Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe faecal incontinence: long-term clinical, manometric and quality of life results.

BACKGROUND: Faecal incontinence (FI) is a complex and multifactorial health problem. Treatment has to be individualised, analysing the aetiology and gravity in every case. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has been shown to effectively improve treatment of FI. METHODS: Fifty patients with severe FI treated with SNS between March 2002 and December 2010 were analysed. Preoperative assessment included physical examination, anorectal manometry and anal endosonography. Anal continence was evaluated using the Wexner continence grading system. Quality of life was evaluated using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of life Scale (FIQLS). Follow-up appointments were scheduled at 1, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Wexner score, FIQLS and the ability to defer defecation were assessed at each visit. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent a permanent implant. The overall mean follow-up period was 55.52 ± 31.84 months. After 6 months, SNS significantly improved FI and positively impacted quality of life, as evidence by significant improvements in all 4 scales of the FIQLS. Anorectal manometry showed a trend towards an increase in maximum resting pressure and maximum pressure. After the first assessment at 6 months, Wexner score and FIQLS remained stable. Ability to defer defecation was also maintained. During follow-up, 3 patients (6 %) experienced implant site pain and episodes of extremity pain and paresthesias that were refractory to medical management and required device explantation. The implant site infection rate was 2 %. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of our long-term results confirms the safety and effectiveness of SNS in the management of patients with FI.

Updating controversies on the multidisciplinary management of gastric cancer

The rates of relapse and death remain high in gastric cancer patients, especially in advanced stages. Local relapses in the tumour bed and regional lymph nodes, peritoneal spread as abdominal carcinomatosis, and distant metastasis are common mechanisms of failure after a R0 resection. To overcome this, a multidisciplinary approach has been prompted. In recent years, multidisciplinary treatment has been strengthened by some randomised controlled trials and it is now considered the standard by most groups, although the improvement in long-term survival rates achieved is still limited. This new therapeutic approach in gastric cancer is rapidly evolving and has led to a series of controversies on the best strategy to follow. Some of these controversies are discussed in this paper (AU)

Resultados del proyecto de mejora de la calidad de la asistencia en hemodiálisis: estudio multicéntrico de indicadores de calidad de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología (SEN) / No disponible

Introducción: En el año 2002 se creó el grupo de trabajo sobre Calidad en Nefrología de la SEN (CNSEN). Los objetivos de este grupo han sido la identificación, difusión, implantación y consolidación de una herramienta de Gestión de la Calidad en Hemodiálisis, sistemática, objetiva y global, basada en la recopilación de Indicadores de Calidad, las estrategias de retroalimentación (Feedback) y Benchmarking,y el diseño de Planes de Mejora y Evaluación Global. El objetivo de este estudio es presentar los primeros resultados de los indicadores de calidad obtenidos en un grupo de centros españoles, así como evaluar la repercusión de la aplicación de las mencionadas técnicas en los resultados obtenidos. Métodos: Durante 2007 se ha ido incorporando al estudio un total de 28 unidades de hemodiálisis de todo el ámbito nacional. El número total de pacientes evaluados a lo largo del estudio ha sido 2516. Los indicadores han sido recogidos mediante un software informático específico de calidad, que permite calcularlos con facilidad. Los indicadores de cumplimiento se refieren a las siguientes áreas: adecuación de diálisis, anemia, metabolismo mineral y óseo, nutrición, enfermedades víricas, accesos vasculares, mortalidad, morbilidad (ingresos hospitalarios) y trasplante. Cada tres meses los centros reciben sus datos comparados con los del resto del grupo. Resultados: Se detectó una mejora de los resultados a nivel global, excepto en los niveles de hemoglobina. El porcentaje de centros que alcanzaron los estándares definidos por el CNSEN pasó del 65% al 90,9% en el caso del estándar de Kt/V Daugirdas II (> 1,3 en > del 80% de sus pacientes); del 71,4 % al 77,2 % en el caso del estándar de PTH (> 30% de sus pacientes con PTH entre 150 y 300 pg/ml); y del 42,8% al 63,5% en el caso del estándar de fósforo (> 75% de sus pacientes con fósforo < 5,5 mg/dl). Más del 50% de los centros mejoraron sus resultados con respecto al inicio del estudio en todas las áreas analizadas. Los centros que no obtuvieron una mejora en sus resultados partían de porcentajes de cumplimiento de los indicadores significativamente más altos que aquellos que si lograron mejorarlos (80,6 ± 15,4 versus 71,8 ± 16,6 respectivamente; p < 0,001). Conclusiones: Estamos avanzando en lo referente al conocimiento de los resultados de la hemodiálisis, aunque el trabajo pendiente todavía es extenso. La monitorización de indicadores de calidad respecto a un estándar, y su puesta en común con otros centros puede contribuir a la mejora de resultados y a la disminución en la variabilidad entre centros (AU)

Introduction: The Spanish Society of Nephrology «Quality in Nephrology Working Group» (QNWG) was created in 2002. The aims of this group are the identification, diffusion, implementation and consolidation of a systematic, objective and comprehensive set of quality performance measures (QPMs) to help along the improvement of patient care and outcomes on hemodialysis, by means of strategies of feedback and benchmarking, and the design of quality improvement projects. The objective of this study is to present the preliminary results of a set of quality performance measures obtained in a group of Spanish hemodialysis centers, as well as to evaluate the repercussion of the application of the aforementioned thecniques on the observed results. Methods: During 2007 a total of 28 hemodialysis units participated in the study; 2,516 patients were evaluated. A specific software was designed and used to facilitate the calculation of CPMs in each unit. The clinical indicators used refered to dialysis adequacy; anemia; mineral metabolisme; nutrition; viral infections; vascular access; mortality, morbidity (number and days of hospital admissions); and renal transplant. Every three months each center received its own data and its comparison with the rest of the group. Results: Except for hemoglobin levels we observed a global improvement. The percentage of centers reaching the stablished standards defined by the QNWG passed from 65% to 90.9% for Kt/V Daugirdas II (> 1.3 in > that 80% of the patients); from 71.4% to 77.2% for PTH (> 30% of patients with serum PTH between 150 and 300 pg/ml); and from 42.8% to 63.5% for phosphate (> 75% of patients with a serum phsphate < 5.5 mg/dl). More than 50% of centers showed an improvement in their final results as compared with their own initial results in all analyzed CPMs. Those centers that did not obtained an improvement in their results started the study with better percentages of acomplishment than those that showed a significant improvement in QPMs. (80.6 ± 15.4 versus 71.8 ± 16.6 respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions: We are starting to make progresses in our knowledge of clinical results in our hemodialysis units, although there is still a long way to go over. To monitor and share CPMs results within hemodialysis centers might help to improve their results as well as to reduce intecenters variability (AU)

[Preliminary results of the Spanish Society of Nephrology multicenter study of quality performance measures: hemodialysis outcomes can be improved]. / Resultados del proyecto de mejora de la calidad de la asistencia en hemodiálisis: estudio multicéntrico de indicadores de calidad de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología (SEN).

INTRODUCTION: The Spanish Society of Nephrology "Quality in Nephrology Working Group" (QNWG) was created in 2002. The aims of this group are the identification, diffusion, implementation and consolidation of a systematic, objective and comprehensive set of quality performance measures (QPMs) to help along the improvement of patient care and outcomes on hemodialysis, by means of strategies of feedback and benchmarking, and the design of quality improvement projects. The objective of this study is to present the preliminary results of a set of quality performance measures obtained in a group of Spanish hemodialysis centers, as well as to evaluate the repercussion of the application of the aforementioned thecniques on the observed results. METHODS: During 2007 a total of 28 hemodialysis units participated in the study; 2516 patients were evaluated. A specific software was designed and used to facilitate the calculation of CPMs in each unit. The clinical indicators used refered to dialysis adequacy; anemia; mineral metabolisme; nutrition; viral infections; vascular access; mortality, morbidity (number and days of hospital admissions); and renal transplant. Every three months each center received its own data and its comparison with the rest of the group. RESULTS: Except for hemoglobin levels we observed a global improvement. The percentage of centers reaching the stablished standards defined by the QNWG passed from 65% to 90,9% for Kt/V Daugirdas II (> 1,3 in > that 80% of the patients); from 71,4 % to 77,2 % for PTH (> 30 % of patients with serum PTH between 150 and 300 pg/ml); and from 42,8 % to 63,5 % for phosphate (> 75 % of patients with a serum phsphate < 5,5 mg/dl). More than 50% of centers showed an improvement in their final results as compared with their own initial results in all analyzed CPMs. Those centers that did not obtained an improvement in their results started the study with better percentages of acomplishment than those that showed a significant improvement in QPMs. (80,6+/-15,4 versus 71,8+/-16,6 respectively; p<0,001) CONCLUSIONS: We are starting to make progresses in our knowledge of clinical results in our hemodialysis units, although there is still a long way to go over. To monitor and share CPMs results within hemodialysis centers might help to improve their results as well as to reduce intecenters variability.

[Functional dependency evaluation of hemodialysis patients: a multicentric study]. / Valoración del grado de dependencia funcional de los pacientes en hemodiálisis (HD): estudio multicéntrico.

BACKGROUND: There has been a change in the hemodialysis population characteristics over the last years with a progressive increase in patient,s age and associated comorbility and mortality. This older hemodialysis population are more functionally and medically dependent increasing the time taken to perform nursing work. The objective of this study was to evaluate the degree of functional dependency on hemodialysis patients and the need of care by nursing workload. METHODS: A transversal descriptive study was done during 1 month (april 2005) on 586 patients from 10 HD Units in Spain. No exclusion criteria were used. The Delta Test, who was used to evaluate the patients dependency needs, is a workload measure instrument base on three subscales: dependency, Physical Deficiency and mental deficiency. The indicators are measure on a scale of one to three with each level representing an increasing demand on nursing time. The results obtained from the Delta Test were analyzed taking into account the following variables: age, average time in dialysis, Charlson comorbidity Index, geographic location and HD unit. RESULTS: 46% of the patients show some degree of dependency, of these 12.8% were moderated and 8.1% severe; the subscale analysis showed that 19.6% and 6.7% had, respectively, a moderate to severe physical and mental health deficiency. The dependency degree varied significantly between HD Units and geographic location with a range of 0% to 59.8%. The degree of dependency were statistically associated with age and CCI. The higher CCI (r: 0,21; p < 0.001) and age (r: 0,26; p < 0.001) the higher was the Delta Test Score for dependency level. Patients times of initiation on dialysis were not associated with an increase in the degree of dependency. The aspects evaluated by the Delta Test that showed a higher score were those related to patients mobility. The patients assistance requirements during the HD session are basically related to a lack of mobility due to musculoskeletal disease and to a lesser extent to behavior alterations. CONCLUSIONS: HD units are attending patients with an important degree of dependency which impose and added workload to the healthcare personnel. In occasions, it is very difficult to attend and give proper care with the current legally established nurse to patient ratio which. This suggests the need to implement a better staffing policy. The Delta Test provides an objective, adaptable and standardized instrument for measuring degree of dependency of HD patients.

Valoración del grado de dependencia funcional de los pacientes en hemodiálisis (HD): estudio multicéntrico / Functional dependency evaluation of hemofialysis patients. A multicentric study

Introducción: Las características de los pacientes que se incluyen en hemodiálisis (HD) han cambiado en los últimos años, habiendo aumentado la edad y la comorbilidad, lo que tiene implicaciones sobre aspectos funcionales, dada la necesidad de ayuda que requieren estos pacientes. El objetivo de este estudio ha sido analizar el grado de dependencia funcional del paciente en HD. Métodos: Estudio transversal y descriptivo en 586 pacientes dializados en abril de 2005 en 10 unidades de HD ubicadas en la Comunidad Valenciana, Andalucía y Castilla-León. Para valorar el grado de dependencia se utilizó el «Test Delta», que consta de tres subescalas que miden: Dependencia: (puntuación máxima 30), Deficiencia física: (puntuación máxima 15) y Deficiencia psíquica: (puntuación máxima 15). Los ítems se puntúan de 0 a 3, de menor a mayor severidad. Se analizaron los resultados obtenidos de acuerdo con las siguientes variables: Edad, tiempo medio en hemodiálisis, Índice de Comorbilidad de Charlson (ICC), Provincias y Unidades. Resultados: El 45,6% de los pacientes presentaba algún tipo de dependencia (un 12,8% en grado moderado y un 8,1% en grado severo). El análisis por sub-escalas mostró una Deficiencia física moderada-severa en el 19,6%, y en el 6,7% una Deficiencia psíquica. Este grado de dependencia variaba significativamente de unas unidades a otras (0%- 59,8%), y según áreas geográficas. La edad y el ICC mostraron asociación estadísticamente significativa con el grado de dependencia, de modo que a mayor edad (r: 0,26; p < 0,001) y mayor puntuación en el ICC (r: 0,21; p < 0,001) mayor grado de dependencia, sin embargo el tiempo de permanencia en hemodiálisis no mostró asociación. Los aspectos evaluados en el Test Delta que mostraron mayor puntuación fueron los relacionados con la movilidad del paciente. Los requerimientos de ayuda se deben fundamentalmente a falta de autonomía en la movilidad por alteraciones del aparato locomotor y, en menor medida, a trastornos de conducta. En conclusión, los centros de hemodiálisis están atendiendo a pacientes con un importante grado de dependencia, lo que supone una mayor carga de trabajo para el personal sanitario y muy especialmente el de enfermería. En ocasiones es imposible atender a este tipo de pacientes con el ratio de personal asignado actualmente por los conciertos vigentes, y se requiere una mayor dotación de enfermería. La existencia de parámetros que de manera objetiva permitan valorar tales circunstancias, hacen aconsejable aprobar un instrumento de valoración común, que sea sencillo, universal y rápido en la valoración y que, además, pueda adaptarse a las necesidades cambiantes de la población a la que va destinado

Background: There has been a change in the hemodialysis population characteristics over the last years with a progressive increase in patient,s age and associated comorbility and mortality. This older hemodialysis population are more functionally and medically dependent increasing the time taken to perform nursing work. The objective of this study was to evaluate the degree of functional dependency on hemodialysis patients and the need of care by nursing workload. Methods: A transversal descriptive study was done during 1 month (april 2005) on 586 patients from 10 HD Units in Spain. No exclusion criteria were used. The Delta Test, who was used to evaluate the patients dependency needs, is a workload measure instrument base on three subscales: dependency, Physical Deficiency and mental deficiency. The indicators are measure on a scale of one to three with each level representing an increasing demand on nursing time. The results obtained from the Delta Test were analyzed taking into account the following variables: age, average time in dialysis, Charlson comorbidity Index, geographic location and HD unit. Results: 46% of the patients show some degree of dependency, of these 12.8% were moderated and 8.1% severe; the subscale analysis showed that 19.6% and 6.7% had, respectively, a moderate to severe physical and mental health deficiency. The dependency degree varied significantly between HD Units and geographic location with a range of 0% to 59.8%. The degree of dependency were statistically associated with age and CCI. The higher CCI (r: 0,21; p < 0.001) and age (r: 0,26; p < 0.001) the higher was the Delta Test Score for dependency level. Patients times of initiation on dialysis were not associated with an increase in the degree of dependency. The aspects evaluated by the Delta Test that showed a higher score were those related to patients mobility. The patients assistance requirements during the HD session are basically related to a lack of mobility due to musculoskeletal disease and to a lesser extent to behavior alterations. Conclusions: HD units are attending patients with an important degree of dependency which impose and added workload to the healthcare personnel. In occasions, it is very difficult to attend and give proper care with the current legally established nurse to patient ratio which. This suggests the need to implement a better staffing policy. The Delta Test provides an objective, adaptable and standardized instrument for measuring degree of dependency of HD patients

Multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1) gene is strongly expressed in gastric carcinomas. Analysis by immunohistochemistry and real-time quantitative RT-PCR.

AIMS: To assess MRP1 protein and MRP1 mRNA levels in gastric carcinomas and in non-neoplastic mucosa remote from the tumours. MRP1 gene expression may play a role in the complex pattern of chemoresistance present in gastric carcinomas. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 57 carcinomas and respective gastric tissues were included for immunohistochemical assessment with the anti-MRP1 monoclonal antibodies MRPr1 and QCRL-1. Of these, 35 tumour and gastric mucosa tissues were also assessed by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Medium or high MRP1 protein expression was detected in 89% and 77% of carcinomas and in 96% and 93% of non-neoplastic gastric mucosa by MRPr1and QCRL-1, respectively. No difference in MRP1 mRNA levels was detected between carcinomas and non-neoplastic gastric mucosa tissues in 77% of the patients. A significant correlation was found between MRP1 mRNA level and protein expression detected in carcinomas related to non-neoplastic gastric mucosa, although they were non-concordant in 29% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: MRP1 gene is usually expressed in most gastric carcinomas and does not differ substantially from that observed in non-neoplastic gastric mucosa remote from the tumour. However, a decrease in MRP1 gene expression is found in some carcinomas. For accurate assessment of changes in MRP1 expression between tumour and normal tissues both protein and mRNA detection are necessary.

Open versus closed day-case haemorrhoidectomy: is there any difference? Results of a prospective randomised study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nowadays there is still controversy as to whether open or closed haemorrhoidectomy is the surgical treatment of choice for haemorrhoidal pathology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a randomised prospective study in the Day Surgery Unit comparing 100 patients undergoing Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy (group A) versus 100 patients undergoing Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy (group B) for symptomatic haemorrhoids, in whom medical treatment or rubber band ligation had failed. RESULTS: Characteristics of the population were: mean age 43.5 years, with predominance of males, 123 vs. 77; 88% ASA I-II. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: 95% rectal bleeding; 87.5% third-fourth degree. The anaesthetic technique of choice was local anaesthesia plus sedation in 180 patients (90%). Length of surgery: 24 min (group A) and 30 min (group B) (p=n.s.). Resection of three haemorrhoidal cushions was done in 87.5% of cases. There were no re-operations or re-admissions after discharge. Symptomatic recurrence, stenosis and incontinence were not found during the follow-up of the first year. Postoperative pain during the first postoperative week was greater in the open haemorrhoidectomy group, but the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) only during bowel movements. There was complete healing in 40% of the patients in group A and 90% of those in group B (p<0.05) after 1 month. After 1 year, the results and complications were similar in both groups (p=n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Closed haemorrhoidectomy gives better results in terms of pain and healing than open haemorrhoidectomy, whereas recurrence and complications are similar after 1 year.

Is prosthetic umbilical hernia repair bound to replace primary herniorrhaphy in the adult patient?

Given the outstanding outcome that prosthetic repair has recently achieved in the repair of inguinal hernia, we wonder whether it should be implemented as the gold-standard technique for umbilical hernia repair. We report on 213 adult patients who underwent surgery for umbilical hernia at our Day Surgery Unit from June 1992 to January 1998. Criteria for exclusion included problematic social and family environment and ASA IV status. A polypropylene plug was placed in small umbilical defects, whereas large defects (> 3 cm in diameter) were repaired with a polypropylene mesh. The mean follow-up was 64 months. The mean age was 57.1 years, with females accounting for the majority (57.8%). Most patients (88.3%) were classified as ASA I-II. With regard to the hernia size, 143 patients (67.1%) presented with small defects (< 3 cm). The anaesthetic technique of choice was local plus sedation. Reported complications included seroma (5.6%), haematoma (2.3%), wound infection (1.4%), and intolerance to prosthesis (0.95%), the last causing recurrence. The overall recurrence rate at a mean follow-up of 64 months was 0.95%. Prosthetic umbilical hernia repair can safely be performed in adults, and the rate of recurrence in this study is low in comparison to primary tissue repair.

Granulomatous interstitial nephritis associated with hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride.

A 74-year-old woman developed acute renal failure and granulomatous interstitial nephritis associated with hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride. On stopping the drug the renal function improved, but not significantly. Around 20 months after prednisone administration, the renal function had stabilized, with a moderate degree of renal insufficiency. The case is discussed, and some aspects of acute interstitial nephritis induced by diuretics are briefly reviewed.

Gastric carcinoma: study of the most eminent prognostic factors.

In order to analyse some prognostic factors in relation to gastric cancer, 218 patients were included in a prospective protocol at 'Hospital General de Elche' (Spain) with a follow-up of 100%. Survival curves were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test. The number of patients who underwent resection was 122 (63.5%). In 70 cases (36.5%) the resection was not possible. The postoperative mortality was 4.9%. In the survival of patients with gastric cancer we find the following prognostic factors are significant: age, tumour site, macroscopic type, depth of gastric wall affection, presence of lymph nodes, staging, resectability and surgical intention (curative vs palliative).

Relapsing steroid-responsive idiopathic acute interstitial nephritis.

A 49-year-old woman developed acute renal failure secondary to interstitial nephritis. Her clinical history, complementary studies and two renal biopsies could not establish the etiology. She showed signs of incomplete Fanconi syndrome. Treatment with corticosteroids was very effective, though she tended to relapse. We comment briefly on some aspects of idiopathic acute interstitial nephritis.