US cost-effectiveness analysis of polatuzumab vedotin in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

AIMS: We evaluated the pharmacoeconomic value of polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) versus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3-state partitioned survival model was used to estimate life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and cost impacts of Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP. Analyses utilized mixture-cure survival modelling, assessed a lifetime horizon, discounted all outcomes at 3% per year, and examined both payer and societal perspectives. Progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), drug utilization, treatment duration, adverse reactions, and subsequent treatment inputs were based on data from the POLARIX study (NCT03274492). Costs included drug acquisition/administration, adverse reaction management, routine care, subsequent treatments, end-of-life care, and work productivity. RESULTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP were $70,719/QALY gained and $88,855/QALY gained from societal and payer perspectives, respectively. The $32,824 higher total cost of Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP was largely due to higher drug costs ($122,525 vs $27,694), with cost offsets including subsequent treatment (-$52,765), routine care (-$1,781), end-of-life care (-$383), and work productivity (-$8,418). Pola-R-CHP resulted in an increase of 0.47 LYs and 0.46 QALYs versus R-CHOP. Pola-R-CHP was cost-effective in 60.9% and 58.0% of simulations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY gained from societal and payer perspectives, respectively. LIMITATIONS: There was uncertainty around the OS extrapolation in the model, and costs were derived from different sources. Recommended prophylactic medications were not included; prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for all patients was assumed to be equal across treatment arms in POLARIX. Work productivity loss was estimated from a general population and was not specific to patients with DLBCL. CONCLUSION: Pola-R-CHP was projected to be cost-effective versus R-CHOP in previously untreated DLBCL, suggesting that Pola-R-CHP represents good value relative to R-CHOP in this setting.

Comparison of statistical methods for extrapolating survival in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results based on the POLARIX study.

OBJECTIVE: The ongoing Phase III randomized POLARIX study (GO39942; NCT03274492) demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) with polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) versus rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We compared statistical methodologies to extrapolate long-term PFS data from POLARIX. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This analysis explored four different approaches to extrapolate the POLARIX data: standard parametric survival, mixture-cure, landmark, and spline models. The resulting extrapolation curves were validated via comparison with the corresponding Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves from POLARIX and the POLARIX-like population of the Phase III GOYA study (NCT01287741; R-CHOP arm). RESULTS: The R-CHOP PFS KM curve from the GOYA validation set was well aligned with the POLARIX KM curve. As we anticipated that PFS in POLARIX would evolve similarly to that of GOYA, the data from GOYA were used to externally validate the extrapolated modelling results. While all four statistical methods were able to fit the data to the POLARIX KM curve, the mixture-cure model was the most accurate in predicting long-term PFS in the GOYA external validation set. In the mixture-cure model, generalized gamma distribution estimated 64% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 56-71%) of patients to have long-term remission in the R-CHOP arm of POLARIX and GOYA, and 75% (95% CI: 70-79%) in the Pola-R-CHP arm of POLARIX. A limitation of this study was the comparison of the statistical models only in the PFS KM curves, since it was not possible to determine which statistical method was more appropriate to extrapolate the overall survival KM curves. CONCLUSIONS: Within this analysis, the mixture-cure model provided the best prediction of long-term outcomes from the primary PFS analysis of the POLARIX study.

Risk Factors for and Outcomes of Follicular Lymphoma Histological Transformation at First Progression in the GALLIUM Study.

BACKGROUND: Although advanced­stage follicular lymphoma (FL) is considered incurable, survival has improved with the introduction of the anti-CD20 antibodies, rituximab (R) and obinutuzumab (G). However, FL can undergo histological transformation (HT) to a more aggressive disease, and a validated model for predicting HT risk is not yet available. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed HT incidence, risk factors and outcomes in the phase III, GALLIUM study evaluating R- or G-chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, advanced-stage FL (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01332968). HT rates were assessed by repeat tumour biopsy at disease progression or relapse, at the investigator's discretion. RESULTS: Of 1202 patients enrolled, 315 (26.2%) experienced progressive disease; 46 (14.6%) had a biopsy at first progression, 40 of whom had biopsy-confirmed HT. HT risk factors were male sex (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-4.20), elevated baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase (sHR, 3.97; 95% CI, 2.03-7.76), and elevated baseline serum ß2-microglobulin (sHR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.02-3.79). Patients with HT at first progression had poorer post-progression survival than those with relapsed FL (2-year rate: 55.9% vs. 83.1%). Relapse with HT occurred earlier than FL relapse (median time from randomisation: 0.8 vs. 2.3 years). CONCLUSION: HT was a low-frequency event associated with poor survival outcomes in the GALLIUM study. Male sex and elevated baseline levels of serum LDH and B2M were significant risk factors for HT. Further research is required to develop validated prognostic indices for HT risk and guide treatment decisions.

Approximation of Long-Term Survival with Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Bendamustine and Rituximab for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results Based on The GO29365 Trial.

BACKGROUND: To inform healthcare professionals, payers and health technology organisations of estimated survival benefits of new treatments, statistical methods can be used to model the projected clinical benefits versus costs of new interventions. This is particularly relevant for new treatments where data describing all progression events are incomplete and long-term survival outcomes are not yet established. In patients with the fast-growing B-cell cancer, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), heterogeneous clinical efficacy outcomes are observed with the presence of both 'cured' (long-term survivors [LTS]) and 'non-cured' patients. Mixture cure rate models represent an alternative approach to traditional standard parametric survival models as they capture this heterogeneity. The aim of this analysis was to use progression-free survival (PFS) as an intermediate endpoint to estimate long-term survival with polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) + bendamustine (B) + rituximab (R) treatment (Pola+BR); these survival estimates will be utilised to inform future economic analyses. METHODS: Using data from the Phase II randomised cohort of the GO29365 trial (NCT02257567), we estimated the overall survival (OS) benefit and proportion of LTS with Pola+BR versus BR alone in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL. Alongside standard parametric survival models, a mixture cure rate model was evaluated for each treatment arm, exploring both OS and OS informed by PFS. RESULTS: The estimated mean OS was 3.78 years for Pola+BR versus 1.07 years for BR using standard parametric methods and 4.00 years versus 1.02 years using a mixture cure rate model (OS informed by PFS). The proportion of LTS using the mixture cure rate model was 23.0% (95% confidence interval: 9.3, 45.36) for Pola+BR versus 0% for BR (assuming a generalised gamma distribution). Of the extrapolation methods tested, mixture cure rate model predictions were best aligned with the observed survival data in GO29365. CONCLUSIONS: These models suggest that compared with BR alone, Pola+BR is associated with a higher proportion of LTS ranging from 22.0 to 26.6%, depending on the distribution assumed. However, the upper and lower limits of the confidence intervals of the point estimates are reaching from 9 to 45%.

Early Relapse in First-Line Follicular Lymphoma: A Review of the Clinical Implications and Available Mitigation and Management Strategies.

Chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab (R-chemo) or obinutuzumab (G-chemo) is standard of care for patients with previously untreated symptomatic or high-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma. Median progression-free survival (PFS) with R-chemo plus R maintenance exceeds 10 years, and G-chemo plus G maintenance improves PFS relative to the corresponding R-containing regimen. Despite these positive results, a sizable proportion of patients continue to progress during or shortly after initial treatment. While no single definition of early relapse has been established, progression of disease within 24 months of initial treatment (POD24) is now widely accepted as a critical adverse prognostic factor. Multiple studies have shown increased mortality risk in patients with POD24 versus those without POD24. Unfortunately, tools for the assessment of POD24 risk are suboptimal, and it is not currently possible in clinical practice to identify individual patients who are at increased risk for early relapse. Treatment strategies for patients with POD24 are not well defined. G-chemo regimens appear to reduce the risk of POD24 relative to R-chemo regimens, although the impact on survival outcomes remains unclear. Beyond standard therapy, autologous stem cell transplant and emerging treatment modalities, such as bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, may have a role in future management. Until standard treatments are defined, mitigating the risk of early relapse with effective up-front treatment remains the priority.

Phase III Clinical Trials in First-Line Follicular Lymphoma: A Review of Their Design and Interpretation.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is one of the most common subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma worldwide. Improved survival outcomes with rituximab-based therapy in clinical trials led to the establishment of rituximab-based immunochemotherapy as standard of care for first-line (1L) treatment of FL. In the GALLIUM trial, obinutuzumab-based immunochemotherapy demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS), prolonged time-to-next antilymphoma treatment (TTNT) and comparable overall survival (OS) compared with rituximab-based immunochemotherapy as 1L treatment for FL. Using GALLIUM as an example, this article aims to explain how improved outcomes in 1L treatment of FL have changed the landscape for the design and interpretation of future trials. As approved therapies for 1L FL already achieve good responses, it is becoming more difficult to design trials that demonstrate further treatment benefits with the currently accepted primary endpoints. New endpoints are needed to reflect the long remission times, low relapse rates, and impact of subsequent therapies in FL. PFS is used as a primary efficacy endpoint in registrational clinical trials for indolent malignancies like FL, where improvement in OS is not always observed due to the large number of patients and long study duration required to demonstrate a clear survival benefit. However, there are limitations to using PFS as the primary endpoint. Other potential endpoints, including TTNT, progression of disease within 2 years, response rate, and minimal residual disease status are explored.

Cost-effectiveness of obinutuzumab versus rituximab biosimilars for previously untreated follicular lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: In the randomized phase 3 GALLIUM trial, first-line treatment with obinutuzumab (GA101; G) plus chemotherapy (G + chemo) resulted in superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared with rituximab plus chemotherapy (R + chemo) for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). G + chemo was found to be cost-effective when compared with R + chemo (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] of approximately $2,300 per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained). Two rituximab biosimilars, rituximab-abbs (Ra) and rituximab-pvvr (Rp), have been approved by the FDA for use in this setting. However, the cost-effectiveness of G + chemo versus Ra + chemo and Rp + chemo has not yet been estimated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of G + chemo versus Ra + chemo and Rp + chemo in the first-line treatment of FL. METHODS: We adapted an existing Markov model that compared G + chemo with R + chemo, using investigator-assessed PFS and postprogression survival data from the GALLIUM trial to model overall survival. All patients in the study received induction chemoimmunotherapy with either G + chemo or R + chemo, with responders then receiving obinutuzumab or rituximab maintenance therapy for 2 years or until disease progression. We assumed that the efficacy and safety of the rituximab biosimilars plus chemotherapy were the same as the R + chemo arm of the GALLIUM study. Drug utilization and treatment duration were also derived from GALLIUM. Health care costs were based on Medicare reimbursements, and drug costs were average sale prices for intravenous therapies or wholesale acquisition costs for oral therapies used after progression. Utility estimates were based on the GALLIUM trial data and published literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the key drivers of the model and uncertainty in the results. Results: Treatment with G + chemo led to an increase of 0.93 QALYs relative to rituximab biosimilars plus chemotherapy (95% credible range [CR] = 0.36-1.46). The total cost of G + chemo was $191,317, whereas the total costs of Ra + chemo and Rp + chemo were $164,340 (Δ14.1%) and $169,755 (Δ11.3%), respectively, with G + chemo resulting in incremental costs of $26,978 (95% CR = $19,781-$33,119) and $21,562 (95% CR = $14,473-$28,389), respectively. The incremental total drug and administration costs were $32,678 (Δ25.4%) and $27,263 (Δ21.2%) for G + chemo versus Ra + chemo and G + chemo versus Rp + chemo, respectively. There were cost savings of $7,050 (Δ-12.4%) related to disease progression for G + chemo ($56,727) compared with Ra + chemo and Rp + chemo ($63,777). ICERs were $28,879 and $23,082 per QALY gained for G + chemo versus Ra + chemo and Rp + chemo, respectively. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, G + chemo was cost-effective at the $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY thresholds versus both Ra + chemo (88% and 98% probabilities of cost-effectiveness, respectively) and Rp + chemo (93% and 98%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: G + chemo is projected to be cost-effective versus rituximab biosimilars plus chemotherapy in the United States as first-line treatment for FL, driven by increased QALYs for G + chemo and cost savings from delayed disease progression. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Genentech, a member of the Roche Group. The study sponsor was involved in study design, data interpretation, and writing of the report. All authors approved the decision to submit the report for publication. Spencer and Guzauskas report fees from Genentech during the conduct of the study. Felizzi was employed by F. Hoffmann-La Roche at the time this study was conducted; Launonen is an employees of F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Felizzi and Launonen previously had share ownership in Novartis. Dawson and Masaquel are employees of Genentech, and they have stock options in F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Veenstra reports fees from Genentech, during the conduct of this study and outside of the submitted work. This work was presented, in part, at the AACR Virtual Meeting Advances in Malignant Lymphoma meeting (virtual; August 17-19, 2020) and the SOHO annual meeting (virtual; September 9-12, 2020).

The societal impact of obinutuzumab in the first-line treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma in Germany.

In this study, we assessed the productivity gains associated with the use of obinutuzumab in combination with chemoimmunotherapy (G-chemo) in first-line treatment among follicular lymphoma patients. Health benefits, measured as an increase in progression-free survival, were translated into productivity gains in both paid and unpaid work using gross value added as productivity measure. From 2017 to 2030, 11,870 overall progression-free years can be gained by utilizing obinutuzumab. These progression-free years correspond to undiscounted productivity gains of about €187.9 million in paid work and about €535.9 million in unpaid work. Our study shows that the benefits of the use of obinutuzumab in the first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma extend beyond clinical advantages.

Association of early disease progression and very poor survival in the GALLIUM study in follicular lymphoma: benefit of obinutuzumab in reducing the rate of early progression.

We evaluated early disease progression and its impact on overall survival (OS) in previously untreated follicular lymphoma patients in GALLIUM (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01332968), and investigated the effect on early disease progression of the two randomization arms: obinutuzumab-based versus rituximab-based immunochemotherapy. Cause-specific Cox regression was used to estimate the effect of treatment on the risk of disease progression or death due to disease progression within 24 months of randomization and to analyze OS in patients with or without disease progression after 24 months. Mortality in both groups was analyzed 6, 12, and 18 months post randomization (median follow up, 41 months). Fewer early disease progression events occurred in obinutuzumab (57 out of 601) versus rituximab (98 out of 601) immunochemotherapy patients, with an average risk reduction of 46.0% (95%CI: 25.0-61.1%; cumulative incidence rate 10.1% vs 17.4%). At a median post-progression follow up of 22.6 months, risk of mortality increased markedly following a progression event [HR of time-varying progression status, 25.5 (95%CI: 16.2-40.3)]. Mortality risk was higher the earlier patients progressed within the first 24 months. Age-adjusted HR for OS after 24 months in surviving patients with disease progression versus those without was 12.2 (95%CI: 5.6-26.5). Post-progression survival was similar by treatment arm. In conclusion, obinutuzumab plus chemotherapy was associated with a marked reduction in the rate of early disease progression events relative to rituximab plus chemotherapy. Early disease progression in patients with follicular lymphoma was associated with poor prognosis, with mortality risk higher after earlier progression. Survival post progression did not seem to be influenced by treatment arm.

Health-related quality of life and symptoms in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated in the phase III GADOLIN study with obinutuzumab plus bendamustine versus bendamustine alone.

We present health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from GADOLIN, comparing bendamustine (B) alone or combined with obinutuzumab (G-B) in rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) questionnaire was administered on day 1 of cycles 1, 3, and 5 during treatment, at end of induction (EOI), bi-monthly for 2 years during maintenance/follow-up, and annually during extended follow-up until progression/death. Time to first ≥6-point worsening from baseline in the FACT-Lym trial outcome index (TOI) was estimated. Minimally important differences at individual subscale and total score level were used to define the proportion of patients reporting improvement on the FACT-Lym lymphoma-specific subscale (≥3 points), FACT-Lym TOI (≥6 points), and FACT-Lym total score (≥7 points). Overall, 396 patients were randomized. Analysis was conducted when 175 Independent Review Committee-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) events were observed. Questionnaire completion rates were generally balanced between arms at baseline, EOI, and final follow-up. Median time to ≥6-point worsening from baseline on the FACT-Lym TOI was 8.0 months in the G-B arm and 4.6 months in the B arm (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.98). More G-B patients reported meaningful improvements on the FACT-Lym questionnaire subscales. Results were similar when follicular lymphoma patients were analyzed separately. The delayed time to worsening and greater proportion of patients reporting meaningful improvement in HRQoL in the G-B arm suggest that benefit in PFS is not at the expense of an increase in treatment-related toxicity that could lead to reduced HRQoL.

The single dose pharmacokinetic profile of a novel oral human parathyroid hormone formulation in healthy postmenopausal women.

Parathyroid hormone (PTH), currently the only marketed anabolic treatment for osteoporosis, is available as the full-length hormone, human PTH1-84, or as the human PTH1-34 fragment (teriparatide). Both must be administered as a daily subcutaneous (sc) injection. A new oral formulation of human PTH1-34 (PTH134) is being developed as a more convenient option for patients. In this single-center, partially-blinded, incomplete cross-over study, the safety, tolerability, and exposure of oral PTH134 (teriparatide combined with 2 different quantities of the absorption enhancer 5-CNAC) were assessed in 32 healthy postmenopausal women. 16 subjects were randomized to receive 4 single doses out of 6 different treatments: placebo, teriparatide 20 µg sc, or 1, 2.5, 5 or 10 mg of oral PTH134 formulated with 200 mg 5-CNAC. Subsequently, another 16 subjects were randomized to receive 4 out of 6 different treatments: placebo, teriparatide 20 µg sc, or 2.5 or 5 mg of oral PTH134 formulated with either 100 or 200 mg 5-CNAC. Doses were given ≥6 days apart. All doses of PTH134 were rapidly absorbed, and showed robust blood concentrations in a dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, PTH1-34 disappeared from blood faster after oral than after sc administration. Specifically, 2.5 and 5 mg PTH134 (containing 200 mg 5-CNAC) demonstrated Cmax and AUC0-last values closest to those of sc teriparatide 20 µg (Forsteo®). Mean+/-SD hPTH134 Cmax values were, respectively, 74+/-59, 138+/-101, 717+/-496, and 1624+/-1579 pg/mL for 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg doses of this peptide administered with 200 mg 5-CNAC; while mean+/-SD AUC (0-last) values were, respectively, 30+/-40, 62+/-69, 320+/-269, and 627+/-633 h*pg/mL. The corresponding estimates for teriparatide 20 µg sc were 149+/-35 for Cmax and 236+/-58 for AUC (0-last) Ionized calcium remained within normal limits in all treatment groups except for 3 isolated events. Nine subjects withdrew due to treatment-related AEs. Of those, seven were taking PTH134 2.5 or 5 mg: three withdrew for symptomatic hypotension (two of whom were in the 200 mg 5-CNAC group), three because of delayed vomiting (two from the 200 mg 5-CNAC group), one was proactively withdrawn by the investigator for symptomatic hypercalcemia (receiving 2.5 mg/100 mg 5-CNAC) at slightly supra-normal total calcium but normal ionized serum calcium levels. One subject receiving teriparatide and one receiving placebo withdrew for symptomatic hypotension. No serious AEs were reported. In conclusion, the study demonstrated potential therapeutically relevant PTH1-34 systemic exposure levels after oral administration of PTH1-34 formulated with the absorption enhancer 5-CNAC. Doses of 2.5 and 5 mg of oral PTH134 achieved exposure levels closest to those of teriparatide 20 µg sc, with a comparable incidence of AEs in healthy postmenopausal women.

Use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of exogenous hormones on the incidence of breast cancer has been extensively studied. Most studies regarding hormonal contraception have focused on combined oral contraceptives, and there is paucity of literature regarding nonoral and progestin-only contraceptives. The present study analyzed the relationship between breast cancer and use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. METHODS: This study was based on data gathered from a large postmarketing study on levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system users (n = 17,360) carried out in Finland. The results present an incidence comparison between levonorgestrel system user data and the data on average Finnish female population (derived from the Finnish Cancer Registry), between 30 and 54 years of age. RESULTS: Based on the 95% confidence intervals for the incidences of breast cancer, and the Fisher exact test, there is no indication of a difference between the levonorgestrel system users and average Finnish female population in any of the 5-year age groups. The incidence rate per 100,000 woman-years was for the age groups 30-34 years 27.2 and 25.5, for 35-39 years 74.0 and 49.2, for 40-44 years 120.3 and 122.4, for 45-49 years 203.6 and 232.5, and for 50-54 years 258.5 and 272.6, in the levonorgestrel system group and in Finnish female population, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.