Low molecular weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in the colonoscopy peri-procedure period: a cost modeling study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the economic outcomes of peri-procedure anticoagulation approaches for elective colonoscopy. METHODS: Decision analysis was used to model the economic outcomes of five peri-procedure anticoagulation options: outpatient low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), inpatient unfractionated heparin infusion (UFHi), continuous warfarin (with probability of a repeat procedure using LMWH or UFHi), and discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy. The model's base-case scenario assumed drug therapy options for high-risk patients were equally effective in preventing a thromboembolic event (0.1% risk), with a higher probability for the no anticoagulation strategy (0.4%); event costs were based on published data and adjusted to 1997 dollars. Drug costs reflected 1997 average wholesale price. Medical costs for other variables were estimated based on local hospital charges. Indirect costs were not considered. Risk probabilities and LMWH drug cost were tested in sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, costs for the options evaluated were $1436/patient, $1792/patient, $1848/patient, $2629/patient, and $5196/patient for no anticoagulation, continuous warfarin/repeat LMWH, LMWH as outpatient, continuous warfarin/repeat UFHi, and UFHi as inpatient respectively ($1997). Discontinuing anticoagulation was the least costly approach but involved the greatest thromboembolic risk. The cost of continued warfarin anticoagulation/repeat LMWH was minimally less than the LMWH option, but assumes 25% of patients would require a second procedure. The traditional approach (UFHi) requires an extended hospitalization and is the most costly option. Varying risk category or LMWH cost in sensitivity analysis had a negligible impact on overall costs. CONCLUSION: Within the model's assumptions, LMWH offers a novel, convenient, and economical solution to the problem of peri-procedure anticoagulation for elective colonoscopy.

Annual cost of care for Crohn's disease: a payor perspective.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the annual cost of care of patients with Crohn's disease according to treatment setting. METHODS: Using a 1994 integrated claims database, patients with a Crohn's-related medical claim (ICD-9 code 555) from 10/01/94 to 09/30/95 were included in this analysis. These patients were stratified into three mutually exclusive disease severity groups: group 1, required hospitalization for Crohn's; group 2, required chronic glucocorticoid or immunosuppressive drug therapy for >6 months; group 3, all remaining patients. Direct charges (based on reimbursement) and utilization of resources were reported for each group. RESULTS: Six-hundred-seven patients were analyzed: 117(19%) in group 1, 31(5%) in group 2, and 459(76%) in group 3. Average age of all patients was 48 years and 43% of these patients were men. Average annual charges for all patients totaled $12,417. Group I patients experienced the highest mean charges ($37,135), whereas patients in groups 2 and 3 incurred $10,033 and $6,277. Approximately 25% of patients accounted for 80% of the total charges. CONCLUSIONS: Crohn's disease is associated with high cost. Although a minority of Crohn's patients required hospitalization, they tended to have higher utilization and were responsible for a majority of total expenditures. New therapies have the potential to reduce overall cost of care, if they prevent Crohn's-related hospitalizations.

The cost of hospitalization in Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographics, resource use, and costs associated with hospitalization of Crohn's disease patients. METHODS: All patients hospitalized at our institution from 7/1/96 to 6/30/97 with a primary diagnosis of "Crohn's Disease" were analyzed using a computerized database. Data are presented "per hospitalization." RESULTS: A total of 175 hospitalizations (147 patients) were identified. Mean patient age was 36.5 yr; 61% were female; 82% Caucasian. Payer mix was most commonly contracted (57%), commercial (21%), or Medicare (13%). 57% of hospitalizations had a primary surgical procedure; the remainder were medical. Average length of stay was 8.7 days (surgical, 9.6 days; medical, 7.5 days). The average cost of hospitalization, excluding physician fees, was $12,528 (surgical, $14,409; medical, $10,020), whereas average charges were $35,378 (surgical, $46,354; medical, $20,744), including physician fees, which averaged $7,249 (surgical, $11,217; medical, $1,959). Mean reimbursements were $21,968 (surgical, $28,946; medical, $12,666) with average weighted reimbursement rates of 60.17% of hospital charges, 69.57% of physician fees. The distribution of costs across subcategories was: Surgery (39.6%), Pharmacy (18.6%), Laboratory (3.8%), Radiology (2.1%), Pathology (0.8%), Endoscopy (0.3%), and Other Hospital Costs (34.9%). Of the hospitalizations, 87% included treatment with steroids, 23% with immunomodulators, and 14% with aminosalicylates; 27% included the administration of total parenteral nutrition, which accounted for 63% of the total pharmacy costs. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery accounts for the majority of hospitalizations, nearly 40% of their total costs, and 75% of overall charges and reimbursements. Therapy that decreases the number of surgical hospitalizations should substantially reduce inpatient Crohn's disease costs, as well as overall costs.

Cost effectiveness of rabeprazole versus generic ranitidine for symptom resolution in patients with erosive esophagitis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost effectiveness of rabeprazole (RAB) and ranitidine (RAN) in acute and maintenance therapy for erosive esophagitis using symptom response, rather than endoscopic healing, as the clinical outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Decision analysis was used to model the cost effectiveness of competing therapies based on the results of clinical trials of RAB versus RAN and estimates from the medical literature. METHODS: The model's base case scenario compared brand-name RAB (estimated average wholesale price) with generic RAN (25% of the average wholesale price of brand-name RAN). Medical costs for hospitalizations, procedures, and office visits reflected 1998 Medicare payments. The 1-year maintenance model accounted for drug-class switching and symptomatic, rather than endoscopic, recurrences. Effectiveness was reported as the percentage of patients in whom a symptomatic recurrence was prevented. The cost per symptomatic recurrence prevented was reported as an average and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: The per-patient cost of RAB therapy was higher than that of RAN therapy ($2020 vs $1917); RAB therapy, however, was more effective than RAN therapy in preventing symptomatic recurrences (74% vs 41%). The average cost-effectiveness ratio was lower for RAB therapy than for RAN therapy ($2748 per symptomatic recurrence prevented vs $4719 per symptomatic recurrence prevented). The cost of preventing one additional symptomatic recurrence with RAB rather than RAN was $313 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio). Sensitivity analysis conducted on key clinical and cost variables supported the robustness of the decision model. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates that management of esophagitis with RAB is more effective, and may be more cost effective, than management with generic RAN, despite RAB's higher per-unit cost.

Advances in the management of Crohn's disease: economic and clinical potential of infliximab.

New therapies for Crohn's disease are being developed based on improvements in our understanding of the disease's immune and inflammatory properties. One of these new therapies is infliximab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Recent studies indicate that treatment of moderately to severely ill Crohn's disease patients with infliximab produces a rapid and profound reduction in the signs, symptoms, and severity of this disease. Beyond its clinical impact, Crohn's disease also carries significant economic consequences. Earlier reports on the costs of managing this disease estimated the average annual medical costs per patient at $9197, with the total annual cost of illness estimated to exceed $1.7 billion. Hospitalizations and surgeries represented 80% of these costs. Additional analyses have been conducted for this review to reflect more current treatment patterns. Assuming that proven increases in response and remission rates lead to diminished disease severity, infliximab can be expected to reduce the number of hospitalizations and surgeries in moderately to severely ill patients, with substantial cost savings. Moreover, improvement in disease status and quality of life may allow Crohn's disease patients to lead more productive lives.

Prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastropathy: clinical and economic implications of a single-tablet formulation of diclofenac/misoprostol.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to manage arthritis. While controlling symptoms and improving quality of life, NSAID use is associated with gastroduodenal injury and a 2%-4% annual risk for symptomatic gastroduodenal ulceration, hemorrhage, and perforation. This requires clinicians to balance the efficacy of NSAIDs against the potential risk of serious gastrointestinal events. Identification and stratification of risk can help guide the optimal approach for arthritis management of individual patients or large populations such as managed care organizations. NSAID-induced gastroenteropathy carries considerable economic consequences; 46% of arthritis costs are related to managing serious adverse events. It is reasonable to assume that these costs may not be incurred if high-risk patients are recognized and optimally managed. Newer therapies with proven safety margins present an attractive option, especially for patients at higher risk. The single-tablet formulations of diclofenac and misoprostol (Arthrotec) offer an alternative in managing NSAID patients because of their inherent safety profile. Studies with diclofenac/misoprostol indicate its effectiveness in treating signs and symptoms of arthritis and in reducing the incidence of NSAID-induced gastroenteropathy. As such, this agent may provide improved medical and economic outcomes. This review discusses the clinical aspects of NSAID-induced gastroenteropathy, including available preventive therapies. Approaches to assessing patients' risk for developing complications, and the relationship of medical risk and economic outcomes, are also examined. Although not all patients require preventive therapy, patients with heightened risk may benefit clinically and economically from gastroprotective NSAIDs. Additional research or modeling may provide further insight into the economic implications of managing and preventing NSAID-induced gastroenteropathy.

Management of NSAID-induced gastropathy: an economic decision analysis.

The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with a 2% to 4% annual incidence of serious gastrointestinal complications. These adverse clinical outcomes, and the strategies used to prevent their occurrence, translate into a significant economic burden. A decision-analysis model was constructed to contrast the 6-month costs associated with various approaches to preventing and managing NSAID-induced gastropathy and to evaluate the economic impact of two treatment regimens using fixed-dose formulations of diclofenac/misoprostol. After incorporating expected medical out-comes and predicted practice patterns, 6-month per-patient costs were derived from the model for each of five treatment regimens: (1) NSAID alone; (2) NSAID with a histamine2-receptor antagonist; (3) NSAID with coprescribed misoprostol; (4) diclofenac/misoprostol 50 mg/200 micrograms TID/BID; and (5) diclofenac/misoprostol 75 mg/200 micrograms BID. The combined diclofenac/misoprostol regimens demonstrated an 18.6% per-patient cost advantage compared with the combined NSAID regimens. Based on a 6-month period, this cost savings translated into a $214.00 per-patient overall cost savings ($1153.00 per patient for NSAID regimens versus $939.00 for diclofenac/misoprostol regimens). The magnitude of this difference was verified by Monte Carlo simulation. Despite the considerable cost difference, sensitivity analyses revealed that our model was robust and that no single variation substantially influenced the results. Given the lack of long-term prospective, comparative clinical-outcomes studies in this area, this decision analysis provides guidance to clinicians in developing a rational and cost-effective approach to the treatment of patients requiring chronic NSAID therapy.

Identifying patient symptoms after radiotherapy using a nurse-managed telephone interview.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To identify patients' symptoms following completion of radiotherapy for common cancers by a nurse-managed telephone interview. DESIGN: Quality assurance project. SETTING: Radiation therapy department in a community hospital in a large midwestern city. SAMPLE: One hundred eleven patients treated by radiotherapy for primary cancer of the prostate, head/neck, lung, and breast. METHODS: Two time points of data collection: nurses completed an end-of-treatment symptom evaluation within the last five days of treatment and conducted telephone interviews 14-21 days post-therapy. Interview questions were based on each individual's end-of-treatment symptoms and common site-specific side effects. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Symptoms at end of treatment and 14-21 days after therapy completion, nursing assessments and interventions, and length of telephone interview. FINDINGS: At the end of treatment, 104 (94%) patients were experiencing symptoms. Nurses contacted 106 (95%) patients by telephone 14-21 days after therapy completion and assessed symptoms in 84 (79%) patients. Nineteen (18%) patients reported the development of a new symptom. Nurses independently managed 95% of the calls. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients experienced symptoms in the immediate post-therapy period. Telephone follow-up interviews served as a mechanism for evaluating short-term morbidity and provided the opportunity for nurses to intervene with many patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: A nurse-managed telephone follow-up program can be used as a component of a quality improvement process in radiation centers to assess patients' post-treatment symptoms and provide education and support.

Fatty acid profiles of phospholipids in rabbit and bovine dental pulp.

The fatty acid profiles of purified phospholipids were similar in dental pulp from rabbit and bovine teeth. The characteristic fatty acid profile of each phospholipid was similar to that found in several other mammalian tissues. The ethanolamine phosphoglycerides had high levels of arachidonic acid and docosapolyenoic acids. Phosphatidylserine and phosphatidic acid contained high amounts of stearic acid and low levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids. Phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin contained high amounts of palmitic acid and low levels of C20 and C22 unsaturated fatty acids, and sphingomyelin contained C24 fatty acids. Phosphatidylinositol contained mainly stearic, oleic, and arachidonic acids. The fatty acid compositions of the purified pulp phospholipids are markedly different from those reported for dentin lipids which have been reported to contain little or no arachidonic acid and docosapolyenoic acids. The possible significance of the polyunsaturated fatty acids and phospholipids in tooth formation and maintenance is discussed.