Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 85(6): 637-642, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34482552

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preservatives are used widely in cosmetic, household, and industrial products to prevent microbial growth and spoiling of the products. There has been a recent epidemic of contact allergy to methylisothiazolinone (MI). OBJECTIVES: To establish emerging trends in preservative contact allergy as MI is replaced. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on consecutively patch-tested patients at our center from January 2011 to December 2019. RESULTS: A total of 7846 consecutively patch-tested patients were included who were patch tested between January 2011 and December 2019. The prevalence of allergy to MI fell from a peak of 9.39% in 2013 to 1.98% in 2019. MI/methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI) followed a similar trend, with a peak prevalence of 7.85% in 2014 and falling to 1.39% in 2018. The prevalence of contact allergy to benzisothiazolinone (BIT) has increased steadily increased in 2014 from 0.26% (confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.93) to 3.42% (CI 2.43-4.66) in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a significant increase in the prevalence of contact allergy to BIT over the last 6 years, probably as a consequence of increased use in household products. It is essential to continue to look for emerging trends in contact allergy to enable prompt preventative measures to be taken.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/adverse effects , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Cosmetics/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Female , Household Products/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patch Tests , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 80(4): 217-221, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30430597

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is defined as equipment that protects the wearer's body against health/safety risks at work. Gloves cause many dermatoses. Non-glove PPE constitutes a wide array of garments. Dermatoses resulting from these have hitherto not been documented. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and types of non-glove PPE-related dermatoses. PATIENTS/METHODS: We analysed incident case reports from dermatologists of non-glove PPE-related dermatoses to a UK-wide surveillance scheme (EPIDERM) between 1993 and 2013. RESULTS: The dermatoses associated with non-glove PPE accounted for 0.84% of all occupational skin disease. Of all PPE-related cases, 194 (9.2%) were attributable to non-glove PPE. Of these, 132 (68.0%) occurred in men, and the median age (both male and female) was 42 years (range 18-82 years). The non-glove PPE-related dermatoses were diagnosed as: allergic contact dermatitis (47.4%), irritant contact dermatitis (16.0%), friction (11.3%), occlusion (11.3%), unspecified dermatitis (8.8%), acne (3.1%), infections (1.5), and contact urticaria (0.52%). The industries most associated with non-glove PPE-related dermatoses were manufacturing (18.6%), public administration and defence (17.0%), health and social work (15.5%), and transport, storage, and communication (9.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Clothing, footwear, facemasks and headgear need to be recognized as causes of dermatoses occurring at body sites less commonly associated with occupational skin disease.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Gloves, Protective/statistics & numerical data , Personal Protective Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Female , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United Kingdom/epidemiology
6.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 15(5): 461-6, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26308332

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review was to examine the current outbreak of cases of contact allergy to methylisothiazolinone in Europe, a phenomenon that has also been observed worldwide, despite initial legislative control of the introduction of methylisothiazolinone into the market. RECENT FINDINGS: Reported allergic contact reactions are primarily eczematous, most commonly in women over 40 from cosmetic use, but there are reports of noneczematous eruptions such as lichen planus-like or lymphomatoid reactions. Methylisothiazolinone in cosmetic, personal care, for example, wet wipe, and household products are the most common exposure. Occupational exposure is represented by workplace use of hygiene (healthcare) and beauty products (hairdressers, beauticians) together with water-based paints and other aqueous solutions such as cutting fluid.Methylisothiazolinone should be patch tested at a concentration of 2000 ppm (0.2% aqueous) to maximize sensitivity of the test.Notwithstanding the recommendation to discontinue the use of methylisothiazolinone in leave-on cosmetics, studies suggest safer use of concentrations should also be determined for rinse-off products. Legislation to improve labelling of industrial materials is also required.Going forward there is a need for collaboration between the cosmetic industry and interested physicians to break the recurrent cycle of sensitization to preservatives as one is replaced with another to maintain the risk of sensitization at an acceptably low level. SUMMARY: Methylisothiazolinone is particularly relevant at present as strategies to control the outbreak are yet to be enforced and there is no current evidence of the outbreak abating.


Subject(s)
Age Factors , Dermatitis, Contact/epidemiology , Product Labeling/legislation & jurisprudence , Sex Factors , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Cosmetics/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Contact/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , European Union , Female , Humans , Male , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects
7.
Int J Cancer ; 136(12): 2890-9, 2015 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25403087

ABSTRACT

Lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 /D3 levels at melanoma diagnosis are associated with thicker primaries and poorer survival. We postulated that this might relate to the deleterious effect of systemic inflammation as 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 /D3 levels are inversely associated with levels of C-reactive protein. 2,182 participants in the Leeds Melanoma Cohort (median follow-up 7.98 years) provided data on drug exposure, comorbidities and a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 /D3 level at recruitment. Factors reported to modify systemic inflammation (low vitamin D levels, high body mass index, use of aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or smoking were tested as predictors of microscopic ulceration (in which primary tumors are inflamed) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS). Ulceration was independently associated with lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 /D3 levels (odds ratio (OR) = 0.94 per 10 nmol/L, 95% CI 0.88-1.00, p = 0.05) and smoking at diagnosis (OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.00-2.15, p = 0.04). In analyses adjusted for age and sex, a protective effect was seen of 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 /D3 levels at diagnosis on melanoma death (OR = 0.89 per 10 nmol/L, 95% CI 0.83-0.95, p < 0.001) and smoking increased the risk of death (OR = 1.13 per 10 years, 95% CI 1.05-1.22, p = 0.001). In multivariable analyses (adjusted for tumor thickness) the associations with death from melanoma were low 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 /D3 level at recruitment (<20 nmol/L vs. 20-60 nmol/L, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.52, 95% CI 0.97-2.40, p = 0.07) and smoking duration at diagnosis (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20, p = 0.009). The study shows evidence that lower vitamin D levels and smoking are associated with ulceration of primary melanomas and poorer MSS. Further analyses are necessary to understand any biological mechanisms that underlie these findings.


Subject(s)
25-Hydroxyvitamin D 2/blood , Calcifediol/blood , Inflammation/blood , Melanoma/blood , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Comorbidity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Inflammation/drug therapy , Inflammation/epidemiology , Male , Melanoma/drug therapy , Melanoma/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Smoking/blood , Smoking/epidemiology , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Ulcer/blood , Ulcer/epidemiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...