Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study.

BACKGROUND: MRI can identify patients with obstructive coronary artery disease by imaging the left ventricular myocardium during a first-pass contrast bolus in the presence and absence of pharmacologically induced myocardial hyperemia. The purpose of this multicenter dose-ranging study was to determine the minimally efficacious dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine injection (Magnevist Injection; Berlex Laboratories) for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. METHOD AND RESULTS: A total of 99 patients scheduled for coronary artery catheterization as part of their clinical evaluation were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 doses of gadopentate dimeglumine: 0.05, 0.10, or 0.15 mmol/kg. First-pass perfusion imaging was performed during hyperemia (induced by a 4-minute infusion of adenosine at a rate of 140 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) and then again in the absence of adenosine with otherwise identical imaging parameters and the same contrast dose. Perfusion defects were evaluated subjectively by 4 blinded reviewers. Receiver-operating curve analysis showed that the areas under the receiver-operating curve were 0.90, 0.72, and 0.83 for the low-, medium-, and high-contrast doses, respectively, compared with quantitative coronary angiography (diameter stenosis > or =70%). For the low-dose group, mean sensitivity was 93+/-0%, mean specificity was 75+/-7%, and mean accuracy was 85+/-3%. CONCLUSIONS: First-pass perfusion MRI is a safe and accurate test for identifying patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. A low dose of 0.05 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine is at least as efficacious as higher doses.

Clinical outcomes of compromised side branch (stent jail) after coronary stenting with the NIR stent.

Acute side-branch (SB) compromise or occlusion stent jail after native coronary stenting is a matter of concern. Attempts at maintaining SB patency can be a technical challenge. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical impact of SB compromise or occlusion in patients undergoing stenting of parent vessel lesions. We evaluated in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization rates at 6 months) in 318 consecutive patients undergoing NIR stent implantation across an SB. Based on independent angiographic analysis, 218 (68.6%) patients had no poststent SB compromise, 85 (26.7%) patients had narrowed SB (> 70% narrowing, without total occlusion), and 15 (4.7%) patients had an occluded SB after stent implantation. The baseline patient and lesion characteristics were similar between the groups. Procedural success was 100%. Patients with SB occlusion had a higher stents/lesion ratio (P < 0.006). Side-branch occlusion was associated with higher in-hospital ischemic complications (Q-wave myocardial infarction, 7%; non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, 20%; P < 0.05) compared to patients with SB compromise or normal SB. At 6-month follow-up, there was a trend for more myocardial infarctions in the group with SB occlusion during the index procedure (Q-wave myocardial infarction, 7% vs. 1% in the narrowed and 0% in normal SB; P = 0.09). However, late target lesion revascularization and mortality were similar in the three groups (P = 0.91). SB occlusion after parent vessel stenting is associated with more frequent in-hospital Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions. However, with the NIR stent, side-branch compromise or occlusion does not influence late (6 month) major adverse events, including death, myocardial infarction, or need for repeat revascularization.

Importance of time to reperfusion on outcomes with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (results from the Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Trial).

The mortality benefit of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is strongly dependent on time to treatment. Recent observations suggest that time to treatment may be less important with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Patients with AMI of <12 hours duration, without cardiogenic shock, who were treated with primary PTCA from the Stent PAMI Trial (n = 1,232) were evaluated to assess the effect of time to reperfusion on outcomes. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow was achieved in a high proportion of patients regardless of time to treatment. Improvement in ejection fraction from baseline to 6 months was substantial with reperfusion at <2 hours but was modest and relatively independent of time to reperfusion after 2 hours (<2 hours, 12.3% vs > or =2 hours, 4.2%, p = 0.004). There were no differences in 1- or 6-month mortality by time to reperfusion (6-month mortality: <2 hours [5.5%], 2 to <4 hours [4.6%], 4 to <6 hours [4.5%], >6 hours [4.2%], p = 0.97). There were also no differences in other clinical outcomes by time to reperfusion, except that reinfarction and infarct artery reocclusion at 6 months were more frequent with later reperfusion. The lack of correlation between time to treatment and mortality in patients without cardiogenic shock suggests that the survival benefit of primary PTCA may be related principally to factors other than myocardial salvage. These data may also have implications regarding the triage of patients with AMI for primary PTCA.

Effect of gender on the outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Limited information exists regarding the outcomes of newer percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technologies in women. This study sought to determine whether female gender is an independent risk factor for PCI mortality and/or complications in contemporary practice. Using information from the National Cardiovascular Network (NCN) Database on 109,708 (33% women) PCI cases from 22 hospitals between January 1994 and January 1998, we examined the association of gender with unadjusted and risk-adjusted procedural outcomes. Women undergoing PCI were older, smaller, and had more comorbid illness than men, but less extensive coronary disease. Temporal trends in PCI device selection were similar in men and women. Compared with men, women had higher unadjusted procedural mortality rates (1.8% vs 1.0%, p <0.001), more strokes (0.4% vs 0.2%, p <0.001), and higher vascular complication rates (5.4% vs 2.7%, p <0.001). However, after adjusting for baseline clinical risk factors, and importantly, body surface area, women and men had similar PCI mortality risks (adjusted odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.24). Gender was not an independent risk factor for mortality among subgroups receiving coronary stent or atherectomy devices after risk adjustment. However, women undergoing PCI remained at higher risk for stroke, vascular complications, and repeat in-hospital revascularization than men, even after risk adjustment. We conclude that in contemporary practice, a patient's body size rather than gender, conveys independent risk for mortality after PCI.

Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the vascular complications after hemostasis with arteriotomy closure devices (ACD) versus manual compression after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). BACKGROUND: Previous clinical studies have indicated that ACD can be used for achievement of hemostasis and early ambulation after PCI. This study investigated the safety of ACD in achieving hemostasis after PCI compared with manual compression in a large cohort of consecutive patients. METHODS: A total of 5,093 patients were followed after PCI was performed with the transfemoral approach. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to identify the predictors of vascular complications with ACD (n = 516) or with manual compression (n = 5,892) as a hemostasis option after sheath removal. RESULTS: The use of ACD was associated with a more frequent occurrence of hematoma compared with manual compression (9.3 vs. 5.1%, p < 0.001). There was also a higher rate of significant hematocrit drop (>15%) with ACD versus manual compression (5.2% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.001). Similar rates of pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistulae were noted with either hemostasis technique. Vascular surgical repair at the access site was required more often with ACD versus manual compression (2.5 vs. 1.5%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this early experience with ACD after PCI, their use was associated with higher vascular complication rates than hemostasis with manual compression.

Normal flow (TIMI-3) before mechanical reperfusion therapy is an independent determinant of survival in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials.

BACKGROUND: Whereas survival after lytic therapy for myocardial infarction is strongly dependent on early administration, it is unknown whether the otherwise excellent outcomes in patients undergoing primary PTCA for acute myocardial infarction, in whom TIMI-3 flow rates of >90% may be achieved, can be further improved by early reperfusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 2507 patients enrolled in 4 PAMI trials undergoing primary PTCA, spontaneous reperfusion (TIMI-3 flow) was present in 16% at initial angiography. Compared with patients without TIMI-3 flow, those with TIMI-3 flow before PTCA had greater left ventricular ejection fraction (57+/-10% versus 53+/-11%, P=0.003) and were less likely to present in heart failure (7.0% versus 11.6%, P=0.009). Patients with initial TIMI-3 flow had significantly lower in-hospital rates of mortality, new-onset heart failure, and hypotension and had a shorter hospital stay. Cumulative 6-month mortality was 0.5% in patients with initial TIMI-3 flow, 2.8% with TIMI-2 flow, and 4.4% with initial TIMI-0/1 flow (P=0.009). By multivariate analysis, TIMI-3 flow before PTCA was an independent determinant of survival (odds ratio 2.1, P=0.04), even when corrected for by postprocedural TIMI-3 flow. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing primary PTCA in whom TIMI-3 flow is present before angioplasty present with greater clinical and angiographic evidence of myocardial salvage, are less likely to develop complications related to left ventricular failure, and have improved early and late survival. These data warrant prospective randomized trials of pharmacological strategies to promote early reperfusion before definitive mechanical intervention in acute myocardial infarction.

Differential impact on survival of electrocardiographic Q-wave versus enzymatic myocardial infarction after percutaneous intervention: a device-specific analysis of 7147 patients.

BACKGROUND: The relative prognostic importance of ECG myocardial infarction (MI) after intervention compared with varying degrees of enzymatic elevation has not been characterized, and the device-specific implications of periprocedural MI are also unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Serial creatine phosphokinase (CPK)-MB levels were determined after elective percutaneous intervention of 12 098 lesions in 7147 consecutive patients at a tertiary referral center. Procedural, in-hospital, and follow-up data were collected by independent research nurses, and clinical and ECG events were adjudicated by a separate committee. Stents were implanted in 50.6% of lesions, atheroablation was performed in 54.8%, and PTCA alone was performed in 9.8%. The peak periprocedural CPK-MB level was >3x the upper limit of normal (ULN) in 17.9% of patients, and Q-wave MI developed in 0.6%. By multivariate analysis, the periprocedural development of new Q waves was the most powerful independent determinant of death (2-year mortality rate, 38.3%; hazard ratio, 9.9; P<0.0001). Non-Q-wave MI with CPK-MB >8x ULN was also a strong predictor of death (2-year mortality rate, 16.3%; hazard ratio, 2.2; P<0.0001); survival was unaffected by lesser degrees of CPK-MB elevation. Though CPK-MB elevation was more common after atheroablation and stenting than PTCA, the rates of Q-wave MI and survival were device-independent. CONCLUSIONS: Myonecrosis after percutaneous intervention is common in a high-risk referral population dominated by atheroablation and stent use. Large periprocedural infarctions (signified by new Q waves and CPK-MB >8xULN) are powerful determinants of death, whereas lesser degrees of CPK-MB release and specific device use do not adversely affect survival.

Intravascular ultrasound-guided renal artery stenting.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing renal artery stenting with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance and compare measurements between IVUS and angiography. METHODS: One hundred thirty-one patients (71 women; mean age 71 +/- 8 years) underwent IVUS-guided Palmaz stent implantation in 153 stenotic renal arteries at a single center. The indications for stenting were uncontrolled hypertension (102, 77.9%), renal insufficiency (10, 7.6%), and both conditions (19, 14.5%). The majority of lesions were ostial (114, 74.5%); the remainder occupied the proximal renal artery (39, 25.5%). The mean lesion length and diameter stenosis were 6.5 +/- 3.0 mm and 74% +/- 10%, respectively, as measured by angiography. Data were recorded in a prespecified database; angiographic and IVUS images were analyzed at dedicated core laboratories and compared. RESULTS: Angiographic success was achieved in all patients, but IVUS indicated the need for additional intervention in 36 (23.5%) cases. There was strong correlation between the angiographic and IVUS measurements of lesion length (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001) and pre-/postprocedural minimal luminal diameter (r = 0.72 and 0.63, respectively; p < 0.0001). The mean contrast volume was 74 +/- 18 mL per case. In-hospital renal failure occurred in 8 (6.1%) patients; 2 (1.5%) required transient hemodialysis. At a mean 15-month follow-up, patients were treated with fewer antihypertensive medications (p = 0.05), and systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressures had decreased (p = 0.001); no significant change was noted in serum creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: IVUS-guided stenting facilitates safe renal artery revascularization. IVUS imaging may complement angiography in certain cases, which should be studied further in prospective studies with iodinated or noniodinated contrast agents.

Intravascular radiation therapy after balloon angioplasty of narrowed femoropopliteal arteries to prevent restenosis: results of the PARIS feasibility clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To conduct a feasibility study to assess the feasibility, safety, and outcome of endoluminal gamma radiation therapy after balloon angioplasty of superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with claudication were enrolled in the study and underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of SFA lesions with a mean lesion length of 9.8 cm +/- 3.0 and a mean reference vessel diameter of 5.2 mm +/- 3.1. After successful PTA, a segmented centering balloon catheter was positioned to cover the PTA site. The patients were then transported to the radiation oncology suite and treated with a microSelectron HDR afterloader with use of an Ir-192 source with a prescribed dose of 14 Gy, 2 mm into the vessel wall. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) and Rutherford score were evaluated at 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure and angiographic follow-up was conducted at 6 months. RESULTS: Radiation was delivered successfully to 35 of 40 patients. There were no procedural complications. Exercise and rest ABI were higher at 1 year (0.72 +/- 0.26 and 0.89 +/- 0.18, respectively) compared to baseline (0.51 +/- 0.25 and 0.67 +/- 0.17, respectively). Maximum walking time on a treadmill increased from 3.41 min +/- 2.41 to 4.43 min +/- 2.49 at 30 days and was 4.04 min +/- 2.8 at 12 months. The angiographic binary restenosis rate at 6 months was 17.2% and the clinical restenosis rate at 12 months was 13.3%. There were no angiographic or clinical adverse events related to the radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Intraarterial radiation after PTA of SFA lesions with use of high-dose rate gamma radiation is feasible and safe. The angiographic and clinical improvements are sustainable at 1 year and represent a potent antirestenotic therapy for the treatment of narrowed peripheral arteries.

Intracoronary radiation with gamma wire inhibits recurrent in-stent restenosis.

To study the safety and efficacy of intracoronary gamma radiation delivered via a new high-activity (192)Ir source wire for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis results from neointimal tissue proliferation especially in its diffused form and presents a therapeutic challenge. Gamma radiation has been shown to decrease neointima formation within stents in animal models and in initial clinical trials. A total of 26 patients with in-stent restenosis underwent successful intervention and was treated with open-label (192)Ir using a high-activity line source. The specific activity of the source wire was 372+/-51 mCi, and the dwell time was 10.8+/-1.9 min. Primary endpoints were freedom from death, myocardial infraction (MI), and repeat target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included angiographic restenosis and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) neointimal hyperplasia. Procedural success was high (96.2%), and in-hospital and 30-day complications were low with no deaths, MI, or requirement for repeat revascularization. At 6 months, event-free survival was 85%: one patient required repeat PTCA, one underwent bypass surgery, and two had an MI. Baseline lesion length measured 15.77 mm. Follow-up angiography was available in 21/25 (84%) patients. The binary restenosis rates were 19.0% (4/21) in-stent and 23.8% (5/21) in-lesion. Follow-up IVUS was available in 20/25 patients. There was no increase in intimal hyperplasia from postintervention to follow-up (3.11.8 vs. 3.41.8 mm(2); P=.32). Eight patients had a reduction of neointimal intimal tissue at follow-up. These results indicate that intracoronary gamma radiation with the Angiorad source wire is safe and effective in preventing in-stent restenosis.

Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of edge recurrence after intracoronary gamma radiation treatment of native artery in-stent restenosis lesions.

In the Washington Radiation for In-Stent restenosis Trial (WRIST), patients were first treated with conventional techniques and then randomized to either gamma-irradiation ((192)Ir) or placebo (dummy seeds). In the (192)Ir group with native coronary in-stent restenosis, we identified 8 patients with edge recurrence and compared them with 21 patients with no recurrence. Serial (postirradiation and follow-up) intravascular ultrasound analysis was performed according to conventional methods. When compared with nonrecurring lesions, lesions with distal edge recurrence had (1) greater decrease in mean distal lumen cross-sectional area (-3.0 +/- 1.2 vs -0.7 +/- 1.0 mm(2), p = 0.0002), (2) no change in mean distal external elastic membrane cross-sectional area versus an increase in mean distal cross-sectional area of 1.0 +/- 0.9 mm(2) in nonrecurring lesions (p = 0.0047), and (3) a greater increase in mean distal plaque + media cross-sectional area (2.9 +/- 1.2 mm vs 1.7 +/- 0.6 mm(2), p = 0.0103). Within the stented segment, the nonrecurring lesions had no decrease in mean lumen and no increase in mean intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area. Conversely, lesions with distal edge recurrence had a significant decrease in mean intrastent lumen cross-sectional area (-1.7 +/- 1.7 mm(2)) and a significant increase in mean intrastent intimal hyperplasia cross-sectional area (1.6 +/- 1.6 mm(2)). Lesions with distal edge recurrence also had a greater decrease in mean proximal lumen cross-sectional area (-1.7 +/- 1.3 vs -0.3 +/- 0.8 mm(2), p = 0.0213), with a trend toward a greater increase in mean proximal plaque + media cross-sectional area. Thus, edge recurrence after (192)Ir treatment of in-stent restenosis is the result of neointimal hyperplasia (part of generalized treatment failure) and the absence of radiation-induced positive remodeling.

Stent thrombosis in the modern era: a pooled analysis of multicenter coronary stent clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: There are limited studies of stent thrombosis in the modern era of second-generation stents, high-pressure deployment, and current antithrombotic regimens. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six recently completed coronary stent trials and associated nonrandomized registries that enrolled 6186 patients (6219 treated vessels) treated with >/=1 coronary stent followed by antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticlopidine were pooled for this analysis. Within 30 days, clinical stent thrombosis developed in 53 patients (0.9%). The variables most significantly associated with the probability of stent thrombosis were persistent dissection NHLBI grade B or higher after stenting (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.9 to 7.7), total stent length (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.5 per 10 mm), and final minimal lumen diameter within the stent (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.7 per 1 mm). Stent thrombosis was documented by angiography in 45 patients (0.7%). Clinical consequences of angiographic stent thrombosis included 64.4% incidence of death or myocardial infarction at the time of stent thrombosis and 8.9% 6-month mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Stent thrombosis occurred in <1.0% of patients undergoing stenting of native coronary artery lesions and receiving routine antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus ticlopidine. Procedure-related variables of persistent dissection, total stent length, and final lumen diameter were significantly associated with the probability of stent thrombosis. Continued efforts to eliminate this complication are warranted given the serious clinical consequences.

Effectiveness of excimer laser coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction or in unstable angina pectoris.

This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and acute results of percutaneous excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) in acute coronary syndromes. Fifty-nine patients were treated with ELCA (308 nm), including 33 patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP) (35 vessels with 39 lesions) and 26 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (26 vessels with 29 lesions). In each patient the target lesion had a complex morphology. Overall, 71% of the patients had contraindications for pharmacologic thrombolytic agents or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists. All patients received adjunct balloon dilation followed by stent implantation in 88% of patients with AMI versus 76% of patients with UAP (p = NS). Quantitative angiography was performed at an independent core laboratory; 86% laser success and 100% procedural success was achieved in the AMI group versus 87% laser success and 97% procedural success in the UAP group (p = NS). In the AMI group, the minimal luminal diameter increased from 0.77 +/- 0.56 to 1.44 +/- 0.47 mm after lasing to a final 2.65 +/- 0.47 mm versus 0.77 +/- 0.38 to 1.35 +/- 0.4 mm after lasing to 2.66 +/- 0.5 mm final in the UAP group. A prelaser percent stenosis of 76 +/- 17% for the AMI group versus 70 +/- 16% for the UAP group (p = NS) was decreased after lasing to 52 +/- 16% for the AMI group versus 51 +/- 14% for the UAP group (p = NS) and to a final stenosis of 15 +/- 17% for the AMI group versus 12 +/- 15% for the UAP group (p = NS). A 96% laser-induced reduction of thrombus burden area was achieved in the AMI group versus 97% in the UAP group (p = NS). Preprocedure Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow of 1.3 +/- 0.9 in the AMI group versus 2.3 +/- 1.2 for the UAP group (p = 0.01) increased to a final flow of 3.0 +/- 0 for the AMI group versus 3.0 +/- 0 for the UAP group (p = NS). There were no deaths, cerebrovascular accident, emergency bypass surgery, acute closure, major perforation or major dissection, distal embolization, or bleeding complications in either group. One patient with AMI had localized perforation (caused by guidewire) without sequelae and 1 patient with UAP had an abnormal increase in creatine kinase levels. All 59 patients survived the laser procedure, improved clinically, and were discharged. Thus, early experience in patients with acute coronary syndromes suggest that percutaneous ELCA is feasible and safe.

Treatment of focal in-stent restenosis with balloon angioplasty alone versus stenting: Short- and long-term results.

BACKGROUND: Although both percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and additional stenting can be used for the treatment for focal in-stent restenosis (ISR), no large-scale comparative data on the clinical outcomes after these interventional procedures have been reported. METHODS: In the current study we compared the in-hospital and long-term clinical results of PTCA alone (n = 266 patients, n = 364 lesions) versus stenting (n = 135 patients, n = 161 lesions) for the treatment of focal ISR, defined as a lesion length less than or equal to 10 mm. RESULTS: There were significantly more diabetic patients in the PTCA group than in the stent group (36% vs 26%, P =.04), but other baseline characteristics were similar. Lesion length and preprocedure minimal lumen diameter (MLD) were also similar in the two groups, but the stent group had a larger reference vessel diameter (3.40 +/- 0.73 mm vs 2.99 +/- 0.68 mm, P <.001). Stenting achieved a larger postprocedure MLD than PTCA did (2.95 +/- 0.95 mm vs 2.23 +/- 0.60 mm, P <.001) and a smaller residual diameter stenosis (11% +/- 15% vs 23% +/- 16%, P =.04). Angiographic success was achieved in all cases. The rate of death/Q-wave infarction of urgent revascularization was higher with PTCA than with stent (5.6% vs 0.7%, P =.02). Postprocedure creatine kinase myocardial band enzyme elevation >5 times normal was more frequent with stent (18.5% vs 9.7%, P =.05). At 1 year the two interventional strategies had similar cumulative mortality (4.6% PTCA vs 5.1% stent, P not significant) and target lesion revascularization rate (24.6% PTCA vs 26.5% stent, P not significant). By multivariate analysis, the sole predictor of target lesion revascularization was diabetes (odds ratio 2.4, 95% confidence intervals 1.2-4.7, P =.01). CONCLUSION: Repeat stenting for the treatment of focal ISR had a higher postprocedure creatine kinase myocardial band elevation rate and similar long-term clinical results compared with PTCA alone.

Influence of gender on early and one-year clinical outcomes after saphenous vein graft stenting.

Compared with men, women may have a worse prognosis after native coronary revascularization. However, the influence of gender on clinical outcomes after saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenting is unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare early and 1-year clinical outcomes between men and women after stent implantation in SVG. A total of 1,199 consecutive patients with 1,858 SVG lesions were studied. Procedural success, in-hospital events, and late clinical outcomes were compared between men (n = 951) and women (n = 248). Overall procedural success was similar between men and women (97% vs 96%, p = NS). However, in-hospital (3.2% vs 1.6%, p = 0.07) and 30-day cumulative (4.4% vs 1.9%, p = 0.02) mortality rates were higher in women than in men. In addition, women had a higher incidence of vascular complications (12% vs 7.3%, p = 0.006) and postprocedural acute renal failure (8.1% vs 4%, p = 0.02). At 1-year follow-up, mortality was 13% in women and 11% in men (p = NS) and target lesion revascularization was 18% versus 23%, respectively (p = NS). By multivariate regression analysis, independent correlates of in-hospital mortality were female gender (odds ratio [OR] 3.6, confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 12.5, p = 0.05) and left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 0.9, CI 0.9 to 1.0, p = 0.01). Female gender was found to predict 30-day mortality (OR 2.5, CI 1.1 to 5.5, p = 0.02). The sole predictor of 1-year mortality was diabetes mellitus (OR 1.6, CI 1.1 to 2.3, p = 0.01). This study shows that women compared with men treated with stent implantation in SVG lesions have (1) a trend toward higher in-hospital mortality, (2) higher risk of 30-day mortality, (3) increased incidence of vascular complications and postprocedure acute renal failure, and (4) similar 1-year clinical outcome.

Combination therapy with aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin plus ticlopidine for prevention of subacute thrombosis after successful native coronary stenting.

We compared the combination of aspirin plus clopidrogrel (A+C) with aspirin and ticlopidine (A+T) for prevention of subacute stent thrombosis in 827 patients. At 30-day follow-up, there were trends toward increased subacute thrombosis with A+C compared with A+T (1.3% vs 0.2%, p = 0.10). These results suggest that A+C may have marginally higher subacute stent thrombosis than A+T.

Carotid artery stenting in patients with high-risk anatomy for carotid endarterectomy.

PURPOSE: To report the results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients considered to have high-risk anatomical characteristics for carotid endarterectomy. METHODS: CAS was performed in 39 carotid arteries of 37 consecutive patients (26 men; mean age 72 +/- 8 years, range 56-88) who met the criteria for high-risk surgical anatomy: previous ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy (20/39, 51.3%), common carotid bifurcation above the mandibular angle (5/39, 12.8%), contralateral carotid artery occlusion (15/39, 38.5%), or previous radiation therapy to the neck (1/39, 2.6%). Palmaz, Integra, or Wallstents were deployed via a percutaneous femoral artery access. Independent neurological evaluation was performed at specified time points, and a dedicated committee adjudicated all clinical events. RESULTS: Procedural success was 100%, with no major in-hospital complications. Neurological events were rare. Only 1 (2.6%) transient ischemic attack occurred prior to discharge; at 30 days, 1 (2.6%) additional minor stroke had been observed, giving a 2.6% cumulative 30-day "death plus any stroke" rate. Over a mean 11 +/- 6-month follow-up, 2 (5.4%) patients died of nonneurological causes, but there were no strokes. CONCLUSIONS: CAS is a viable endovascular revascularization technique that can be performed safely and effectively in patients with high-risk anatomy for carotid endarterectomy.

Localized intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy to inhibit the recurrence of restenosis after stenting.

BACKGROUND: Although the frequency of restenosis after coronary angioplasty is reduced by stenting, when restenosis develops within a stent, the risk of subsequent restenosis is greater than 50 percent. We report on a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of intracoronary radiation therapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. METHODS: Of 252 eligible patients in whom in-stent restenosis had developed, 131 were randomly assigned to receive an indwelling intracoronary ribbon containing a sealed source of iridium-192, and 121 were assigned to receive a similar-appearing nonradioactive ribbon (placebo). RESULTS: The primary end point, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and the need for repeated revascularization of the target lesion during nine months of follow-up, occurred in 53 patients assigned to placebo (43.8 percent) and 37 patients assigned to iridium-192 (28.2 percent, P=0.02). However, the reduction in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events was determined solely by a diminished need for revascularization of the target lesion, not by reductions in the incidence of death or myocardial infarction. Late thrombosis occurred in 5.3 percent of the iridium-192 group, as compared with 0.8 percent of the placebo group (P=0.07), resulting in more late myocardial infarctions in the iridium-192 group (9.9 percent vs. 4.1 percent, P=0.09). Late thrombosis occurred in irradiated patients only after the discontinuation of oral antiplatelet therapy (with ticlopidine or clopidogrel) and only in patients who had received new stents at the time of radiation treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary irradiation with iridium-192 resulted in lower rates of clinical and angiographic restenosis, although it was also associated with a higher rate of late thrombosis, resulting in an increased risk of myocardial infarction. If the problem of late thrombosis within the stent can be overcome, intracoronary irradiation with iridium-192 may become a useful approach to the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

Final results of a randomized trial comparing the NIR stent to the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries.

The NIR stent is a novel second generation tubular stent that was designed to overcome some of the limitations of the earlier Palmaz-Schatz (PS) stent design. The NIR Vascular Advanced North American (NIRVANA) trial randomized 849 patients with single coronary lesions to treatment with the NIR stent or the PS stent. The study was an "equivalency" trial, designed to demonstrate that the NIR stent was not inferior to (i.e., equivalent or better than) the PS stent, for the primary end point of target vessel failure (defined as death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) by 9 months. Successful stent delivery was achieved in 100% versus 98.8%, respectively, with a slightly lower postprocedural diameter stenosis (7% vs. 9%, p = 0.04) after NIR and PS stent placement, respectively. Major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, repeat target lesion revascularization) were not different at 30 days (4.3% vs. 4.4%). The primary end point of target vessel failure at 9 months was seen in 16.0% of NIR versus 17.2% of PS patients, with the NIR proving to be equal or superior to the PS stent (p <0.001 by test for equivalency). Angiographic restudy in 71% of a prespecified cohort showed no significant difference in restenosis (19.3% vs 22.4%). Thus, the NIR stent showed excellent deliverability with slightly better acute angiographic results and equivalent or better 9-month target vessel failure rate when compared with the PS stent.

Final results of a randomized trial comparing the MULTI-LINK stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries.

The MULTI-LINK (ML) stent is a novel second generation coronary stent. The ACS MultiLink Stent Clinical Equivalence in De Novo Lesions Trial (ASCENT) randomized 1,040 patients with single, de novo native vessel lesions to treatment with the ML stent or the benchmark Palmaz-Schatz (PS) stent, to demonstrate that the ML stent was not inferior to (i.e., equivalent or better than) the PS stent in terms of target vessel failure by 9 months. Successful stent delivery was achieved in 98.8% versus 96.9% of patients, with a slightly lower postprocedural diameter stenosis (8% vs 10%, p = 0.04), and no difference in 30-day major adverse cardiac events (5.0% vs 6.5%) for the ML stent versus the PS stent. The primary end point of target vessel failure at 9 months was seen in 15.1% of ML-treated patients versus 16.7% of PS-treated patients, with the ML proving to be equal or superior to the PS stent (p <0.001 by test for equivalency). In a prespecified subset, angiographic restudy showed a nonsignificant trend for reduced ML restenosis (16.0% vs 22.1%). Thus, the ML stent showed excellent deliverability and acute results, with 9-month clinical and 6-month angiographic outcomes that were equivalent or better than the PS stent.