Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Reumatol Port ; 45(1): 7-19, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32572015

ABSTRACT

Pain is a common feature of most rheumatic diseases and it is often the main reason for the patient to seek for a clinical appointment. Chronic pain has a major impact on patient's quality of life, being frequently associated with functional incapacity, sleep and mood disorders. This leads to absenteeism and heavy consumption of health resources, both representing huge burdens on national economy. Managing musculoskeletal pain is pivotal but can be challenging. The use of the available pharmaceutical armamentarium should be parsimonious. Opioids are strong analgesic drugs that mostly act through their agonist action on µ-receptors in the central nervous system. Opioid-related side effects are not negligible and are mediated through both central and peripheral opioid receptors. The use of opioids is well established in the treatment of oncologic pain but their role in the management of musculoskeletal pain is still controversial. Inflammatory rheumatic diseases, osteoarthritis, osteoporotic fractures, chronic low back pain and fibromyalgia represent diverse major rheumatic conditions that frequently lead to chronic pain. In order to standardize and optimize management of musculoskeletal chronic pain in these prevalent diseases, the Portuguese Rheumatology Society elaborated this position paper. The objectives were: a) to define the importance of pain assessment and classification; b) to guide patient selection, appropriate choice of opioids, their management, and raise awareness of their adverse effects; c) to review the existent data on possible indications of opioid therapy on rheumatic diseases.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Musculoskeletal Pain/drug therapy , Pain Measurement/methods , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Tapering/methods , Fibromyalgia/drug therapy , Humans , Low Back Pain/drug therapy , Musculoskeletal Pain/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Osteoporotic Fractures/drug therapy , Patient Selection , Portugal , Rheumatology , Societies, Medical
2.
Acta Reumatol Port ; 42(3): 277-278, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28605750

ABSTRACT

Ackerman's Syndrome or Intersticial Granulomatous Dermatitis with Arthritis has been an issue of increasing number of reports in the last decade which had focused its heterogeneous cutaneous and rheumatologic expression besides the initial manifestations reported by Ackerman and his group. Granulomatosis anterior uveitis has not been previously described. Some patients are reported to have positive autoantibodies but association with anticentromere antibodies has not been previously described as well, to our knowledge. We report a new case of Ackerman Syndrome with cutaneous, articular and ocular involvement with positive anticentromere antibodies successfully treated with systemic steroids, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine and cyclosporine. The ocular involvement and the association of anticentromere antibodies lead us to hypothesize that constellation of symptoms and autoimmune mechanisms of this uncommon multisystemic syndrome are yet to be clarified.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Glaucoma/blood , Maxillofacial Abnormalities/blood , Tooth Abnormalities/blood , Uveitis, Anterior/blood , Aged , Glaucoma/complications , Granuloma/blood , Granuloma/complications , Humans , Male , Maxillofacial Abnormalities/complications , Tooth Abnormalities/complications , Uveitis, Anterior/complications
3.
Acta Reumatol Port ; 39(1): 60-71, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24811463

ABSTRACT

Biotechnological drugs have become a fundamental resource for the treatment of rheumatic patients. Patent expiry of some of these drugs created the opportunity for biopharmaceutical manufacturers to develop biosimilar drugs intended to be as efficacious as the originator product but with a lower cost to healthcare systems. Due to the complex manufacturing process and highly intricate structure of biologicals, a biosimilar can never be an exact copy of its reference product. Consequently, regulatory authorities issued strict preclinical and clinical guidelines to ensure safety and efficacy equivalence and, in September 2013, the biosimilar of infliximab was the first biosimilar monoclonal antibody to be authorized for use in the European Union. The current document is a position statement of the "Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia" (Portuguese Society of Rheumatology) on the use of biosimilar drugs in rheumatic diseases. Two systematic literature reviews were performed, one concerning clinical trials and the other one concerning international position papers on biosimilars. The results were presented and discussed in a national meeting and a final position document was discussed, written and approved by Portuguese rheumatologists. Briefly, this position statement is contrary to automatic substitution of the originator by the biosimilar, defends either a different INN or the prescription by brand name, supports that switching between biosimilars and the originator molecule should be done after at least 6 months of treatment and based on the attending physician decision and after adequate patient information, recommends the registration of all biosimilar treated patients in Reuma.pt for efficacy, safety and immunogenicity surveillance, following the strategy already ongoing for originators, and opposes to extrapolation of indications approved to the originator to completely different diseases and/or age groups without adequate pre-clinical, safety or efficacy data.


Subject(s)
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy , Humans
4.
Acta Reumatol Port ; 37(1): 26-39, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22781512

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with biological therapies, endorsed by the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology. METHODS: These treatment recommendations were formulated by Portuguese rheumatologists based on literature evidence and consensus opinion. A draft of the recommendations was first circulated to all Portuguese rheumatologists and their suggestions were incorporated in the draft. At a national meeting the recommendations were discussed and all attending rheumatologists voted on the level of agreement for each recommendation. A second draft was again circulated before publication. RESULTS: A consensus was achieved regarding the initiation, assessment of response and switching biological therapies in patients with PsA. Specific recommendations were developed for several disease domains: peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis and dactylitis. CONCLUSION: These recommendations may be used for guidance in deciding which patients with PsA should be treated with biological therapies. They cover a rapidly evolving area of therapeutic intervention. As more evidence becomes available and more biological therapies are licensed, these recommendations will have to be updated.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Psoriatic/therapy , Biological Therapy/standards , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL