Could Long-Acting Cabotegravir-Rilpivirine Be the Future for All People Living with HIV? Response Based on Genotype Resistance Test from a Multicenter Italian Cohort.

Long-acting (LA) formulations have been designed to improve the quality of life of people with HIV (PWH) by maintaining virologic suppression. However, clinical trials have shown that patient selection is crucial. In fact, the HIV-1 resistance genotype test and the Body Mass Index of individual patients assume a predominant role in guiding the choice. Our work aimed to estimate the patients eligible for the new LA therapy with cabotegravir (CAB) + rilpivirine (RPV). We selected, from the Antiviral Response Cohort Analysis (ARCA) database, all PWH who had at least one follow-up in the last 24 months. We excluded patients with HBsAg positivity, evidence of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (except K103N) and integrase inhibitor mutations, and with a detectable HIV-RNA (>50 copies/mL). Overall, 4103 patients are currently on follow-up in the ARCA, but the eligible patients totaled 1641 (39.9%). Among them, 1163 (70.9%) were males and 1399 were Caucasian (85.3%), of which 1291 (92%) were Italian born. The median length of HIV infection was 10.2 years (IQR 6.3-16.3) with a median nadir of CD4 cells/count of 238 (106-366) cells/mm3 and a median last available CD4 cells/count of 706 (509-944) cells/mm3. The majority of PWH were treated with a three-drug regimen (n = 1116, 68%). Among the 525 (30.3%) patients treated with two-drug regimens, 325 (18.1%) were treated with lamivudine (3TC) and dolutegravir (DTG) and only 84 (5.1%) with RPV and DTG. In conclusion, according to our snapshot, roughly 39.9% of virologically suppressed patients may be suitable candidates for long-acting CAB+RPV therapy. Therefore, based on our findings, many different variables should be taken into consideration to tailor the antiretroviral treatment according to different individual characteristics.

Spontaneous abdominal bleeding associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection: causality or coincidence?

Authors present 6 cases of abdominal bleeding associated with COVID-19, representing 1.35% of all hospitalized COVID-19 patients and hypothesize that there could be, although not very frequently, a relationship between SARS-CoV2 and bleeding. They excluded a side effect of the low molecular weight heparin therapy that all patients underwent during the course of the disease or other possible causes. Alterations of the coagulation state or a weakness of the vascular wall due toa presumed endotheliitis SARS-CoV-2 infection induced, are hypothesized by the authors. Investigation and follow-up for possible hemorrhagic problems in patients with COVID-19 is recommended. In particular, clinicians should be vigilant about retroperitoneal hemorrhage in COVID-19 patients. In addition to the fact that these patients are being treated with anticoagulants, anemia and abdominal pain are the signs that should lead us to suspect this type of haemorrhage. More studies are needed to understand if COVID-19 can be directly associated with bleeding. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Overall Tolerability of Integrase Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: Results from a Multicenter Italian Cohort.

International guidelines recommend the use of integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INI)-based regimens as first-line antiretroviral (ARV) in both naive and experienced HIV-infected patients. We analyzed a multicenter cohort of HIV-infected patients, both naive and experienced, starting an ARV, including an INI. Chi-square test and nonparametric tests were used to assess differences in categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate the probability of maintaining the study drug and Cox-regression analysis to evaluate predictors of discontinuation. We enrolled 4,343 patients: 3,143 (72.4%) were males, with a median age of 49 years (interquartile range 41-55). Naive patients were 733 (16.9%), of whom 168 (22.9%) were AIDS presenters. Overall, 2,282 patients (52.5%) started dolutegravir (DTG), 1,426 (32.8%) raltegravir (RAL), and 635 (14.7%) elvitegravir (EVG). During 10,032 patient years of follow-up (PYFU), we observed 1,278 discontinuations (13 per 100 PYFU); 448 of them (35%) due to simplification and 355 (28%) to toxicities (98 for central nervous system toxicity). Reasons of discontinuation were different between INIs. Estimated probability of maintaining DTG at 3 and 4 years were 81.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 80.5-82.5] and 76.3% (95% CI: 73.9-78.7), respectively; RAL 61.6% (95% CI: 60.2-63.0) and 54.1% (95% CI: 52.7-55.5); EVG 71.6% (95% CI: 69.2-74.0) and 68.3% (95% CI: 65.3-71.3) (p < .001). At a multivariable analysis, being on a RAL-based ARV [vs. DTG, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.9, 95% CI: 2.3-3.6, p < .001], a EVG-based ARV (vs. DTG, aHR 1.3 95% CI: 1.1-1.7, p = .049), and a peak HIV-RNA >500k cp/mL (aHR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.6, p = .006) predicted INI discontinuation. Our data confirm the good tolerability of INIs in clinical practice. Differences emerge between the three drugs in reasons for discontinuation.

Cognitive performances in patients affected by late-onset epilepsy with unknown etiology: A 12-month follow-up study.

INTRODUCTION: Epilepsy has a growing frequency, particularly in the elderly. Several triggers may cause late-onset epilepsy; however, more than 20% of epilepsies, manifesting in the elderly, has an unknown etiology. Although cognition is frequently altered in patients affected by epilepsy, there is a paucity of studies specifically evaluating cognition in patients affected by late-onset epilepsy. The aim of the present study was to assess the cognitive profile of patients affected by late-onset epilepsy with an unknown etiology and followed for 12 months. METHODS: Patients affected by diagnosed late-onset epilepsy with unknown etiology were included in this observation. All patients were evaluated at the time of diagnosis (baseline) and at follow-up (12 months later). We distributed patients in subgroups based on seizure type (focal seizures [FS], secondarily generalized seizures [SGS], primarily generalized seizures [GS]) and antiepileptic drug (AED) regimen (mono- vs. polytherapy). Cognition was evaluated through standardized neuropsychological testing. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included in this observation and distributed in three groups: 29 affected by FS, 14 affected by SGS, 15 affected by GS. Forty-five patients were in monotherapy, and 13 in polytherapy. The most frequent treatments were levetiracetam (n = 12), valproic acid (VPA) (n = 9), carbamazepine (n = 9), and oxcarbazepine (n = 7). We documented a significant decrease of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and memory scores at follow-up in the whole group. Verbal learning decreased exclusively in VPA users. CONCLUSION: Patients affected by late-onset epilepsy with unknown etiology showed a significant decline of cognition at follow-up, independently from number and efficacy of AEDs received. These results deserve verification in larger longitudinal cohorts.