Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
JAMA Pediatr ; 177(4): 345-352, 2023 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36848113

ABSTRACT

Importance: Intranasal corticosteroids (INCs) remain the first-line treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in both adults and children, despite the lack of evidence regarding their efficacy in the pediatric population. Similarly, their effect on the sinonasal microbiome has not been well documented. Objective: To assess the clinical, immunological, and microbiological effects of 12 weeks of an INC in young children with CRS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial was performed in a pediatric allergy outpatient clinic in 2017 and 2018. Children aged 4 to 8 years with CRS diagnosed by a specialist were included. Data were analyzed from January 2022 to June 2022. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive intranasal mometasone in an atomizer for 12 weeks (1 application per nostril, once per day) and supplemental 3-mL sodium chloride (NaCl), 0.9%, solution in a nasal nebulizer once a day for 12 weeks (INC group) or 3-mL NaCl, 0.9%, solution in a nasal nebulizer once a day for 12 weeks (control group). Main Outcomes and Measures: Measures taken both before and after treatment included the Sinus and Nasal Quality of Life Survey (SN-5), a nasopharynx swab for microbiome analysis by next-generation sequencing methods, and nasal mucosa sampling for occurrence of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). Results: Of the 66 children enrolled, 63 completed the study. The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 6.1 (1.3) years; 38 participants (60.3%) were male and 25 (39.7%) were female. The clinical improvement reflected by reduction in SN-5 score was significantly higher in the INC group compared with the control group (INC group score before and after treatment, 3.6 and 3.1, respectively; control group score before and after treatment, 3.4 and 3.8, respectively; mean between-group difference, -0.58; 95% CI, -1.31 to -0.19; P = .009). The INC group had a greater increase in nasopharyngeal microbiome richness and larger decrease in nasal ILC3 abundance compared with the control group. A significant interaction was observed between change in microbiome richness and the INC intervention on the prediction of significant clinical improvement (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.19; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that treatment with an INC improved the quality of life of children with CRS and had a significant effect on increasing sinonasal biodiversity. Although further investigation is needed of the long-term efficacy and safety of INCs, these data may reinforce the recommendation of using INCs as a first-line treatment of CRS in children. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03011632.


Subject(s)
Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Adult , Child , Male , Humans , Female , Child, Preschool , Quality of Life , Sodium Chloride/therapeutic use , Immunity, Innate , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Lymphocytes , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Chronic Disease , Treatment Outcome
4.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol ; 36(1): 86-91, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30858785

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Bronchial asthma is one of the frequent chronic diseases in elderly persons. Global data show that 6.5-17% of the elderly suffer from asthma. However, there are no Polish data available on asthma prevalence in this group. AIM: This article is a retrospective analysis of the Polish Multicentre Study of Epidemiology of Allergic Diseases (PMSEAD) results aimed at assessing prevalence and clinical characteristics in the elderly. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted in 1998-1999 in 11 research centres in Poland, including the Lodz centre. The study included randomly selected subjects of both sexes. Demographics and prevalence were assessed among adults (aged 16-80 years) based on the nationwide database and the detailed clinical analysis was based on the Lodz centre database. RESULTS: Nationwide data were obtained from 12 970 adults, including 1057 respondents in the Lodz Province; 20.3% of respondents in Poland and 23.6% in the Lodz Province were over 60 years of age. In both groups, elderly participants significantly more frequently suffered from asthma (asthma prevalence in this group was 6.7% for Poland and 12.0% for the Lodz Province). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that age over 60 years (OR = 2.08), residence in the city centre (OR = 3.30), and occurrence of seasonal allergic rhinitis (OR = 3.11) were significant risk factors for asthma occurrence among the residents of the Lodz Province. Among the elderly in Lodz, almost 50% of patients with asthma had not had a proper diagnosis made despite reporting clinical symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In Poland asthma is a common and frequently underdiagnosed disease in the elderly.

6.
Eur Respir Rev ; 24(137): 474-83, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26324809

ABSTRACT

This review presents seven national asthma programmes to support the European Asthma Research and Innovation Partnership in developing strategies to reduce asthma mortality and morbidity across Europe. From published data it appears that in order to influence asthma care, national/regional asthma programmes are more effective than conventional treatment guidelines. An asthma programme should start with the universal commitments of stakeholders at all levels and the programme has to be endorsed by political and governmental bodies. When the national problems have been identified, the goals of the programme have to be clearly defined with measures to evaluate progress. An action plan has to be developed, including defined re-allocation of patients and existing resources, if necessary, between primary care and specialised healthcare units or hospital centres. Patients should be involved in guided self-management education and structured follow-up in relation to disease severity. The three evaluated programmes show that, thanks to rigorous efforts, it is possible to improve patients' quality of life and reduce hospitalisation, asthma mortality, sick leave and disability pensions. The direct and indirect costs, both for the individual patient and for society, can be significantly reduced. The results can form the basis for development of further programme activities in Europe.


Subject(s)
Asthma/therapy , Health Services Accessibility , National Health Programs , Regional Health Planning , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Humans , National Health Programs/organization & administration , National Health Programs/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Program Development , Quality Improvement , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Regional Health Planning/organization & administration , Regional Health Planning/standards , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...