Psychological distress in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients following microsatellite instability testing for Lynch syndrome on the pathologist's initiative.

According to the Dutch Guideline on Hereditary Colorectal Cancer published in 2008, patients with recently diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC) should undergo microsatellite instability (MSI) testing by a pathologist immediately after tumour resection if they are younger than 50 years, or if a second CRC has been diagnosed before the age of 70 years, owing to the high risk of Lynch syndrome (MIPA). The aim of the present MIPAPS study was to investigate general distress and cancer-specific distress following MSI testing. From March 2007 to September 2009, 400 patients who had been tested for MSI after newly diagnosed CRC were recruited from 30 Dutch hospitals. Levels of general distress (SCL-90) and cancer-specific distress (IES) were assessed immediately after MSI result disclosure (T1) and 6 months later (T2). Response rates were 23/77 (30%) in the MSI-positive patients and 58/323 (18%) in the MSI-negative patients. Levels of general distress and cancer-specific distress were moderate. In the MSI-positive group, 27% of the patients had high general distress at T1 versus 18% at T2 (p = 0.5), whereas in the MSI-negative group, these percentage were 14 and 18% (p = 0.6), respectively. At T1 and T2, cancer-specific distress rates in the MSI-positive group and MSI-negative group were 39 versus 27% (p = 0.3) and 38 versus 36% (p = 1.0), respectively. High levels of general distress were correlated with female gender, low social support and high perceived cancer risk. Moderate levels of distress were observed after MSI testing, similar to those found in other patients diagnosed with CRC. Immediately after result disclosure, high cancer-specific distress was observed in 40% of the MSI-positive patients.

Shortened time interval between colorectal cancer diagnosis and risk testing for hereditary colorectal cancer is not related to higher psychological distress.

Current diagnostic practices have shortened the interval between colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis and genetic analysis for Lynch syndrome by MSI-testing. We studied the relation of time between MSI-testing since CRC diagnosis (MSI-CRC interval) and psychological distress. We performed a cross-sectional study in 89 patients who had previously been treated for CRC. Data were collected during MSI-testing after genetic counseling. Psychological distress was measured with the IES, the SCL-90 and the POMS; social issues with the ISS, ISB and the ODHCF. The median time of MSI-CRC interval was 24 months (range 0-332), with 23% of the patients diagnosed less than 12 months and 42% more than 36 months prior to MSI-testing. In 34% of the patients cancer specific distress was high (IES scores >26). Mean psychopathology (SCL-90) scores were low, mean mood states (POMS) scores were moderate. Interval MSI-CRC was not related to psychological distress. High cancer specific distress was reported by 24% of patients diagnosed with CRC less than 12 months ago versus 39 and 35% by those diagnosed between 12 and 36 months and more than 36 months ago respectively. Distress was positively related to female gender (P = 0.04), religiousness (P = 0.01), low social support (P = 0.02) and difficulties with family communication (P < 0.001). Shortened time interval between CRC diagnosis and MSI-testing is not associated with higher psychological distress. Females, religious persons, those having low social support and those reporting difficulties communicating hereditary colorectal cancer with relatives are at higher risk for psychological distress.

Educational-support groups for BRCA mutation carriers satisfy need for information but do not affect emotional distress.

INTRODUCTION: Due to high cancer risks, women carrying a BRCA 1/2 mutation face a complex choice between breast and ovarian cancer surveillance and prophylactic surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate educational-support groups, which are offered to facilitate mutual support between BRCA mutation carriers and to provide adequate information. METHODS: Female BRCA mutation carriers were approached by a social worker after genetic test disclosure and offered participation in educational-support groups. Data regarding emotional well-being, breast cancer risk knowledge and perception, cancer risk management behaviour and family communication were collected both before (T1) and after group participation (T2). RESULTS: Of the 34 participants, mean levels of negative mood states at T1 were significantly higher compared to those of a norm group (depression p < 0.001, anger p < 0.001, fatigue p = 0.04, tension p = 0.03) and remained high at T2. Self-perceived breast cancer risk and frequency of cancer thoughts were high both at T1 and T2. Breast cancer risk knowledge was accurate both at T1 and T2; women either followed current surveillance advices or obtained prophylactic surgery. Communication with the family of origin was significantly reduced at T2 compared to T1 (p = 0.02). At T2, all women indicated that group participation highly met their needs of BRCA-related information to support their decision-making processes regarding cancer surveillance or prophylactic surgery. CONCLUSION: After following an educational support group female BRCA mutation carriers were able to make cancer risk management decisions but still reported high levels of emotional distress while family communication appeared diminished.

Genetic testing offered directly after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a pilot study on the reactions of patients.

UNLABELLED: Genetic testing offered directly after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a pilot study on the reactions of patients: INTRODUCTION: When colorectal cancer is diagnosed before the age of 50 years, then consideration should be given to a hereditary cause. Indications of heredity can be found in tumour tissue with the aid of microsatellite instability (MSI) testing. A positive MSI test means an increased risk of hereditary colorectal cancer, the so-called Lynch syndrome. Until recently, the usual approach was to postpone genetic testing for colorectal cancer until the family history had been studied extensively and information had been made available by a clinical geneticist about the possible consequences. However, it is now possible for MSI testing to be performed on the initiative of the pathologist when the newly diagnosed patient with colorectal cancer is younger than 50 years. This speeds up the procedure considerably. The psychological effects of discussing genetic testing and referring patients during treatment for colorectal cancer are currently unknown. This paper describes an exploratory study on the experience of eight colorectal cancer patients with the new Lynch syndrome detection strategy. METHODS: The patients were interviewed at home using a semistructured questionnaire based on the multicausal model of problem analysis and adapted with items for colorectal cancer and genetic testing. RESULTS: Three coordinating themes were found: (1) 'a changed life after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer', (2) 'warning for the future' and (3) 'communication with family'. It was a considerable challenge for these patients to cope with the physical and psychosocial consequences of colorectal cancer. The majority regarded possible carriership of a hereditary disposition for the Lynch syndrome as useful medico-preventive knowledge for their children. The timing of the confrontation with genetic testing was considered to save time in receiving follow-up advice for their children. However, these patients were apprehensive about having to discuss a hereditary disposition for cancer with their family. CONCLUSION: In this early phase, coping with the diagnosis of colorectal cancer and the consequences of treatment mainly determined the reactions of these patients and their physical well-being. This small group of patients was of the opinion that the advantages of genetic testing will weigh-up against the disadvantages.

The impact of a false-positive MRI on the choice for mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers is limited.

PURPOSE: To assess the false-positive rate of breast cancer surveillance by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in BRCA mutation carriers and the impact of an abnormal mammography or breast MRI on the patients' decision for prophylactic mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 196 BRCA mutation carriers were included with a median follow-up of 2 years (range 1-9) with annual mammography and MRI. Preference for prophylactic mastectomy was registered at first surveillance after the mutation carriership was revealed. RESULTS: In all, 41% (81 of 196) of the women had at least one positive MRI or mammography. Malignancy was detected in 17 women: 11 at surveillance, 4 at an intended prophylactic mastectomy and 2 had an interval cancer. Imaging by mammography and MRI had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 90%. The probability that a positive MRI result is false positive was 83%. In the group with a prior preference for mastectomy with and without a false-positive imaging, prophylactic mastectomy was carried out in 89% and 66%, respectively (P = 0.06), in the group with prior preference for surveillance these percentages were 15% and 11%, respectively (P = 0.47). CONCLUSION: Although the rate of false-positive MRI results is high, the impact on the choice for prophylactic mastectomy is limited and is determined by the woman's preference before the establishment of a BRCA mutation.