ABSTRACT
Women in the postpartum period are at especially high risk of developing psychiatric disorders, and in severe cases, they may require inpatient psychiatric hospitalization. Because of the lack of specialized units for peripartum mothers in the United States, this treatment is usually relegated to general inpatient psychiatric units. Despite the clear benefit of breastfeeding for both mother and child, lactation can be a barrier to placement on a general inpatient psychiatric unit and often is not supported during the hospital stay. Limiting access to inpatient psychiatric care for postpartum mothers with mental illness could be considered sex discrimination under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) because of failure to accommodate lactation. With improvements in education and accommodations around breastfeeding, general inpatient psychiatric units could provide appropriate care for this population.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Mental Disorders , Mental Health Services , Female , Humans , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mothers/psychology , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , United StatesABSTRACT
In 1995, the Kansas legislature adopted what is referred to as the "mens rea approach" and abolished the affirmative insanity defense. This approach allows a defendant to be acquitted who lacks the requisite mental state for the crime, without consideration of the defendant's understanding of wrongfulness. In Kahler v. Kansas, the U.S. Supreme Court recently held that this restrictive approach does not violate due process and that a state is not required to adopt an insanity test which considers a defendant's moral capacity at the time of the crime. Four other states currently follow the mens rea approach, or some form of it. In this article, we first discuss a brief history of insanity defense laws in the United States. We then outline relevant legislative history and precedent in Kansas and other states that have adopted the mens rea approach. We next discuss the Supreme Court's reasoning in Kahler The significance of this test is further discussed, including Eighth Amendment considerations. We advocate for continued education of the public, legislators, and the judiciary regarding the use, application, and necessity of an affirmative insanity defense.
Subject(s)
Insanity Defense , Intention , Supreme Court Decisions , Civil Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , History, 20th Century , Humans , Jurisprudence , Legislation as Topic/history , Prohibitins , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report the novel finding of a significant improvement in essential tremor symptoms with oxcarbazepine in a patient with a suboptimal response to propranolol. CASE SUMMARY: A 40-year-old woman with a history of substance abuse complicated by essential tremor and neuropathic pain was admitted to our addictions unit with altered mental state due to escalating use of alprazolam. Alprazolam had been prescribed several months prior to admission for treatment of anxiety. The doses had risen to 5-10 mg/day during that period. Apparently, her essential tremor had responded inadequately to propranolol, but had responded well to alprazolam. She was started on a sedative/hypnotic withdrawal protocol, but did not require treatment with phenobarbital. She subsequently rated her tremor as "moderately severe." On discontinuation of the withdrawal protocol, oxcarbazepine 450 mg twice daily was initiated to treat her neuropathic pain, and the tremor improved, with a clinically significant reduction in tremor and a decreased pain score. DISCUSSION: Essential tremor is a common neurologic disorder with uncertain pathophysiology. Practice guidelines advocate the use of propranolol or primidone as first-line agents to treat essential tremor. Unfortunately, primidone has abuse potential and propranolol has variable pharmacokinetics; these characteristics limit their effectiveness in treating tremor. Our patient experienced a significant and sustained improvement in her tremor following the initiation of oxcarbazepine. To our knowledge, as of September 2, 2006, this is the first report of the use of oxcarbazepine in essential tremor. While the exact therapeutic action remains unclear, oxcarbazepine offers significant advantages compared with current first-line agents, including its good tolerability profile, the extended half-life of its metabolite, and lack of abuse potential. CONCLUSIONS: We report a case of essential tremor responding to oxcarbazepine. This drug offers several potential advantages over current first-line agents. Further research is warranted to test the robustness of this preliminary finding.