Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 52(D1): D1597-D1613, 2024 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37831097

ABSTRACT

The scope and function of RNA modifications in model plant systems have been extensively studied, resulting in the identification of an increasing number of novel RNA modifications in recent years. Researchers have gradually revealed that RNA modifications, especially N6-methyladenosine (m6A), which is one of the most abundant and commonly studied RNA modifications in plants, have important roles in physiological and pathological processes. These modifications alter the structure of RNA, which affects its molecular complementarity and binding to specific proteins, thereby resulting in various of physiological effects. The increasing interest in plant RNA modifications has necessitated research into RNA modifications and associated datasets. However, there is a lack of a convenient and integrated database with comprehensive annotations and intuitive visualization of plant RNA modifications. Here, we developed the Plant RNA Modification Database (PRMD; http://bioinformatics.sc.cn/PRMD and http://rnainformatics.org.cn/PRMD) to facilitate RNA modification research. This database contains information regarding 20 plant species and provides an intuitive interface for displaying information. Moreover, PRMD offers multiple tools, including RMlevelDiff, RMplantVar, RNAmodNet and Blast (for functional analyses), and mRNAbrowse, RNAlollipop, JBrowse and Integrative Genomics Viewer (for displaying data). Furthermore, PRMD is freely available, making it useful for the rapid development and promotion of research on plant RNA modifications.


Subject(s)
Databases, Nucleic Acid , Plants , RNA, Plant , Data Management , Genomics , Plants/genetics , RNA, Plant/genetics
2.
Dis Markers ; 2022: 4254862, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36157209

ABSTRACT

Background: Various studies have produced contradictory results on the prognostic role of the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Although a meta-analysis published in 2014 reported a worse prognosis of CIMP among CIMP-high (CIMP-H) CRC patients, the sample sizes of the major included studies were small. In this study, we included the most recent studies with large sample sizes and performed an updated meta-analysis on the relationship between CIMP and CRC prognosis. Methods: A search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane for studies related to CIMP and CRC published until July 2021 was conducted based on the PICO (participant, intervention, control, outcome) framework. Data extraction and literature analyses were performed according to PRISMA standards. Results: In the present update, 36 eligible studies (20 recently published) reported survival data in 15315 CRC patients, 18.3% of whom were characterized as CIMP-H. Pooled analysis suggested that CIMP-H was associated with poorer overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.26-1.48) and disease-free survival/progression-free survival/recurrence-free survival (DFS/PFS/RFS) (HR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.19-1.91) among CRC patients. Subgroup analysis based on tumor stage and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status showed that only patients with stages III-IV and proficient MMR (pMMR) tumors showed a significant association between CIMP-H and shorter OS, with HRs of 1.52 and 1.37, respectively. Three studies were pooled to explore the predictive value of CIMP on CRC patient DFS after receiving postoperative chemotherapy, and no significant correlation was found. Conclusion: CIMP-H is associated with a significantly poor prognosis in CRC patients, especially those with stage III-IV and pMMR tumors. However, the predictive value of CIMP needs to be confirmed by more prospective randomized studies.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , DNA Methylation , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , CpG Islands , Humans , Phenotype , Prognosis , Prospective Studies
3.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2298: 15-27, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34085236

ABSTRACT

While over 150 distinct types of chemical modifications are known to occur on various cellular RNAs and can be dynamically controlled, the function of most of these modifications remains poorly defined. Collectively, these RNA modifications have been recently termed the "epitranscriptome". Identification and annotation of individual RNA modifications throughout the transcriptome are key for studying the role of the epitranscriptome in the regulation of gene expression and for elucidating the functional relevance of particular RNA modifications in diverse physiological and disease processes. In this protocol, we demonstrate how to identify and annotate RNA modifications based on the informatic analysis of methylated RNA immunoprecipitation and sequencing (MeRIP-seq) data, using RNAmod, a convenient one-stop online interactive platform for the annotation, analysis, and visualization of mRNA modifications.


Subject(s)
Informatics/methods , RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional/genetics , RNA/genetics , Transcriptome/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Hep G2 Cells , Humans , Sequence Analysis, RNA/methods
4.
Brief Bioinform ; 22(1): 463-473, 2021 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31885040

ABSTRACT

Small noncoding RNAs (sRNA/sncRNAs) are generated from different genomic loci and play important roles in biological processes, such as cell proliferation and the regulation of gene expression. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has provided an unprecedented opportunity to discover and quantify diverse kinds of sncRNA, such as tRFs (tRNA-derived small RNA fragments), phasiRNAs (phased, secondary, small-interfering RNAs), Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNAs) and plant-specific 24-nt short interfering RNAs (siRNAs). However, currently available web-based tools do not provide approaches to comprehensively analyze all of these diverse sncRNAs. This study presents a novel integrated platform, sRNAtools (https://bioinformatics.caf.ac.cn/sRNAtools), that can be used in conjunction with high-throughput sequencing to identify and functionally annotate sncRNAs, including profiling microRNAss, piRNAs, tRNAs, small nuclear RNAs, small nucleolar RNAs and rRNAs and discovering isomiRs, tRFs, phasiRNAs and plant-specific 24-nt siRNAs for up to 21 model organisms. Different modules, including single case, batch case, group case and target case, are developed to provide users with flexible ways of studying sncRNA. In addition, sRNAtools supports different ways of uploading small RNA sequencing data in a very interactive queue system, while local versions based on the program package/Docker/virtureBox are also available. We believe that sRNAtools will greatly benefit the scientific community as an integrated tool for studying sncRNAs.


Subject(s)
Genomics/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , RNA, Small Untranslated/genetics , Software , Animals , Databases, Genetic/standards , Humans , RNA, Small Untranslated/chemistry
5.
Clin Genet ; 97(1): 25-38, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31432497

ABSTRACT

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status was considered to be a potential prognostic factor for colorectal cancer (CRC) but with conflicting reports, and varied in terms of TNM stages. Its relationship with prognosis in stage II-III CRC had not yet been systematically established. Therefore, we retrieved eligible studies published through May 2019, and screened out 51 studies that reported survival data (overall survival [OS] and/or disease-free survival [DFS]) in 28 331 CRC patients at stage II-III, totally 16.4% of whom were characterized as deficient MMR (dMMR). Significant associations of dMMR status were observed with longer OS (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.68-0.82; P < .001), as well as DFS (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.59-0.75, P < .001). However, dMMR patients received no statistically significant benefit from fluoropyrimidine-based treatment for either OS (HR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.60-1.17; P = .31) or DFS (HR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.60-1.15; P = .27), compared with that in proficient MMR (pMMR) patients for both OS (HR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.43-0.71; P < .001) and DFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.50-0.73; P < .001). Our analysis indicate that dMMR CRC patients at stage II-III had higher OS and DFS than pMMR ones, and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy could improve survival in pMMR patients rather than dMMR ones.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , Prognosis , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Neoplasm Staging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL