The risk of diarrhea and colitis in patients with lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (icis), including inhibitors of PD-1, PD-L1, and ctla-4, are relatively novel therapies for lung cancer, although their use might be limited by gastrointestinal toxicity. The aim of the present study was to determine the risk of diarrhea and colitis associated with icis in lung cancer and the rates of discontinuation because of those toxicities. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for prospective trials reporting the risk of diarrhea and colitis in patients with lung cancer treated with PD-1, PD-L1, and ctla-4 inhibitors. The incidences of diarrhea and colitis and their grades were assessed clinically using standardized reporting criteria. Pooled incidence and weighted relative risk estimates for diarrhea and colitis with 95% confidence intervals (cis) were estimated using a random effects model. The incidence of discontinuations for gi toxicity was also calculated. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included: sixteen studies with PD-1 inhibitors, nine studies with PD-L1 inhibitors, and four studies combining PD-based strategies with ctla-4 inhibitors. The incidence of all-grade diarrhea was 9.1% (95% ci: 7.8% to 10.5%) for anti-PD-1 therapy and 11.0% (95% ci: 7.5% to 14.5%) for anti-PD-L1 therapy. The incidence of all-grade colitis was 0.9% (95% ci: 0.4% to 1.3%) for anti-PD-1 therapy and 0.4% (95% ci: 0.0% to 0.8%) for anti-PD-L1 therapy. The relative risk for all-grade diarrhea was higher with combination anti-PD-1 and anti-ctla-4 than with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (relative risk: 1.61; 95% ci: 1.14 to 2.29). Anti-PD-1 therapy was discontinued in 4.1% of patients with diarrhea (95% ci: 0.7% to 7.4%) and in 35.7% of those with colitis (95% ci: 0.0% to 81.1%); combination therapy was discontinued in 10.1% of patients with diarrhea (95% ci: 4.8% to 15.4%) and in 39.9% of those with colitis (95% ci: 3.9% to 75.9%). Conclusions: Diarrhea is a relatively frequently encountered gi toxicity when ici therapy is used in lung cancer treatment. Colitis is less frequently encountered, although when it does occur, it often results in therapy discontinuation.

Analyzing the effect of physician assignment in the survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) is the most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with a 5-year survival of 17%. The low survival rate observed in patients with nsclc is primarily attributable to advanced stage of disease at diagnosis, with more than 50% of cases being stage iv at presentation. For patients with advanced disease, palliative systemic therapy can improve overall survival (os); however, a recent review at our institution of more than 500 consecutive cases of advanced nsclc demonstrated that only 55% of the patients received palliative systemic therapy. What is unknown to date is whether that observed low rate of systemic therapy in our previous study is uniform across oncologists. Methods: With ethics approval, we performed a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed patients with stage iv nsclc seen as outpatients at our institution between 2009 and 2012 by 4 different oncologists. Demographics, treatment, and survival data were collected and compared for the 4 oncologists. Results: The 4 oncologists saw 528 patients overall, with D seeing 115; L, 158; R, 137; and M, 118. Significant variation was observed in the proportion receiving 1 line or more of chemotherapy: D, 60%; L, 65%; R, 43%; and M, 52%. Physician assignment was not associated with a difference in median os, with D's cohort having a median os of 6.8 months; L, 8.4 months; R, 7.0 months; and M, 7.0 months. Conclusions: Practice size and proportion of patients treated varied between oncologists, but those differences did not translate into significantly different survival outcomes for patients.

Canadian consensus: oligoprogressive, pseudoprogressive, and oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Little evidence has been generated for how best to manage patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) presenting with rarer clinical scenarios, including oligometastases, oligoprogression, and pseudoprogression. In each of those scenarios, oncologists have to consider how best to balance efficacy with quality of life, while maximizing the duration of each line of therapy and ensuring that patients are still eligible for later options, including clinical trial enrolment. Methods: An expert panel was convened to define the clinical questions. Using case-based presentations, consensus practice recommendations for each clinical scenario were generated through focused, evidence-based discussions. Results: Treatment strategies and best-practice or consensus recommendations are presented, with areas of consensus and areas of uncertainty identified. Conclusions: In each situation, treatment has to be tailored to suit the individual patient, but with the intent of extending and maximizing the use of each line of treatment, while keeping treatment options in reserve for later lines of therapy. Patient participation in clinical trials examining these issues should be encouraged.

Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) IND215: A phase Ib study of Selumetinib in patients with untreated advanced or metastatic NSCLC who are receiving standard chemotherapy regimens.

Introduction Selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886) is a potent inhibitor of MEK1/2, thereby inhibiting phosphorylation of ERK2. We investigated the toxicity and the recommended phase II dose of the combination of selumetinib with two platinum based first line chemotherapy combinations in non-small cell lung cancer. Methods This was a phase I trial of escalating doses of selumetinib with carboplatin (AUC 6), paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) (cohort 1) or pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) (cohort 2) in patients with chemotherapy naïve, advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients enrolled on cohort 2 had non-squamous histology. Dose escalation of selumetinib proceeded using a 3 + 3 design: 50 mg b.i.d. days 2-19 (dose level 1); 75 mg b.i.d. days 2-19 (dose level 2); and 75 mg b.i.d. continuously. Adverse events were evaluated using CTC AE v4 and response by RECIST 1.1. Results Thirty-nine patients were enrolled (cohort 1 n = 16; cohort 2, n = 23). There were no dose limiting toxicities in either cohort and the recommended phase II dose for both regimens was standard doses of carboplatin, paclitaxel or pemetrexed and cisplatin with continuous selumetinib at a dose of 75 mg b.i.d. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 and were predominantly diarrhea, nausea, stomatitis, peripheral edema, neutropenia, and skin rash. Response rate was 37.5% for cohort 1 and 30.4% for cohort 2. Conclusion Selumetinib at a dose of 75 mg b.i.d continuously can be safely combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin or pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. This trial provided the dose for the regimens used in a randomized phase II trial in NSCLC (CCTG IND.219).

Are clinical trial eligibility criteria an accurate reflection of a real-world population of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients?

Background: Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) represents a major health issue globally. Systemic treatment decisions are informed by clinical trials, which, over years, have improved the survival of patients with advanced nsclc. The applicability of clinical trial results to the broad lung cancer population is unclear because strict eligibility criteria in trials generally select for optimal patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all consecutive patients with advanced nsclc seen in outpatient consultation at our academic institution between September 2009 and September 2012, collecting data about patient demographics and cancer characteristics, treatment, and survival from hospital and pharmacy records. Two sets of arbitrary trial eligibility criteria were applied to the cohort. Scenario A stipulated Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ecog ps) 0-1, no brain metastasis, creatinine less than 120 µmol/L, and no second malignancy. Less-strict scenario B stipulated ecog ps 0-2 and creatinine less than 120 µmol/L. We then used the two scenarios to analyze treatment and survival of patients by trial eligibility status. Results: The 528 included patients had a median age of 67 years, with 55% being men and 58% having adenocarcinoma. Of those 528 patients, 291 received at least 1 line of palliative systemic therapy. Using the scenario A eligibility criteria, 73% were trial-ineligible. However, 46% of "ineligible" patients actually received therapy and experienced survival similar to that of the "eligible" treated patients (10.2 months vs. 11.6 months, p = 0.10). Using the scenario B criteria, only 35% were ineligible, but again, the survival of treated patients was similar in the ineligible and eligible groups (10.1 months vs. 10.9 months, p = 0.57). Conclusions: Current trial eligibility criteria are often strict and limit the enrolment of patients in clinical trials. Our results suggest that, depending on the chosen drug, its toxicities and tolerability, eligibility criteria could be carefully reviewed and relaxed.

Algorithm for the treatment of advanced or metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: an evidence-based overview.

The treatment of squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) is evolving. In the past, the backbone of treatment was chemotherapy, with very few other options available. Fortunately, that situation is changing, especially with a better understanding of tumour biology. Various strategies have been tried to improve patient outcomes. The most notable advance must be immunotherapy, which has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for lung cancer in patients without a driver mutation. Immunotherapy is now the treatment of choice in patients who have progressed after chemotherapy and is replacing chemotherapy as upfront therapy in a selected population. Other strategies have also been tried, such as the addition of targeted therapy to chemotherapy. Targeted agents include ramucirumab, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, and necitumumab, a monoclonal antibody against epithelial growth factor receptor. Recently, advances in molecular profiling have also been applied to tumours of squamous histology, in which multiple genetic alterations, including mutations and amplifications, have been described. Research is actively seeking targetable mutations and testing various therapies in the hopes of further improving prognosis for patients with squamous nsclc. Here, we review the various advances in the treatment of squamous nsclc and present a proposed treatment algorithm based on current evidence.

Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial.

Background: In LUX-Lung 7, the irreversible ErbB family blocker, afatinib, significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and objective response rate (ORR) versus gefitinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we present primary analysis of mature overall survival (OS) data. Patients and methods: LUX-Lung 7 assessed afatinib 40 mg/day versus gefitinib 250 mg/day in treatment-naïve patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC and a common EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion/L858R). Primary OS analysis was planned after ∼213 OS events and ≥32-month follow-up. OS was analysed by a Cox proportional hazards model, stratified by EGFR mutation type and baseline brain metastases. Results: Two-hundred and twenty-six OS events had occurred at the data cut-off (8 April 2016). After a median follow-up of 42.6 months, median OS (afatinib versus gefitinib) was 27.9 versus 24.5 months [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66‒1.12, P = 0.2580]. Prespecified subgroup analyses showed similar OS trends (afatinib versus gefitinib) in patients with exon 19 deletion (30.7 versus 26.4 months; HR, 0.83, 95% CI 0.58‒1.17, P = 0.2841) and L858R (25.0 versus 21.2 months; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.62‒1.36, P = 0.6585) mutations. Most patients (afatinib, 72.6%; gefitinib, 76.8%) had at least one subsequent systemic anti-cancer treatment following discontinuation of afatinib/gefitinib; 20 (13.7%) and 23 (15.2%) patients received a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Updated PFS (independent review), TTF and ORR data were significantly improved with afatinib. Conclusion: In LUX-Lung 7, there was no significant difference in OS with afatinib versus gefitinib. Updated PFS (independent review), TTF and ORR data were significantly improved with afatinib. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01466660.

Canadian consensus: inhibition of ALK-positive tumours in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (alk) is an oncogenic driver in non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc). Chromosomal rearrangements involving the ALK gene occur in up to 4% of nonsquamous nsclc patients and lead to constitutive activation of the alk signalling pathway. ALK-positive nsclc is found in relatively young patients, with a median age of 50 years. Patients frequently have brain metastasis. Targeted inhibition of the alk pathway prolongs progression-free survival in patients with ALK-positive advanced nsclc. The results of several recent clinical trials confirm the efficacy and safety benefit of crizotinib and ceritinib in this population. Canadian oncologists support the following consensus statement: All patients with advanced nonsquamous nsclc (excluding pure neuroendocrine carcinoma) should be tested for the presence of an ALK rearrangement. If an ALK rearrangement is present, treatment with a targeted alk inhibitor in the first-line setting is recommended. As patients become resistant to first-generation alk inhibitors, other treatments, including second-generation alk inhibitors can be considered.

A phase I combination dose-escalation study of eribulin mesylate and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumours: a study of the Princess Margaret Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Eribulin mesylate is a synthetic microtubule inhibitor that showed cytotoxic synergy in combination with gemcitabine preclinically. This combination was assessed in a Phase I dose-finding trial in patients diagnosed with advanced solid tumours who had received up to two prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease (CP cohort). METHODS: Dose escalation was performed in a 3+3 design to identify the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Two additional expansion cohorts in women with gynaecologic cancers at the RP2D (G), and further dose escalation of metastatic chemotherapy-naive patients (CN), were evaluated. RESULTS: 45 patients were treated: 21 (CP), 10 (G) and 14 (CN). The initial combination of eribulin and gemcitabine was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle; however, due to 2 out of 6 dose-limiting haematological toxicities at the first dose level, a reduced dose-intense schedule was assessed. The RP2D was defined at 1.0 mg m(-2) eribulin and 1000 mg m(-2) gemcitabine day 1 and 8 q3 weeks. No other significant toxicities were observed in the G expansion cohort. Neutropenia prevented further dose escalation in the CN cohort. Objective responses were seen in all three cohorts - 2/21 (CP), 1/10 (G) and 2/14 (CN). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of eribulin and gemcitabine was well tolerated at the RP2D.

Randomised, double-blind trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with daily oral cediranib or placebo in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: NCIC Clinical Trials Group study BR29.

INTRODUCTION: This randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study evaluated the addition of cediranib, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1-3, to standard carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients received paclitaxel (200mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the concentration time curve 6) intravenously every 3 weeks. Daily oral cediranib/placebo 20mg was commenced day 1 of cycle 1 and continued as monotherapy after completion of 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy. The primary end-point of the study was overall survival (OS). The trial would continue to full accrual if an interim analysis (IA) for progression-free survival (PFS), performed after 170 events of progression or death in the first 260 randomised patients, revealed a hazard ratio (HR) for PFS of ⩽ 0.70. RESULTS: The trial was halted for futility at the IA (HR for PFS 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.20, p = 0.45). A final analysis was performed on all 306 enrolled patients. The addition of cediranib increased response rate ([RR] 52% versus 34%, p = 0.001) but did not significantly improve PFS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71-1.18, p = 0.49) or OS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.30, p=0.72). Cediranib patients had more grade 3 hypertension, diarrhoea and anorexia. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cediranib 20mg daily to carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy increased RR and toxicity, but not survival.

A phase II trial of dacomitinib, an oral pan-human EGF receptor (HER) inhibitor, as first-line treatment in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: An open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial was conducted to investigate the clinical activity of dacomitinib in recurrent/metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (RM-SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were administered dacomitinib at 45 mg orally daily, in 21-day cycles. Primary end point was objective response rate. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were enrolled with a median age of 62 years. Among response-evaluable patients, 8 [12.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.6% to 23.5%] achieved a partial response and 36 (57.1%) had stable disease, lasting ≥24 weeks in 9 patients (14.3%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.1 weeks and the median overall survival (OS) was 34.6 weeks. Most adverse events (AEs) were tolerable. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related AEs were diarrhea (15.9%), acneiform dermatitis (8.7%), and fatigue (8.7%). Treatment-related AEs led to at least one dose interruption in 28 (40.6%) patients and dose reductions in 26 (37.7%). Permanent treatment discontinuation occurred in 8 (11.6%) patients due to treatment-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Dacomitinib demonstrated clinical activity in RM-SCCHN, and the primary end point of this study was met. The toxicity profile of this agent was generally manageable with dose interruptions and adjustments.

A phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of sunitinib in combination with pemetrexed in patients with advanced solid malignancies, with an expanded cohort in non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this phase I dose-escalation study was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sunitinib plus pemetrexed in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, patients received oral sunitinib qd by continuous daily dosing (CDD schedule; 37.5 or 50 mg) or 2 weeks on/1 week off treatment schedule (Schedule 2/1; 50 mg). Pemetrexed (300-500 mg/m(2) IV) was administered q3w. At the proposed recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), additional patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled on the CDD schedule and seven on Schedule 2/1. MTDs were sunitinib 37.5 mg/day (CDD/RP2D) or 50 mg/day (Schedule 2/1) with pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicities included grade (G) 5 cerebral hemorrhage, G3 febrile neutropenia, and G3 anorexia. Common G3/4 drug-related non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) at the CDD MTD included fatigue, anorexia, and hand-foot syndrome. G3/4 hematologic AEs included lymphopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. No significant drug-drug interactions were identified. Five (24%) NSCLC patients had partial responses. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced solid malignancies, the MTD of sunitinib plus 500 mg/m(2) pemetrexed was 37.5 mg/day (CDD schedule) or 50 mg/day (Schedule 2/1). The CDD schedule MTD was tolerable and demonstrated promising clinical benefit in NSCLC.

Treatment-emergent hypertension and outcomes in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy with or without the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor cediranib: NCIC Clinical Trials Group Study BR24.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension (HTN), a recognized adverse effect of angiogenesis inhibitors, may be a potential biomarker of activity of these agents. We conducted a retrospective analysis to examine the incidence and predictors of the development of on-treatment HTN with the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor cediranib, and the relationship of this adverse event with treatment outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: BR24 was a double-blind placebo-controlled phase II trial of carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy with either daily oral cediranib or placebo in patients (n = 296) with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Exploratory analyses characterized relationships between HTN, baseline variables, and efficacy outcomes. RESULTS: New onset or worsening of preexisting HTN (treatment-emergent HTN) was more frequent in patients receiving cediranib (68 versus 45%, P < 0.0001). Factors associated with HTN in all randomized patients were good performance status and treatment with cediranib. In both arms, treatment-emergent HTN was associated with improved efficacy outcomes, but there was no evidence of a differential treatment effect, with nonsignificant interaction P values. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced NSCLC, HTN is frequent in patients receiving chemotherapy, with or without cediranib. The development of HTN was favorably prognostic in these patients, but not predictive of a differential outcome with cediranib.

The impact of anemia on outcome of chemoradiation for limited small-cell lung cancer: a combined analysis of studies of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: Associations between anemia and outcomes of chemoradiation have been documented in several malignancies, but few data exist for limited small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). This combined analysis of 652 patients in two randomized clinical trials in LD-SCLC carried out by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group was undertaken to explore the relationship between anemia at baseline and anemia arising during therapy, and outcomes of chemoradiation in this cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The relationships between overall survival and local control with hemoglobin levels at baseline and those arising during therapy (nadir hemoglobin (Hb) and maximum percentage drop from baseline values) were explored. RESULTS: No Hb parameter was associated with either outcome. Baseline anemia was found in one-third of patients, was more common in males, in those with a poorer performance status and those with an elevated lactate dehydrogenase; all of these latter factors were associated with shorter survival. A trend towards improved local control in patients with the greatest drop in their Hb did not remain significant in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Anemia is common in patients with LD-SCLC. Anemia at diagnosis may have a different prognostic implication than that arising during therapy, and correction of anemia may have no impact on outcomes.

Phase I and pharmacological study of two schedules of the antifolate edatrexate in combination with cisplatin.

The antifolate edatrexate has shown moderate activity against cancers of the head and neck and non-small cell lung cancer, as has cisplatin. Edatrexate demonstrates synergy with cisplatin in transplanted tumor models. This Phase I study was designed to evaluate two schedules of administration of cisplatin in combination with escalating doses of edatrexate, in a population consisting mainly of patients with these two cancers. The starting dose of edatrexate was 40 mg/m2. Dose escalation was to occur in 10-mg/m2 increments; the planned maximum dose level for study was 80 mg/m2. A total of 39 patients were registered. Eleven were treated on schedule A: cisplatin 120 mg/m2 every 4 weeks, and edatrexate weekly. Twenty-eight patients were assigned to schedule B: cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and edatrexate, both given every 2 weeks. On schedule A, the maximum tolerated dose of weekly edatrexate was 40 mg/m2, with dose-limiting toxicities of leukopenia, mucositis, and renal insufficiency. On schedule B, the maximum tolerated dose of biweekly edatrexate was 80 mg/m2, with leukopenia and mucositis as dose limiting. For schedule A, pharmacokinetic studies suggested a possible effect of cisplatin on the day 8 clearance of edatrexate. Studies on patients on schedule B did not show a clear effect of cisplatin on the day 15 edatrexate clearance. On schedule A, 5 of 9 evaluable patients had major responses (1 complete); whereas on schedule B, 8 of 25 patients had major responses (1 complete). Responses were seen in both head and neck and non-small cell lung cancer patients. For Phase II studies, use of cisplatin 60 mg/m2 and edatrexate 80 mg/m2, both given biweekly, is recommended.

Single-agent docetaxel (Taxotere) in the treatment of advanced non small-cell lung cancer: clinical concepts and commentary.

Chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been shown to im-prove quality of life, and to provide a modest prolongation of survival. Docetaxel is a semisynthetic taxane that is an active agent for the treatment of NSCLC, both in previously untreated patients as well as those who have relapsed or progressed following cisplatin-based chemotherapy. After encouraging results in phase II studies, randomized trials have shown that treatment with single-agent docetaxel is superior to best supportive care for advanced NSCLC in both untreated and previously treated patients. This article will review the published data on the use of single-agent docetaxel in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.