La señal de la cruz: un automatismo muy poco frecuente en la epilepsia del lóbulo temporal. Descripción de dos casos / The sign of the cross: a very rare automatism in temporal lobe epilepsy. Two case reports

Introducción: En la evaluación de la epilepsia farmacorresistente, el análisis detallado de la semiología es fundamental para establecer una hipótesis diagnóstica de la localización de la zona epileptógena. La señal de la cruz es un automatismo manual complejo muy infrecuente descrito por primera vez en 2008 y poco referido en la bibliografía. Caso clínico: Presentamos dos casos con presencia de la señal de la cruz de nuestra serie de pacientes monitorizados mediante videoelectroencefalograma, uno de ellos estudiado también con electrodos profundos, en los que describimos la localización de la descarga en el momento de realizar la señal de la cruz. Se realiza también una revisión bibliográfica para intentar establecer un valor localizador y/o lateralizador de este signo.(AU)

Introduction: In the evaluation of drug-resistant epilepsy, a detailed analysis of the semiology is essential to establish a diagnostic hypothesis of the location of the epileptogenic zone. Cross-sign (CS) is a very infrequent complex manual automatism described for the first time in 2008 and rarely reported in the literature. Case report: We present two cases from our series of patients monitored by video-EEG, one of whom also studied with deep electrodes, in which we describe the location of the discharge while performing the CS. A bibliographic review is also carried out to try to establish a localizing and/or lateralizing value of this sign. Conclusion: The sign of the cross is a rare ictal automatism that occurs in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. The hand used to make the sign of the cross is the dominant one, regardless of the origin of the crises.(AU)

[The sign of the cross: a very rare automatism in temporal lobe epilepsy. Two case reports]. / La señal de la cruz: un automatismo muy poco frecuente en la epilepsia del lóbulo temporal. Descripción de dos casos.

INTRODUCTION: In the evaluation of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRF), a detailed analysis of the semiology is essential to establish a diagnostic hypothesis of the location of the epileptogenic zone. Cross-sign (CS) is a very infrequent complex manual automatism described for the first time in 2008 and rarely reported in the literature. CASE REPORT: We present two cases from our series of patients monitored by videoEEG, one of whom also studied with deep electrodes, in which we describe the location of the discharge while performing the CS. A bibliographic review is also carried out to try to establish a localizing and/or lateralizing value of this sign. CONCLUSION: The sign of the cross is a rare ictal automatism that occurs in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. The hand used to make the sign of the cross is the dominant one, regardless of the origin of the crises.

TITLE: La señal de la cruz: un automatismo muy poco frecuente en la epilepsia del lóbulo temporal. Descripción de dos casos.Introducción. En la evaluación de la epilepsia farmacorresistente, el análisis detallado de la semiología es fundamental para establecer una hipótesis diagnóstica de la localización de la zona epileptógena. La señal de la cruz es un automatismo manual complejo muy infrecuente descrito por primera vez en 2008 y poco referido en la bibliografía. Caso clínico. Presentamos dos casos con presencia de la señal de la cruz de nuestra serie de pacientes monitorizados mediante videoelectroencefalograma, uno de ellos estudiado también con electrodos profundos, en los que describimos la localización de la descarga en el momento de realizar la señal de la cruz. Se realiza también una revisión bibliográfica para intentar establecer un valor localizador y/o lateralizador de este signo. Conclusión. La señal de la cruz es un raro automatismo ictal que ocurre en pacientes con epilepsia del lóbulo temporal. La mano empleada para la señal de la cruz es la dominante, independientemente del origen de las crisis.

Selection of patients for percutaneous closure in nonlacunar cryptogenic stroke associated with patent foramen ovale. Data from the NORDICTUS cooperative registry.

INTRODUCTION: There is an extending use of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) as therapy for PFO-associated cryptogenic strokes. The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical practice of percutaneous closure of PFO and to analyse the variables for decision-making on the selection of patients for this procedure. METHOD: A prospective observational multicentric survey was conducted using all the cases of cryptogenic stroke/transient ischaemic attack associated with PFO recorded in the NORDICTUS hospital registry during the period 2018-2021. Clinical data, radiological patterns, echocardiogram data and factors related to PFO-associated stroke (thromboembolic disease and paradoxical embolism criteria) were recorded. The indication for closure was analysed according to age (≤/> 60 years) and the characteristics of the PFO. RESULTS: In the group ≤ 60 years (n = 488), 143 patients (29.3%) underwent PFO closure. The most influential variables for this therapy were detection of a high-risk PFO (OR 4.11; IC 2.6-6.5, P < .001), criteria for paradoxical embolism (OR 2.61; IC 1.28-5.28; P = .008) and previous use of antithrombotics (OR 2.67; IC 1.38-5.18; P = .009). In the > 60 years group (n = 124), 24 patients had PFO closure (19%). The variables related to this option were history of pulmonary thromboembolism, predisposition to thromboembolic disease, paradoxical embolism criteria, and high-risk PFO. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of a high-risk PFO (large shunt, shunt with associated aneurysm) is the main criterion for a percutaneous closure-based therapy. Other conditions to consider in the eligibility of patients are the history of thromboembolic disease, paradoxical embolism criteria or the previous use of antithrombotics.

Encephalopathy and encephalitis during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Spanish Society of Neurology COVID-19 Registry. / Encefalopatías y encefalitis durante la infección aguda por SARS-CoV2. Registro de la Sociedad Española de Neurología SEN COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Spanish Society of Neurology has run a registry of patients with neurological involvement for the purpose of informing clinical neurologists. Encephalopathy and encephalitis were among the most frequently reported complications. In this study, we analyse the characteristics of these complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, observational, multicentre study of patients with symptoms compatible with encephalitis or encephalopathy, entered in the Spanish Society of Neurology's COVID-19 Registry from 17 March to 6 June 2020. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients with neurological symptoms were registered, including 51 cases of encephalopathy or encephalitis (21.9%). None of these patients were healthcare professionals. The most frequent syndromes were mild or moderate confusion (33%) and severe encephalopathy or coma (9.8%). The mean time between onset of infection and onset of neurological symptoms was 8.02 days. Lumbar puncture was performed in 60.8% of patients, with positive PCR results for SARS-CoV-2 in only one case. Brain MRI studies were performed in 47% of patients, with alterations detected in 7.8% of these. EEG studies were performed in 41.3% of cases, detecting alterations in 61.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Encephalopathy and encephalitis are among the complications most frequently reported in the registry. More than one-third of patients presented mild or moderate confusional syndrome. The mean time from onset of infection to onset of neurological symptoms was 8 days (up to 24hours earlier in women than in men). EEG was the most sensitive test in these patients, with very few cases presenting alterations in neuroimaging studies. All patients treated with boluses of corticosteroids or immunoglobulins progressed favourably.

Cardiac arrhythmias in stroke unit patients. Evaluation of the cardiac monitoring data. / Arritmias cardiacas en la unidad de ictus: análisis de los datos de la monitorización cardiaca.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac arrhythmias are frequent in acute stroke. Stroke units are widely equipped with cardiac monitoring systems. Pre-existing heart diseases and heart-brain interactions may be implicated in causing cardiac arrhythmias in acute stroke. This article analyses cardiac arrhythmias detected in patients hospitalised in a stroke unit. METHOD: Prospective observational study of consecutive patients admitted to a stroke unit with cardiac monitoring. We collected clinical data from patients and the characteristics of their cardiac arrhythmias over a 1-year period (2013). Time of arrhythmia onset, associated predisposing factors, and the therapeutic decisions made after detection of arrhythmia were examined. All patients underwent continuous cardiac monitoring during no less than 48hours. RESULTS: Of a total of 332 patients admitted, significant cardiac arrhythmias occurred in 98 patients (29.5%) during their stay in the stroke unit. Tachyarrhythmia (ventricular tachyarrhythmias, supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, complex ventricular ectopy) was present in 90 patients (27.1%); bradyarrhythmia was present in 13 patients (3.91%). Arrhythmias were independently associated with larger size of brain lesion and older age. In 10% of the patient total, therapeutic actions were taken after detection of significant cardiac arrhythmias. Most events occurred within the first 48hours after stroke unit admission. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic cardiac monitoring in patients with acute stroke is useful for detecting clinically relevant cardiac arrhythmias. Incidence of arrhythmia is higher in the first 48hours after stroke unit admission. Age and lesion size were predicted appearance of arrhythmias. Detection of cardiac arrhythmias in a stroke unit has important implications for treatment.