Unusual shape and structure of lymphocyte nuclei is linked to hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes patients.

Type 2 diabetes is an endocrine disorder characterized with hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. Morphological changes in cell nuclei in diabetes were recently detected. The aim of this study was to compare electron microscopic features of lymphocyte nuclei in type 2 diabetes and healthy individuals using conventional computer assisted methods, fractal analysis and gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) analysis of nuclear chromatin. Mononuclear cells taken from the peripheral blood of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients, metformin treated type 2 diabetes patients and healthy individuals were analyzed with transmission electron microscope. Irregular nuclear contours and lower amount of heterochromatin in lymphocytes were detected with conventional computer assisted methods in type 2 diabetes. Fractal analysis of chromatin structures and GLCM angular second moment (ASM) analysis detected differences in nuclear structure between metformin treated type 2 diabetes and two other groups. Irregularities in lymphocyte nuclei correlated with blood glucose, but not with cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Decrease in fractal dimension, indicating lower level of complexity, increase in GLCM ASM, indicating higher texture uniformity, and higher amount of euchromatin that we found in metformin treated type 2 diabetes could be indicators of higher transcriptional activity in these cells.

Distribution of indications and procedures within the framework of centers participating in the WAA apheresis registry.

The WAA apheresis registry was established in 2003 and an increasing number of centers have since then included their experience and data of their procedures. The registry now contains data of more than 74,000 apheresis procedures in more than 10,000 patients. This report shows that the indications for apheresis procedures are changing towards more oncological diagnoses and stem cell collections from patients and donors and less therapeutic apheresis procedures. In centers that continue to register, the total extent of apheresis procedures and patients treated have expanded during the latest years.

Adverse events in apheresis: An update of the WAA registry data.

Apheresis with different procedures and devices are used for a variety of indications that may have different adverse events (AEs). The aim of this study was to clarify the extent and possible reasons of various side effects based on data from a multinational registry. The WAA-apheresis registry data focus on adverse events in a total of 50846 procedures in 7142 patients (42% women). AEs were graded as mild, moderate (need for medication), severe (interruption due to the AE) or death (due to AE). More AEs occurred during the first procedures versus subsequent (8.4 and 5.5%, respectively). AEs were mild in 2.4% (due to access 54%, device 7%, hypotension 15%, tingling 8%), moderate in 3% (tingling 58%, urticaria 15%, hypotension 10%, nausea 3%), and severe in 0.4% of procedures (syncope/hypotension 32%, urticaria 17%, chills/fever 8%, arrhythmia/asystole 4.5%, nausea/vomiting 4%). Hypotension was most common if albumin was used as the replacement fluid, and urticaria when plasma was used. Arrhythmia occurred to similar extents when using plasma or albumin as replacement. In 64% of procedures with bronchospasm, plasma was part of the replacement fluid used. Severe AEs are rare. Although most reactions are mild and moderate, several side effects may be critical for the patient. We present side effects in relation to the procedures and suggest that safety is increased by regular vital sign measurements, cardiac monitoring and by having emergency equipment nearby.

Diabetic cardiomyopathy: ongoing controversies in 2012.

Diabetic cardiomyopathy is a controversial clinical entity that in its initial state is usually characterized by left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus that cannot be explained by coronary artery disease, hypertension, or any other known cardiac disease. It was reported in up to 52-60% of well-controlled type-II diabetic subjects, but more recent studies, using standardized tissue Doppler criteria and more strict patient selection, revealed a much lower prevalence. The pathological substrate is myocardial damage, left ventricular hypertrophy, interstitial fibrosis, structural and functional changes of the small coronary vessels, metabolic disturbance, and autonomic cardiac neuropathy. Hyperglycemia causes myocardial necrosis and fibrosis, as well as the increase of myocardial free radicals and oxidants, which decrease nitric oxide levels, worsen the endothelial function, and induce myocardial inflammation. Insulin resistance with hyperinsulinemia and decreased insulin sensitivity may also contribute to the left ventricular hypertrophy. Clinical manifestations of diabetic cardiomyopathy may include dyspnea, arrhythmias, atypical chest pain, and dizziness. Currently, there is no specific treatment of diabetic cardiomyopathy that targets its pathophysiological substrate, but various therapeutic options are discussed that include improving diabetic control with both diet and drugs (metformin and thiazolidinediones), the use of ACE inhibitors, beta blockers, and calcium channel blockers. Daily physical activity and a reduction in body mass index may improve glucose homeostasis by reducing the glucose/insulin ratio and the increase of both insulin sensitivity and glucose oxidation by the skeletal and cardiac muscles.

Metabolic normality in overweight and obese subjects. Which parameters? Which risks?

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to define metabolic normality and to investigate the cardiometabolic profile of metabolically normal obese. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study conducted at 21 research centers in Europe. SUBJECTS: Normal body weight (nbw, n=382) and overweight or obese (ow/ob, n=185) subjects free from metabolic syndrome and with normal glucose tolerance, were selected among the Relationship between Insulin Sensitivity and Cardiovascular Disease study participants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Insulin sensitivity was assessed by the clamp technique. On the basis of quartiles in nbw subjects, the limits of normal insulin sensitivity and of normal fasting insulinemia were established. Subjects with normal insulin sensitivity and fasting insulin were defined as metabolically normal. RESULTS: Among ow/ob subjects, 11% were metabolically normal vs 37% among nbw, P<0.0001. Ow/ob subjects showed increased fasting insulin (P=0.0009), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol) (P=0.004), systolic (P=0.0007) and diastolic (P=0.001) blood pressure, as compared with nbw. When evaluating the contribution of body mass index (BMI), hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, BMI showed an isolated effect on high-density lipoprotein (P=0.007), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (P<0.0001), systolic (P=0.002) and diastolic (P=0.008) blood pressures. BMI shared its influence with insulinemia on total cholesterol (P=0.04 and 0.003, respectively), LDL-cholesterol (P=0.003 and 0.006, respectively) and triglycerides (P=0.02 and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: In obese subjects, fasting insulin should be taken into account in the definition of metabolic normality. Even when metabolically normal, obese subjects could be at increased risk for cardiometabolic diseases. Increased BMI, alone or with fasting insulin, is the major responsible for the less favorable cardio-metabolic profile.

A European evidence-based guideline for the prevention of type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and socioeconomic burden of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and associated co-morbidities are rising worldwide. AIMS: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for preventing T2DM. METHODS: A European multidisciplinary consortium systematically reviewed the evidence on the effectiveness of screening and interventions for T2DM prevention using SIGN criteria. RESULTS: Obesity and sedentary lifestyle are the main modifiable risk factors. Age and ethnicity are non-modifiable risk factors. Case-finding should follow a step-wise procedure using risk questionnaires and oral glucose tolerance testing. Persons with impaired glucose tolerance and/or fasting glucose are at high-risk and should be prioritized for intensive intervention. Interventions supporting lifestyle changes delay the onset of T2DM in high-risk adults (number-needed-to-treat: 6.4 over 1.8-4.6 years). These should be supported by inter-sectoral strategies that create health promoting environments. Sustained body weight reduction by >or= 5 % lowers risk. Currently metformin, acarbose and orlistat can be considered as second-line prevention options. The population approach should use organized measures to raise awareness and change lifestyle with specific approaches for adolescents, minorities and disadvantaged people. Interventions promoting lifestyle changes are more effective if they target both diet and physical activity, mobilize social support, involve the planned use of established behaviour change techniques, and provide frequent contacts. Cost-effectiveness analysis should take a societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS: Prevention using lifestyle modifications in high-risk individuals is cost-effective and should be embedded in evaluated models of care. Effective prevention plans are predicated upon sustained government initiatives comprising advocacy, community support, fiscal and legislative changes, private sector engagement and continuous media communication.

Quality indicators for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in Europe--IMAGE.

BACKGROUND: The marked increase of type 2 diabetes necessitates active development and implementation of efficient prevention programs. A European level action has been taken by launching the IMAGE project to unify and improve the various prevention management concepts, which currently exist within the EU. This report describes the background and the methods used in the development of the IMAGE project quality indicators for diabetes primary prevention programs. It is targeted to the persons responsible for diabetes prevention at different levels of the health care systems. METHODS: Development of the quality indicators was conducted by a group of specialists representing different professional groups from several European countries. Indicators and measurement recommendations were produced by the expert group in consensus meetings and further developed by combining evidence and expert opinion. RESULTS: The quality indicators were developed for different prevention strategies: population level prevention strategy, screening for high risk, and high risk prevention strategy. Totally, 22 quality indicators were generated. They constitute the minimum level of quality assurance recommended for diabetes prevention programs. In addition, 20 scientific evaluation indicators with measurement standards were produced. These micro level indicators describe measurements, which should be used if evaluation, reporting, and scientific analysis are planned. CONCLUSIONS: We hope that these quality tools together with the IMAGE guidelines will provide a useful tool for improving the quality of diabetes prevention in Europe and make different prevention approaches comparable.

Human fetal islet transplantation in type 1 diabetics: comparison of immunological effects between multiple implantation regimens.

Previous studies have suggested that the multiple transplants might be equally metabolically efficient to a single regimen for human adult islets. The aim of this study was to compare immunological and metabolic parameters after each of the two regimens of human fetal islets (HFI). Group A single transplants (n = 9) had 180 +/- 20 x 1000 HFI equivalents (IEQs) implanted via a single intramuscular injection. In group B multiple transplants (n = 8) islets were implanted by three consecutive injections of 60 +/- 10 x 1000 IEQs at 7-day intervals. We analyzed the immunological parameters of CD4/CD8 T lymphocyte ratios; islet cell antibodies (ICAs) and insulin antibodies (IAs). We estimated insulin secreting capacity (ISC) as the metabolic parameter. We observed that the CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratio increased, peaking on day 90, in similar fashion in both groups: day -1: A = 1.18 +/- 0.03 versus B = 1.19 +/- 0.04; on day 90: A = 1.79 +/- 0.09, versus B = 1.75 +/- 0.08 (P = NS) immediately before the decrease in C-peptide levels. Thereafter the ratios rapidly decreased without statistical differences. The levels of ICAs did not change. The levels of IAs, which were increased before transplant, then decreased without statistical differences between the groups. The values of ISC increased after transplant and then decreased similar to the T-cell ratio. Our results demonstrated that regimens of multiple and single HFIs did not show differences in the kinetics of the immunological response presumably mediating graft destruction. The CD4/CD8 ratio increased as the C-peptide level decreased, peaking on day 90 at the time of a decrease in C-peptide. These results may be useful for clinical studies of HFIs for type 1 diabetic patients.

Human fetal islet transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients: comparison of metabolic effects between single and multiple implantation regimens.

Previous studies suggest that multiple transplantations might be equally efficient to a single regimen for human adult islets. The aim of this study was to compare metabolic parameters after each of the two regimens of human fetal islet (HFI) transplantation in type 1 diabetics. In group A (single transplant, n = 9), 180 +/- 20 x 1000 HFI equivalents (IEQs) were implanted by a single IM injection; in group B (multiple transplants, n = 8) islets were implanted as three consecutive injections (60 +/- 10 x 1000 IEQs) at 7-day intervals. We analyzed the metabolic parameters on days -1, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 after the procedure. Among the metabolic parameters, we evaluated insulin secretion capacity-ISC (C peptide, RIA), metabolic control (HbA1c, chromatography), and insulin daily dose IDD. We found that C peptide levels increased, peaking on day 90 (A: 0.38 +/- 0.15; B: 0.34 +/- 0.19 nmol/L, P = NS) and then rapidly decreasing without differences, the HbA1c levels and IDD decreased in the same manner without differences between the groups. Our results demonstrate that multiple and single islet transplant regimens are equally efficient to temporarily restore a significant ISC with improvement of metabolic and clinical parameters. The results imply that the two regimens have an equal clinical value.

Relation between course of disease in type 1 diabetes and islet cell antibodies.

The aim of this study was to estimate the possibility of predicting the course of type 1 diabetes. We analyzed the importance of islet cell antibody levels and residual beta cell function in 46 newly diagnosed patients with diabetes. Islet cell antibodies (ICAs; Juvenile Diabetes Foundation [JDF] units) were determined at the time of diagnosis by the indirect immunofluorescent method. beta cell function was estimated by C peptide levels (nmol/L) before and after glucagon stimulation at the time of clinical remission. Of the 46 patients, 13 were ICA negative (group A). Among ICA-positive patients, ICAs were < 20 JDF units (group B) in 15, between 20 and 80 JDF in 9 (group C), and > 80 JDF in 9 (group D). In group A, 9 patients had clinical remission for 7.5 +/- 1.7 months. Their basal C peptide level was 0.26 +/- 0.05 nmol/L and it increased after stimulation to 44.5 +/- 2.5%. Ten patients in group B had remission for 6.2 +/- 1.5 months. Their basal C peptide levels (0.28 +/- 0.07 nmol/L) were similarly increased after stimulation (47.5 +/- 2.5%). In group C, all patients had remission and it was of the longest duration (14.7 +/- 1.5 months). They had the highest basal C peptide levels (0.45 +/- 0.12 nmol/L) with increases to 57.5 +/- 3.5%. Seven patients in group D with ICA levels > 80 JDF had a short remission (3.2 +/- 1.2 months) despite good basal C peptide levels (0.42 +/- 0.05 nmol/L) and excellent increases after stimulation (92.5%). Our results suggest that moderate levels of ICA are associated with good residual beta cell function and longer remission. Very high ICA levels (> 80 JDF) at the time of diagnosis despite better beta cell function are associated with short clinical remission. Therefore, high ICA levels could be a marker of strong autoimmune reaction and accelerated depletion of beta cell function.