Diagnosing Myocardial Injury in an Acute Chest Pain Cohort; Long-Term Prognostic Implications of Cardiac Troponin T and I.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding the utility of follow-up cardiac troponin (cTn) measurements after admission for acute chest pain and how long-term stability of myocardial injury and prognostic value differ when using cardiac troponin T (cTnT) or I (cTnI). METHODS: We measured high-sensitivity (hs)-cTnT (Roche Diagnostics) and hs-cTnI (Siemens Healthineers) during hospitalization for acute chest pain and after 3 months. Acute myocardial injury was defined as concentrations > sex-specific upper reference limit (URL) during hospitalization and ≤URL at 3-months. Chronic myocardial injury (CMI) was defined as concentrations > URL at both time points. Patients were followed from the 3-month sampling point for a median of 1586 (IQR 1161-1786) days for a primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and heart failure, and a secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Among 754 patients, 33.8% (hs-cTnT) and 19.2% (hs-cTnI) had myocardial injury during hospitalization. The rate of CMI was 5 times higher by hs-cTnT (20%) assay than hs-cTnI (4%), while acute myocardial injury was equally common; 14% (hs-cTnT) and 15% (hs-cTnI), respectively (6% and 5% when excluding index non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI). For hs-cTnT, peak index concentration, 3-month concentration and classification of CMI predicted the primary endpoint; hazard ratios (HRs) 1.38 (95% CI 1.20-1.58), 2.34 (1.70-3.20), and 2.31 (1.30-4.12), respectively. For hs-cTnI, peak index concentration predicted the primary endpoint; HR 1.14 (1.03-1.25). This association was nonsignificant after excluding index NSTEMI. CONCLUSIONS: Acute myocardial injury is equally frequent, whereas CMI is more prevalent using hs-cTnT assay than hs-cTnI. Measuring hs-cTnT 3 months after an acute chest pain episode could assist in further long-term risk assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT02620202.

Appropriateness and outcomes of hospitalized patients telemetry monitored for cardiac arrhythmias in accordance with the American Heart Association Practice Standards-A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, no prospective research studies have compared clinical practice to the American Heart Association (AHA) updated practice standards for in-hospital telemetry monitoring. OBJECTIVES: Our aims were therefore (1) to investigate how patients were assigned to telemetry monitoring in accordance with the AHA's updated practice standards, (2) to determine the number and type of arrhythmic events, and (3) to describe subsequent changes in clinical management. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study included 1154 patients at three university hospitals in Norway. Data were collected 24/7 over a four-week period, with follow-up measurements from telemetry admission until hospital discharge. RESULTS: Of patients assigned to telemetry, 67 % (n = 767) met practice standards, corresponding to AHA Class I or II. Patients were predominantly men (65 %, n = 748), and the mean age was 65 years (SD ±16). The study included both patients with cardiac and non-cardiac diagnoses from various medical and surgical departments throughout the hospitals. Ninety-one percent of the patients in Class III were monitored based on indications that were reclassified from Class II to Class III (not indicated) in the updated practice standards (patients admitted with chest pain or post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without complications). Overall, arrhythmic events occurred in 37 % (n = 424) of patients, and they occurred in all classes. Eighteen percent (n = 59) of arrhythmic events occurred in Class III. Of all arrhythmias, 3 % (n = 14) were life threatening, and all of them occurring within Class I. Telemetry monitoring led to changes in clinical management in 22 % (n = 257) of patients due to clinical alarms, of which 71 % (n = 182) were related to medication management. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients were appropriately monitored according to the AHA practice standards, meeting Class I and II. Arrhythmias occurred in all classes, but life-threatening arrhythmias only occurred in patients in Class I. However, a daily re-assessment of each patient's telemetry indication is warranted.

The patient experience of in-hospital telemetry monitoring: a qualitative analysis.

AIMS: In-hospital telemetry monitoring has been an integrated part of arrhythmia monitoring for decades. A substantial proportion of patients require arrhythmia monitoring during stays in non-intensive care units. However, studies exploring patients' experiences of telemetry monitoring are scarce. Therefore, the aim was to explore and describe patients' experiences of in-hospital telemetry monitoring in a non-intensive care setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted. Interviews were conducted before discharge at two university hospitals in Norway. The patients were purposively sampled, resulting in a well-balanced population comprising 11 men and nine women, mean age 62 years (range 25-83). Average monitoring time was 9 days (range 3-14). Data were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and coded using NVivo software. Qualitative content analysis using an inductive approach was performed. Patients expressed a need for individualized information during telemetry monitoring. Their feelings of safety were related to responses from nurses from the central monitoring station when alarms from the telemetry were triggered. Despite perceived physical restrictions and psychological limitations associated with telemetry monitoring, they found monitoring to be beneficial because it facilitated the diagnosis of arrhythmia. Moreover, they expressed a need for improvements in wearable monitoring equipment. Patients expressed ambivalent feelings about discontinuing the telemetry and their readiness for discharge. CONCLUSION: Patients need individualized information about the results of their telemetry monitoring in order to better understand the arrhythmia management and to increase their experience of safety after discharge. The limitations patients experienced should be taken into consideration in further upgrades of telemetry monitoring equipment.

Prognostic significance of chronic myocardial injury diagnosed by three different cardiac troponin assays in patients admitted with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic myocardial injury (CMI) is defined as stable concentrations of cardiac troponin T or I (cTnT or cTnI) above the assay-specific 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) and signals poor outcome. The clinical implications of diagnosing CMI are unclear. We aimed to assess prevalence and association of CMI with long-term prognosis using three different high-sensitivity cTn (hs-cTn) assays. METHODS: A total of 1,292 hospitalized patients without acute myocardial injury had cTn concentrations quantified by hs-cTn assays by Roche Diagnostics, Abbott Diagnostics and Siemens Healthineers. The median follow-up time was 4.1 years. The prevalence of CMI and hazard ratios for mortality and cardiovascular (CV) events were calculated based on the URL provided by the manufacturers and compared to the prognostic accuracy when lower percentiles of cTn (97.5, 95 or 90), limit of detection or the estimated bioequivalent concentrations between assays were used as cutoff values. RESULTS: There was no major difference in prognostic accuracy between cTnT and cTnI analyzed as continuous variables. The correlation between cTnT and cTnI was high (r=0.724-0.785), but the cTnT assay diagnosed 3.9-4.5 times more patients with having CMI based on the sex-specific URLs (TnT, n=207; TnI Abbott, n=46, TnI Siemens, n=53) and had higher clinical sensitivity and AUC at the URL. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of CMI is highly assay-dependent. cTnT and cTnI have similar prognostic accuracy for mortality or CV events when measured as continuous variables. However, a CMI diagnosis according to cTnT has higher prognostic accuracy compared to a CMI diagnosis according to cTnI.

Prognostic value of growth differentiation factor-15 3 months after an acute chest pain admission.

OBJECTIVE: Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is a predictor of death and cardiovascular events when measured during index hospitalisation in patients with acute chest pain. This study investigated the prognostic utility of measuring GDF-15 3 months after an admission with suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). METHODS: GDF-15 was measured at baseline and 3 months after admission in 758 patients admitted with suspected NSTE-ACS. Patients were followed for a median of 1540 (IQR: 1087-1776) days after the 3-month visit. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, while the secondary composite endpoint included all-cause mortality, incident myocardial infarction and heart failure hospitalisation during follow-up. RESULTS: In patients with GDF-15 ≥1200 pg/mL (n=248), 18% died and 25% met the composite endpoint. In patients with GDF-15 <1200 pg/mL (n=510), 1.7% died and 4% met the composite endpoint. The GDF-15 concentration (log2 transformed) at 3 months was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.4 to 3.3, p<0.001) and the composite endpoint (adjusted HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.4 to 2.7, p<0.001), independently of traditional risk factors and baseline troponin T. A 10% change in GDF-15 concentration from baseline to the 3-month visit was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.13, p=0.031), adjusting for baseline GDF-15 concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: High GDF-15 concentrations 3 months after admission for suspected NSTE-ACS are associated with long-term mortality and cardiovascular events, independent of traditional risk factors and troponin T. A change in GDF-15 concentration can provide prognostic information.

Growth Differentiation Factor 15: A Prognostic Marker in Patients with Acute Chest Pain without Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Acute chest pain is associated with an increased risk of death and cardiovascular events even when acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been excluded. Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is a strong prognostic marker in patients with acute chest pain and AMI, but the prognostic value in patients without AMI is uncertain. This study sought to investigate the ability of GDF-15 to predict long-term prognosis in patients presenting with acute chest pain without AMI. METHODS: In total, 1320 patients admitted with acute chest pain without AMI were followed for a median of 1523 days (range: 4 to 2208 days). The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Secondary end points included cardiovascular (CV) death, future AMI, heart failure hospitalization, and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF). RESULTS: Higher concentrations of GDF-15 were associated with increased risk of death from all causes (median concentration in non-survivors vs survivors: 2124 pg/mL vs 852 pg/mL, P < 0.001), and all secondary end points. By multivariable Cox regression, GDF-15 concentration ≥4th quartile (compared to <4th quartile) remained an independent predictor of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 2.75; 95% CI, 1.69-4.45, P < 0.001), CV death (adjusted HR: 3.74; 95% CI, 1.31-10.63, P = 0.013), and heart failure hospitalization (adjusted HR: 2.60; 95% CI, 1.11-6.06, P = 0.027). Adding GDF-15 to a model consisting of established risk factors and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) led to a significant increase in C-statistics for prediction of all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Higher concentrations of GDF-15 were associated with increased risk of mortality from all causes and risk of future CV events.

Time trends in incidence, treatment, and outcome in acute myocardial infarction in Norway 2013-19.

Aims: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present study was to assess time trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcome of AMI in a nationwide registry-based cohort of patients. Methods and results: All patients with a first AMI registered in the Norwegian Myocardial Infarction Registry between 2013 and 2019 were included in this cohort study. The number of patients admitted to Norwegian hospitals with a first AMI decreased from 8933 in 2013 to 8383 in 2019. The proportion of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was stable at 30% throughout the period, and the percentage of STEMI undergoing coronary angiography was stable at 87%. The proportion of patients with non-STEMI undergoing coronary angiography increased by 2.4% per year (95% confidence interval 1.6-3.3) from 58% in 2013 to 68% in 2019. More patients were discharged with secondary preventive medication at the end of study period. Age-adjusted 1-year mortality was reduced from 16.4% in 2013 to 15.1% in 2018. The changes over time were primarily seen in the oldest patient groups. Conclusion: In the period 2013-19 in Norway, we found a reduction in hospitalizations due to a first AMI. Both the percentage of patients undergoing coronary angiography as well as the percentage discharged with recommended secondary preventive therapy increased during the period, and the age-adjusted 1-year mortality after AMI decreased. A national AMI register provides important information about trends in incidence, treatment, and outcome, and may improve adherence to guideline recommendations.

Predictors of long-term symptom burden and quality of life in patients hospitalised with chest pain: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the magnitude and predictors of symptom burden (SB) and quality of life (QoL) 3 months after hospital admission for acute chest pain. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Single centre, outpatient follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: 1506 patients. OUTCOMES: Scores reported for general health (RAND-12), angina-related health (Seattle Angina Questionnaire 7 (SAQ-7)) and dyspnoea (Rose Dyspnea Scale) 3 months after hospital admission for chest pain. METHODS: A total of 1506 patients received questionnaires assessing general health (RAND-12), angina-related health (SAQ-7) and dyspnoea (Rose Dyspnea Scale) 3 months after discharge. Univariable and multivariable regression models identified predictors of SB and QoL scores. A mediator analysis identified factors mediating the effect of an unstable angina pectoris (UAP) diagnosis. RESULTS: 774 (52%) responded. Discharge diagnoses were non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (14.2%), UAP (17.1%), non-coronary cardiac disease (6.6%), non-cardiac disease (6.3%) and non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) (55.6%). NSTEMI had the most favourable, and UAP patients the least favourable SAQ-7 scores (median SAQ7-summary; 88 vs 75, p<0.001). NCCP patients reported persisting chest pain in 50% and dyspnoea in 33% of cases. After adjusting for confounders, revascularisation predicted better QoL scores, while UAP, current smoking and hypertension predicted worse outcome. NSTEMI and UAP patients who were revascularised reported higher scores (p<0.05) in SAQ-7-QL, SAQ7-PL, SAQ7-summary (NSTEMI) and all SAQ-7 domains (UAP). Revascularisation altered the unstandardised beta value (>±10%) of an UAP diagnosis for all SAQ-7 and RAND-12 outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSTEMI reported the most favourable outcome 3 months after hospitalisation for chest pain. Patients with other diseases, in particular UAP patients, reported lower scores. Revascularised NSTEMI and UAP patients reported higher QoL scores compared with patients receiving conservative treatment. Revascularisation mediated all outcomes in UAP patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02620202.

Association between symptoms and risk of non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction according to age and sex in patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the association between symptoms and risk of non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in patients admitted to an emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome based on sex and age. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a prospective observational study conducted between September 2015 and May 2019. SETTING: University hospital in Norway. PARTICIPANTS: 1506 participants >18 years of age (39.6% women and 31.0% 70 years of age or older). FINDINGS: The OR for NSTEMI was 9.4 if pain radiated to both arms, 3.0 if exertional chest pain was present during the last week and 2.9 if pain occurred during activity. Men had significantly lower OR compared with women if pain was dependent of position, respiration or palpation (OR 0.17 vs 0.53, p value for interaction 0.047). Patients <70 years had higher predictive value than older patients if they reported exertional chest pain the last week (OR 4.08 vs 1.81, 95%, p value for interaction 0.025) and lower if pain radiated to the left arm (OR 0.73 vs 1.67, p value for interaction 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Chest pain with radiation to both arms, exertional chest pain during the last week and pain during activity had the strongest predictive value for NSTEMI. The differences in symptom presentation and risk of NSTEMI between sex and age groups were small. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: WESTCOR study ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02620202).

Adding stress biomarkers to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin for rapid non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction rule-out protocols.

AIMS: This study tested the hypothesis that combining stress-induced biomarkers (copeptin or glucose) with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) increases diagnostic accuracy for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in patients presenting to the emergency department. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ability to rule-out NSTEMI for combinations of baseline hs-cTnT or hs-cTnI with copeptin or glucose was compared with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) hs-cTnT/I-only rule-out algorithms in two independent (one Norwegian and one international multicentre) diagnostic studies. Among 959 patients (median age 64 years, 60.5% male) with suspected NSTEMI in the Norwegian cohort, 13% had NSTEMI. Adding copeptin or glucose to hs-cTnT/I as a continuous variable did not improve discrimination as quantified by the area under the curve {e.g. hs-cTnT/copeptin 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-0.93] vs. hs-cTnT alone 0.91 (95% CI 0.89-0.93); hs-cTnI/copeptin 0.85 (95% CI 0.82-0.87) vs. hs-cTnI alone 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.95)}, nor did adding copeptin <9 mmol/L or glucose <5.6 mmol/L increase the sensitivity of the rule-out provided by hs-cTnT <5 ng/L or hs-cTnI <4 ng/L in patients presenting more than 3 h after chest pain onset (target population in the ESC-0 h-algorithm). The combination decreased rule-out efficacy significantly (both P < 0.01). These findings were confirmed among 1272 patients (median age 62 years, 69.3% male) with suspected NSTEMI in the international validation cohort, of which 20.7% had NSTEMI. A trend towards increased sensitivity for the hs-cTnT/I/copeptin combinations (97-100% vs. 91-97% for the ESC-0 h-rule-out cut-offs) was observed in the Norwegian cohort. CONCLUSION: Adding copeptin or glucose to hs-cTnT/I did not increase diagnostic performance when compared with current ESC guideline hs-cTnT/I-only 0 h-algorithms.

Diagnostic Performance of Novel Troponin Algorithms for the Rule-Out of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) rule-out algorithms use cutoffs optimized for exclusion of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We investigated these and several novel algorithms for the rule-out of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) including less urgent coronary ischemia. METHOD: A total of 1504 unselected patients with suspected NSTE-ACS were included and divided into a derivation cohort (n = 988) and validation cohort (n = 516). The primary endpoint was the diagnostic performance to rule-out NSTEMI and unstable angina pectoris during index hospitalization. The secondary endpoint was combined MI, all-cause mortality (within 30 days) and urgent (24 h) revascularization. The ESC algorithms for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and I (hs-cTnI) were compared to different novel low-baseline (limit of detection), low-delta (based on the assay analytical and biological variation), and 0-1-h and 0-3-h algorithms. RESULTS: The prevalence of NSTE-ACS was 24.8%, 60.0% had noncardiac chest pain, and 15.2% other diseases. The 0-1/0-3-h algorithms had superior clinical sensitivity for the primary endpoint compared to the ESC algorithm (validation cohort); hs-cTnT: 95% vs 63%, and hs-cTnI: 87% vs 64%, respectively. Regarding the secondary endpoint, the algorithms had similar clinical sensitivity (100% vs 94%-96%) but lower clinical specificity (41%-19%) compared to the ESC algorithms (77%-74%). The rule-out rates decreased by a factor of 2-4. CONCLUSION: Low concentration/low-delta troponin algorithms improve the clinical sensitivity for a combined endpoint of NSTEMI and unstable angina pectoris, with the cost of a substantial reduction in total rule-out rate. There was no clear benefit compared to ESC for diagnosing high-risk events.

Patients' reflections on prehospital symptom recognition and timely treatment of myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Early treatment is crucial to successful therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Prehospital delay is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. There is little empirical evidence of patients' reflections on prehospital symptoms of MI and timely treatment at the time of discharge from hospital. To explore patients' reflections on prehospital symptoms of MI and their experiences of interaction with local hospitals, general practitioners, and laypersons. METHODS AND RESULTS: An inductive explorative design with a qualitative method approach was used to conduct in-depth interviews of patients after confirmed MI. Twenty patients were purposefully selected based on age and gender. Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted prior to hospital discharge. The interviews were organized around a set of predetermined, open-ended questions, transcribed verbatim and analysed using qualitative content analysis. There were patients who acted upon severe symptoms of MI by seeking medical assistance. Patients commonly experienced that the time from the onset of symptoms to treatment posed a transitional challenge. They did not take subtle signs of MI seriously; they underestimated symptoms of MI and delayed seeking medical assistance. Patients frequently experienced that healthcare professionals did not take them seriously, as they struggled to gain access to healthcare services. CONCLUSION: This study highlights patients' unique experiences of the pathway from symptom onset to confirmed MI. Severe chest pain is associated with MI and triggers an immediate need for care. However, patients often underestimated moderate chest pain or subtle signs and symptoms of MI. Existing knowledge gaps concerning the misinterpretation of symptoms in primary care need to be addressed in order to reduce this clinical challenge.

Clinical risk scores identify more patients at risk for cardiovascular events within 30 days as compared to standard ACS risk criteria: the WESTCOR study.

AIMS: Troponin-based algorithms are made to identify myocardial infarctions (MIs) but adding either standard acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk criteria or a clinical risk score may identify more patients eligible for early discharge and patients in need of urgent revascularization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Post-hoc analysis of the WESTCOR study including 932 patients (mean 63 years, 61% male) with suspected NSTE-ACS. Serum samples were collected at 0, 3, and 8-12 h and high-sensitivity cTnT (Roche Diagnostics) and cTnI (Abbott Diagnostics) were analysed. The primary endpoint was MI, all-cause mortality, and unplanned revascularizations within 30 days. Secondary endpoint was non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) during index hospitalization. Two combinations were compared: troponin-based algorithms (ESC 0/3 h and the High-STEACS algorithm) and either ACS risk criteria recommended in the ESC guidelines, or one of eleven clinical risk scores, HEART, mHEART, CARE, GRACE, T-MACS, sT-MACS, TIMI, EDACS, sEDACS, Goldman, and Geleijnse-Sanchis. The prevalence of primary events was 21%. Patients ruled out for NSTEMI and regarded low risk of ACS according to ESC guidelines had 3.8-4.9% risk of an event, primarily unplanned revascularizations. Using HEART score instead of ACS risk criteria reduced the number of events to 2.2-2.7%, with maintained efficacy. The secondary endpoint was met by 13%. The troponin-based algorithms without evaluation of ACS risk missed three-index NSTEMIs with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.5% and 99.6%. CONCLUSION: Combining ESC 0/3 h or the High-STEACS algorithm with standardized clinical risk scores instead of ACS risk criteria halved the prevalence of rule-out patients in need of revascularization, with maintained efficacy.

Baseline frailty status and outcomes important for shared decision-making in older adults receiving transcatheter aortic valve implantation, a prospective observational study.

AIMS: The objective of this study was to examine baseline frailty status (including cognitive deficits) and important clinical outcomes, to inform shared decision-making in older adults receiving transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prospective, observational study of 82 TAVI patients, recruited 2013 to 2015, with 2-year follow-up. Mean age was 83 years (standard deviation (SD) 4.7). Eighteen percent of the patients were frail, as assessed with an 8-item frailty scale. Fifteen patients (18%) had a Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score below 24 points at baseline, indicating cognitive impairment or dementia and five patients had an MMSE below 20 points. Mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) class at baseline and 6 months was 2.5 (SD 0.6) and 1.4 (SD 0.6), (p < 0.001). There was no change in mean Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) scale between baseline and 6 months, 54.2 (SD 11.5) and 54.5 (SD 10.3) points, respectively, mean difference 0.3 (p = 0.7). At 2 years, six patients (7%) had died, four (5%, n = 79) lived in a nursing home, four (5%) suffered from disabling stroke, and six (7%) contracted infective endocarditis. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI patients had improvement in symptoms and maintenance of activity of daily living at 6 months. They had low mortality and most patients lived in their own home 2 years after TAVI. Complications like death, stroke, and endocarditis occurred. Some patients had cognitive impairment before the procedure which might influence decision-making. Our findings may be used to develop pre-TAVI decision aids.

Cardiac Troponin Assays With Improved Analytical Quality: A Trade-Off Between Enhanced Diagnostic Performance and Reduced Long-Term Prognostic Value.

Background Cardiac troponin (cTn) permits early rule-out/rule-in of patients admitted with possible non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. In this study, we developed an admission and a 0/1 hour rule-out/rule-in algorithm for a troponin assay with measurable results in >99% of healthy individuals. We then compared its diagnostic and long-term prognostic properties with other protocols. Methods and Results Blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 3, and 8 to 12 hours from patients admitted with possible non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. cTnT (Roche Diagnostics), cTnI(Abbott) (Abbott Diagnostics), and cTnI(sgx) (Singulex Clarity System) were measured in 971 admission and 465 1-hour samples. An admission and a 0/1 hour rule-out/rule-in algorithm were developed for the cTnI(sgx) assay and its diagnostic properties were compared with cTnTESC (European Society of Cardiology), cTnI(Abbott)ESC, and 2 earlier cTnI(sgx) algorithms. The prognostic composite end point was all-cause mortality and future nonfatal myocardial infarction during a median follow-up of 723 days. non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction prevalence was 13%. The novel cTnI(sgx) algorithms showed similar performance regardless of time from symptom onset, and area under the curve was significantly better than comparators. The cTnI(sgx)0/1 hour algorithm classified 92% of patients to rule-in or rule-out compared with ≤78% of comparators. Patients allocated to rule-out by the prior published 0/1 hour algorithms had significantly fewer long-term events compared with the rule-in and observation groups. The novel cTnI(sgx)0/1 hour algorithm used a higher troponin baseline concentration for rule-out and did not allow for prognostication. Conclusions Increasingly sensitive troponin assays may improve identification of non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction but could rule-out patients with subclinical chronic myocardial injury. Separate protocols for diagnosis and risk prediction seem appropriate.

Cardiac arrest as a reportable condition: a cohort study of the first 6 years of the Norwegian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry.

OBJECTIVES: The Norwegian Cardiac Arrest Registry (NorCAR) was established in 2013 when cardiac arrest became a mandatory reportable condition. The aim of this cohort study is to describe how the world's first mandatory, population-based cardiac arrest registry evolved during its first 6 years. SETTING: Norway has a total population of 5.3 million inhabitants with a population density that varies considerably. All residents are assigned a unique identifier number, giving nationally approved registries access to information about all births and deaths in the country. Data in the registry are entered by data processors; public employees with close links to the emergency medical services. All data processors undergo a standardised training and meet for yearly retraining and updates. PARTICIPANTS: All events of cardiac arrest where bystanders or healthcare professionals have started cardiopulmonary resuscitation or performed defibrillation are included into the NorCAR. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Since the establishment of the registry, the number of reporting health trusts, the number of reported events and the corresponding population at risk were followed year by year. Outcome is measured as changes in inclusion rate, incidence per 100 000 inhabitants and survival to 30 days after cardiac arrest. RESULTS: In total, 14 849 cases were registered over 6 years, between 2013 and 2018. The number of health trusts reporting rose steadily from 2013. Within 3 years, all trusts reported to the registry with an increasing number of events reported; going from 1101 to 3400 per year. The prevalence of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation increased slightly, but the population incidence of survival did not change. CONCLUSION: Declaring cardiac arrest as a reportable condition and close follow-up of all reporting areas is essential when building a national registry.

Incidence, risk factors and outcome of young patients with myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: The decline in the incidence and mortality of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been less among younger compared with older individuals. The aim of this nationwide study was to assess the current incidence, risk factors and outcome of AMI in patients <45 years of age. METHODS: All patients ≤80 years of age registered in the Norwegian Myocardial Infarction Register in 2013-2016 were included in this observational, nationwide cohort study. Follow-up was conducted through linkage with the Norwegian Patient Registry through 2017. RESULTS: Among a total of 33 439 patients ≤80 years with AMI, 1468 (4.4%) were <45 years old. The incidence of AMI was 2.1 per 100 000 person-years in people aged 20-29 years, 16.9 in people aged 30-39 years and 97.6 in people aged 40-49 years. Compared with older patients, patients <45 years were more likely to be male (81%), current smokers (56%), obese (30%) and have a family history of premature AMI (44%), and their low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels were higher. Patients <45 years were more likely to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease (14% vs 10%, p<0.001) compared with older patients. During a median follow-up time of 2.4 years, 135 (9%) patients <45 years experienced a new AMI, stroke or death, and 58 (4%) patients died. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of AMI was low in people <45 years old in Norway, but almost one in ten patients with AMI <45 years old died or experienced a new cardiovascular event during follow-up. Increased efforts to improve risk factor control in these patients are warranted.

Pharmacy-dispensed drugs for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction. / Forebyggende legemidler etter hjerteinfarkt utlevert fra apotek.

BACKGROUND: Secondary prophylactic drugs are important for avoiding further cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction. We have examined whether patients collect these drugs from pharmacies and whether there are differences in survival between those who collect versus do not collect the drugs. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All patients <80 years registered in the Norwegian Myocardial Infarction Registry in 2013-16 were included in the study. The Norwegian Prescription Database was used to determine whether patients collected their prescriptions from pharmacies. RESULTS: During the study period, 32 328 patients under the age of 80 were registered in the Norwegian Myocardial Infarction Registry, of whom 96 % were discharged alive. The proportion of patients who were prescribed acetylsalicylic acid was 95 %, two antiplatelet agents, 83 %; a statin, 90 %; beta-blockers, 76 %; and ACE inhibitors/AII receptor blockers, 55 %. The proportions of patients who collected each of these drugs from a pharmacy within six months were 94 %, 90 %, 96 %, 95 % and 94 %, respectively. The combined incidence of death, stroke and myocardial infarction during the follow-up period (median 944 days) was higher among patients who did not collect all of their prescribed drugs (adjusted HR 1.7; 95 % CI 1.6-1.8). Among patients who died, the median time to death was 509 days for those who collected all of their prescribed drugs versus 126 days for those who did not (p <0.001). INTERPRETATION: Most patients do collect prescribed drugs from a pharmacy after myocardial infarction. A shorter time to death among patients who do not collect the drugs may suggest a high degree of general morbidity in this group.

Aiming toWards Evidence baSed inTerpretation of Cardiac biOmarkers in patients pResenting with chest pain-the WESTCOR study: study design.

Objectives. The main aim of the Aiming toWards Evidence baSed inTerpretation of Cardiac biOmarkers in patients pResenting with chest pain (WESTCOR-study) (Clinical Trials number NCT02620202) is to improve diagnostic pathways for patients presenting to the Emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain. Design. The WESTCOR-study is a two center, cross-sectional and prospective observational study recruiting unselected patients presenting to the ED with suspected non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Patient inclusion started September 2015 and we plan to include 2250 patients, finishing in 2019. The final diagnosis will be adjudicated by two independent cardiologists based on all available information including serial high sensitivity cardiac troponin measurements, coronary angiography, coronary CT angiography and echocardiography. The study includes one derivation cohort (N = 985) that will be used to develop rule out/rule in algorithms for NSTEMI and NSTE-ACS (if possible) using novel troponin assays, and to validate established NSTEMI algorithms, with and without clinical scoring systems. The study further includes one subcohort (n = 500) where all patients are examined with coronary CT angiography independent of biomarker status, aiming to assess the associations between biomarkers and the extent and severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Finally, an external validation cohort (N = 750) will be included at Stavanger University Hospital. Prospective studies will be based on the merged cohorts. Conclusion. The WESTCOR study will provide new diagnostic algorithms for early inclusion and exclusion of NSTE-ACS and insights in the associations between cardiovascular biomarkers, CT-angiographic findings and short and long-term clinical outcomes.