Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Athl Train ; 2024 Mar 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38477153

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Athletic trainers (ATs) face organizational-professional conflict (OPC), often surrounding return-to-sport decisions. To prioritize patient safety and establish a healthy work environment, OPC must be mitigated, yet little research has determined how ATs manage conflicts with stakeholders. OBJECTIVE: To explore ATs' experiences with OPC in the secondary school setting. DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: Telephone interviews. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: 16 ATs (9 females, 7 males; age = 43±11 years; years certified = 17±9; years in their current positions = 9±6). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We digitally recorded telephone interviews and had them professionally transcribed. Data saturation guided recruitment efforts, and was met. To ensure rigor and trustworthiness of the data, we completed basic member checks along with multiple analyst triangulation. We analyzed the qualitative data using an interpretive phenomenological approach. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: effective communication, professional relationships, stakeholder education and professional experience. Participants used effective communication described as frequent, open, and direct, during interactions with stakeholders to manage OPC. OPC was reduced when ATs built professional relationships with stakeholders centered on trust and respect. Participants used stakeholder education as a primary strategy for managing OPC by educating stakeholders about prognosis and return-to-sport timelines post-injury and providing rationale for decisions made. Additionally, years of experience served as a mitigating factor of conflict, in that as ATs gained experience and confidence, they perceived less OPC. CONCLUSIONS: Participants suggested various interpersonal relationship development strategies that can be implemented to manage OPC, especially when starting a new position or building rapport with stakeholders. Specifically, educating various stakeholders on reasons for clinical decisions via effective communication and developing strong professional relationships built on mutual respect assisted in avoiding OPC. Since professional experience appears to alleviate conflict, OPC management strategies should be taught during professional preparation and used early during transition to autonomous practice.

2.
J Athl Train ; 58(1): 18-28, 2023 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35380681

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Coaches play a role in streamlining care, especially by directing student-athletes in need of further medical attention to the athletic trainer (AT). The AT-coach relationship holds great potential for incorporating collaborative care, and yet, little is known about coaches' perceptions and knowledge of ATs. OBJECTIVE: To investigate coaches' perceptions of athletic training and their knowledge regarding the roles and responsibilities of ATs in secondary schools. DESIGN: Concurrent mixed-methods study. SETTING: Cross-sectional online questionnaire. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Secondary school athletic coaches from 10 sports with the highest participation rates during the 2017-2018 season (n = 1097). Most respondents were male (n = 795, 72.4%), and their average age was 44.7 ± 11.4 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Participants completed a web-based questionnaire containing demographics and quantitative measures assessing their perceived value and knowledge of ATs, as well as open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics summarized the demographic data. Counts and percentage responses for quantitative measures were reported. Open-ended responses were analyzed using the general inductive approach. RESULTS: Approximately 93% of respondents considered an AT a trusted source of medical information and a key member of the sports medicine team. Most respondents selected injury prevention (98.9%), first aid and wound care (97%), therapeutic interventions (89.9%), and emergency care (85.8%) as skills ATs are qualified to perform. Forty-six percent of respondents were willing to coach without an AT employed. Coaches trusted ATs as part of the "athletic team" and as gatekeepers, referring student-athletes for advanced care when warranted. Regarding the AT role, coaches emphasized the treatment of minor injuries and the idea of "coverage versus care." CONCLUSIONS: Secondary school coaches valued the athletic training profession and were knowledgeable regarding various roles and responsibilities ATs frequently perform. However, they may view ATs as luxuries instead of necessities, as evidenced by the fact that just under half of responding coaches were willing to coach without an AT employed at the school.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Sports Medicine , Sports , Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Sports/education , Schools , Athletes , Sports Medicine/education , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
J Athl Train ; 55(3): 303-311, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31986099

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Organizational conflict, particularly between coaches and medical professionals, has been reported in collegiate athletics. Different values create room for conflict between coaches and athletic trainers (ATs); however, ATs' experiences when making medical decisions are not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the presence of organizational conflict regarding medical decision making and determine if differences exist across athletic affiliations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Collegiate athletics (National Collegiate Athletic Association [NCAA], National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics [NAIA], National Junior College Athletic Association [NJCAA]). PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 434 ATs responded (age = 27.7 ± 3.2 years, years certified = 5.2 ± 2.7), representing the NCAA Division I (DI; n = 199), Division II (DII; n = 67), Division III (DIII; n = 108); NAIA (n = 37); and NJCAA (n = 23) settings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The survey instrument contained quantitative measures and open-ended questions, with affiliation as our primary independent variable. Responses to Likert-scale questions (1 = strongly agree, 5 = strongly disagree) regarding organizational pressures within athletics served as the dependent variables. Kruskal-Wallis analysis-of-variance and Mann-Whitney U post hoc tests assessed differences in organizational conflict across affiliations. Open-ended questions were analyzed inductively. RESULTS: We obtained a 14.47% (434 of 3000) response rate. National Collegiate Athletic Association DI ATs disagreed less than NCAA DII and DIII and NJCAA ATs that they would worry about job security if turnover in the head coaching position occurred (P < .05). Regarding the influence of coaches on job performance, differences were found between NCAA DI and DIII and between DI and NJCAA ATs (P < .01). Visibility of the injury and situational factors influenced the level of perceived pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Athletic trainers perceived pressure from coaches regarding medical decision making. Division I ATs placed greater emphasis on the role that coaches played in their job performance and job security. Athletic departments should consider transitioning to patient-centered models of care to better align values and reduce the external pressures placed on ATs.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Clinical Decision-Making , Conflict of Interest , Organizational Culture , Sports Medicine/organization & administration , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Mentoring , Personnel Turnover , Physical Conditioning, Human , Return to Sport , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...