Infliximab Therapeutic monitoring by tryptic peptide LC-MS/MS method improvements lead to improved accuracy with decreased imprecision and turnaround time.

Introduction: Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab has become the standard of care for inflammatory bowel disease in the setting of loss of response to therapy, and occasionally in proactive therapy personalization. Measurement of infliximab by tryptic peptide HPLC-MS/MS has been available since 2015, mostly in reference laboratories. Objectives: Here, we present method improvements to our original published method leading to a more efficient, robust, and high throughput tryptic peptide HPLC-MS/MS assay for infliximab quantitation. Methods: Deidentified residual serum samples submitted for clinical testing were used for method comparison and infliximab was spiked into normal human serum for performance studies. Improvements included the addition of a stable isotope labeled full length infliximab internal standard (IS) replacing a surrogate IS, and immunoenrichment using Melon Gel for immunoglobulins replacing the saturated ammonium sulfate precipitation. Digestion and chromatography were optimized, and automation was added. The method improvements were validated to include precision, accuracy, reportable range, linearity, and analytical sensitivity. Results: The digestion time was reduced from overnight to 1 h. The assay analytical measuring range (AMR) remained the same throughout improvements, 1-100 µg/mL, with linearity of 0.98x + 0.50, R2 = 1.00. Intra- and inter-assay imprecision were less than 5 % CV at four different concentrations. Accuracy was assessed with 106 patients within the AMR; Passing-Bablok Regression yielded a slope of 1.00 and a y-intercept of 0.25. Turnaround time was reduced by 1 day, and imprecision of three levels of quality control trended down after new method implementation. Conclusions: Method improvements including automation have allowed for assay completion in half a day, improving robustness and turnaround time.

Alpha-1-Antitrypsin (A1AT) Proteotyping by LC-MS/MS.

The diagnosis of alpha-1-antitrypsin (A1AT) deficiency is established by quantitation of protein concentration in serum (immunoassay) followed by determination of specific allelic variants by phenotyping (isoelectric focusing (IEF) gel electrophoresis) and/or allele-specific genotyping. Various phenotyping and genotyping methodologies are available, and each has their own advantages and disadvantages. As an alternative, mass spectrometry is emerging as a powerful tool in the identification and quantitation of proteins and peptides. The method described here, referred to as proteotyping, is a proteomic method using trypsin digestion and tandem mass spectrometry that detects the most common deficiency alleles, S and Z, associated with A1AT deficiency.This qualitative mass spectrometry method is based on the principle that the S and Z mutations lead to amino acid changes which result in a change in the mass of the A1AT protein. When the A1AT protein is proteolytically digested, multiple peptides are generated, two of which include the sites of the S and Z mutations, respectively. Peptides generated from wild-type A1AT (M alleles) differ in sequence and mass from peptides generated from the S and Z alleles at these two specific locations. The mass difference allows for differentiation of S and Z peptides, representing the deficiency alleles, from non-S and non-Z peptides, representing the wild-type alleles (M). Interpretation of the peptide patterns in conjunction with A1AT quantitation by immunoassay allows for an accurate assessment for the presence of deficiency alleles in the majority of patients.

Lack of observed interference by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in select commonly utilized immunoassays.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (tmabs) have been hypothesized to interfere with immunoassay measurements, although studies investigating this potential new class of interference are lacking. This study evaluated the effects of tmabs used in cancers ipilimumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), nivolumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), pembrolizumab (Merck) and autoimmune disorders adalimumab (AbbVie), infliximab (Janssen) and vedolizumab (Takeda) in common immunoassays used in the clinical laboratory. METHODS: Residual sera from 10 randomly chosen patients were split into two tubes and spiked with same volume (approximately 5 % final volume) of either saline (control) or 6 tmabs (final concentration of 100 µg/mL each). Concentrations from sixteen analytes in 19 different assays were assessed: TSH (Roche and Beckman), free thyroxine (Roche and Siemens), cortisol (Beckman), Cancer Antigens (CA): CA19-9 (Beckman), CA15-3 (Roche), CA125 (Roche), and CA27.29 (Siemens), carcinoembryonic antigen (Beckman), alpha-fetoprotein (Beckman), thyroglobulin (Beckman) and thyroglobulin antibodies (Beckman), thyroid peroxidase antibody (Beckman), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (Roche and Beckman), total prostate-specific antigen (Roche), parathyroid hormone (Roche) and antinuclear antibodies IgG (Werfen). The tmab spiked residual sera were compared with matched saline spiked sera and percent error was assessed against allowable total error defined from biological variation or CLIA limits. RESULTS: None of the tested immunoassays were affected by the presence of the tmabs, in samples within or outside assay reference intervals. The median % error among all immunoassays ranged between -2.0% (for TSH) to 2.7% (for TPO Ab assay). CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate no detectable tmab interference for the assessed immunoassays using spiked preparations of the tmabs in residual human sera. The findings are limited to the tmabs and immunoassays studied here.

Outcomes of Infliximab-Treated inflammatory bowel disease patients undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring with two different assays.

OBJECTIVES: There are multiple assays for infliximab (IFX) drug level (IFX-DL) and antibody to infliximab (ATI) measurement. The aims of this study are to examine the correlation and outcomes of IFX-DL and ATI in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, simultaneously measured with different methods in different institutions. DESIGN AND METHODS: Residual samples of IFX-treated IBD patients undergoing drug monitoring for IFX-DL and ATI, both measured by ECLIA (Esoterix Laboratories) were used to simultaneously quantify IFX-DL via LC-MS/MS and ATI via an in-house ECLIA (ih-ECLIA) (Mayo Clinic Laboratories). Comparisons of IFX-DL and ATI detection between the assays from different institutions were performed, along with a comparison between the assays by association of IFX-DL and ATI obtained by each method with clinical remission, endoscopic healing (EH) and normal serum C-reactive protein (CRP ≤ 8 mg/L). RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were included (median age, 32 years (range, 12-84); 45.7% female). The median IFX-DL was 7 mcg/mL (IQR: 1.3, 19.4) and 6 mcg/mL (IQR: 0.9, 20) via LC-MS/MS and ECLIA, respectively (Spearman correlation coefficient r = 0.97). ATI was detected in 13/142 (9.2%) via ih-ECLIA of whom 100% had IFX-DL < 5 mcg/mL by LC-MS/MS. ATI was positive in 39/151 (25.8%) via ECLIA, and 84.6% of positives had IFX-DL < 5 mcg/mL by ECLIA. Compared to ECLIA, the frequency of ATI detection via ih-ECLIA was lower in patients in clinical remission (7.3% vs 36.6%; p = 0.0005), those with normal CRP (5.9% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.0005), and in patients with EH (5.3% vs 18.4%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: IFX-DL was comparable between LC-MS/MS and ECLIA assays. Rate of ATI detection via ih-ECLIA was lower than ECLIA, which was more aligned with favorable clinical outcomes.

Characterizing M-protein light chain glycosylation via mass spectrometry.

OBJECTIVES: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) patients with M-proteins containing n-glycosylated light chains (GLC) have an increased risk for progression to symptomatic plasma cell disorders (PCD). Large-scale research involving the determination of glycan specific moieties is understudied due to the lack of clinically viable methods. This report documents a proof-of-concept glycan characterization method for patients with M-protein GLCs. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-three previously characterized MGUS patients with glycosylated light chains identified by MASS-FIX were used for this study. Glycosylated light chains were enriched from patient serum using light chain (LC) specific Sepharose nanobody beads (NB), followed by glycan digestion via PNGase F. Glycan moieties were derivatized on-target using Girard's reagent T for MALDI-TOF analysis and confirmed with top-down GLC LC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS analysis. RESULTS: Intact GLC LC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS and cleaved glycan MALDI-TOF MS analysis had 100% agreement for the top three intensity glycans between spectra and 88 percent agreement for all reported glycan moieties. GLC moieties among patients were similar with fucosylation being the only notable difference. Additionally, doubly glycosylated light chains were observed in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: The MALDI-TOF method provides the tools to characterize and evaluate GLCs in a clinical setting as it is adaptable to our clinical MASS-Fix assay, relatively cheap, and accurate in glycan moiety assignments as confirmed by top-down GLC LC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS.

Ravulizumab: Characterization and quantitation of a new C5 inhibitor using isotype specific affinity purification and high-resolution mass spectrometry.

INTRODUCTION: Ravulizumab (RAVUL) is a new complement inhibitor, with a difference of 4 amino acids in the heavy chain from a predecessor compound, eculizumab (ECUL). OBJECTIVES: First, to utilize mass spectrometry (MS) to characterize RAVUL and verify differences from its predecessor and, second, to validate and implement a lab developed test (LDT) for RAVUL that will allow for quantitative therapeutic monitoring. METHODS: A time-of-flight mass spectrometer (TOF-MS) was used to characterize and differentiate the molecular weight differences between RAVUL and ECUL by both digest and reduction experiments. In parallel, an LDT for RAVUL was validated and implemented utilizing IgG4 enrichment with light chain detection and quantitation on a high throughput orbitrap MS platform. RESULTS: The TOF-MS platform allowed for the mass difference between RAVUL and ECUL to be verified along with providing a proof of concept for a new intact protein quantitation software. An LDT on an orbitrap MS was validated and implemented using intact light chain quantitation, with the limitation that it cannot differentiate between ECUL and RAVUL. The LDT has an analytical measuring range from 5 to 600 mcg/mL, inter-assay imprecision of ≤13% CV (n = 13) and accuracy with <4% error from expected values (n = 20). CONCLUSION: The TOF-MS is a versatile development platform that can be used to characterize and verify the molecular weight differences between the ECUL and RAVUL heavy chains. Routine laboratory testing for RAVUL was viable using an orbitrap-MS to quantitate using the mass of the intact light chain. These two platforms, combined, provide incomparable value in development of LDTs for the clinical laboratory.

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry can distinguish immunofixation bands of the same isotype as monoclonal or biclonal proteins.

BACKGROUND: Plasma cell disorders (PCDs) are typically characterized by excessive production of a single immunoglobulin, defined as a monoclonal protein (M-protein). Some patients have more than one identifiable M-protein, termed biclonal. Traditional immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) cannot distinguish if two bands of the same isotype represent biclonal proteins or M-proteins with some other feature. A novel assay using immunoenrichment coupled to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry (Mass-Fix) was applied to determine whether two bands of the same isotype represented (1) monomers and dimers of a single M-protein, (2) an M-protein plus a therapeutic monoclonal antibody (t-mAb), (3) an M-protein with light chain glycosylation, or (4) two distinct biclonal M-proteins. METHODS: Patient samples with two bands of the same isotype identified by IFE were enriched using nanobodies against IgG, IgA, IgM, or κ and λ light chains then analyzed by Mass-Fix. Light chain masses were used to differentiate IgGκ M-proteins from t-mAbs. Mass differences between peaks were calculated to identify N-glycosylation or matrix adducts. High-resolution mass spectrometry was used as a comparator method in a subset of samples. RESULTS: Eighty-one residual samples were collected. For IgA, 93% (n = 25) were identified as monoclonal. For IgG, 67% (n = 24) were monoclonal, and 33% (n = 12) were truly biclonal. Among the monoclonal IgGs, the second band represented a glycosylated form for 21% (n = 5), while 33% (n = 8) had masses consistent with a t-mAb. 44% (n = 8) of IgM samples were biclonal, and 56% (n = 10) were monoclonal, of which one was glycosylated. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the utility of mass spectrometry in the characterization of multiple IFE bands of the same isotype. Improved reporting accuracy of M-proteins is useful for monitoring of patients with PCDs.

Monitoring Ravulizumab effect on complement assays.

Ravulizumab is a new C5 inhibitor therapeutic monoclonal antibody with a longer half-life than eculizumab. Monitoring complete complement blockade by eculizumab has allowed personalized therapy in specific settings. Similar action is expected with ravulizumab. Ravulizumab has 4 different amino acids from eculizumab, which allow greater affinity for the FcRn immunoglobulin receptor and change the affinity of the molecule for C5. Here we investigate if clinical lab tests traditionally used to monitor complement blockade for eculizumab are appropriate for monitoring complement blockade caused by ravulizumab. De-identified serum samples with known normal complement activity were spiked with increasing amounts of ravulizumab, from zero to 1000 µg/mL. Measurement of classical pathway function (CH50) and C5 function using a liposome method (Wako Diagnostics) showed >50% complement inhibition starting with 50 µg/mL of ravulizumab, but inhibition >95% of complement activity was not achieved, with residual measurements of 11% at 700 µg/mL. In contrast, measurement of alternative pathway function using an ELISA (AH50, Wieslab) showed alternative pathway function inhibition of 80% at 50 µg/mL of ravulizumab and > 95% at 200 µg/mL, which is consistent with expected therapeutic concentrations of ravulizumab >175 µg/mL. If replicated in patient sera, AH50 could be a suitable therapeutic monitoring tool.

Vedolizumab quantitation using high-resolution accurate mass-mass spectrometry middle-up protein subunit: method validation.

Background While quantitation methods for small-molecule and tryptic peptide bottom-up mass spectrometry (MS) have been well defined, quantitation methods for top-down or middle-up MS approaches have not been as well defined. Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (t-mAbs) are a group of proteins that can be used to both demonstrate the advantages of top-down or middle-up detection methods over classic tryptic peptide bottom-up along with the growing need for robust quantitation strategies/software for these top-down or middle-up methods. Bottom-up proteolytic digest methods for the t-mAbs tend to suffer from challenges such as limited peptide selection due to potential interference from the polyclonal immunoglobulin background, complicated workflows, and inadequate sensitivity and specificity without laborious purification steps, and therefore have prompted the search for new detection and quantitation methods. Time-of-flight along with Orbitrap MS have recently evolved from the research and/or pharmaceutical setting into the clinical laboratory. With their superior mass measurement accuracy, resolution and scanning speeds, these are ideal platforms for top-down or middle-up characterization and quantitation. Methods We demonstrate a validated, robust, middle-up protein subunit detection and quantitation method for the IgG1 t-mAb, vedolizumab (VEDO), which takes advantage of the high resolution of the Orbitrap MS detection and quantitation software to increase specificity. Results Validated performance characteristics met pre-defined acceptance criteria with simple workflows and rapid turnaround times: characteristics necessary for implementation into a high-volume clinical MS laboratory. Conclusions While the extraction method can easily be used with other IgG1 t-mAbs, the detection and quantitation method may become an option for measurement of other proteins.

The impact of eculizumab on routine complement assays.

BACKGROUND: Eculizumab (ECU) blocks complement C5 cleavage, preventing the formation of C5a and the cytolytic effects of the membrane attack complex. The presence of ECU in blood impacts routine complement tests used to monitor treatment. METHODS: Residual serum samples with normal total complement (CH50) and residual citrate plasma with normal PT/APTT were spiked with ECU at varied concentrations ranging from 25 to 600 µg/mL. In addition, seventy-one samples from patients on ECU were obtained. Artificial and patient samples were analyzed for CH50 and C5 function (Wako Diagnostics), C5 concentration (Quidel), AH50 (Wieslab ELISA) and sMAC (Quidel). ECU concentration was measured by mass spectrometry for all patients. RESULTS: Complement blockage by ECU was evident in spiked artificial samples. At 25 µg/mL ECU, partial complement blockage was observed in CH50, AH50 and C5 function in serum. Complete blockage defined by undetectable AH50 (<10%) occurred at 100 µg/mL ECU. C5 concentrations remained the same regardless of ECU. sMAC results stayed around 81% of baseline in serum and 47% in citrate plasma with 50µg/mL ECU. Patient samples had ECU ranging from <5 to 1220 µg/mL. In all patients with ECU >100 µg/mL, C5 function was <29 U/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The spiked sera and patient samples showed complement blockage with CH50, AH50 and C5 function assays when ECU >100 µg/mL. CH50, AH50 or C5 function assays can serve as indicators for the pharmacodynamic effects of eculizumab. Allied to ECU concentration, laboratory studies may be helpful to tailor therapy.

Mass Spectrometry Approaches for Identification and Quantitation of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies in the Clinical Laboratory.

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are an important class of drugs used to treat diseases ranging from autoimmune disorders to B cell lymphomas to other rare conditions thought to be untreatable in the past. Many advances have been made in the characterization of immunoglobulins as a result of pharmaceutical companies investing in technologies that allow them to better understand MAbs during the development phase. Mass spectrometry is one of the new advancements utilized extensively by pharma to analyze MAbs and is now beginning to be applied in the clinical laboratory setting. The rise in the use of therapeutic MAbs has opened up new challenges for the development of assays for monitoring this class of drugs. MAbs are larger and more complex than typical small-molecule therapeutic drugs routinely analyzed by mass spectrometry. In addition, they must be quantified in samples that contain endogenous immunoglobulins with nearly identical structures. In contrast to an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for quantifying MAbs, mass spectrometry-based assays do not rely on MAb-specific reagents such as recombinant antigens and/or anti-idiotypic antibodies, and time for development is usually shorter. Furthermore, using molecular mass as a measurement tool provides increased specificity since it is a first-order principle unique to each MAb. This enables rapid quantification of MAbs and multiplexing. This review describes how mass spectrometry can become an important tool for clinical chemists and especially immunologists, who are starting to develop assays for MAbs in the clinical laboratory and are considering mass spectrometry as a versatile platform for the task.

Quantification of the IgG2/4 kappa Monoclonal Therapeutic Eculizumab from Serum Using Isotype Specific Affinity Purification and Microflow LC-ESI-Q-TOF Mass Spectrometry.

As therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) become more humanized, traditional tryptic peptide approaches used to measure biologics in serum become more challenging since unique clonotypic peptides used for quantifying the mAb may also be found in the normal serum polyclonal background. An alternative approach is to monitor the unique molecular mass of the intact light chain portion of the mAbs using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Distinguishing a therapeutic mAb from a patient's normal polyclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) repertoire is the primary limiting factor when determining the limit of quantitation (LOQ) in serum. The ability to selectively extract subclass specific Igs from serum reduces the polyclonal background in a sample. We present here the development of an LC-MS method to quantify eculizumab in serum. Eculizumab is a complement component 5 (C5) binding mAb that is fully humanized and contains portions of both IgG2 and IgG4 subclasses. Our group developed a method that uses Life Technologies CaptureSelect IgG4 (Hu) affinity matrix. We show here the ability to quantitate eculizumab with a LOQ of 5 mcg/mL by removing the higher abundance IgG1, IgG2, and IgG3 from the polyclonal background, making this approach a simple and efficient procedure. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Using Mass Spectrometry to Quantify Rituximab and Perform Individualized Immunoglobulin Phenotyping in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis.

Therapeutic monoclonal immunoglobulins (mAbs) are used to treat patients with a wide range of disorders including autoimmune diseases. As pharmaceutical companies bring more fully humanized therapeutic mAb drugs to the healthcare market analytical platforms that perform therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) without relying on mAb specific reagents will be needed. In this study we demonstrate that liquid-chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) can be used to perform TDM of mAbs in the same manner as smaller nonbiologic drugs. The assay uses commercially available reagents combined with heavy and light chain disulfide bond reduction followed by light chain analysis by microflow-LC-electrospray ionization-quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI-Q-TOF MS). Quantification is performed using the peak areas from multiply charged mAb light chain ions using an in-house developed software package developed for TDM of mAbs. The data presented here demonstrate the ability of an LC-MS assay to quantify a therapeutic mAb in a large cohort of patients in a clinical trial. The ability to quantify any mAb in serum via the reduced light chain without the need for reagents specific for each mAb demonstrates the unique capabilities of LC-MS. This fact, coupled with the ability to phenotype a patient's polyclonal repertoire in the same analysis further shows the potential of this approach to mAb analysis.

Monoclonal antibody therapeutics as potential interferences on protein electrophoresis and immunofixation.

BACKGROUND: The use of therapeutic recombinant monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has triggered concerns of mis-diagnosis of a plasma cell dyscrasia in treated patients. The purpose of this study is to determine if infliximab (INF), adalimumab (ADA), eculizumab (ECU), vedolizumab (VEDO), and rituximab (RITU) are detected as monoclonal proteins by serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE). METHODS: Pooled normal sera were spiked with various concentrations (ranging from trough to peak) of INF, ADA, ECU, VEDO and RITU. The peak concentration for VEDO and RITU was also added to samples with known monoclonal gammopathies. All samples were analyzed by SPEP (Helena Laboratories) and IFE (Sebia); sera containing peak concentrations of mAbs were reflexed to electrospray-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (AbSciex Triple TOF 5600) for the intact light chain monoclonal immunoglobulin rapid accurate mass measurement (miRAMM). RESULTS: For all mAbs tested, no quantifiable M-spikes were observed by SPEP at any concentration analyzed. Small γ fraction abnormalities were noted on SPEP for VEDO at 300 µg/mL and RITU at 400 µg/mL, with identification of small IgG κ proteins on IFE. Using miRAMM for peak samples, therapeutic mAbs light chain accurate masses were identified above the polyclonal background and were distinct from endogenous monoclonal gammopathies. CONCLUSIONS: MAbs should not be easily confounded with plasma cell dyscrasias in patients undergoing therapy except when a SPEP and IFE are performed within a couple of days from infusion (peak). In ambiguous cases the use of the miRAMM technology could precisely identify the therapeutic mAb distinct from any endogenous monoclonal protein.

Quantitation of infliximab using clonotypic peptides and selective reaction monitoring by LC-MS/MS.

OBJECTIVES: Although therapeutic concentrations of infliximab (chimeric IgG1 kappa) are associated with improved clinical prognosis, clinical laboratory methods for monitoring are limited. Therefore, we aimed to develop a LC-MS/MS method to measure infliximab in serum. METHODS: Infliximab was measured using isotope-labeled peptides and horse IgG as a surrogate internal standard. After trypsin digestion, peptides were separated by reverse-phase C8 LC and detected by MS/MS on an ABSciex API 5000; analyte-to-internal standard peak area ratios were used for quantitation. Sera from patients receiving infliximab were collected at different time points in treatment and compared with a commercially available ECLIA method. RESULTS: The linear dynamic range of the assay was 1-100 µg/mL (R(2)>0.998); both intra- and inter-assay imprecisions were <20%. Patients undergoing infliximab therapy had trough concentrations of 8.5 ± 8.8 µg/mL (mean ± SD), which substantially increased 48-72 h after infusion (77 ± 40 µg/mL), then fell after 28-32 days (15 ± 11 µg/mL). A comparison of LC-MS/MS and ECLIA methods demonstrated a slope of 0.967 (95% CI: 0.894-1.034, r=0.970). CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated the ability to quantify infliximab in patients using clonotypic peptides. This approach has the potential to be quickly adaptable to other monoclonal antibodies and to expand the availability of testing for this class of therapeutics in routine clinical practice.

Quantification of serum IgG subclasses by use of subclass-specific tryptic peptides and liquid chromatography--tandem mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of IgG subclasses is a useful tool for investigation of humoral immune deficiency in the presence of total IgG within reference intervals and IgG4-related disease. Nephelometry has been the method of choice for quantification. We describe an LC-MS/MS method that can multiplex all 4 subclasses along with total IgG by use of either IgG subclass-specific peptide stable isotope-labeled internal standards or a surrogate digest standard for quantification and does not rely on antigen/antibody reactions. METHODS: We combined serum with labeled internal peptide standards and intact purified horse IgG. Samples were denatured, reduced, alkylated, and digested. We analyzed the digested serum by LC-MS/MS for IgG subclasses 1-4 and total IgG. RESULTS: We assayed 112 patient sera by LC-MS/MS and immunonephelometry. The mean of the slopes and R(2) values for IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, and IgG were 1.18 and 0.93, respectively. Interassay imprecision for the LC-MS/MS method was <15% for total IgG and subclasses and was slightly improved by use of a calibrator peptide from an exogenous horse IgG. Summed total IgG correlated with the measured total IgG within 10%. Reference intervals and analytical measuring range were all similar to our previous validation data for the immunonephelometry assays. CONCLUSIONS: Total IgG and IgG subclasses 1, 2, 3, and 4 can be quantified by LC-MS/MS with performance comparable to nephelometry.

Comparison between immunoturbidimetry, size-exclusion chromatography, and LC-MS to quantify urinary albumin.

BACKGROUND: The accurate and precise measurement of urinary albumin is critical, since even minor increases are diagnostically sensitive indicators of renal disease, cardiovascular events, and risk for death. To gain insights into potential measurement biases, we systematically compared urine albumin measurements performed by LC-MS, a clinically available immunoturbidimetric assay, and size-exclusion HPLC. METHODS: We obtained unused clinical urine samples from 150 patients who were stratified by degrees of albuminuria (<20 mg/L, 20-250 mg/L, >250 mg/L) as determined by the immunoturbidimetric assay used in our clinical laboratory (Roche Hitachi 912). Urine albumin was then remeasured via LC-MS and HPLC (Accumin) assays. RESULTS: The immunoturbidimetric assay, calibrated using manufacturer-supplied serum-derived calibrators (Diasorin), underestimated albumin compared with LC-MS. After calibration with purified HSA, this immunoturbidimetric assay correlated well with LC-MS. HPLC overestimated albumin compared with both LC-MS and immunoturbidimetry. The current LC-MS and HPLC assays both performed poorly at concentrations <20 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts are needed to establish gold-standard traceable calibrators for clinical assays. LC-MS is a specific method to quantify albumin in native urine when concentrations exceed 20 mg/L, and therefore could be employed for standardization among assays.