Bronchoalveolar lavage and plasma Antithrombin and cytokines in inhalation and burn injury: a pilot study.

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is initiated during the acute phase of thermal injury. The objective was to determine the SIRS impact on cytokine and Antithrombin (AT) levels in smoke inhalation and burn injury. This observational pilot study compared plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) cytokine and AT levels in the first six days post smoke inhalation and burn injury. Twenty-five patients, 14 with inhalation + burn injury > 10% total body surface area (TBSA) and 11 with inhalation injury and ≤ 10% TBSA participated. Human Th1/Th2 cytometric bead array kit from BD Biosciences Pharmingen determined cytokine levels; AT levels with Sigma Diagnostics and spectrophotometry. Results indicated no significant age difference between the two groups (42.1 ± 7.2) versus 49.6 ± 6.4 years. On admission, the inhalation group had 5.4 ± 3.9% TBSA compared to 35.0 ± 22.2% TBSA in the inhalation + burn group, P < 0.001. Comparing groups, AT plasma levels were significantly decreased (P = 0.025) and IL-2 levels significantly increased (P = 0.025) in the inhalation + burn group compared to the inhalation group; there was no significant difference in BAL AT or cytokine levels. Combined group plasma AT levels (65.41 ± 4.44%) were significantly increased compared to BAL AT levels (1.06 ± 0.71%), P < 0.001. In contrast, BAL TNF-α levels (35.61 ± 16.01 pg/ml) were significantly increased in relation to the plasma levels (4.68 ± 1.27 pg/ml), P = 0.02. On days 1-2, AT plasma levels were significantly decreased in the inhalation + burn group (41.01 ± 5.24%) compared to the inhalation group (81.02 ± 10.99%), P = 0.002. IL-6 plasma levels were higher in the inhalation + burn group compared to the inhalation group on admission, but both levels decreased by days 3-6. IL-6 BAL levels were elevated in both groups on days 1-2 and decreased by days 3-6. In the first six days of resuscitation, all plasma cytokines were increased in the two groups compared to controls. AT plasma and BAL levels were significantly reduced in both groups, contributing to the coagulopathy. Increased BAL TNF-α and IL-6 levels may have contributed to the pulmonary perturbations during the initial SIRS response in both groups.

Characterizing demographics, injury severity, and intubation status for patients transported by air or ground ambulance to a rural burn center.

Our study was designed to characterize intubation status among patients transported by air or ground ambulance to a rural burn center. A retrospective chart review of patients arriving at our burn center from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2009 was completed. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were performed. During the study period, 259 air and 590 ground ambulance patients met inclusion criteria. Air ambulance patients were older and had higher total body surface area burned, lower Glasgow Coma scores, longer lengths of stay, and more frequent inhalation injuries. Approximately 10% of patients arriving by air were intubated after burn center admission, and 49% of intubated patients were extubated within 24 hours of admission. These values were 2% and 40%, respectively, for patients transported by ground. Increasing age and air ambulance transport increased the overall likelihood of change in intubation status. The likelihood of intubation by burn center providers increased with age, with suspicion of inhalation injury, and for patients transported by air. The likelihood of extubation within 24 hours of burn center admission increased with age, decreased with suspected inhalation injury, and was independent of transport mode. Among our patient population, more severely injured patients were being transported by air ambulance. However, age, suspicion of inhalation injury, and mode of transport showed a complex pattern of associations with changes in intubation status, and illustrate the need to develop better prehospital guidelines for intubation in burn patients.

Burn prevention in Zambia: a work in progress.

The aim of this study was to assess both burn prevention knowledge and the effectiveness of educational intervention in alleviating the current knowledge deficit in Zambian youth. In one rural Zambian district, a burn prevention program was implemented in June 2011. Children at two elementary schools completed a 10-question survey that aimed to assess knowledge regarding burn injuries. After completing the survey, children received a burn and fire safety presentation and a burn prevention coloring book. Children were reassessed in May 2012 using the same survey to determine program efficacy and knowledge retention. Burn knowledge assessments were also completed for children at other schools who did not receive the burn prevention program in 2011. Logistic regression analysis was used for statistical adjustment for confounding variables. Between June 2011 and May 2012, 2747 children from six schools were assessed for their burn knowledge, with 312 of them resurveyed after educational intervention since initial survey. Reassessed children performed significantly better on three questions after controlling for confounders. They did better on five questions but their performance on these failed to achieve statistical significance. Children performed significantly worse on one concept about first aid treatment of a burn. A majority of the children demonstrated knowledge deficit in three concepts, even after educational intervention. There is a large variation in first burn knowledge survey performance of children from different schools, with inconsistency between concepts. With half the questions, knowledge deficit did not improve with advancement in school grade. Low- and moderate-income countries (LMICs) face the largest burns burden. With the lack of adequate burn care facing LMICs, burn injury prevention is of particular importance in those countries. This study shows that burn educational intervention could be effective in reducing burn knowledge deficit; however, the residual deficit posteducation could still be large and potentially contributing to heightened burn injury incidence. Customized and integrated educational programs may be proposed regarding the epidemiological profile of burn knowledge deficit from various schools. This study represents one of the few reports on the effectiveness of a burn prevention program in an LMIC. Future epidemiological data will be needed from nearby healthcare facilities to determine whether this program decreased burn morbidity and mortality at the hospital level.

Burn prevention in Zambia: a targeted epidemiological approach.

The aim of this study is to assess primary burn prevention knowledge in a rural Zambian population that is disproportionately burdened by burn injuries. A 10-question survey was completed by youths, and a 15-question survey was completed by adults. The survey was available in both English and Nyanja. The surveys were designed to test their knowledge in common causes, first aid, and emergency measures regarding burn injuries. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore relationships between burn knowledge, age, school, and socioeconomic variables. A burn prevention coloring book, based on previous local epidemiological data, was also distributed to 800 school age youths. Five hundred fifty youths and 39 adults completed the survey. The most significant results show knowledge deficits in common causes of burns, first aid treatment of a burn injury, and what to do in the event of clothing catching fire. Younger children were more likely to do worse than older children. The adults performed better than the youths, but still lack fundamental burn prevention and treatment knowledge. Primary burn prevention data from the youths and adults surveyed demonstrate a clear need for burn prevention and treatment education in this population. In a country where effective and sustainable burn care is lacking, burn prevention may be a better investment to reduce burn injury than large investments in healthcare resources.

The epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on a burn trauma unit.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the frequency and relatedness of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates to determine whether healthcare workers, the environment, or admitted patients could be a reservoir for MRSA on a burn trauma unit (BTU). We also assessed risk factors for MRSA colonization among BTU patients. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study and surveillance for MRSA carriage. SETTING: BTU of a Midwestern academic medical center. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to a BTU from February 2009 through January 2010 and healthcare workers on this unit during the same time period. METHODS: Samples for MRSA culture were collected on admission from the nares and wounds of all BTU patients. We also had collected culture samples from the throat, axilla, antecubital fossa, groin, and perianal area of 12 patients per month. Samples collected from healthcare workers' nares and from environmental sites were cultured quarterly. MRSA isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: Of 144 patients, 24 (17%) carried MRSA in their nares on admission. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 5.51; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.25-24.30), admission for necrotizing fasciitis (OR, 7.66; 95% CI, 1.64-35.81), and MRSA colonization of a site other than the nares (OR, 23.40; 95% CI, 6.93-79.01) were independent predictors of MRSA nasal carriage. Cultures of samples collected from 4 healthcare workers and 4 environmental cultures had positive results. Two patients were colonized with strains that were indistinguishable from strains collected from a healthcare worker or the environment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were a major reservoir for MRSA. Infection control efforts should focus on preventing transmission of MRSA from patients who are MRSA carriers to other patients on the unit.

Trends in 393 necrotizing acute soft tissue infection patients 2000-2008.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcomes effect of changing trends in patients with necrotizing acute soft tissue infections (NASTI) 2000-2008. METHODS: A single institution retrospective chart review of all patients treated for NASTI. RESULTS: There were 393 patients with mean age 50 years, diabetes 53%, % body surface area excised 3.5. Wounds were located on: extremity 57%, perineum 40%, trunk 26%. Wound cultures %: polymicrobial=62, Staphylococci=48, Streptococci=31. Patients developing complications %: Pulmonary=23, renal insufficiency/failure=27. During the study period, overall mortality rate remained unchanged: 30/393=7.6% (5.5% for patients first admitted by burn/trauma/acute care surgery vs. 29% for all other services, p=0.003). Significant annual increases were found in number of patients, p=0.03, male sex, p=0.000, transfer from outside hospital, p<0.001, BMI p=0.003, ventilator requirement >24h, p=0.0005, APACHE II p=0.002, and number of patients developing any complication, p=0.04. Statistically significant decreases annually were found in: days of antibiotic use, p=0.008, number of operations required for excision, p=0.02, development of non-wound infections, p=0.002, and length of stay in days (LOS), p=0.03. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest cohort of NASTI patients from a single institution to date, demonstrating significantly shorter LOS and decreased non-wound infection rates in the face of increasing BMI and APACHE II scores. The increasing number of patients and BMI suggests a causal relationship between NASTI and obesity. Initial care by surgeons experienced in caring for these patients provides mortality rates well below the national average.

An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver-containing soft silicone foam dressing (intervention) vs silver sulfadiazine cream.

An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study was implemented to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver-containing soft silicone foam dressing (Mepilex Ag) vs silver sulfadiazine cream (control) in the treatment of partial-thickness thermal burns. Individuals aged 5 years and older with partial-thickness thermal burns (2.5-20% BSA) were randomized into two groups and treated with the trial products for 21 days or until healed, whichever occurred first. Data were obtained and analyzed on cost (direct and indirect), healing rates, pain, comfort, ease of product use, and adverse events. A total of 101 subjects were recruited. There were no significant differences in burn area profiles within the groups. The cost of dressing-related analgesia was lower in the intervention group (P = .03) as was the cost of background analgesia (P = .07). The mean total cost of treatment was $309 vs $513 in the control (P < .001). The average cost-effectiveness per treatment regime was $381 lower in the intervention product, producing an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1688 in favor of the soft silicone foam dressing. Mean healing rates were 71.7 vs 60.8% at final visit, and the number of dressing changes were 2.2 vs 12.4 in the treatment and control groups, respectively. Subjects reported significantly less pain at application (P = .02) and during wear (P = .048) of the Mepilex Ag dressing in the acute stages of wound healing. Clinicians reported the intervention dressing was significantly easier to use (P = .03) and flexible (P = .04). Both treatments were well tolerated; however, the total incidence of adverse events was higher in the control group. The silver-containing soft silicone foam dressing was as effective in the treatment of patients as the standard care (silver sulfadiazine). In addition, the group of patients treated with the soft silicone foam dressing demonstrated decreased pain and lower costs associated with treatment.

Burn injuries in eastern Zambia: impact of multidisciplinary teaching teams.

The American Burn Association/Children's Burn Foundation (ABA/CBF) sponsors teams who offer burn education to healthcare providers in Zambia, a sub-Saharan country. The goals of this study are 1) to acquire burn-patient demographics for the Eastern Province, Zambia and 2) to assess the early impact of the ABA/CBF-sponsored burn teams. This is a retrospective chart review of burn patients admitted in one mission hospital in Katete, Zambia, July 2002 to June 2009. July 2002 to December 2006 = data before ABA/CBF burn teams and January 2007 to June 2009 = burn care data during/after burn outreach. There were 510 burn patients hospitalized, male:female ratio 1.2:1. Average age = 15.6 years, with 44% younger than 5 years. Average TBSA burned = 11% and mean fatal TBSA = 25%. Average hospital length of stay = 16.9 days survivors and 11.6 days nonsurvivors. Most common mechanisms of burn injuries: flame (52%) and scald (41%). Ninety-two patients (18%) died and 23 (4.5%) left against medical advice. There were 191 (37.4%) patients who underwent 410 surgical procedures (range 1-13/patient). There were 138 (33.7%) sloughectomies, 118 (28.7%) skin grafts, 39 (9.5%) amputations, and 115 (28.1%) other procedures. Changes noted in the 2007 to 2009 time period: more patients had burn diagrams (48.6 vs 27.6%, P < .001), received analgesics (91 vs 84%, P = .05), resuscitation fluid (56 vs 49%, P = not significant [NS]), topical antimicrobials (40 vs 37%, P = NS), underwent skin grafting (35.5 vs 25.1%, P = NS), and underwent any operative intervention (40.6 vs 35.2%, P = NS), compared with patients treated between 2002 and 2006. This study represents the largest, most comprehensive burn data set for a sub-Saharan region in Africa. There has been a statistically significant improvement in documentation of burn size as well as administration of analgesics, validating the efficacy of the ABA/CBF-sponsored burn teams. Continued contact with burn teams may lead to increased use of resuscitation fluids, topical antimicrobials, and more patients undergoing operative intervention, translating into improved burn patient outcomes.

Evaluation of the usefulness of two established pain assessment tools in a burn population.

Evaluation of burn pain and its successful treatment has proven challenging for all staff who care for burn patients. As successful pain relief is important for full physical and psychological recovery, accurate assessment of burn pain is essential. The authors sought to prospectively evaluate two previously validated pain scales, the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CCPOT) and the Adult Nonverbal Scale (ANVS), in our burn population and compare them with patients' reports of pain. Both scales include nonverbal behaviors that are numerically scored and can be used in communicative as well as noncommunicative patients. Thirty-eight patients underwent 225 paired pain assessments. Assessments were compared with patients' self-reports of pain using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the visual analog scale (VAS). Performance of the scales was evaluated by psychometric analysis. Logistic regression was used to compare pain scores with patient demographics, burn demographics, and administered analgesia. Both CCPOT and ANVS were internally consistent and able to discriminate pain intensity. However, these scales had poor interrater reliability. Furthermore, they correlated poorly with patients' self-reports of pain per the NRS and VAS pain scale scores. By logistic regression, all the pain scales showed a decrease in patient pain corresponding to the length of time after the burn. Otherwise, pain was not related to any patient demographics or evaluator experience. The size of burn was the only burn-related variable significantly associated with the pain scores, and this was only for the scores obtained with the CCPOT scale. In addition, only CCPOT and ANVS scales correlated with administered analgesia during hospitalization. The authors conclude that CCPOT and ANVS do not accurately assess pain in burn patients. However, it seems that the staff may administer analgesia based on several nonverbal clues encompassed in these scales. Future studies should address nonverbal signs of pain in burn patients. These signs could then be used in pain scales to target burn patient pain more effectively.

Risk factors for acquiring vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on a burn surgery step-down unit.

The incidence of hospital-associated infections secondary to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and those caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) continue to increase, despite the publication of evidence-based guidelines on infection control. We sought to determine modifiable risks factors for acquisition of MRSA or VRE or both on a burn trauma unit (BTU). We performed a retrospective single-center-matched control study. Our study group comprised 94 patients who acquired MRSA or VRE or both while on the BTU from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2005. The case-patients were matched 1:1 to control-patients based on the time the cases were exposed to the BTU before they became colonized or infected. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship of demographic, procedure, and antimicrobial exposure variables to acquisition of MRSA or VRE. Acquisition of MRSA or VRE was related to patient factors, antimicrobial exposure, and device use. Younger age and prior vancomycin treatment while on the BTU were independently associated with MRSA acquisition. The presence of a Foley catheter was related to VRE acquisition. Sixteen study patients (17.0%) who became colonized on the BTU subsequently acquired 17 infections: six patients had MRSA bloodstream infections, nine had MRSA burn wound infections, and two had VRE urinary tract infections. Younger age, exposure to vancomycin, or Foley catheters were associated with increased risk of acquiring MRSA or VRE. Protocols or algorithms that help physicians remember to assess the necessity of antimicrobial agents and devices may help limit the duration of exposure to these risk factors, which may enhance infection prevention efforts. Future studies need to explore the effect of these variables on cross-transmission and their impact predominately in a burn unit.

The impact of opioid administration on resuscitation volumes in thermally injured patients.

Administration of resuscitation volumes far beyond the estimates established by burn-body weight resuscitation formulas has been well documented. The reasons behind this increase are not clear. We sought to determine if our resuscitation volumes had increased and, if so, what factors were related to their increase. A retrospective chart review identified 154 patients admitted with burns greater than 20% of their BSA during the years of 1975-1976 (period 1), 1990-1991 (period 2), and 2006-2007 (period 3). Charts were reviewed for total fluids (crystalloid, colloid, and blood products) and opioids given before admission, during the first 8 hours of treatment, the next 16 hours of treatment, and the following 24 hours of treatment. Opioids were converted to opioid equivalents (OE). Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the effects of variables of interest and control for confounders. Significance was assumed at the P < .05 level. Resuscitation fluid volumes increased significantly among adults from 3.97 ml/kg/%BSA during the first period to 6.40 ml/kg/%BSA during the third period (P < .01). The same trend in children <30 kg was not seen (P = .72). Fluid administered during the first 24 hours was significantly associated with age, BSA, intubation, latter two study periods, and opioid administration. Fluid administration was consistently associated with opioid administration at all measured time points. At 24 hours postburn, patients who received 2 to 4 OE/kg required an average of additional 3,650 +/- 1,704 ml of fluid, those receiving 4 to 6 OE/kg had required an average of 25,154 +/- 4,386 ml, and those who received >6 OE kg had required an average of 32,969 +/- 3,982 ml. In this single center retrospective study, we have shown a statistically significant increase in resuscitation fluids (from 1975 to 2007) and an association of resuscitation volumes with opioids. Opioids have been shown to increase resuscitation volumes in critically ill patients through both central and peripheral effects on the cardiovascular system. Because increased fluid resuscitation has been associated with adverse consequences in other studies, further research on alternative pain control strategies in thermally injured patients is warranted.

Long-term outcomes of patients with necrotizing fasciitis.

CONTEXT: Necrotizing fasciitis is an aggressive infection affecting the skin and soft tissue. It has a very high acute mortality. The long-term survival and cause of death of patients who survive an index hospitalization for necrotizing fasciitis are not known. OBJECTIVE: To define the long-term survival of patients who survive an index admission for necrotizing fasciitis. We hypothesize that survivors will have a shorter life span than population controls. DESIGN: Long-term follow-up of a registry of patients from 1989 to 2006 who survived a hospitalization for necrotizing fasciitis. Last date of follow-up was January 1, 2008. SETTINGS: A university-based Burn and Trauma Center. PATIENTS: A prospective registry of patients with necrotizing fasciitis has been collected from 1989 to 2006. This registry was linked to data from the Department of Health, Department of Motor Vehicles, and the University Hospital Medical Records Department in January 2008 to obtain follow-up and vital status data. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Date and cause of death were abstracted from death certificates. Date of last live follow-up was determined from the medical record and by the last driver's license renewal. The death rate of the cohort was standardized for age and sex against 2005 statewide mortality rates. Cause of death was collated into infectious and noninfectious and compared with the statewide causes of death. Statistical analysis included standardized mortality rates, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Aalen's additive hazard model. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-five patients of the 377 in the registry survived at least 30 days and were analyzed. Average age at presentation was 49 years (range, 1-86; median, 49). Patients were followed up an average of 3.3 years (range, 0.0-15.7; median, 2.4). Eighty-seven of these patients died (25%). Median survival was 10.0 years (95% confidence interval: 7.25-13.11). There was a trend toward higher mortality in women. Twelve of the 87 deaths were due to infectious causes. Using three different statistical analytic techniques, there was a statistically significant increase in the long-term death rate when compared with population-based controls. Infectious causes of death were statistically higher than controls as well. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who survive an episode of necrotizing fasciitis are at continued risk for premature death; many of these deaths were due to infectious causes such as pneumonia, cholecystitis, urinary tract infections, and sepsis. These patients should be counseled, followed, and immunized to minimize chances of death. Modification of other risk factors for death such as obesity, diabetes, smoking, and atherosclerotic disease should also be undertaken. The sex difference in long-term survival is intriguing and needs to be addressed in further studies.

The evolution of resource utilization in regional burn centers.

Regional burn centers provide unique multidisciplinary care that has been associated with dramatically improved outcomes for burn victims. Patients with complex skin and soft tissue injuries are increasingly admitted to these centers for definitive care. This study was designed to assess current trends in burn center resource utilization. Members of the Multicenter Trials Group of American Burn Association were invited to participate in this retrospective review of all patients admitted to their respective regional burn centers during a 10-year period. Collected data included admission diagnosis, demographics, length of stay (LOS), hospital charges, and mortality. Five regional academic burn centers participated. They collectively admitted 18,246 patients during the study period, of whom 15,219 (83.4%) had a primary burn diagnosis and 3027 (16.6%) were patients with nonburn diagnoses. During this period, annual admissions for the five centers increased by 34.7%, ranging from 19 to 83% for individual centers. Simultaneously, mean burn size decreased from 12.3 to 8.8% TBSA. From 1998 to 2006, admissions for nonburn diagnoses increased by 244.9%, whereas burn admissions increased by 31.1%. Although mean LOS was reduced by >25%, total charges for all patients increased by 37.7% after adjustment for inflation. Nonburn patients had significantly higher mean age, longer LOS, greater mortality, and higher daily charges. This review of admissions to five academic burn centers reveals that these centers are treating more patients with smaller burns and an increasing number of complex nonburn conditions. Nonburn patients represent an older and more debilitated population that consumes disproportionately more resources than burn patients. These data show a dramatic shift in burn center resource utilization and the concurrent evolution of regional burn centers into centers for the care of complex wounds.

The effect of burn center and burn center volume on the mortality of burned adults--an analysis of the data in the National Burn Repository.

Regional variations of care, and improved outcomes with larger volumes, have been well described in the medical and surgical literature for a variety of conditions including heart surgery, vascular surgery, and orthopedic surgery. Burn care has not been recently subjected to such an analysis. The National Burn Repository (NBR) contains de-identified patient and burn center data to allow this analysis. The NBR was queried for adult burn patients admitted for an acute thermal burn injury. A multivariable regression analysis to identify risk of death was performed incorporating patient characteristics, de-identified burn center, and burn center volume. Patient characteristics such as age, size of burn, mechanism of burn, inhalation injury, race, and sex determine mortality. There is also a statistically significant difference in death rates when individual, de-identified centers are compared. This difference in care persists even when accounting for burn center volume. Analysis of registries like the NBR, insurance claims databases, and statewide hospital discharge databases may help identify opportunities to improve burn care. According to this analysis of data available in the NBR, burn mortality depends not only on patient characteristics but also where the patient is treated. Mortality does not linearly improve with burn center volume and plateaus with increasing burn center size. The optimal burn center size is a complicated and contentious question. Future discussions about burn center size and density should incorporate not only mortality but also the region's ability to absorb surges in volume, and the optimal "staffing" ratios for the multidisciplinary aspects of burn care.

Critical care of the burn patient: the first 48 hours.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this concise review is to provide an overview of some of the most important resuscitation and monitoring issues and approaches that are unique to burn patients compared with the general intensive care unit population. STUDY SELECTION: Consensus conference findings, clinical trials, and expert medical opinion regarding care of the critically burned patient were gathered and reviewed. Studies focusing on burn shock, resuscitation goals, monitoring tools, and current recommendations for initial burn care were examined. CONCLUSIONS: The critically burned patient differs from other critically ill patients in many ways, the most important being the necessity of a team approach to patient care. The burn patient is best cared for in a dedicated burn center where resuscitation and monitoring concentrate on the pathophysiology of burns, inhalation injury, and edema formation. Early operative intervention and wound closure, metabolic interventions, early enteral nutrition, and intensive glucose control have led to continued improvements in outcome. Prevention of complications such as hypothermia and compartment syndromes is part of burn critical care. The myriad areas where standards and guidelines are currently determined only by expert opinion will become driven by level 1 data only by continued research into the critical care of the burn patient.

Effectiveness of universal screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococcus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission to a burn-trauma step-down unit.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are significant healthcare-associated pathogens. We sought to identify factors that could be used to predict which patients carry or are infected with VRE or MRSA on admission so that we could obtain cultures selectively from high-risk patients on our burn-trauma unit. We conducted a case-control study of patients admitted to our burn-trauma unit from September 2000 to March 2005 who were colonized or infected with either VRE or MRSA (cases) and patients who were not colonized or infected with one of these organisms (controls). We used logistic regression to construct a model that we subsequently validated based on data collected prospectively from patients admitted from September 2006 to August 2007. In the case-control study, colonization or infection with MRSA or VRE on admission were independently associated with the total days of antimicrobial treatment, age, prior hospitalization, prior operations, and admitting diagnosis (admission for a burn injury was protective). In the cohort study, a prior hospitalization with a length of stay>or=7 days and operations within the past 6 months were significantly associated with colonization or infection on admission. The latter model was 59.3% sensitive. If, we used this model to identify which patients should be cultured on admission, we would have missed 24 (39.3%) of the colonized or infected patients. These patients would not have been placed in isolation (434 missed isolation days, 71.0%) and may have been the source of transmission to other patients. Our model lacked the sensitivity to identify patients colonized or infected with VRE or MRSA. We recommend that units, which care for patients who are at high risk of hospital-acquired infection and having prevalence and transmission rates of VRE or MRSA similar to those in our study, screen all patients for these organisms on admission to the unit.

The efficacy of hair and urine toxicology screening on the detection of child abuse by burning.

Abuse by burning is estimated to occur in 1 to 25% of children admitted with burn injuries annually. Hair and urine toxicology for illicit drug exposure may provide additional confirmatory evidence for abuse. To determine the impact of hair and urine toxicology on the identification of child abuse, we performed a retrospective chart review of all pediatric patients admitted to our burn unit. The medical records of 263 children aged 0 to 16 years of age who were admitted to our burn unit from January 2002 to December 2007 were reviewed. Sixty-five children had suspected abuse. Of those with suspected abuse, 33 were confirmed by the Department of Health and Human Services and comprised the study group. Each of the 33 cases was randomly matched to three pediatric (0-16 years of age) control patients (99). The average annual incidence of abuse in pediatric burn patients was 13.7+/-8.4% of total annual pediatric admissions (range, 0-25.6%). Age younger than 5 years, hot tap water cause, bilateral, and posterior location of injury were significantly associated with nonaccidental burn injury on multivariate analysis. Thirteen (39.4%) abused children had positive ancillary tests. These included four (16%) skeletal surveys positive for fractures and 10 (45%) hair samples positive for drugs of abuse (one patient had a fracture and a positive hair screen). In three (9.1%) patients who were not initially suspected of abuse but later confirmed, positive hair test for illicit drugs was the only indicator of abuse. Nonaccidental injury can be difficult to confirm. Although inconsistent injury history and burn injury pattern remain central to the diagnosis of abuse by burning, hair and urine toxicology offers a further means to facilitate confirmation of abuse.