ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This study examined the effectiveness of mobile phone reminders in improving the completeness and timeliness of childhood immunization. METHOD: We conducted a parallel arm cluster randomized controlled trial in four primary health care facilities in Nigeria. Reminders were sent to eligible participants in the intervention group at specific intervals when their children were scheduled to receive the vaccines administered at the sixth, 10, and 14 weeks after birth. Immunization records of all participants' children were then tracked to assess their immunization status. RESULTS: The immunization status of the intervention (n = 275) and control (n = 261) arms was analyzed. Completeness and timeliness of the vaccine series were significantly higher (p < .001) among children of participants in the intervention (n = 169, 61.5% and n = 138, 50.2%) than those in the control group (n = 35, 13.4% and n = 13, 5%) arm. DISCUSSION: Mobile phone reminders were established to be effective in increasing the completeness and timeliness of childhood immunization.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study assessed the effect of mobile phone text message and call reminders in the completeness of the pentavalent vaccine administered against diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, hepatitis B, and Haemophilus influenza. DESIGN AND METHODS: The population for this quasi-experimental study were recent mothers of children not more than three weeks old selected from six local government areas of Kano State, Northern Nigeria. Three local government areas were each allocated to the intervention (reminder) and control groups of the study. Mobile phone reminders (SMS and follow-up calls) were sent to mothers in the reminder group three days to and on the due date of their child's schedule for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd doses of the pentavalent vaccine. All statistical data were entered into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 and analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: A total of 541 mothers (271 in the intervention group and 270 in the control group) participated in the study. Completion rates for the three doses of the pentavalent vaccine were observed to be higher for children in the reminder group (n = 161, 59.4%) compared to those in the control group (n = 92, 34.1%). CONCLUSION: Mobile phone reminders were effective and improved the rate of completeness of the pentavalent vaccine in the studied population. In line with the findings of the study, it is recommended that future studies should focus on identifying the best approach to remind parents either through SMS, phone calls, or voice messages or a combination of any of the approaches. PRACTICE IMPLICATION: Nurses and other health care providers will have empirical evidence on the use of mobile phone technology to improve the health and wellbeing of children by protecting them from vaccine-preventable diseases.
Subject(s)
Cell Phone , Text Messaging , Child , Female , Humans , Nigeria , Reminder Systems , Vaccines, CombinedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to explore the viewpoints of healthcare professionals (HCPs) on the adoption and use of eHealth in clinical practice in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Information and communication technologies (ICTs) including eHealth provide HCPs the opportunity to provide quality healthcare to their patients while also improving their own clinical practices. Despite this, previous research has identified these technologies have their associated challenges when adopting them for clinical practice. But more research is needed to identify how these eHealth resources influence clinical practice. In addition, there is still little information about adoption and use of these technologies by HCPs inclinical practice in Sub-Saharan Africa. METHOD: An exploratory descriptive design was adopted for this study. Thirty-six (36) HCPs (18 nurses and 18 physicians) working in the clinical area in a tertiary health institution in SSA participated in this study. Using Qmethodology, study participants rank-ordered forty-six statementsin relation to their adoption and use of eHealth within their clinical practice.This was analysed using by-person factor analysis and complemented with audio-taped interviews. RESULTS: The analysis yielded four factors i.e., distinct viewpoints the HCPs hold about adoption and use of eHealth within their clinical practice. These factors include: "Patient-focused eHealth advocates" who use the eHealth because they are motivated by patients and their families preferences; "Task-focused eHealth advocates" use eHealth because it helps them complete clinical tasks; "Traditionalistic-pragmatists" recognise contributions eHealth makes in clinical practice but separate from their routine clinical activities; and the "Tech-focused eHealth advocates" who use the eHealth because they are motivated by the technology itself. CONCLUSION: The study shows the equivocal viewpoints that HCPs have about eHealth within their clinical practice. This, in addition to adding to existing literature, will help policymakers/decision makers to consider HCPs views about these technologies prior to implementing an eHealth resource.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Technologies have globally been recognised to improve productivity across different areas of practice including healthcare. This has been achieved due to the expansion of computers and other forms of information technologies. Despite this advancement, there has also been the growing challenge of the adoption and use of these technologies within practice and especially in healthcare. The evolution of information technologies and more specifically e-health within the healthcare practice has its own barriers and facilitators. METHODOLOGY: This paper describes a pilot study to explore these factors that influence information and technology adoption and use by health professionals in the clinical area in Sub-Saharan Africa. We report on the use of Q-methodology and the models of technology acceptance used in combination for the first time. The methodology used for this study aims to explore the subjectivity of healthcare professionals and present their shared views (factors) on their adoption and use of e-health within clinical practice.
