Factors Affecting Patient Safety in Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospital: A Multidisciplinary Perspective.

Patient safety (PS) is of special importance in Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospital (IRH). Few studies have assessed the factors affecting PS in IRH. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the factors affecting PS based on the experiences of the rehabilitation team in an IRH. This qualitative study was conducted using the conventional content analysis approach in 2020-2021. The participants were 16 members of the rehabilitation team. They were purposively selected from Rofaydeh rehabilitation hospital, Tehran, Iran. Data collection was performed through semi-structured interviews and was continued up to data saturation. The mean age of the participants was 37.31 ± 8.68 years and their mean work experience was 8.75 years. The factors affecting PS in IRH were classified into five main categories, namely shortage of organizational resources, inappropriate physical environment of the IRH, inappropriate PS culture, patients' and their caregivers' limited participation in safety programs, and poor fall prevention programs. The results of this study revealed the factors affecting PS in IRH. Accurate identification of the influential factors on PS can help healthcare providers, managers, and policymakers use multi-component interventions to improve PS culture and increase PS in IRHs. Action research studies are also recommended to determine the main components of such interventions.

Outcomes at 3 Months of a Place and Active Hold Method of Flexor Tendon Rehabilitation Following Zone II Injury.

Background: Previous studies have shown that outcomes following a place and active hold (PAH) are better than a passive flexion protocol after a two-strand core-suture repair of flexor tendons injuries in zone II. This study aims to determine the outcomes of a PAH protocol of flexor tendon rehabilitation following a four-strand core-suture plus an epitendinous suture repair of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) combined with a simple horizontal loop repair of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS). Methods: This is a prospective study of patients with complete injury to both flexor tendons in zone II. All tendons were repaired with a simple horizontal loop for FDS and four-strand core-suture plus epitendinous suture for FDP. The PAH protocol was used postoperatively for 6 weeks. The outcome was evaluated using flexion contracture and total active motion (TAM), interpreted using Strickland criteria and categorised as excellent, good, fair and poor at 6 weeks and 3 months. The linear regression model was used to determine predictors of outcomes. Results: The study included 32 patients with flexor tendon injury in 46 fingers. No repairs ruptured, and 24 (52%) digits achieved good or excellent motion 6 weeks after surgery using the Strickland criteria. According to the Strickland criteria, 41 (89%) digits ranked as excellent and good with no poor result at a 3-month follow-up. Four patients had 5-10° of flexion contracture. Age was the predictor of TAM at 6 weeks and accounted for 13% of its variation. Improvement of TAM from 6 weeks to 3 months was related to age and flexion contracture at 6 weeks. Conclusions: The PAH protocol can be considered a safe technique for flexor rehabilitation after four-strand core-suture repair of FDP in zone II. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Changes in functional independence after inpatient rehabilitation in patients with spinal cord injury: A simultaneous evaluation of prognostic factors.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the improvements of functional independence following inpatient rehabilitation and compare those improvements between different levels and severities of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Prognostic factors affecting the patient's outcomes were also studied. SETTINGS: Rofeideh Rehabilitation Hospital. OUTCOME MEASURES: Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM III), and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). METHOD: In this retrospective cohort study, 180 patients with SCI were enrolled to record their functional independence upon admission and discharge, and the changes were compared between different levels and severities of injury using non-parametric tests. The prognostic factors of outcomes were studied by generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis. RESULTS: The independence changes were significant for all the severities (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS)) and levels of injury except for the patients with AIS A and B at upper cervical levels (P < 0.05). The level of injury, AIS, Length of Stay (LOS), and pressure ulcer had a significant prognostic value on patient's outcomes. Furthermore, there was a significant difference between different levels of injury with the same AIS grade in functional improvement (P < 0.05), while there was a significant difference between AIS groups with the same level of injury only at upper and middle cervical lesions (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Recording the values of functional independence before and after rehabilitation in individuals with SCI can help clinicians approximately expect the outcomes of future patients. Moreover, a deeper study of the prognostic factors can provide a more logical expectation of rehabilitation outcomes.

Persian version of the LANSS and S-LANSS questionnaires: A study for cultural adaptation and validation.

The aim of this study was to culturally adapt and validate Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANSS) and self-report LANSS (S-LANSS) tools. Patients with chronic pain (n = 206) were categorized into neuropathic pain (NeP) (n = 101) or non-NeP (n = 105). After the translation process, both questionnaires and the Persian Douleur Neuropathique 4 (P-DN4) were administered to patients to assess the clinometric properties. The mean overall score of both tools was significantly higher in the NeP group (p < 0.01). Test-retest reliability analysis of the overall score of the Persian (P)-LANSS and PS-LANSS were 0.99 and 0.98, respectively. α-Cronbach value for P-LANSS and PS-LANSS were 0.64 and 0.61, respectively. Factor analysis of both questionnaires yielded two components explaining most of the observable variance. The P-LANSS was significantly correlated with PS-LANSS and P-DN4 (ρ = 0.92, p = 0.01, for both). PS-LANSS was also significantly correlated with P-DN4 (ρ = 0.79, p = 0.01). Both tools successfully diagnosed NeP patients at the cutoff point of ≥12 with 88.12% sensitivity and 76.19% specificity for P-LANSS and 83.17% sensitivity and 95.24% specificity for PS-LANSS. P-LANSS and PS-LANSS are reliable and valid tools to identify NeP component in chronic pain patients. PS-LANSS was found to be an acceptable alternative for P-LANSS.

Investigate the Effect of Psychological Factors in Development of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I in Patients with Fracture of the Distal Radius: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the role of psychological factors (anxiety and depression) and pain measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) in the development of complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) following the distal radius fracture (DRF). METHODS: A consecutive sample of patients (N=60) with a distal radius fracture was measured for signs of CRPS by Budapest criteria weekly till 8 weeks and then another follow-up one year after injury to determine the incidence and predictors of developing CRPS I in a prospective cohort study and also to discover whether there is difference between pain, depression, and anxiety level in the patients with and without CRPS I. The most of the patients were treated by Pin stabilization. The Beck depression inventoryshort form (BDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Numerical pain rating scale were used to determine the patients' psychological features and pain intensity at the base line and 8 weeks after the fracture. RESULTS: CRPS I developed in 15 (25%) patients after eight weeks and just last in 10 (16.67%) patients after one year. No difference was found between the two groups (CRPS and non-CRPS group) in terms of state (STAI-I) and trait (STAI-II) anxiety, and BDI score. Pain at the base line was the most important risk factor in developing CRPS (odds ratio [OR] =1.52; 95% CI). CONCLUSIONS: After fracturing the distal radius, patients who have high pain intensity have a higher risk of developing CRPS I. To following these patients closely for the development of CRPS I may be advantageous for early preventative and therapeutic interventions.

Using the Rasch Model to Develop a Measure of Participation Capturing the Full Range of Participation Characteristics for the Patients with Hand Injuries.

Objective The purpose of this paper was to report on the first step in the development of a new instrument to measure participation including the full range of its characteristics. Methods The 30-item participation behavior questionnaire (PBQ) was developed from four main sources (a literature review of the theatrical basis of participation, available participation measures, and interviews with patients and experts about participation). Item selection and the reliability and validity of the measure were explored using Rasch measurement modeling for analysis. Participants A total of 404 individuals referred to rehabilitation after hand, wrist, or upper extremity surgery to reduce impairment from trauma, at least 2 months post-injury. Results An initial pool of 100 items; reflecting 14 characteristics of participation was initially reduced to 91 items after review by 15 participation experts and then further reduced to 30 items by three rounds of Rasch analysis removing misfitting items. The final PBQ has a person reliability of 0.91 with separation of 3.22, indicating it can reliably differentiate four levels of participation. There are no misfitting items and the instrument is unidimensional. All 14 characteristics of participation were retained in the PBQ, and none of the 30 items refer specifically to upper extremity issues. Conclusion The 30 participation behavior items of the PBQ show promise of being a psychometrically sound measure of participation. Further research is needed to validate the PBQ in samples of people with a range of other disabilities.

Are the Domains Considered by ICF Comprehensive Enough to Conceptualize Participation in the Patient with Hand Injuries?

Background Although participation is a core concept in multiple models of disability, there is no consensus on its definition. Objective The aim of this study was to extract participation domains based on review of theories, available outcome measures, and interviews with experts and the person with hand injuries to compare with the ICF domains of participation. Methods A qualitative approach using a deductive content analysis was employed to extend definitions of participation from theories. Later on, inductive qualitative method using semistructured interview with five experts in different fields and 30 patients with different hand injuries was used. Coding was performed with extracted domains from the content of data, and finally, the extracted domains were compared with the ICF domains of participation. Results Some of the extracted domains were not considered in ICF. Conclusion Subjective participation is the main forbearance part. Role, leisure, domestic life, environment, and others are also main missing meanings. This limitation can hinder measuring disability and health.

Exploring the Relation Between Impairment Rating by AMA Guide and Activity and Participation Based on ICF in the Patients with Hand Injuries.

The aim of this paper is to analyze the relation between components of disability with distinguished score of impairment, activity and participation questionnaire based on clinical data of persons with hand injuries. Impairment was evaluated by use of AMA guide 6th edition and disability by DASH questionnaire on Convenience sample of patients (N = 117), with chronic hand injuries. Linking and allocating items of the DASH were done based on the ICF Core Set for Hand Conditions and the opinions of a group of experts from different related fields. Data was analyses by using Kappa index, Chi square test and a set of Pearson, Part and Partial correlations coefficient. Most of the DASH items were allocated to the activity; one to four of the items could not be classified and 0 to 22 were classified as having overlap. Participation and activity scores correlated positively with each other (r > 0.80). Impairment had high correlation with activity and participation scores (>73). With controlling the effect of each or both construct, this relation between them with impairment diminished but still significant between activity and impairment. There is a huge overlap in definition of activity and participation. The most effecting item in relation of disability and impairment is activity restriction. Participation had no relation with impairment.

Does Disability Correlate With Impairment After Hand Injury?

BACKGROUND: Any loss or deviation in body function and structure is considered impairment, whereas limitations on activities are fundamental to the definition of disability. Although it seems intuitive that the two should be closely related, this might not be the case; there is some evidence that psychosocial factors are more important determinants of disability than are objective impairments. However, the degree to which this is the case has been incompletely explored. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to determine if disability (as measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] and the Michigan Hand Questionnaire [MHQ]) and pain intensity correlate with impairment (as measured by the American Medical Association [AMA] impairment guide). Secondary study questions addressed the effect of pain intensity and symptom of depression on predicting disability. METHODS: Impairment and disability were evaluated in a sample of 107 hand-injured patients a mean of 11 months after injury. Impairment rating was performed prospectively. From the patients who came for therapy, they were invited to fill out the questionnaire and evaluated for impairment rating. Response variables of DASH, MHQ, and visual analog scale pain intensity values were collected at the same setting. Other explanatory variables included demographic, injury-related, and psychological factors (symptoms of depression measured with the Beck Depression Inventory). Initial bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine correlations of disability and pain to impairment rating and other exploratory variables. RESULTS: Disability as measured by the DASH showed intermediate correlation with AMA impairment (r = 0 .38, beta = 0.36, p = 0.000). Together with gender, it accounted for only 22% of the variability in DASH scores. Similarly, MHQ score correlated with impairment rating (r = -0.24, beta = -0.23, p < 0.05). However, together with age, injured hand accounted for only 19% of the variability in MHQ scores. However, pain intensity did not correlate with impairment (r = -0.46, p > 0.05). Interestingly, pain intensity did correlate with the time passed from surgery but it was correlated with symptom of depression (r(2) = 0.10, beta = 0.33, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The limited correlation between impairment and disability emphasizes the importance of factors other than pathophysiology in human illness behavior. These may include physical (pain, dominant injured hand) and conditional factors (time since surgery) or psychological factors such as depression and adapting; all mentioned can be considered as personal factors that may be different in each patient. So considering personal difference and any other condition except the impairment alone can help to better plan interventions and also diminish disability level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

The effect of new method of suspension on quality of life, satisfaction, and suspension in patients with finger prostheses.

BACKGROUND: The use of a finger prosthesis following finger amputation is a common approach that is linked to many factors. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a new method of suspension on quality of life, satisfaction, and suspension in these patients. STUDY DESIGN: Quasi-experimental. METHOD: A total of 24 patients with finger amputation and 12 healthy subjects as control group participated in this study. Two types of finger prostheses with conventional suction suspension and new method suspension were provided. A force gauge was used to evaluate suspension force along with a World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF questionnaire instrument. Satisfaction of the prosthesis was also evaluated using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: There was significant difference in quality of life assessment between the patient group and healthy control group, but there was no statistical difference (p > 0.05) between the two patients groups at baseline and after prosthesis use. Using finger prosthesis improved all domains after prosthesis wearing in patients with finger amputations. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two types of prosthesis in terms of suspension and satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Wearing the prosthesis with the new method of suspension had an effective role in terms of providing suspension and an increase in satisfaction in patients with finger amputation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients with finger amputation usually use a prosthesis with a simple suspension technique, yet many of these patients experience atrophy and subsequently loss of appropriate suspension. This paper presents a new method of suspension and showed that using this approach improved satisfaction and suspension in patients with finger amputation.

Evaluation of Non Diseased Specified Outcome Measures in Hand Injuries to Assess Activity and Participation Based on ICF Content.

The objective of the study is to provide information about non disease specified outcome measures which evaluate disability in patients who have impairments in hand and upper extremity and to find the extent to which they are evaluating "disability" based on ICF hand Core Set (activity limitation and participation restriction). MEDLINE, CINAHL, GOOGLE SCHOLAR , OVID and SCIENCE DIRECT databases were systematically searched for studies on non disease specified outcome measures used to evaluate upper extremity function; only studies written in English were considered. We reviewed titles and abstracts of the identified studies to determine whether the studies met predefined eligibility criteria (eg, non disease specified out come measures used in hand injured patients). All the outcome measures which had eligibility included. After full text review ,7 non disease specified outcome measures in hand were identified. Studies were extracted, and the information retrieved from them. All the outcome measures which had incuded, were linked with ICF hand core set disability part (activity and participation). All of them only linked to 16 (42 %) components of ICF hand Core Set, which were most activity and less participation from ICF. None of the non disease specified out come measures in hand injuries cover all domains of disability from the ICF Hand Core Set.

A prospective randomized controlled trial of controlled passive mobilization vs. place and active hold exercises after zone 2 flexor tendon repair.

PURPOSE: The rehabilitation program after flexor tendon repair of zone II laceration varies. We designed a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of controlled passive mobilization (modified Kleinert) vs. Place and active hold exercises after zone 2-flexor tendon repair by two-strand suture (Modified kessler). METHODS: Sixty-four fingers in 54 patients with zone 2 flexor tendon modified Kessler repairs were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing place and active hold exercises to controlled passive mobilization (modified Kleinert). The primary outcome measure was total active motion eight weeks after repair as measured by an independent and blinded therapist. RESULTS: Patients treated with place and active hold exercises had significantly greater total active motion (146) eight weeks after surgery than patients treated with controlled passive mobilization (114) (modified Klinert). There were no ruptures in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Place and hold achieves greater motion than controlled passive mobilization after a two-strand repair for zone 2 flexor tendon repairs.

A custom-made neoprene thumb carpometacarpal orthosis with thermoplastic stabilization: an orthosis that promotes function and improvement in patients with the first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Patients with mild to moderate first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis report pain, a reduction in pinch and grip strength and hand function. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of a custom-made neoprene thumb carpometacarpal orthosis with thermoplastic stabilization on pain, function, grip strength, and key pinch in these patients. TECHNIQUE: A total of 11 volunteer patients participated in this study. All the above-mentioned parameters were evaluated at baseline and also 30, 60, and 90 days after using the splint. DISCUSSION: A decrease in pain was observed after 30 days, and this continued to improve during treatment with the splint. After 90 days of using the splint, grip strength was improved. Function and pinch strength also increased significantly and was maintained during the study period compared to baseline. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A custom-made neoprene thumb carpometacarpal orthosis with thermoplastic stabilization may be a suitable conservative approach for the treatment of first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.