Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Wound Repair Regen ; 32(3): 229-233, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38534045

ABSTRACT

The capability to produce suture material using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology may have applications in remote health facilities where rapid restocking of supplies is not an option. This is a feasibility study evaluating the usability of 3D-printed sutures in the repair of a laceration wound when compared with standard suture material. The 3D-printed suture material was manufactured using a fused deposition modelling 3D printer and nylon 3D printing filament. Study participants were tasked with performing laceration repairs on the pigs' feet, first with 3-0 WeGo nylon suture material, followed by the 3D-printed nylon suture material. Twenty-six participants were enrolled in the study. Survey data demonstrated statistical significance with how well the 3D suture material performed with knot tying, 8.9 versus 7.5 (p = 0.0018). Statistical significance was observed in the 3D-printed suture's ultimate tensile strength when compared to the 3-0 Novafil suture (274.8 vs. 199.8 MPa, p = 0.0096). The 3D-printed suture also demonstrated statistical significance in ultimate extension when compared to commercial 3-0 WeGo nylon suture (49% vs. 37%, p = 0.0215). This study was successful in using 3D printing technology to manufacture suture material and provided insight into its usability when compared to standard suture material.


Subject(s)
Feasibility Studies , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Suture Techniques , Sutures , Tensile Strength , Animals , Swine , Lacerations/surgery , Materials Testing , Nylons , Wound Healing , Humans , Disease Models, Animal
2.
West J Emerg Med ; 21(4): 790-794, 2020 Jun 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32726243

ABSTRACT

Emergency physicians are on the front lines of treating patients with highly infectious respiratory diseases. Personal protective equipment is one defense against contamination from droplet and aerosol secretions. Intubation is a procedure that greatly can increase provider's risk of exposure. Utilization of an intubation box has been discussed and recommended on social media platforms. There has been scant literature demonstrating the effectiveness of such devices. This study aimed to determine degree of droplet contamination to the intubator utilizing a novel barrier enclosure with a fluorescent simulated respiratory contagion. This model confirmed both added protection to the providers preforming intubation, and reduction of spread of the droplets when such a device is applied to patient care.


Subject(s)
Aerosols , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Personal Protective Equipment , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Biofouling/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , Cough/virology , Humans , Simulation Training
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL