Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Arch. esp. urol. (Ed. impr.) ; 71(6): 523-530, jul.-ago. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-178721

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVOS: La incontinencia urinaria (IU) es una importante complicación tras la prostatectomía radical (PR). Aunque la incompetencia esfinteriana es la causa predominante; la disfunción vesical puede contribuir considerablemente. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar los resultados del estudio urodinámico (EUD) en hombres con IU tras PR y analizar su relación con la clínica. MÉTODOS: Evaluamos retrospectivamente aquellos pacientes remitidos a nuestra unidad con IU tras PR entre 2004 y 2014. Describimos sintomatología, hallazgos urodinámicos y analizamos la correlación entre ambos. RESULTADOS: Incluimos 74 pacientes con una mediana de pañales al día de 3. El 61% referían urgencia, 63% IU esfuerzo (IUE), 11% IU urgencia (IUU) y 26% IU mixta (IUM).El EUD mostró IUE urodinámica en el 53%, hiperactividad del detrusor en el 53% y una acomodación vesical disminuida en el 43%. Del total con acomodación vesical disminuida, referían IUU el 56%. El EUD no demostró IU en el 16%, de los cuales el 80% referían clínicamente IUU. Se observa obstrucción del tracto de salida vesical en el 17% e hipoactividad del detrusor o detrusor acontráctil en el 36%. De los pacientes con obstrucción, en el 46% se objetivó incontinencia por hiperactividad del detrusor. Al correlacionar la clínica y resultados urodinámicos observamos que pacientes con IUE, un 31% sólo presentaban incontinencia por hiperactividad del detrusor. En aquellos con IUM, en un 42% sólo se observó IUE urodinámica y en el 33% sólo incontinencia por hiperactividad del detrusor. Sólo en el 27% de los que referían urgencia se objetivó incontinencia por hiperactividad del detrusor. CONCLUSIONES: En pacientes con IU tras PR existe un elevado porcentaje de obstrucción del tracto urinario, hiperactividad del detrusor y disminución de la acomodación vesical, que podría contribuir a la IU. Además, la correlación entre la clínica y EUD es baja


OBJECTIVES: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a significant complication after radical prostatectomy (RP). Although sphincter incompetence is considered the main cause; bladder dysfunction can contribute substantially. Our objective was to evaluate the results of the urodynamic study (UDS) in men with UI after radical prostatectomy and analyze the correlation between symptoms and urodynamic parameters. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study reviewing the symptoms and urodynamics in patients with urinary incontinence after RP. We describe the symptoms, urodynamic findings and we analyze the correlation between both. RESULTS: Our study included 74 patients. The median number of pads used per day was 3. 61% reported urgency, 63% stress urinary incontinence, 11% urgency urinary incontinence and 26% mixed urinary incontinence. The UDS showed stress urinary incontinence in 53% of patients, detrusor overactivity in 53% and, reduced bladder compliance in 43%. Urgency urinary incontinence was reported in 56% of patients with reduced bladder compliance. Urodynamics showed no incontinence in 16% of patients, of whom 80% showed urgency urinary incontinence. Urodynamics data showing obstruction of the urinary tract was reported in 17% and detrusor hypo or acontractility in 36%. Among patients with obstruction, 46% showed incontinence due to detrusor overactivity. The correlation of symptoms and urodynamics showed that only 31% of patients with stress urinary incontinence had incontinence due to detrusor overactivity in urodynamics. Among those with mixed urinary incontinence, urodynamic stress urinary incontinence only was found in 42% and 33% incontinence due to detrusor overactivity only. Finally, among those with symptoms of urgency urinary incontinence, the urodynamics showed detrusor overactivity in 27%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy, there is a high percentage of patients with urinary tract obstruction, detrusor overactivity and decreased compliance. Moreover, the correlation between symptoms and urodynamics is low


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Urinary Incontinence/physiopathology , Urodynamics , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Incontinence/diagnosis , Urinary Incontinence/etiology
2.
Arch Esp Urol ; 71(6): 523-530, 2018 Jul.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29991660

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a significant complication after radical prostatectomy (RP). Although sphincter incompetence is considered the main cause; bladder dysfunction can contribute substantially. Our objective was to evaluate the results of the urodynamic study (UDS) in men with UI after radical prostatectomy and analyze the correlation between symptoms and urodynamic parameters. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study reviewing the symptoms and urodynamics in patients with urinary incontinence after RP. We describe the symptoms, urodynamic findings and we analyze the correlation between both. RESULTS: Our study included 74 patients. The median number of pads used per day was 3. 61% reported urgency, 63% stress urinary incontinence, 11% urgency urinary incontinence and 26% mixed urinary incontinence. The UDS showed stress urinary incontinence in 53% of patients, detrusor overactivity in 53% and, reduced bladder compliance in 43%. Urgency urinary incontinence was reported in 56% of patients with reduced bladder compliance. Urodynamics showed no incontinence in 16% of patients, of whom 80% showed urgency urinary incontinence. Urodynamics data showing obstruction of the urinary tract was reported in 17% and detrusor hypo or acontractility in 36%. Among patients with obstruction, 46% showed incontinence due to detrusor overactivity. The correlation of symptoms and urodynamics showed that only 31% of patients with stress urinary incontinence had incontinence due to detrusor overactivity in urodynamics. Among those with mixed urinary incontinence, urodynamic stress urinary incontinence only was found in 42% and 33% incontinence due to detrusor overactivity only. Finally, among those with symptoms of urgency urinary incontinence, the urodynamics showed detrusor overactivity in 27%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy, there is a high percentage of patients with urinary tract obstruction, detrusor overactivity and decreased compliance. Moreover, the correlation between symptoms and urodynamics is low.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Prostatectomy , Urinary Incontinence/physiopathology , Urodynamics , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Incontinence/diagnosis , Urinary Incontinence/etiology
3.
Urol Int ; 100(4): 440-444, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29649830

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To review the incidence of healthcare-associated infections/urinary tract infection (UTI), risk factors, microorganisms isolated and antibiotic resistances in patients who underwent lower urinary tract endoscopic surgery (LUTES) in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out including 1,498 patients who undergo LUTES. Patients with and without UTI after surgery were compared. We analysed infection incidence, risk factors, microorganisms isolated and antibiotic resistances. RESULTS: Postoperative UTI incidence was 4.7%. Risk factors found: higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (OR 2.82; 95% CI 1.8-4.5; p < 0.00), immunosuppression (OR 2.89; 95% CI 1.2-7.2; p = 0.01), indwelling urinary catheter prior admission (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.6-4.2; p < 0.00) and postoperative catheterization longer than 2 days (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.7-4.3; p < 0.00). Transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) had the highest infection rates (5.5%). Microorganisms isolated were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23.5%), Escherichia coli (17.6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterococcus spp (11.8%). Resistance rates for flourquinolones varied between 28 and 80%, and Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae rose up 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Low percentage of UTI after endoscopic surgery was registered. TURB was the procedure with highest infection rate. Pseudomonas aeruginosa stands out as the most frequently isolated microorganism. Patient comorbidities, previous urinary catheter and postoperative catheter were identified as risk factors.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Carbapenems , Comorbidity , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Enterococcus , Escherichia coli , Female , Fluoroquinolones , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Risk Factors , Tertiary Care Centers , Urinary Tract/drug effects , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
Arch. esp. urol. (Ed. impr.) ; 71(1): 114-118, ene.-feb. 2018.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-171835

ABSTRACT

La Urología está definida como la especialidad médico-quirúrgica que engloba el estudio, diagnóstico y tratamiento de las afecciones médicas del aparato urinario. Queda bien especificado por la Comisión Nacional de Especialidades que debemos conocer la patología médica que nos compete. Sin embargo, en ocasiones, la formación de los residentes se centra en el ámbito quirúrgico y la patología oncológica, que, si bien es uno de los grandes pilares de la especialidad, suele ser en detrimento de la formación en patología médica y funcional. Hemos realizado una encuesta a residentes de cuarto año de Urología de España, en la que preguntamos sobre la calidad de la formación en Andrología y Urología Funcional. La media de tiempo de rotación es de 3,5 meses en cada unidad. Solo un 20% considera que su formación es satisfactoria y suficiente en Andrología. El 75% de los residentes encuestados considera que su formación en Urología Funcional es aceptable o suficiente, tanto a nivel médico como quirúrgico. Existen numerosos campos de actuación para la mejora de la formación de los residentes y jóvenes urólogos de este país en el manejo de la patología médica urológica. El futuro está abierto, y está en nuestra mano configurar una formación para los residentes de urología dentro de la excelencia y que sea reconocida tanto a nivel nacional como internacional como uno de los grandes pilares de la Urología española. En este capítulo analizaremos la situación actual en la formación de los Residentes de Urología españoles en la patología médica urológica, y nos vamos a centrar en la formación en urología funcional y andrología (AU)


Urology is defined as the medical-surgical specialty that includes the study, diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions of the urinary system. It is well specified by the National Commission of Specialties that we must know the medical pathology that concerns us. However, on occasions, resident training focuses on the surgical field and oncological pathology, which, although one of the main pillars of the specialty, is usually to the detriment of training in medical and functional pathology. We conducted a survey of residents in the fourth year of Urology in Spain, where we asked about the quality of training in Andrology and Functional Urology. The average rotation time is 3.5 months in each unit. Only 20% consider that their training is satisfactory and sufficient in Andrology. Seventy-five percent of residents surveyed believe that their training in Functional Urology is acceptable or sufficient, both medical and surgical. There are numerous fields of action to improve the training of residents and young urologists in this country in the management of urological medical pathology. The future is open, and it is in our hand to set up a training for urology residents within excellence and to be recognized both nationally and internationally as one of the great pillars of Spanish Urology. In this chapter we will analyze the current situation in the training of Spanish Urology Residents in urological medical pathology, and we will focus on training in functional urology and andrology (AU)


Subject(s)
Education, Continuing , Andrology/education , Urology/education , Internship and Residency , Spain
5.
Arch Esp Urol ; 71(1): 114-118, 2018 Jan.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29336340

ABSTRACT

Urology is defined as the medical-surgical specialty that includes the study, diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions of the urinary system. It is well specified by the National Commission of Specialties that we must know the medical pathology that concerns us. However, on occasions, resident training focuses on the surgical field and oncological pathology, which, although one of the main pillars of the specialty, is usually to the detriment of training in medical and functional pathology. We conducted a survey of residents in the fourth year of Urology in Spain, where we asked about the quality of training in Andrology and Functional Urology. The average rotation time is 3.5 months in each unit. Only 20% consider that their training is satisfactory and sufficient in Andrology. Seventy-five percent of residents surveyed believe that their training in Functional Urology is acceptable or sufficient, both medical and surgical. There are numerous fields of action to improve the training of residents and young urologists in this country in the management of urological medical pathology. The future is open, and it is in our hand to set up a training for urology residents within excellence and to be recognized both nationally and internationally as one of the great pillars of Spanish Urology. In this chapter we will analyze the current situation in the training of Spanish Urology Residents in urological medical pathology, and we will focus on training in functional urology and andrology.


Subject(s)
Urology/education , Education, Medical, Graduate/trends , Forecasting
6.
Urol Int ; 98(4): 442-448, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28355599

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infections related to catheters in the upper urinary tract (CUUT) are associated with specific characteristics. METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out from 2012 to 2015 to evaluate infections in patients with CUUT. RESULTS: A total of 209 infections were included (99 with double-J, 81 with nephrostomy, and 29 with internal/external nephroureteral stents). Among nephrostomy tube carriers, the most frequently isolated microorganisms were Pseudomonas and Enterococcus. In those with an internal/external nephroureteral stent, Klebsiella was the most common, and 57.1% were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella. In double-J carriers, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus were the most common microorganisms. Multiple-drug resistance (MDR) microorganisms were isolated in 28.6, 47.1, and 58.3% of patients with double-J, nephrostomy, and internal-external nephroureteral stents. A percutaneous CUUT (p = 0.005) and immunosuppression (p = 0.034) were risk factors for MDR microorganisms. CONCLUSIONS: Non-E. coli bacteria are commonly isolated in patients with CUUT. MDR microorganisms are frequent, mainly in percutaneous approach or immunosuppression.


Subject(s)
Catheters , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross Infection/microbiology , Enterococcus , Escherichia coli , Female , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Immunosuppression Therapy , Klebsiella , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous , Nephrotomy , Prospective Studies , Pseudomonas , Risk Factors , Urinary Tract/microbiology , beta-Lactamases/therapeutic use
7.
Investig Clin Urol ; 58(1): 61-69, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28097270

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in urological patients have special features due to specific risk factors. Our objective was to evaluate the characteristics and risk factors for HAIs in patients hospitalized in a Urology ward. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated prospectively, from 2012 to 2015, the incidence, types and risk factor for HAIs, microbiological and resistance patterns. RESULTS: The incidence of HAIs was 6.3%. The most common types were urinary infections (70.5%) and surgical site infections (22.1%). Univariate analysis showed an increased risk of HAIs among patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system III-IV (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; p<0.001), immunosuppression (OR, 1.80; p=0.013), previous urinary infection (OR, 4.46; p<0,001), and urinary catheter before admission (OR, 1.74; p<0.001). The surgical procedures with the highest incidence of HAIs were radical cystectomy (54.2%) and renal surgery (8.7%). The most frequently isolated microorganisms were Escherichia coli (25.1%), Enterococcus spp. (17.5%), Klebsiella spp. (13.5%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.3%). Enterococcus sp was the most common microorganism after radical cystectomy and in surgical site infections, E. coli showed resistance rates of 53.5% for fluoroquinolones, 9.3% for amikacin. The percentage of extended-spectrum betalactamase producing E. coli was 24.7%. Klebsiella spp. showed resistance rates of 47.8% for fluoroquinolones, 7.1% for amikacin and 4.3% for carbapenems. Enterococcus spp showed resistance rates of 1.7% for vancomycin and; P. aeruginosa of 33.3% for carbapenems and 26.2% for amikacin. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities, previous urinary infections, and urinary catheter are risk factors for HAIs. The microorganisms most commonly isolated were E. coli, Enterococcus and P. aeruginosa. Prospective monitoring may decrease the incidence of infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Hospital Units/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urology/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Amikacin/pharmacology , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cystectomy/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Enterococcus/drug effects , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Female , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy/adverse effects , Incidence , Klebsiella/drug effects , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Pseudomonas Infections/epidemiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Vancomycin/pharmacology , beta-Lactamases/metabolism
8.
Urol Int ; 95(3): 288-92, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26394031

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to describe the incidence and risk factors associated with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae and their resistance rate in a urological ward. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a prospective observational study from November 2011 to December 2014, reviewing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in our department. We evaluated the infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. RESULTS: The incidence of HAIs in our urology ward was 6.8%. Enterobacteriaceae including Escherichia coli (24.9%), Klebsiella spp. (12.1%), Enterobacter spp. (5.9%), Morganella spp. (1.5%), Proteus spp. (1.5%), and Citrobacter spp. (1.5%) represented 47.4% of the isolated pathogens. The percentage of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae was 26.4. Risk factors associated with a higher incidence of ESBL-producing bacteria were prior urinary tract infection (UTI; p < 0.001), hypertension (p = 0.042), immunosuppression (p = 0.004), and urinary stone (p = 0.027). The multivariable analysis confirmed prior UTI, immunosuppression and urinary stone as risk factors. ESBL-producing strains showed resistance rates of 85.3% for fluoroquinolones and 11.8% for carbapenems. Moreover, 16.7% of ESBL-Klebsiella were resistant to carbapenems. CONCLUSIONS: ESBL-producing enterobacteria are associated with higher cross resistance to antibiotics such as quinolones. Higher resistance rates are reported in ESBL-producing Klebsiella. Among patients admitted in a urology ward, risk factors for ESBL-producing strains were previous UTI, immunosuppression, and urinary stone.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/epidemiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Aged , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Enterobacteriaceae/enzymology , Hospital Departments , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Urology , beta-Lactamases/biosynthesis
9.
Arch. esp. urol. (Ed. impr.) ; 68(6): 541-550, jul.-ago. 2015. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-139309

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Las infecciones del tracto urinario asociadas a catéteres urinarios (ITU-AC) son la causa más frecuente de infección nosocomial, presentando altas tasas de resistencias. Están asociadas a complicaciones potencialmente severas, implicando mayor coste económico. Nuestro objetivo fue analizar las características de las ITU nosocomiales asociadas a catéter urinario en un Servicio de Urología. MÉTODOS: Llevamos a cabo un estudio prospectivo desde Noviembre de 2011 hasta Octubre de 2013, evaluando la incidencia de infecciones nosocomiales asociadas a los catéter de derivación urinaria en una planta de hospitalización urológica. Además evaluamos los factores de riesgo como comorbilidades, sondaje previo al ingreso y cirugía durante la hospitalización. Se presentan los patrones microbiológicos y tasas de resistencia de los gérmenes aislados. RESULTADOS: La incidencia de ITU-AC nosocomial fue de 8,2% (189/2283 pacientes portadores d e catéteres urinarios). La edad media fue de 67,4 ± 14,26 años, el 90,2% fueron sometidos a un procedimiento quirúrgico (p< 0,001), 14,8% tenían litiasis urinaria (p = 0,058) y el 46% portaban cateterismo urinario previo al ingreso (p < 0,001). Los microorganismos más frecuentemente aislados fueron Escherichia coli (22,6%), Enterococcus (21,9%) y Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13,9%). E.coli mostró una resistencia de 41,9% para quinolonas y un 33,3% fueron productores de β-lactamasas de espectro extendido (ESBL). P.aeruginosa presentaba 42,1% de resistencias a quinolonas y hasta un 21,1% a carbapenems. CONCLUSIONES: Portar un catéter urinario previo al ingreso y la realización de un procedimiento quirúrgico urológico durante el ingreso son factores de riesgo de ITU nosocomial en pacientes ingresados en el Servicio de Urología. Existe una elevada incidencia de gérmenes resistentes y de patógenos no clásicos como Enterococcus spp


OBJECTIVE: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are the most common nosocomial acquired infections, with high resistance rates. CAUTIs are a potentially severe complication in hospitalized patients and imply higher costs. Our aim was to analyze the characteristics of CAUTIs in our Urology department. METHODS: Between November 2011 and October 2013, a prospective observational study was carried out analyzing the incidence of healthcare-associated urinary tract infections in patients admitted to the urology ward with an indwelling urinary catheter. Furthermore, we evaluated associated risks factors and comorbidities such as urinary catheter at the time of admission or urological surgery during the hospitalization. We also presented our results regarding the microbiological characteristics and patterns of resistance to antibiotics in patients with CAUTI admitted in our service. RESULTS: The incidence of CAUTI was 8.2% (189/2283 patients who had urinary catheter). Mean age was 67.4 ± 14.26 years, 90.2% underwent a surgical procedure (p < 0.001), 14.8% had a urinary stone (p = 0.058) and 46% had a urinary catheter before admission (p < 0.001). The most commonly isolated pathogens were Escherichia coli (22.6%), Enterococcus (21.9%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.9%). E.coli showed resistance rates of 41.9% for quinolones, 33.3% of them produced extended spectrum βeta-lactamase (ESBL). P.aeruginosa showed resistance rates of 42.1% for quinolones and 21.1% for carbapenems. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare-associated CAUTI in patients hospitalized in a urology ward are related to risks factors such as having a urinary catheter before admission and undergoing a surgical procedure. Moreover, CAUTIs have higher incidence of pathogens with antibiotic resistances and non-common pathogens such as Enterococcus spp


Subject(s)
Humans , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies
10.
Arch Esp Urol ; 68(6): 541-50, 2015.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26179791

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are the most common nosocomial acquired infections, with high resistance rates. CAUTIs are a potentially severe complication in hospitalized patients and imply higher costs. Our aim was to analyze the characteristics of CAUTIs in our Urology department. METHODS: Between November 2011 and October 2013, a prospective observational study was carried out analyzing the incidence of healthcare-associated urinary tract infections in patients admitted to the urology ward with an indwelling urinary catheter. Furthermore, we evaluated associated risks factors and comorbidities such as urinary catheter at the time of admission or urological surgery during the hospitalization. We also presented our results regarding the microbiological characteristics and patterns of resistance to antibiotics in patients with CAUTI admitted in our service. RESULTS: The incidence of CAUTI was 8.2% (189/2283 patients who had urinary catheter). Mean age was 67.4±14.26 years, 90.2% underwent a surgical procedure (p<0.001), 14.8% had a urinary stone (p=0.058) and 46% had a urinary catheter before admission (p<0.001). The most commonly isolated pathogens were Escherichia coli (22.6%), Enterococcus (21.9%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (13.9%). E.coli showed resistance rates of 41.9% for quinolones, 33.3% of them produced extended spectrum Β-lactamase (ESBL). P.aeruginosa showed resistance rates of 42.1% for quinolones and 21.1% for carbapenems. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare-associated CAUTI in patients hospitalized in a urology ward are related to risks factors such as having a urinary catheter before admission and undergoing a surgical procedure. Moreover, CAUTIs have higher incidence of pathogens with antibiotic resistances and non-common pathogens such as Enterococcus spp.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Catheter-Related Infections/drug therapy , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/microbiology , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Aged , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...