Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: The Great Ormond Street Hospital experience (2005-2021).

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a complex, systemic inflammatory disorder driven by both innate and adaptive immunity. Improved understanding of sJIA pathophysiology has led to recent therapeutic advances including a growing evidence base for the earlier use of IL-1 or IL-6 blockade as first-line treatment. We conducted a retrospective case notes review of patients diagnosed with sJIA over a 16-year period (October 2005-October 2021) at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children. We describe the clinical presentation, therapeutic interventions, complications, and remission rates at different timepoints over the disease course. We examined our data, which spanned a period of changing therapeutic landscape, to try and identify potential therapeutic signals in patients who received biologic treatment early in the disease course compared to those who did not. A total of 76-children (female n = 40, 53%) were diagnosed with sJIA, median age 4.5 years (range 0.6-14.1); 36% (27/76) presented with suspected or confirmed macrophage activation syndrome. A biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) alone was commenced as first-line treatment in 28% (n = 21/76) of the cohort; however, at last review, 84% (n = 64/76) had received treatment with a bDMARD. Clinically inactive disease (CID) was achieved by 88% (n = 67/76) of the cohort at last review; however, only 32% (24/76) achieved treatment-free CID. At 1-year follow-up, CID was achieved in a significantly greater proportion of children who received treatment with a bDMARD within 3 months of diagnosis compared to those who did not (90% vs. 53%, p = 0.002). Based on an ever-increasing evidence base for the earlier use of bDMARD in sJIA and our experience of the largest UK single-centre case series described to date, we now propose a new therapeutic pathway for children diagnosed with sJIA in the UK based on early use of bDMARDs. Reappraisal of the current National Health Service commissioning pathway for sJIA is now urgently required.

Defining consensus opinion to develop randomised controlled trials in rare diseases using Bayesian design: An example of a proposed trial of adalimumab versus pamidronate for children with CNO/CRMO.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is a rare autoinflammatory bone disorder primarily affecting children and adolescents. It can lead to chronic pain, bony deformities and fractures. The pathophysiology of CNO is incompletely understood. Scientific evidence suggests dysregulated expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines to be centrally involved. Currently, treatment is largely based on retrospective observational studies and expert opinion. Treatment usually includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or glucocorticoids, followed by a range of drugs in unresponsive cases. While randomised clinical trials are lacking, retrospective and prospective non-controlled studies suggest effectiveness of TNF inhibitors and bisphosphonates. The objective of the Bayesian consensus meeting was to quantify prior expert opinion. METHODS: Twelve international CNO experts were randomly chosen to be invited to a Bayesian prior elicitation meeting. RESULTS: Results showed that a typical new patient treated with pamidronate would have an 84% chance of improvement in their pain score relative to baseline at 26 weeks and an 83% chance on adalimumab. Experts thought there was a 50% chance that a new typical patient would record a pain score of 28mm (pamidronate) to 30mm (adalimumab) or better at 26 weeks. There was a modest trend in prior opinion to indicate an advantage of pamidronate vs adalimumab, with a 68% prior chance that pamidronate is superior to adalimumab by some margin. However, it is clear that there is considerable uncertainty about the precise relative merits of the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The rarity of CNO leads to challenges in conducting randomised controlled trials with sufficient power to provide a definitive outcome. We address this using a Bayesian design, and here describe the process and outcome of the elicitation exercise to establish expert prior opinion. This opinion will be tested in the planned prospective CNO study. The process for establishing expert consensus opinion in CNO will be helpful for developing studies in other rare paediatric diseases.