Should intrauterine inseminations still be proposed in cases of unexplained infertility? Retrospective study and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: Unexplained infertility is defined by the absence of identifiable causes of infertility. The results of randomized studies and meta-analysis regarding the treatment of unexplained infertility are discordant due to methodological problems. DESIGN: The aim of this study is to compare the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle (CPR/c) in IUI and IVF/ICSI in cases of unexplained infertility, according to the woman's age group and to identify the factors which predict success. INTERVENTIONS: We performed a retrospective study in two ART centers, comparing overall clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI and IUI. We also compared pregnancy and birth rates according to different female age groups. RESULTS: 855 IVF/ICSI and 804 IUI cycles were compared. We found a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the pregnancy and live birth rates per cycle between IUI and IVF/ICSI, overall and in the different female age groups, except in women aged 40 and over. The greatest chances of pregnancy with IUI are found in women with secondary unexplained infertility, during the first two cycles and with a bi-follicular response to stimulation. In IVF/ICSI, pregnancy rates are higher in women with secondary unexplained infertility, in the first two cycles, in IVF and in women receiving a transfer of two embryos regardless of the embryonic stage. CONCLUSION: We recommend IVF/ICSI treatment rather than IUI for unexplained infertility (OR CPR/c 4.20 with 95% CI [3.72-4.68]). This is in accordance with NICE, which advises the use of IVF after 2 years.

Systematic overestimation of human serum albumin by capillary zone electrophoresis method due to monoclonal immunoglobulin interferences.

BACKGROUND: The capillary zone electrophoresis method of albumin measurement is frequently used in monoclonal gammopathy patients but some studies suggest poor performances of the method in this population. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of serum monoclonal immunoglobulins on human serum albumin determination by capillary zone electrophoresis method compared to other available methods. METHOD: We prospectively measured albumin in 100 freshly collected non-frozen serum samples in a monoclonal gammopathy patients population, by using four different methods: the capillary zone electrophoresis method, the bromocresol purple dye method, the nephelometric method and the turbidimetric method. Differences in albumin values between the different methods were analysed with respect to serum monoclonal immunoglobulin concentration. These differences were further investigated by measuring albumin levels in human serum samples spiked with exogenous monoclonal immunoglobulins. RESULTS: Human serum albumin difference values between capillary zone electrophoresis compared to immunonephelometry method are significantly correlated with increasing monoclonal immunoglobulins concentrations: regression analyses revealed a correlation coefficient r2 = 0.60 and a slope of 0.14 (0.12-0.17, 95% confidence interval). The capillary zone electrophoresis method overestimated serum albumin levels by up to 67% (12 g/L) when monoclonal immunoglobulin level was 63 g/L. The determination of albumin levels in human serum samples spiked with exogenous monoclonal immunoglobulins showed an overestimation of human serum albumin measurement by the capillary zone electrophoresis method proportional to the amount of monoclonal immunoglobulin added in the serum with a slope of 0.19 (0.18-0.20, 95% confidence interval). CONCLUSION: Monoclonal immunoglobulins directly interfere with serum albumin measurement by the capillary zone electrophoresis method leading to a systematic overestimation of serum albumin concentrations proportional to the serum monoclonal immunoglobulin level.

Is capillary zone electrophoresis a suitable method for estimating serum albumin: A comparison of four methods.

BACKGROUND: The capillary zone electrophoresis method of albumin measurement is frequently used for oncologic and haematologic patients but few data exist about the agreement between the albumin measurements performed by capillary zone electrophoresis and other methods. The aim of this study was to analyse the agreement between human serum albumin measurements by capillary zone electrophoresis and by the nephelometry, bromocresol purple and turbidimetry methods. METHOD: We prospectively measured 100 freshly collected non-frozen patient serum samples, by using four different methods: the capillary zone electrophoresis method performed with a CAPILLARYS 2 instrument, the bromocresol purple dye method performed with an Advia XPT analyser, the nephelometric method performed with a BN ProSpec analyser and the turbidimetric method with reagents from DiAgam and performed with the Advia XPT analyser. RESULTS: A bias towards higher values in the lower range of albumin concentrations was observed with capillary zone electrophoresis compared to immunonephelometry: correlation coefficient r2 = 0.925; slope of 0.86 (0.82-0.89, 95% confidence interval), which is significantly different from 1; and an intercept of 4.94 g/L (3.67-6.16, 95% confidence interval). Similar results were observed when comparing capillary zone electrophoresis to the bromocresol purple and immunoturbidimetry methods. The capillary electrophoresis method overestimated low albumin levels by up to 25% (5 g/L). CONCLUSION: Compared to the nephelometry, turbidimetry and bromocresol purple methods, the capillary zone electrophoresis method tends to overestimate human serum albumin concentrations for levels below 30 g/L. This discrepancy could lead to an overestimation of the nutritional status, an inappropriate scoring of the disease and a delay in nutritional treatment.