Antiprogestins reduce epigenetic field cancerization in breast tissue of young healthy women.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a leading cause of death in premenopausal women. Progesterone drives expansion of luminal progenitor cells, leading to the development of poor-prognostic breast cancers. However, it is not known if antagonising progesterone can prevent breast cancers in humans. We suggest that targeting progesterone signalling could be a means of reducing features which are known to promote breast cancer formation. METHODS: In healthy premenopausal women with and without a BRCA mutation we studied (i) estrogen and progesterone levels in saliva over an entire menstrual cycle (n = 20); (ii) cancer-free normal breast-tissue from a control population who had no family or personal history of breast cancer and equivalently from BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (n = 28); triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) biopsies and healthy breast tissue taken from sites surrounding the TNBC in the same individuals (n = 14); and biopsies of ER+ve/PR+ve stage T1-T2 cancers and healthy breast tissue taken from sites surrounding the cancer in the same individuals (n = 31); and (iii) DNA methylation and DNA mutations in normal breast tissue (before and after treatment) from clinical trials that assessed the potential preventative effects of vitamins and antiprogestins (mifepristone and ulipristal acetate; n = 44). RESULTS: Daily levels of progesterone were higher throughout the menstrual cycle of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, raising the prospect of targeting progesterone signalling as a means of cancer risk reduction in this population. Furthermore, breast field cancerization DNA methylation signatures reflective of (i) the mitotic age of normal breast epithelium and (ii) the proportion of luminal progenitor cells were increased in breast cancers, indicating that luminal progenitor cells with elevated replicative age are more prone to malignant transformation. The progesterone receptor antagonist mifepristone reduced both the mitotic age and the proportion of luminal progenitor cells in normal breast tissue of all control women and in 64% of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. These findings were validated by an alternate progesterone receptor antagonist, ulipristal acetate, which yielded similar results. Importantly, mifepristone reduced both the TP53 mutation frequency as well as the number of TP53 mutations in mitotic-age-responders. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the potential usage of antiprogestins for primary prevention of poor-prognostic breast cancers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial 1 Mifepristone treatment prior to insertion of a levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system for improved bleeding control - a randomized controlled trial, clinicaltrialsregister.eu, 2009-009014-40 ; registered on 20 July 2009. Clinical trial 2 The effect of a progesterone receptor modulator on breast tissue in women with BRCA1 and 2 mutations, clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01898312 ; registered on 07 May 2013. Clinical trial 3 A pilot prevention study of the effects of the anti- progestin Ulipristal Acetate (UA) on surrogate markers of breast cancer risk, clinicaltrialsregister.eu, 2015-001587-19 ; registered on 15 July 2015.

Mifepristone mediates anti-proliferative effect on ovarian mesenchymal stem/stromal cells from female BRCA1-/2- carriers.

INTRODUCTION: Women with hereditary mutation in breast cancer-associated genes (BRCA1-/2- ) have a higher lifetime risk of developing ovarian cancer. Here, we aimed to investigate the effect of mifepristone, a selective progesterone receptor modulator of ovarian mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) from BRCA1-/2- carriers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ovarian BRCA1-/2- MSC were positively selected using the markers CD90, CD73 and CD105 from nine healthy women. The effect of dose response and combination treatment with mifepristone and analogs of progesterone- or glucocorticoid-receptors were investigated on BRCA1-/2- MSC in vitro using a panel of markers for proliferation (ki67, BrdU, CDK2, p21CIP ), apoptosis (BAX, BCL2, CASPASE3), tumor suppression (TP53, PTEN) and cell survival (PI3KCA, MAPK3, mTOR). RESULTS: The dose response with mifepristone treatment suggested an optimal effect with 10 µm mifepristone, exhibiting >90% viability and significantly reducing growth signaling markers (TP53 and MAPK3). Furthermore, combined treatment with progesterone plus mifepristone (PG+MIFE) gave an enhanced anti-proliferative effect in comparison with hydrocortisone plus mifepristone (HC+MIFE) by significantly reducing markers of proliferation (BrdU+ and Ki67 expression) and tumor suppressors (PTEN, TP53), and increasing the percentage of pro-apoptotic cells. Consequently, accumulation of p21CIP together with reduced levels of CDK2 confirms growth inhibition by reversibly arresting cell-cycle progression at the G1-S phase, not by inducing apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed an anti-proliferative effect on ovarian BRCA1-/2- MSC on in vitro combined treatment with mifepristone and progesterone. These findings suggest that mifepristone or other selective progesterone receptor modulators could be developed as a preventive treatment and postpone early use of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy as well as reduce the risk of ovarian cancer.

Characterization of Molecular Changes in Endometrium Associated With Chronic Use of Progesterone Receptor Modulators: Ulipristal Acetate Versus Mifepristone.

Ulipristal acetate (UPA) is a selective progesterone receptor modulator (PRM), which is used as an emergency contraceptive in women. Recent studies demonstrated the efficacy of an UPA contraceptive vaginal ring (UPA-CVR) as a blocker of ovulation. However, the endometrium of women exposed to UPA over a 6-month period display glandular changes, termed PRM-associated endometrial changes (PAECs). We, therefore, investigated whether UPA-induced PAECs are associated with altered expression of the transcription factor heart- and neural crest derivatives-expressed protein 2 (HAND2) whose downregulation is observed in endometrial epithelial hyperplasia and cancer. Our results showed that while exposure to mifepristone, a well-known PRM, leads to suppression of endometrial HAND2 expression, long-term exposure to UPA-CVR did not cause downregulation of this marker. Further studies, using human primary endometrial stromal cells, confirmed that whereas mifepristone-mediated suppression of HAND2 elevated the levels of its downstream target fibroblast growth factor 18, UPA did not significantly alter the expression of this growth factor. A rationale for the differential regulation of HAND2 by these PRMs was provided by our observation that mifepristone-bound progesterone receptors turn over at a faster rate than those bound to UPA. Collectively, these results support the selective effects of different PRMs and indicate that chronic exposure to UPA does not alter the HAND2 pathway whose dysregulation is linked to complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. The results from this study involving a limited number of clinical samples should pave the way for a larger study to determine the safety of UPA for long-term use.

Meta-signature of human endometrial receptivity: a meta-analysis and validation study of transcriptomic biomarkers.

Previous transcriptome studies of the human endometrium have revealed hundreds of simultaneously up- and down-regulated genes that are involved in endometrial receptivity. However, the overlap between the studies is relatively small, and we are still searching for potential diagnostic biomarkers. Here we perform a meta-analysis of endometrial-receptivity associated genes on 164 endometrial samples (76 from 'pre-receptive' and 88 from mid-secretory, 'receptive' phase endometria) using a robust rank aggregation (RRA) method, followed by enrichment analysis, and regulatory microRNA prediction. We identify a meta-signature of endometrial receptivity involving 57 mRNA genes as putative receptivity markers, where 39 of these we confirm experimentally using RNA-sequencing method in two separate datasets. The meta-signature genes highlight the importance of immune responses, the complement cascade pathway and the involvement of exosomes in mid-secretory endometrial functions. Bioinformatic prediction identifies 348 microRNAs that could regulate 30 endometrial-receptivity associated genes, and we confirm experimentally the decreased expression of 19 microRNAs with 11 corresponding up-regulated meta-signature genes in our validation experiments. The 57 identified meta-signature genes and involved pathways, together with their regulatory microRNAs could serve as promising and sought-after biomarkers of endometrial receptivity, fertility and infertility.

Recent advances in understanding endometrial receptivity: molecular basis and clinical applications.

Advancement in the field of ART has lead to the possibility of achieving good quality embryos. However, the success rate in ART needs further improvement. This is largely dependent on identifying the receptive endometrium for the successful implantation of embryos as well as modulating the endometrium to the receptive stage. In the last half-a-decade, focus has been shifting toward identifying the receptive endometrium. Here, we summarize different tools explored to identify receptive endometrium from the literature, mainly focusing on the past decade, with the help of PubMed. The quest to identify endometrial receptivity markers has lead to the exploration of morphological features at micro and macro scale levels. A large number of studies at molecular levels have focused on genomic, proteomic and lipidomic targets. Recent development of endometrial receptivity array is a promising diagnostic instrument. However, a noninvasive possibility for the diagnosis of endometrial receptivity would be an ideal tool, which could be used in the clinic to improve the success rate of ART. Improved knowledge on endometrial receptivity will not only help to improve the diagnosis and treatment of infertility but will also give possibilities to develop new contraceptive methods targeting the endometrium.

Endometrial receptivity and human embryo implantation.

PROBLEM: The pre-requisite of successful implantation involves an intricate cascade of molecular interactions which plays a crucial role in preparing receptive endometrium and implanting blastocyst. METHOD OF STUDY: Data are hereby presented for a better understanding of endometrial receptivity in women, hoping to provide a comprehensive picture of the process and identify new areas of basic and translational research in the biology of blastocyst implantation. RESULTS: Timely regulation of the expression of a number of complex molecules like hormones, cytokines and growth factors, and their crosstalk from embryonic and maternal endometrial side play a major role in determining the fate of the embryo. The molecular basis of endometrial receptivity and the mechanisms by which the blastocyst first adheres to the luminal epithelium and then penetrates into the stroma are only just beginning to be resolved. CONCLUSION: Advances in the development of implantation models and 'omics' technologies, particularly proteomics and metabolomics, are set to have a major impact on the development of this field.

Monoclonal anti-leukemia inhibitory factor antibody inhibits blastocyst implantation in the rhesus monkey.

INTRODUCTION: Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) appears important in the process of blastocyst implantation in primates. In the present study, we investigated the effect on pregnancy outcome of the administration of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) to recombinant human (rh) LIF (anti-LIF mAb) into the uterine cavity of mated female rhesus monkeys during the peri-implantation period. METHODS: Two milligrams of either mouse mAb to rhLIF or isotype-matched immunoglobulin (Ig) was administered into the uterine cavity on estimated Day 5 or Day 8 after ovulation either through the vagina (n=33) or through the oviduct (n=29) of successfully mated females. RESULTS: There was a significant (p<.04) decline in pregnancy outcome in groups treated with anti-LIF mAb (8 pregnancies from 32 animals) compared with control animals (24 pregnancies from 30 animals). There was, however, no significant difference in pregnancy inhibition between a group of animals subjected to vaginal route treatment and a group of animals subjected to oviductal route treatment, as well as between a group subjected to anti-LIF mAb on Day 5 after ovulation and a group subjected to anti-LIF mAb on Day 8 after ovulation. No significant change was seen in the number of viable pregnancy in animals treated with 6 mg of anti-LIF mAb (5 pregnancies from 16 animals) compared with animals treated with 2 mg of anti-LIF mAb (8 pregnancies from 32 animals). Serum profiles of estradiol, progesterone, monkey chorionic gonadotropin and mouse IgG did not show any difference among different treatment subgroups during the luteal phase. However, among animals treated with anti-LIF mAb, the mean area under the curve for serum mouse IgG in pregnant animals (234+/-55 microg/mL day) was significantly (p<.01) less than that of nonpregnant animals (1325+/-97 microg/mL day). CONCLUSION: The results of the present study put forward the proof of concept that LIF plays a critical role in the process of blastocyst implantation in the rhesus monkey.