Mid-Term to Long-Term Follow-Up of Stemless Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Background: The purpose was to report mid-term to long-term clinical outcomes in a multicentre series of patients who received stemless total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The hypothesis was that stemless TSA would be a safe and effective treatment with satisfactory clinical outcomes. Methods: Authors retrospectively reviewed records of 62 stemless TSAs implanted between March 2013 and December 2014. Six were excluded because they had fractures or muscular impairment, which left 56: primary osteoarthritis (n = 49), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 4), avascular necrosis (n = 1), or glenoid dysplasia (n = 2). Outcomes were absolute Constant Score (CS), age-/sex-adjusted CS, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Proportions of patients that achieved substantial clinical benefits for absolute CS and ASES scores were determined. Results: Of the 56 patients, 8 (14%) died (unrelated to TSA), 5 (9%) were lost to follow-up, and 2 (4%) refused participation. One patient was reoperated for infection with implant removal (excluded from analysis), and one for periprosthetic fracture without implant removal. At 7.6 ± 0.5 years (range 6.8-9.3), the remaining 40 patients, aged 71.0 ± 8.5 years, achieved net improvements of 40.7 ± 15.8 (CS), 62%±23% (age-/sex-adjusted CS), and 59.7 ± 16.4 (ASES). Of patients with complete absolute CS (n = 37) and ASES score (n = 28), respectively, 33 (89%) and 27 (96%) achieved substantial clinical benefits. Conclusions: Stemless TSA yields improvements in functional outcomes at mid-term to long-term that exceed the substantial clinical benefits of the absolute CS and ASES score at a mean follow-up of 7.6 years. Although the findings of this study revealed low complications and revision rates, more studies are needed to confirm long-term benefits of stemless TSA. Level of evidence: IV, case series.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Patients with Massive Rotator Cuff Tears or Cuff Tear Arthropathies at a Minimum Follow-up of 7 Years.

Purpose: To evaluate indications and factors that influence long-term clinical outcomes and revision rates for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in shoulders with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs) or cuff tear arthropathies (CTAs). Methods: The authors retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of shoulders with no fracture sequelae that underwent primary RSA between 2011 and 2013. Independent observers collected demographic data, surgical techniques, and implant types, as well as primary outcome measures such as American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score and Constant score (CS). Study design: Case series, level IV. Results: From the initial series of 123 patients that underwent RSA, 29 patients died (24%) for reasons unrelated to the shoulder arthroplasty, 11 were lost to follow-up (9%), and 4 required revision surgery (3%). The final cohort of 79 patients comprised 55 women (70%), and 24 men (30%), aged 72.7 ± 7.0. At a final follow-up of 8.9 ± 0.6 years (range: 7.4-10.3) the absolute CS was 59.0 ± 16.2, the age-/sex-adjusted CS was 76.6 ± 41.2, and ASES was 77.1 ± 20.3. Univariable analysis revealed no associations for absolute CS, but revealed that age-/sex-adjusted CS was significantly lower for patients with high blood pressure (ß = -15.8, p = .025). Conclusions: At a minimum follow-up of 7.4 years, the absolute CS was 59.0 ± 16.2, the age-/sex-adjusted CS was 87.4 ± 24.1 and ASES was 77.1 ± 20.3. When stratifying the outcomes of RSA by indication, there were no significant differences in patients with mRCTs versus CTA in terms of absolute CS, age-/sex-adjusted CS, and ASES. Univariable analysis revealed no association with absolute and age-/sex-adjusted CS for type of indication or surgical approach.

Intra- and Inter-rater Reliability of Postoperative Radiographic Analysis of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in 49 Shoulders After Proximal Humerus Fracture.

Introduction: The lateralization shoulder angle (LSA), the distalization shoulder angle (DSA) and the new "pentagon" concept are tools used in scheduled shoulder surgery to evaluate the positioning of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) implants. There is no information on the intra- and inter-rater reliability of these tools in the context of RSA for a proximal humerus fracture. The first hypothesis was the high reliability of the intra- and inter-rater analysis of the LSA and DSA angles. The second hypothesis was the reproductibility of the pentagon based on LSA and DSA analysis. Methods: Forty-nine patients were evaluated retrospectively with a minimum of 2 years radiological follow-up after RSA surgery. Tuberosity healing was evaluated using an AP radiograph of the shoulder and their location analyzed within the said "pentagon" defined by the LSA/DSA angles and the maximum lengthening recommended. Results: The intra-rater analysis found strong to an almost perfect agreement for the LSA and DSA. The agreement was moderate to strong for the pentagon. The inter-rater analysis found a fair agreement for the LSA and moderate agreement for the DSA and pentagon. Conclusion: The LSA/DSA is used in patients undergoing RSA for glenohumeral OA. In this context, the tuberosities were intact and certain complications inherent to RSA for humeral fracture were not present. The population studied here (RSA after fracture) creates an interpretation bias due to the difficulty in analyzing tuberosity position. Level of Evidence: 4, retrospective study.

Use of a locking stem for reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a rare but reliable option.

INTRODUCTION: RSA is widely used in the treatment of complex trauma or degenerative changes of the shoulder. Strong primary fixation of the stem is necessary to prevent any loosening of the stem and subsequent revision. Presently, cement fixation or press-fit fixation are two options for humeral fixation, though each has its own limitations and risks. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an alternative option involving a distal screw interlocking system for fixation of the humeral stem from initial implantation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of patients implanted with the Humelock Reversed® stem RSA that can be locked with distal humeral screws in cases of operative poor press fit or to modulate the lengthening of the arm via prosthetic humeral height. Seventy-two patients with a minimum two year follow-up were included, 13 for acute trauma, 42 for degenerative changes, and 17 for revision surgery. RESULTS: No difference was seen in radiological or clinical results for patients with or without interlocking screw primary stabilization. For non-trauma patients, the mean raw Constant score improved significantly from 31 (± 12) to 71 (± 12). For trauma patients, the mean raw Constant score for trauma (63.4) was significantly lower than for non-trauma cases (72.1) (p < 0.001). Analysis of the filling ratio demonstrated that interlocking screws were not used for lower filling ratios and that midterm fixation of the stem is not negatively impacted by distal interlocking screw fixation. DISCUSSION: Even if use of a distal interlocking screw fixation system is rare, it can be useful for patients with poor quality fixation of stemmed RSA. CONCLUSION: Use of an interlocking screw system to stabilize the stem in RSA provides good immediate and midterm stability of the implant allowing for clinical and radiological outcomes comparable to those obtained with press-fit fixation alone.

Assessment of intraoperative bleeding in reverse shoulder arthroplasty - with or without a stem.

INTRODUCTION: The functional results of stemless reverse shoulder prostheses are similar to those with stems. However, the operative time and the bleeding appear less significant because of the absence of humeral reaming. To date, the data amongst the literature regarding this subject is limited. Thus, we report a retrospective evaluation on these 2 types of prostheses by assessing their respective intraoperative blood loss. HYPOTHESIS: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty without a stem leads to less blood loss, compared to arthroplasty with a stem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients underwent an operation for a stemless prosthesis, while 37 patients had a prosthesis with a stem. The hemoglobin was measured preoperatively, as well as postoperatively. Drainage of the operative site was maintained for two to three days. In the stem group, the preoperative hemoglobin was 14g/dL (11.7-16.6), while it was 13.1g/dL (11-15.8) in the stemless group. RESULTS: The intraoperative bleeding reached 223cm3 (80-530), with an operative duration of 81minutes (40-110) in the stemless group, compared to 260cm3 (50-1000) and 92minutes (33-110) in the stem group. On the first day postoperatively, 333cm3 (20-570) of blood had been collected by drainage for the stemless group, compared to 279cm3 (40-550) in the stem group. The amount decreased the second day, with 139cm3 (20-510) and 129cm3 (0-750) respectively. There was no difference between the two groups regarding the postoperative hemoglobin level (11g/dL). DISCUSSION: There is no significant difference concerning the blood loss between reverse shoulder replacements with and without stems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Retrospective case control study.

Cementless anatomical prosthesis for the treatment of 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: cadaver study and prospective clinical study with minimum 2 years followup.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of a cementless, trauma-specific locked stem for 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study consisted of two parts: a cadaver study with 22 shoulders and a multicenter prospective clinical study of 23 fracture patients evaluated at least 2 years after treatment. In the cadaver study, the locked stem (Humelock(TM), FX Solutions) and its instrumentation were evaluated. In the clinical study, five senior surgeons at four different hospitals performed the surgical procedures. An independent surgeon evaluated the patients using clinical (Constant score, QuickDASH) and radiological (X-rays, CT scans) outcome measures. RESULTS: The cadaver study allowed us to validate the height landmarks relative to the pectoralis major tendon. In the clinical study, at the review, abduction was 95° (60-160), forward flexion was 108° (70-160), external rotation (elbow at body) was 34° (0-55), the QuickDASH was 31 (4.5-59), the overall Constant score was 54 (27-75), and the weighted Constant score was 76 (31.5-109). DISCUSSION: This preliminary study of hemiarthroplasty (HA) with a locked stem found results that were at least equivalent to published series. As all patients had at least a 2-year follow-up, integration of the locked stem did not cause any specific complications. These results suggest that it is possible to avoid using cement when hemiarthroplasty is performed for the humeral stem. This implant makes height adjustment and transosseous suturing of the tuberosities more reproducible.