Pharmacy education in traditional and complementary medicines - A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Traditional and complementary medicines (T&CMs) are not typically covered in medical curricula despite 80% of the world's population using some form of herbal product as part of their healthcare. Concurrent use of T&CMs with conventional therapies is common, and both are primarily accessed in pharmacies. There is an expectation that pharmacists should be knowledgeable about T&CMs. Therefore, this review aimed to investigate what is currently known about pharmacists' T&CMs education and training to inform developments in pharmacy education. METHODS: Eligible studies published between 01/01/2016 and 28/02/2023 were identified across six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, ScienceDirect and MEDLINE). Data were extracted from included studies and categorized into key themes and sub-themes and reported descriptively. FINDINGS: Fifty-eight studies were identified, conducted across 30 countries, that included information about pharmacists' T&CMs education and training. Within the four main themes extracted, six subthemes were identified including: T&CMs education and training received; inadequate education and training opportunities; knowledge, and confidence towards T&CMs in the pharmacy setting; professional practice behaviour associated with T&CM; university education for pharmacy students; and continuing professional development for practicing pharmacists, including T&CM-drug interactions, interpreting T&CM research, T&CM-specific communication skills, T&CM use in pregnancy and breastfeeding, and efficacy and safety of T&CM in specific conditions. CONCLUSION: Overall pharmacists are receiving limited T&CM education in undergraduate and continuing professional training and report a lack of resources to inform the advice they provide to consumers. The findings of this review can inform developments in T&CMs curriculum and accreditation standards that support the training needs of pharmacists who play a role in fostering the safe and appropriate use of these products.

Towards defining and supporting pharmacists' professional role associated with traditional and complementary medicines - A systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: A review conducted in 2015 reported community pharmacists are willing to adopt a professional role in counselling consumers about the appropriate and safe use of traditional and complementary medicines (T&CM) but faced multiple barriers in doing so; including the role being poorly defined. This current review aimed to update and extend these findings, by identifying studies published since 2015 that reported on pharmacists across any setting. METHODS: Eligible studies published between January 01, 2016 and December 31, 2021 were identified across six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, ScienceDirect and MEDLINE). A grounded theory approach was used to thematically synthesize the data extracted. FINDINGS: A total 64 studies representing pharmacists across 30 countries were included for review. Study designs varied including cross-sectional surveys (n = 36), qualitative studies (n = 14), and pseudo-patient studies (n = 3). Eight studies reported on practice and/or bioethical responsibilities and 19 studies reported on factors that would enable pharmacists to fulfill these responsibilities, while 37 studies reported about both. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate research about pharmacists' responsibilities associated with T&CM is evolving from gap analysis towards research that is proactive in advocating for change in multiple areas. These findings can be used to inform a consensus discussion among pharmacists and key stakeholders regarding a set of professional responsibilities that would serve in the development of: a clearly defined role and associated practice standards, and competency requirements that inform educational learning objectives for inclusion in undergraduate, post-graduate and continuing professional pharmacy education.

The provision of care provided by the pharmacy workforce in relation to complementary medicines in Australia.

BACKGROUND: The use of complementary medicines (CMs) is prevalent across the world. Some CMs, such as St John's Wort, when taken with specific pharmaceutical medicines, may cause drug-herb interactions. In this context, pharmacists have the opportunity to play an important role in preventing harm to patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore real-life pharmacy practice in relation to CMs in New South Wales, Australia. METHODS: The study design involved 'pseudo-patient' pharmacy visits while posing as a patient's relative requesting St John's Wort and using a standardized set of questions to document details of the interaction with a range of pharmacy staff. RESULTS: Of the 110 metropolitan pharmacy visits made, the pharmacy workforce who were involved in assisting the pseudo-patient's request included 51 pharmacists (46.4%), 57 pharmacy assistants (51.8%) and 1 naturopath (0.9%). Advice that may have resulted in harm to the patient, was offered by pharmacists in 11.8% (n = 13) of the encounters, and 20.9% (n = 23) by pharmacy assistants. Conversely, advice that prevented harm was provided by only 17.3% (n = 19) pharmacists and 10.9% (n = 12) pharmacy assistants. History-taking was not attempted by 84 pharmacy staff. CONCLUSION: The majority of pharmacy staff involved in this study did not manage a request for a CM with known drug-herb interactions in a way that would prevent harm. These findings highlight the need for the pharmacy workforce to engage in education and training in CMs, with a focus on how to consult evidence-based resources regarding interactions in the interest of patient safety.