Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nurs Open ; 11(4): e2144, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38618718

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate the relationship among emotional intelligence (EI), resilience and academic procrastination (AP), and provide suggestions for the development of targeted intervention strategies and lowering of AP level of nursing undergraduates. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: Three provincial universities offering nursing courses in China were investigated in this study. A convenience sample of 256 nursing undergraduates from May 2021 to September 2021 were recruited, with a response rate of 91.4%. Data were collected using face-to-face interviews. The survey tools included the General Information Questionnaire, Academic Procrastination Scale, Emotional Intelligence Scale and Resilience Scale. IBM SPSS v19.0 and Amos 22.0 were used for data analysis. RESULTS: The AP of sampled nursing undergraduates was at the middle level (54.4 ± 21.5). The AP of nursing undergraduates was negatively correlated with EI and resilience. Moreover, the analysis on the mediating role of resilience via structural equation model showed a good fit, with χ2/df = 2.34, RMSEA = 0.07, CFI = 0.99, GFI = 0.95, TLI = 0.98. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.


Subject(s)
Procrastination , Resilience, Psychological , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Research Design , Emotional Intelligence
2.
J Healthc Eng ; 2021: 8784905, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34552708

ABSTRACT

In order to explore the curative effect of early enteral nutrition nursing on patients with severe acute pancreatitis and the improvement of patients' mental health and inflammation levels, this paper compares the curative effect of early enteral nutrition nursing and traditional care on patients with severe acute pancreatitis and the improvement effects of patients' mental health and inflammation levels through controlled trials. Moreover, this paper combines statistical methods for data processing and visually expresses data through statistical graphs and statistical tables. Through the comparison of experiments, it can be seen that the improvement effect in all aspects of patients in the test group is significantly higher than that in the control group. Finally, through the analysis of the test results, it can be known that the use of early enteral nutrition nursing for patients with acute severe acute pancreatitis has a certain effect in improving their nutritional status, regulating immune function, and promoting mental health.


Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition , Pancreatitis , Acute Disease , Enteral Nutrition/adverse effects , Enteral Nutrition/methods , Humans , Inflammation/therapy , Mental Health , Pancreatitis/etiology , Pancreatitis/therapy
3.
Nurs Open ; 8(3): 1292-1300, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33372316

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Both midline catheters (MCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) can cause catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), but the prevalence associated with each is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of CRBSI between MCs and PICCs with a meta-analysis. METHODS: The Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, The Cochrane Library and ProQuest were searched. All studies comparing the risk of CRBSI between MCs and PICCs were included. Selected studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Downs and Black checklist. Two authors independently assessed the literature and extracted the data. A fixed effects model was used to generate estimates of CRBSI risk in patients with MCs versus PICCs. Publication bias was evaluated, and meta-analyses were conducted with RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: A total of 167 studies were identified. Ten studies were collected, involving 33,322 patients. The prevalence of CRBSI with MCs and PICCs was 0.58% (40/6,900) and 0.48% (127/26,422), respectively. Meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of CRBSI was not significantly different between MCs and PICCs (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.50-1.17, p = .22). While the result showed that the prevalence of CRBSI with MCs was lower than that with PICCs (RR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.33-0.92, p = .02) after poor-quality studies were removed. The sensitivity analysis shows that the results from this meta-analysis are fair in overall studies and non-poor-quality studies. All studies have no significant publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first systematic assessment of the risk of CRBSI between MCs and PICCs and provides evidence for the selection of appropriate vascular access devices for intravenous infusion therapy in nursing. The prevalence of CRBSI was not significantly different between them.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Peripheral , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheters , Humans , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL