Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Hand (N Y) ; 13(2): 223-227, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28718350

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bier blocks, or intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA), are a method of anesthesia for upper extremity surgeries. This study reports our experience with tourniquet deflation prior to 20 minutes with upper extremity IVRA. METHODS: This study was designed as a retrospective cohort analysis. Records, including intraoperative and immediate postoperative anesthesia notes, of 430 patients who underwent IVRA with an upper extremity Bier block and a corresponding tourniquet time of less than 20 minutes were reviewed. Patient demographics, procedure(s) performed, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, volume of lidocaine used in Bier block, tourniquet time, and any complications were recorded. RESULTS: This cohort consisted of 127 males and 303 females. The 3 most common procedures performed were carpal tunnel release (315), trigger finger release (47), and excision of masses (34). The average tourniquet time for this cohort was 16 minutes (range, 9-19 minutes), and the average volume of lidocaine (0.5% plain) injected was 44 mL (range, 30-70 mL). A tourniquet time of 17 minutes or less was observed in 339 patients, and 170 patients had tourniquet times of 15 minutes or less. Five complications were recorded: intraoperative vomiting, mild postoperative nausea/vomiting, severe postoperative nausea and vomiting, and transient postoperative hypotension that responded to a fluid bolus. CONCLUSIONS: No major complications were observed in our cohort of upper extremity IVRA and tourniquet times of less than 20 minutes. Several variables play a role in the safety of upper extremity IVRA.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Conduction , Tourniquets , Upper Extremity/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Complications , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Young Adult
2.
J Arthroplasty ; 31(1): 215-8, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26521129

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to compare nasal povidone-iodine swab for total joint arthroplasty patients to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening on the incidence of 90-day postoperative surgical site infections in total knee and hip arthroplasties as well as the cost-effectiveness. This is a single-center retrospective review of primary or revision total knee or hip arthroplasty patients. There were 849 patients screened for MRSA and 1004 patients in the nasal swab groups, both with an infection rate of 0.8%. The mean cost for the nasal swab was $27.21 (SD, 0), significantly different (P ≤ .01) than the mean cost for MRSA screens, $121.16 (SD, 26.18). There were significant cost savings with no difference in infection rates; therefore, nasal povidone-iodine swab antiseptic is financially and clinically successful.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/economics , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Povidone-Iodine/administration & dosage , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Chlorhexidine/chemistry , Cohort Studies , Communicable Disease Control/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Care Costs , Humans , Incidence , Nasal Mucosa/microbiology , Povidone-Iodine/therapeutic use , Reoperation/adverse effects , Reoperation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/economics , Surgical Wound Infection/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL