subsequent nerve reconstruction is performed. Beside the morphological and histological assessment or the use of a nerve stimulator, intraoperative electrophysiology is highly useful. The aim of this diagnostic tool is the recording of objective parameters, documenting the function of peripheral nerves. Intraoperative electroneurography allows the assessment of a nerve action potential over a pathological nerve segment and has been used for decades. In contrast, additional needle electromyography is rarely used even though this technique is characterized by interesting advantages: It is very helpful for the selection of donor fascicles during neurotization surgeries and for the electrophysiological assessment of neuromata in continuity. In the present review, we discuss the value of intraoperative electromyography in the treatment of peripheral nerve trauma as well as peripheral nerve tumors.

Intramedullary screw fixation for metacarpal shaft fractures: a biomechanical human cadaver study.

Intramedullary cannulated compression screws have been introduced for the fixation of unstable metacarpal fractures. In the present study, this technique was compared with dorsal compression plating to evaluate its biomechanical performance in stabilizing metacarpal shaft fractures. In a first set of experiments, the biomechanical characteristics of the screws were analysed in an artificial bone model. In subsequent experiments, midshaft osteotomies were performed in human cadaver metacarpals, followed by plating or intramedullary screw osteosynthesis. The metacarpals were tested to failure in cantilever bending, following a stepwise increasing cyclic loading protocol. We found a significantly lower load at failure and a significantly lower number of cycles to failure in the intramedullary screw group, but both methods offered sufficient stability under these loads. With reference to published loads on the metacarpals during use of the hand, we conclude that intramedullary osteosynthesis yields sufficient strength and stiffness for early active motion. A difference in its fixation stability is noted compared with plate fixation, which may not be clinically relevant.

Survival, Neurologic Injury, and Kidney Function after Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: To analyze survival, neurologic injury, and kidney function after acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: A total of 445 patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection were analyzed. Evaluation according to risk factors for mortality, neurologic injury, and kidney function was performed. RESULTS: Overall 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 82.8 ± 1.8%, 73.6 ± 2.4%, and 59.3 ± 3.9, respectively. Independent preoperative risk factors for mortality were preexisting renal impairment (p = 0.001), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.001), and age (p < 0.001). Perioperative risk factors were prolonged cross-clamp (p < 0.001) and cerebral perfusion time (p = 0.001). Risk factors for renal failure were preexisting renal impairment (p < 0.001), prolonged cross-clamp time (p < 0.001), cerebral perfusion time (p < 0.001), and age (p = 0.022). Risk factors for neurologic injury were cross-clamp time (p = 0.038), cerebral perfusion time (p = 0.007), and age (p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: In addition to classic risk factors, survival after type A aortic dissection is affected by preexisting renal impairment. Preexisting renal impairment is predictive of postoperative renal failure. Therefore treatment and prevention strategies for renal failure during the acute and long-term course after acute type A aortic dissection are warranted.