Successful liver transplantation as rescue therapy in a patient with metastases from a vasoactive intestinal peptide producing neuroendocrine tumor.

This case report presents a 40-year-old patient with a vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) secreting high grade (Ki-67 39%) neuroendocrine tumor (NET) from the pancreas, for whom successful liver transplantation (LT) was carried out 8 years after resection of the primary tumor due to massive liver metastases. The transplantation was done as rescue therapy due to rapid progression and a devastating clinical condition requiring intravenous supplementation for 20 hours daily. The latest imaging carried out 18 months after transplantation is without signs of recurrence, and the patient is in good health with undetectable levels of VIP. According to the guidelines, LT is only recommended if Ki-67 is <20% and if there has been tumor control for more than 6 months prior to transplantation. Our case illustrates that LT is an option that should be considered for selected NET patients without extrahepatic involvement regardless of tumor grade and clinical condition.

Technique efficacy and complications after ablation as first surgical intervention for hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide database study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite limited evidence, technique efficacy and complications may be important short-term outcomes after ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to report these outcomes after ablation as the first surgical intervention for HCC. METHODS: This nationwide cohort study was based on data from the Danish Liver and Biliary Duct Cancer Database and medical records. Variables associated with outcomes were investigated using logistic regression. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2023, 433 patients were included of which 79% were male, 73% had one tumor, and 90% had cirrhosis. Complete ablation was achieved after percutaneous, laparoscopic, and open approach in 84%, 100%, and 96% of the procedures, respectively. Most patients did not experience complications (76%). Open ablation compared with percutaneous was associated with higher risk of complications in multivariable adjusted analysis (Clavien-Dindo grade 2-5 (odds ratio 5.34, 95% confidence interval [2.36; 12.08]) and 3B-5 (5.70, [2.03; 16.01]), and lower risk of incomplete ablation (0.19 [0.05; 0.65]). Number of tumors ≥3 was associated with a higher risk of incomplete ablation (3.88, [1.45; 10.41]). Tumor diameter ≥3 cm was associated with increased risk of complications grade 2-5 (2.84, [1.29; 6.26]) and 3B-5 (4.44, [1.62; 12.13]). Performance status ≥2 was associated with risk of complications grade 3B-5 (5.98, [1.58; 22.69]). Tumor diameter was not associated with technique efficacy. CONCLUSION: Open ablation had a higher rate of complete ablation compared with percutaneous but was associated with a higher risk of complications. Tumor diameter ≥3 cm and performance status ≥2 were associated with a higher risk of complications.

Cholangioscopy with Spyglass DS using percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography access: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Conventional peroral methods to visualize biliary strictures are not feasible in some patients with altered anatomy or biliary obstruction, and percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy can be used as an alternative procedure. This study aimed to retrospectively review the use of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography using the SpyGlass DS technology (S-PTCS) during a 5-year period at a Danish tertiary referral centre. Materials and methods: All patients who underwent S-PTCS at a single Danish tertiary referral centre between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The visual, technical, and overall success rates of S-PTCS were analyzed, as well as the complication rate. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of S-PTCS were calculated. Results: Twenty-two patients were included in the study. Visual, technical, and overall success of S-PTCS was achieved in 17/22, 22/22, and 21/22 patients, respectively. S-PTCS yielded a sensitivity of 83.3%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100%, a NPV of 94.1%, and an accuracy of 95.4%. Complications occurred in 1/22 patients. Conclusion: S-PTCS is a safe modality, with high success rates, high predictive values, and a low rate of complications. This study suggests that S-PTCS is an alternative to conventional methods in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures where conventional methods were unfeasible.

Robot-assisted minimally invasive liver surgery in elderly patients: A single-centre, propensity score- matched study.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the short-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive liver surgery(Robot-assisted liver surgery (RLS)) in elderly patients. METHODS: Between November 2019 and July 2022, RLS was performed on 100 consecutive patients. Patients were divided into a middle-aged group (Group1:＜75years) and an elderly group(Group2:≧75years). A propensity score matching(PSM) analysis with a ratio of 1:1 was performed. RESULTS: After PSM, there were 28 patients in each group. There were no significant differences in clinicopathologic characteristics, type of resection and intraoperative variables. Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were comparable in Groups 1 and 2. In a comparison between minor and major hepatectomy in Group 2, there were no significant differences in any of the factors. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that RLS for patients over 75years had similar short-term outcomes as for younger patients down to middle-aged, especially the risk of perioperative complications was comparable.

Learning curves in robot-assisted minimally invasive liver surgery at a high-volume center in Denmark: Report of the first 100 patients and review of literature.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive liver surgery is evolving worldwide, and robot-assisted liver surgery (RLS) can deliver obvious benefits for patients. However, so far no large case series have documented the learning curve for RLS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study for robotic liver surgery (RLS) from June 2019 to June 2022 where 100 patients underwent RLS by the same surgical team. Patients' variables, short-term follow-up, and the learning curve were analyzed. A review of the literature describing the learning curve in RLS was also conducted. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 63.1 years. The median operating time was 246 min and median estimated blood loss was 100 mL. Thirty-two patients underwent subsegmentectomy, 18 monosegmentectomies, 25 bisegmentectomies, and 25 major hepatectomies. One patient (1.0%) required conversion to open surgery. Five patients (5%) experienced postoperative major complications, and no mortalities occurred. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days. R0 resection was achieved in 93.4% of the malignant cases. The learning curve consisted of three stages; there were no significant differences in operative time, transfusion rate, or complication rate among the three groups. Postoperative complications were similar in each group despite an increase in surgical difficulty scores. The learning effect was highlighted by significantly shorter hospital stays in cohorts I, II, and III, respectively. The included systematic review suggested that the learning curve for RLS is similar to, or shorter, than that of laparoscopic liver surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, RLS has achieved good clinical results, albeit in the short term. Standardization of training leads to increasing proficiency in RLS with reduced blood loss and low complication rates even in more advanced liver resections. Our study suggests that a minimum of 30 low-to-moderate difficulty robotic procedures should be performed before proceeding to more difficult resections.

High-dose preoperative glucocorticoid for prevention of emergence and postoperative delirium in liver resection: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial substudy.

BACKGROUND: Emergence delirium (ED) and postoperative delirium (POD) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality and occur in up to one-third of patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery, where the underlying pathogenesis is multifactorial, including increased inflammation. We aimed to assess the effect of pre-operative high- versus low-dose glucocorticoid on the occurrence of ED and POD. METHODS: This was a substudy from a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. Patients ≥18 years, undergoing open liver resection were randomized 1:1 to high-dose (HD, 10 mg/kg methylprednisolone) or low-dose (LD, 8 mg dexamethasone) glucocorticoid and assessed for ED and POD for a maximum of 4 days during hospitalization. The 3-min Diagnostic Interview for CAM-defined delirium (3D-CAM) was used for assessment, 15 and 90 min after arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and subsequently once daily in the ward. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included in this secondary substudy (26 HD-group and 27 LD-group). ED occurred in n = 5 HD versus n = 6 LD patients 15 min after PACU arrival. At 90 min after PACU arrival, 4 patients had ED, all from LD-group, and resulted in significantly longer PACU admission, 273 versus 178 min in ED versus Non-ED patients. During the first 4 days in the ward, n = 5 patients had at least one occurrence of POD, all from LD-group. CONCLUSIONS: The primary finding of the current substudy was a lower occurrence of ED/POD in the PACU 90 min after arrival and during the first four postoperative days in patients receiving high-dose glucocorticoid compared with patients receiving low-dose glucocorticoid. The two study groups were not evenly balanced concerning known explanatory factors, i.e., age and size of surgery, which calls for larger studies to elucidate the matter.

Aspirin as secondary prevention in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (ASAC trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one the most common cancers in the western world with increasing incidence. Approximately 50% of the patients develop liver metastases. Resection of liver metastases is the treatment of choice although almost half of the resected patients get recurrence in the liver. METHODS: The ASAC trial is a Scandinavian, multicentre, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study to determine whether adjuvant treatment with low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)) can improve disease-free survival in patients treated for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). Up to 800 patients operated for CRCLM will be randomized to Arm#1 ASA 160 mg once daily or Arm#2 Placebo, for a period of 3 years or until disease recurrence. The patients will be recruited at all major hepatobiliary surgical units in Norway, Sweden and Denmark and have follow-up according to standard of care and the National Guidelines. DISCUSSION: The ASAC trial will be the first clinical interventional trial to assess the potential beneficial role of ASA in recurrence of CRCLM and survival. ASA is an inexpensive, well-tolerated and easily accessible drug that will be highly potential as adjuvant drug in secondary prevention of CRCLM if the study shows a beneficial effect. We will also determine the effect of ASA as adjuvant treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life and the cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03326791 . Registered on 31 October 2017.

Comparison of nuclear imaging techniques and volumetric imaging for the prediction of postoperative mortality and liver failure in patients undergoing localized liver-directed treatments: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although volumetric imaging by computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for preoperative assessment of the future liver remnant, nuclear imaging studies have shown promising data. This systematic review summarized the results from trials investigating volumetric and nuclear medicine imaging for the prediction of postoperative mortality and liver failure (LF). METHODS: MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched for papers investigating nuclear imaging methods for the prediction of postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing local, liver-directed treatments. Only papers investigating both preoperative nuclear imaging and CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MR) for the prediction of postoperative mortality and/or LF were included. RESULTS: Twenty-five trials were qualified for this review. All trials but two used technetium-based tracers for the nuclear imaging examination. Four papers used MR imaging and the remaining used CT for the volumetric evaluation. Overall, the studies were heterogeneous both in terms of methodology and imaging technique. Of the thirteen studies reporting on postoperative mortality, most were descriptive without detailed diagnostic data. A few with detailed data found that nuclear imaging had better predictive value than volumetric imaging. Nineteen studies investigated the prediction of postoperative LF of which seven papers investigated the predictive value of both modalities in multivariable regression analysis. Two papers found that only nuclear imaging parameters were predictive of LF, one paper found that the CT parameter was predictive, and four papers found that combined nuclear and CT/MR imaging parameters were predictive of LF. CONCLUSION: Both methodologies were useful in the preoperative assessment of patients scheduled for liver interventions, especially in combination, but nuclear imaging demonstrated better predictive value for postoperative mortality and LF in a few trials. The overall technical and methodological heterogeneity of the included studies complicates the ability to directly compare the clinical utility of the two imaging techniques.

How should liver hypertrophy be stimulated? A comparison of upfront associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and portal vein embolization (PVE) with rescue possibility.

BACKGROUND: The role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in comparison to portal vein embolization (PVE) is debated. The aim of this study was to compare successful resection rates (RR) with upfront ALPPS vs. PVE with rescue ALPPS on demand and to compare the hypertrophy of the liver between ALPPS and PVE plus subsequent rescue ALPPS. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients treated with PVE for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) or ALPPS (any diagnosis, rescue ALPPS included) at five Scandinavian university hospitals during the years 2013-2016 was conducted. A Chi-square test and a Mann-Whitney U test were used to assess the difference between the groups. A successful RR was defined as liver resection without a 90-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were included. Successful RR was in 84.5% of the patients with ALPPS upfront and in 73.3% of the patients with PVE and rescue ALPPS on demand (P=0.080). The hypertrophy of the future liver remnants (FLRs) with ALPPS upfront was 71% (48-97%) compared to 96% (82-113%) after PVE and rescue ALPPS (P=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Upfront ALPPS offers a somewhat higher successful RR than PVE with rescue ALPPS on demand. The sequential combination of PVE and ALPPS leads to a higher overall degree of hypertrophy than upfront ALPPS.

Nuclear imaging methods for the prediction of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing localized, liver-directed treatments: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Several nuclear imaging methods may predict postoperative liver function and outcome, but none has achieved recommendations in clinical guidelines. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the existing knowledge on this topic. METHODS: MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched for studies investigating nuclear medicine imaging methods for the prediction of postoperative liver function in patients undergoing localized, liver-directed treatments. The postoperative endpoints were clinical outcome (morbidity and mortality) as well as measures of postoperative liver function, e.g., liver function assessed by biochemical tests or nuclear imaging. RESULTS: A total of 1352 references were identified, of which 82 fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Most studies (n = 63) were retrospective studies. The vast majority of studies assessed [99mTc]Tc-galactosyl serum albumin (GSA) (n = 57) and [99mTc]Tc-mebrofenin (n = 19). Liver resection was entirely or partly major (involved at least three segments) in 78 reports. There were notable variations in the research methodology, e.g., image acquisition, imaging variables, and endpoints. Thirty-seven studies reported on postoperative mortality, of which most reported descriptive data at the patient level. Of the four reports that performed multivariate analyses, two showed significant predictive results of isotope-based preoperative tests. Fifty-two papers presented data on postoperative liver failure. Multivariate predictive analyses were performed in eighteen trials, of which fifteen showed the significant value of nuclear medicine tests. CONCLUSION: There is sparse evidence supporting the significant value of nuclear medicine imaging methods in predicting postoperative mortality. In contrast, a notable number of trials showed a significant prediction of liver failure in multivariate analyses. The research methodology was heterogeneous and exploratory in most trials. Documentation of nuclear medicine tests in this setting awaits the results of properly designed, prospective trials with the standardization of both the nuclear medicine test and endpoints.

Hepatic pinworm infestation misdiagnosed as a liver metastasis in a patient with colonic adenocarcinoma.

An extra-intestinal infestation of Enterobius vermicularis (pinworm) is uncommon. We present a case of hepatic infestation of pinworm in a 57-year-old woman, misdiagnosed as a colorectal adenocarcinoma metastasis. The route of migration from the intestine to the liver is not well established but the most plausible route seems to be hematogenous. In concordance with previously published cases, the hepatic pinworm infestation is usually localised superficially in the right liver lobe. Hence solitary lesions in this location detected radiologically should be interpreted carefully. Additionally, the serum CEA level could be useful to distinguish pinworm from malignancy.

[Radiofrequency ablation for liver tumour treatment].

This review presents the status of the use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver tumours. RFA is used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas and colorectal liver metastases among others. The procedure can be done using percutaneous, laparoscopic and open surgical approaches. Many variables affect the outcome, and the comparison is difficult to conduct. Percutaneous RFA is less invasive, whereas better control of local recurrence and complete ablation may be achieved by open surgical RFA and laparoscopic RFA. However, open surgical RFA is associated with more complications and longer post-procedural hospitalisation than laparoscopic RFA and percutaneous RFA.

Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Increase in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Is Highest the First Week After Portal Vein Occlusion : FLR Increase in Patients with CRLM Is Highest the First Week After PVO.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein occlusion (PVO) is an established method to increase the volume of the future liver remnant (FLR). The main reasons for not proceeding to radical hepatectomy are lack of volume increase and tumor progression due to a wait-time interval of up to 8 weeks. The hypothesis was that the increase in FLR volume is not linear and is largest during the first weeks. METHODS: Patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and standardized future liver remnant (sFLR) < 30% treated with PVO were prospectively included. All patients had at least one CT evaluation before radical hepatectomy. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included. During the first week after PVO, the kinetic growth rate (KGR) was 5.4 (± 4), compared to 1.5 (± 2) between the first and second CT (p < 0.05). For patients reaching adequate FLR and therefore treated with radical hepatectomy, the KGR was 7 (± 4) the first week, compared to 4.3 (± 2) for patients who failed to reach a sufficient volume (p = 0.4). During the interval between the first and second CT, the KGR was 2.2 (± 2), respectively (± 0.1) (p = 0.017). DISCUSSION: The increase in liver volume after PVO is largest during the first week. As KGR decreases over time, it is important to shorten the interval between PVO and the first volume evaluation; this may aid in decision-making and reduce unnecessary waiting time.

Good results after repeated resection for colorectal liver metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Our study aim was to evaluate the perioperative events, postoperative events and survival after a second liver resection due to colorectal liver metastases (CLM), compared with a matched control group that had only undergone primary liver resection due to CLM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of charts from patients having undergone a second liver resection due to CLM. A control group was identified by selecting the first liver resection due to CLM occurring after a second resection due to CLM. Twenty-four patients were hereby included in both the primary resection group (PRG) and the second resection group (SRG). The groups were compared statistically with regard to demographics, primary tumour and hepatic involvement. RESULTS: No significant differences between the groups were noted in terms of perioperative events, although there was a trend towards PRG resections involving more liver segments than SRG resections (p = 0.08). The rate of postoperative surgical complications was 17.4% in the PRG and 4% in the SRG (p = 0.18). The admission time was 10.6 days in the PRG and 8.4 days in the SRG (p = 0.71). 30-day mortality was 4% in the PRG and 0% in the SRG (p = 0.41). The five-year survival was 36% in the PRG and 42% in the SRG (p = 0.17) CONCLUSION: This study shows that a second hepatic resection due to recurrent CLM is safe and feasible. It also shows that patients undergoing a second liver resection due to CLM have five-year survival rates comparable to those of patients who have only undergone one hepatic resection due to CLM. FUNDING: Not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.

[Diagnostic imaging before liver surgery]. / Billeddiagnostik før leverkirurgi.

In this article the radiological work-up before liver surgery is reviewed. Based upon the latest literature the following is recommended: In patients with liver metastases (LM) or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), dedicated magnetic resonance imaging with liver-specific contrast or modern multislice computed tomography (MSCT) of the liver should be performed before liver surgery. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the most accurate modality for detection of extra-hepatic tumours in patients with LM from colorectal cancer. When percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is planned, the patient should be evaluated with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Biopsy should not be performed before liver surgery when typical imaging findings consistent with LM or HCC are present in patients with colorectal cancer or chronic liver disease. Preoperative assessment of resectability of perihilary cholangiocarcinomas is most precisely done with modern MSCT and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.

[Intra-arterial chemo-embolisation and portal vein embolisation prior to liver resection]. / Intraarteriel kemoembolisering og portalembolisering før leverresektion.

We describe the first successful down staging with a combination of neoadjuvant intra-arterial chemo-embolisation followed by portal vein embolisation in a Danish patient with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Down staging allowed radical liver resection in the patient who was initially found to be inoperable. Patients with HCC are often irresectable. The only treatment that offers a chance for long term survival is surgery. Liver transplantation is limited by the shortage of donor organs. The combination of chemo-embolisation and portal venous embolisation may increase the number of resectable patients.

Retransplantation of the liver in adults: long-term outcome and prognostic modeling.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of liver retransplantation in adults at our institution and identify the subset of patients in which the outcome was too poor to justify retransplantation. METHODOLOGY: Over a 12-year period, we performed 346 liver transplantations in 305 adult patients, and of these, 41 (11.8%) were retransplantations. Survival data were stratified and multivariate analysis was conducted to identify variables associated with poor outcome after retransplantation. RESULTS: The 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival rates after liver retransplantation were 65.9%, 62.6%, and 48.2%, respectively. These rates were significantly inferior compared to those following single liver transplantation. Major adverse events affecting patient survival after retransplantation occurred within the first 90 days after surgery. Three independent prognostic variables of patient survival after retransplantation were identified: preoperative coagulation factor, total bilirubin, and the need for preoperative dialysis. Using these variables, we defined a simplified mathematical model available at the time of decision of retransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicated three important prognostic factors associated with a poor outcome after retransplantation. Based on our newly developed scoring-system estimating patient survival, we suggest that retransplantation must be indicated before the deterioration of more than two organs. These findings should assist in the decision process for liver retransplantation in adult patients.