Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 48(6): 590-597, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29984519

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have produced highly varying risk estimates for the prevalence of coeliac disease (CD) in osteoporosis. AIMS: To investigate the prevalence of CD among individuals with osteoporosis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of articles published in PubMed, Medline or EMBASE through May 2017 to identify studies looking at prevalence of CD in patients with osteoporosis. Search terms included "coeliac disease" combined with "fractures", "bone disease", "bone density", "densitometry", "osteoporos*", "osteomal*", "osteodys" or "dexa" or "dxa" or "skelet". Non-English papers with English-language abstracts were included. We used fixed-effects inverse variance-weighted models, and tested heterogeneity through subgroup analysis as well as through meta-regression. RESULTS: We identified eight relevant studies, comprising data from 3188 individuals with osteoporosis. Of these, 59 individuals (1.9%) had CD. A weighted pooled analysis demonstrated biopsy-confirmed CD in 1.6% (95% CI = 1.1%-2.0%) of individuals with osteoporosis. The heterogeneity was moderate (I2  = 40.1%), and influenced by the underlying CD prevalence in the general population. After adding four studies (n = 814) with CD defined as positive tissue transglutaminase or endomysial antibodies, the pooled prevalence was comparable (1.6%; 95% CI = 1.2%-2.0%). CONCLUSIONS: About 1 in 62 individuals with osteoporosis, or 1.6%, have biopsy-verified CD. This prevalence is comparable to that in the general population. These findings argue against routinely screening patients with osteoporosis for CD, which is contrary to current guideline recommendations. Additional studies are needed to determine the true utility of such screening programs.


Subject(s)
Celiac Disease/complications , Celiac Disease/epidemiology , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Absorptiometry, Photon , Bone Density , Celiac Disease/diagnosis , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Humans , Mass Screening , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Prevalence
2.
Am J Transplant ; 13(11): 3010-20, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24102808

ABSTRACT

Regulatory T cell (Treg) therapy has the potential to induce transplantation tolerance so that immunosuppression and associated morbidity can be minimized. Alloantigen-reactive Tregs (arTregs) are more effective at preventing graft rejection than polyclonally expanded Tregs (PolyTregs) in murine models. We have developed a manufacturing process to expand human arTregs in short-term cultures using good manufacturing practice-compliant reagents. This process uses CD40L-activated allogeneic B cells to selectively expand arTregs followed by polyclonal restimulation to increase yield. Tregs expanded 100- to 1600-fold were highly alloantigen reactive and expressed the phenotype of stable Tregs. The alloantigen-expanded Tregs had a diverse TCR repertoire. They were more potent than PolyTregs in vitro and more effective at controlling allograft injuries in vivo in a humanized mouse model.


Subject(s)
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Immune Tolerance/immunology , Isoantigens/immunology , Skin Transplantation , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/transplantation , Animals , Flow Cytometry , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft vs Host Disease/immunology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Humans , Lymphocyte Activation , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Transplantation Tolerance
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...