Bridging Fixed Dose to Body Weight-based Regimen of Adalimumab in Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis Using a Pharmacometric Modelling Approach: Case Study with the Phase 3 ENVISION I Trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Phase 3 study ENVISION I demonstrated efficacy and safety of adalimumab in paediatric patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. The protocol-specified high-dose adalimumab regimen was numerically more efficacious than the standard-dose regimen. The objective of this work was to bridge a fixed-dosing regimen to the protocol-specified high-induction/high-maintenance, body weight-based dosing regimen studied in ENVISION I, using a pharmacometrics modelling and simulation approach. METHODS: A stepwise strategy was implemented, including developing an adalimumab paediatric population pharmacokinetic model; using this model to determine a fixed-dosing regimen in paediatric ulcerative colitis patients which achieves similar concentrations to those observed in ENVISION I patients; determining adalimumab exposure-response relationship using population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model and data from ENVISION I; simulating clinical remission rate in paediatric ulcerative colitis patients using the Markov exposure-response model and the dosing regimen determined to provide similar efficacy to that observed in ENVISION I. RESULTS: Both developed population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models adequately described the observed data. Adalimumab exposure was identified as a significant predictor of clinical remission at Week 8 based on logistic regression [p <0.01]. Simulated efficacy suggested that the fixed-dosing regimen performs similarly to the more efficacious dosing regimen used in ENVISION I, by providing comparable clinical remission per Partial Mayo Score response rates over time. No relationship between adalimumab exposure and adverse events was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model supports the appropriateness of the use of the fixed-dosing regimen in the paediatric ulcerative colitis population.

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (ENVISION I): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Biologic treatment options are limited for children with ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of adalimumab in children with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: The double-blind ENVISION I study was done at 24 hospitals in ten countries. Children (4-17 years) with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis despite stable doses of concurrent treatment with oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressants were enrolled. Per the original study design, patients were randomly assigned with an Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) to receive either high-dose induction adalimumab (2·4 mg/kg [maximum 160 mg] at weeks 0 and 1) or standard-dose induction adalimumab (2·4 mg/kg at week 0 and placebo at week 1); both groups received 1·2 mg/kg (maximum 80 mg) at week 2 and 0·6 mg/kg (maximum 40 mg) at weeks 4 and 6. Patients with partial Mayo score (PMS) response at week 8 (defined as a decrease of two or more points and a decrease of ≥30% from baseline in PMS) were randomly assigned (2:2:1)-using IVRS-to receive either high-dose maintenance adalimumab (0·6 mg/kg weekly), standard-dose maintenance adalimumab (0·6 mg/kg every other week), or placebo up to week 52 (random assignment to the placebo group was ceased mid-trial, as was randomisation in the induction phase with all subsequent patients receiving open-label high-dose induction adalimumab). Coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients with PMS remission at week 8 (intent-to-treat [ITT]-E population, not including those patients who were not randomised in the induction phase) and full Mayo score (FMS) remission at week 52 in week 8 PMS responders (maintenance ITT-E [mITT-E] population), for which the pooled adalimumab group (patients who received high-dose or standard-dose adalimumab) and the individual dose groups were compared against external adult placebo rates. We report results of the final confirmatory analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02065557. FINDINGS: 93 children were recruited between Oct 13, 2014, and Sept 5, 2018, to the main study (77 [83%] were randomly assigned [double-blind] to receive high-dose or standard-dose induction adalimumab; 16 [17%] received open-label high-dose induction adalimumab after study design change). At week 8, 74 (80%) children who were PMS responders continued to the maintenance period. 62 (84%) patients were randomly assigned to receive high-dose or standard-dose maintenance adalimumab treatment; 12 (16%) patients received placebo. In patients in the ITT-E population who were randomly assigned to receive high-dose induction adalimumab, a significantly higher proportion of patients were in PMS remission at week 8 (28 [60%] of 47) compared with external placebo (19·8%; p=0·0001). 13 (43%) of 30 patients in the standard-dose induction adalimumab group were in PMS remission at week 8 versus an external placebo rate of 19·8%, but this difference was not significant (p=0·38). Similarly, FMS remission at week 52 in children who were week 8 PMS responders was reported in a significantly higher proportion of patients in mITT-E population who received high-dose maintenance adalimumab (14 [45%] of 31 patients) versus external placebo at week 52 (18·4%; p=0·0001). Nine (29%) of 31 patients in the standard-dose maintenance adalimumab group were in FMS remission at week 52 versus an external placebo rate of 18·4%, but this difference was not significant (p=0·38). Remission rates in the pooled adalimumab groups were significantly better compared with external placebo (PMS remission at week 8: 41 [53%] of 77 patients; p<0·0001; FMS remission at week 52: 23 [37%] of 62 patients; p=0·0001). 21 (23%) of 93 patients in the main study had one or more treatment-emergent serious adverse events during any adalimumab exposure. The most common adverse events were headache, anaemia, and ulcerative colitis flare during the induction period and ulcerative colitis flare, headache, and nasopharyngitis during the maintenance period. INTERPRETATION: Clinically meaningful rates of remission and response were reported in children who received adalimumab in this study. No new safety signals were observed, suggesting that adalimumab is an efficacious and safe treatment option for children with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. FUNDING: AbbVie.

Rapid Changes in Laboratory Parameters and Early Response to Adalimumab: A Pooled Analysis From Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in Two Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The efficacy and safety of adalimumab for induction and maintenance of clinical remission in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis were demonstrated in the ULTRA 1 and 2 clinical trials. This post-hoc, pooled analysis evaluated early changes in laboratory parameters, Mayo subscores, mucosal healing, and health-related quality of life. METHODS: Mean changes in laboratory parameters including albumin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, total protein, haematocrit, haemoglobin, red blood cell and platelet counts, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, and Short Form 36 Health Survey were evaluated from baseline to Weeks 4 and 8. Mean changes in Mayo subscores of rectal bleeding and stool frequency were evaluated from baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. Mucosal healing was assessed with endoscopy at baseline and Week 8. Categorical variables were evaluated with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test; continuous variables were evaluated with analysis of covariance and considered significant if p <0.05. RESULTS: Treatment with adalimumab significantly improved laboratory and quality-of-life measures at Weeks 4 and 8 compared with placebo [p <0.05 and p <0.001]. Mean reductions from baseline in rectal bleeding and stool frequency were significantly larger in patients receiving adalimumab compared with placebo at Week 2 and sustained through Week 8 [p <0.01]. Normal mucosa at Week 8 was achieved by 13% of patients receiving adalimumab compared with 6% of those receiving placebo [p <0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab resulted in rapid improvements in laboratory markers and early reductions in rectal bleeding and stool frequency. Early improvement in quality-of-life scores correlated with the clinical and laboratory findings.

The effects of concomitant immunomodulators on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of adalimumab in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease: a post hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the IMAgINE 1 study, adalimumab induced and maintained remission of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease in children. AIM: To assess the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and safety of immunomodulator and adalimumab combination therapy vs adalimumab monotherapy in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS: Patients 6-17 years old with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (n = 192) received weight-based adalimumab induction at baseline and week 2. At week 4, 188 patients were randomised to high-dose or low-dose adalimumab. Patients receiving immunomodulators (investigator's decision) at baseline maintained a stable dose until week 26; patients could then discontinue immunomodulators. Adalimumab serum concentrations were measured at weeks 4, 26 and 52. Safety was evaluated at each study visit. Data were analysed using non-responder imputation (NRI; week 4) or modified NRI (weeks 26; 52). RESULTS: At week 4, patients with (n = 117) and without (n = 71) baseline immunomodulator use had similar response (79%; 87%; P = 0.235) and remission (26%; 30%; P = 0.737) rates. At week 26, patients with and without baseline immunomodulators had no significant difference in response (68%; 55%; P = 0.086) or remission (41%; 30%; P = 0.122). At week 52, patients with (n = 82) and without (n = 106) immunomodulator use had no significant difference in response (56%; 46%; P = 0.189) or remission (38%; 33%; P = 0.539). Adalimumab serum trough concentrations and serious infection rates (7%; 6%) were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses found no statistically significant difference in response or remission between patients receiving adalimumab monotherapy vs immunomodulator and adalimumab combination therapy. Serious and infectious adverse event rates were similar between groups.

Efficacy and Safety of Dose Escalation to Adalimumab 80 mg Every Other Week in Japanese Patients with Crohn's Disease Who Lost Response to Maintenance Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Dose escalation is often recommended for loss of response in anti-TNFα-treated patients with Crohn's disease (CD). This 52-week phase 3, multicenter study investigated the efficacy and safety of escalation to adalimumab 80 mg every other week (EOW) in Japanese patients with CD who lost response to maintenance adalimumab 40 mg EOW. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients aged ≥15 years with moderately to severely active CD who had previously attained and subsequently lost clinical response to maintenance ada limumab received open-label adalimumab 80 mg EOW during weeks 0-50. Loss of response was defined as CD activity index (CDAI) ≥200, increases in CDAI ≥50 from minimum observed value, and C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥1 mg/dL at screening. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a CDAI decrease ≥50 (CR-50) from baseline at week 8. RESULTS: At weeks 8 and 52, 75.0 and 57.1$ of patients achieved CR-50 and 25.0 and 35.7$ achieved clinical remission (CDAI < 150), respectively; median CRP changes from baseline were -0.39 and -0.77 mg/dL, respectively. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab dose escalation to 80 mg EOW improved CD activity in patients who had lost response to maintenance adalimumab, with no new safety signals. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01958827.).

Safety of Adalimumab in Pediatric Patients with Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Enthesitis-Related Arthritis, Psoriasis, and Crohn's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of adalimumab in pediatric patients who participated in clinical trials of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis and pediatric enthesitis-related arthritis), psoriasis, and Crohn's disease. STUDY DESIGN: This analysis included data from 7 global, randomized, and open-label AbbVie-sponsored clinical trials of adalimumab and their open-label extensions conducted between September 2002 and December 31, 2015 (cutoff date for ongoing studies). Patients who received ≥1 dose of adalimumab subcutaneously were included. Adverse events that occurred after the first dose of adalimumab and up to 70 days (5 half-lives) after the last dose were reported and events per 100 patient-years were calculated. RESULTS: The analysis included 577 pediatric patients, representing 1440.7 patient-years of adalimumab exposure. Across indications, the most commonly reported adverse events (events/100 patient-years) were upper respiratory tract infections (24.3), nasopharyngitis (17.3), and headache (19.9). Serious infections (4.0 events/100 patient-years) were the most frequent serious adverse events across indications; the most commonly reported was pneumonia (0.6 events/100 patient-years). Serious infection rates were 2.7, 0.8, and 6.6 events/100 patient-years in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriasis, and Crohn's disease, respectively. No events of malignancies were reported. One death (accidental fall) occurred in a patient with psoriasis. CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of adalimumab in pediatric patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, psoriasis, and Crohn's disease was generally similar across indications; no new safety signals were identified in the treatment of pediatric patients with adalimumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00048542, NCT00775437, NCT00690573, NCT01166282, NCT01251614, NCT00409682, and NCT00686374.

Efficacy of Adalimumab for Treatment of Perianal Fistula in Children with Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease: Results from IMAgINE 1 and IMAgINE 2.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adalimumab has been shown to be more effective than placebo in healing fistulae in adults with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. The efficacy and safety of adalimumab in healing fistulae in children/adolescents with Crohn's disease from the 52-week IMAgINE 1 clinical trial, and its open-label extension IMAgINE 2, are reported. METHODS: Children/adolescents with perianal fistulae at baseline of IMAgINE 1 were assessed for fistula closure and improvement during IMAgINE 1 [Weeks 0-52] and from Week 0 of IMAgINE 2 [Week 52 of IMAgINE 1] through to Week 240 of IMAgINE 2 using non-responder imputation. RESULTS: A total of 36 children/adolescents had fistulae at baseline of IMAgINE 1 and were included in the analysis. Fistula closure and improvement were observed in 44.4% and 52.8%, respectively, at Week 12. Rates of closure and improvement were maintained throughout the analysis period to Week 292. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In children/adolescents with moderately to severely active, fistulizing Crohn's disease, adalimumab induced perianal fistula closure and improvement within 12 weeks of treatment, with rates that were sustained for more than 5 years. The safety profile of adalimumab in patients with fistulae at baseline was similar to that of the overall population in IMAgINE 1/2. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: IMAgINE 1 (NCT00409682); IMAgINE 2 (NCT00686374).

Effect of Adalimumab on Clinical Outcomes and Health-related Quality of Life Among Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in a Clinical Practice Setting: Results From InspirADA.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Randomised trials have described the benefits of adalimumab [ADA] for ulcerative colitis [UC]; however, few data are available on health-related quality of life [HRQL] and health care costs in clinical practice. METHODS: InspirADA, a multicentre, prospective study, evaluated the effect of ADA in patients with moderate to severe UC treated according to usual clinical practice. Outcomes assessed were: Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] response/remission rates; changes in HRQL; all-cause direct costs; and UC-related direct and indirect costs from baseline to Week 26. RESULTS: Data from 463 patients were analysed. At Week 26, 67% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62%, 71%) of patients achieved response; 48% [95% CI: 44%, 53%] were in remission. For the overall population, significant [all p < 0.001] improvements from baseline to Week 26 were observed for the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [SIBDQ] (mean change ± standard deviation [SD]: 17.4 ± 14.5) and the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Level [EQ-5D-5L] (index: 0.1 ± 0.2; visual analogue scale [VAS]: 19.5 ± 25.8). Parallel improvements were seen in work productivity [11% absolute decrease in absenteeism; 25% absolute decrease in impairment while working; and 27% absolute decrease in impairment of ability to perform daily activities, all p < 0.001]. Among study completers, cumulative all-cause medical costs and UC-related medical costs were significantly [both p < 0.001] reduced by 59% and 77%, respectively, 6 months after initiation of therapy compared with the preceding 6 months. The safety profile of ADA was consistent with that observed in previous clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: ADA therapy in usual clinical practice is effective at improving and maintaining symptomatic control, improving HRQL, and decreasing costs of medical care among patients with UC.

Four-year maintenance treatment with adalimumab in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: The 52-week safety and efficacy of adalimumab in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis were demonstrated in a placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial. Data from patients who enrolled in the open-label extension study are presented. METHODS: Remission and response per the full Mayo score (FMS) and the partial Mayo score (PMS), remission per the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score, corticosteroid-free remission, and mucosal healing were assessed up to week 196 (week 208 for remission/response per PMS) of adalimumab treatment in patients who received one or more doses of adalimumab with use of a hybrid nonresponder imputation (hNRI) method. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing data up to the latest possible follow-up date for each patient, followed by observed case. Adalimumab trough concentrations were reported from week 52 to week 196 of treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported for all adalimumab-treated patients. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-six patients received adalimumab. At week 196 of treatment, remission and response rates per FMS, remission and response rates per PMS, remission rate per IBDQ score, mucosal healing rate, and corticosteroid-free remission rate were 19.2%, 32.2%, 22.5%, 32.5%, 33.1%, 30.5% (hNRI), and 40.5% (17/42; as observed), respectively. Serum adalimumab concentrations remained constant in patients receiving 40 mg every other week but increased in patients who underwent dose escalation. The safety profile was consistent with that in the 52-week study. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of adalimumab in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis was maintained for up to 4 years of treatment. No new safety signals were observed.

Growth Improvement with Adalimumab Treatment in Children with Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Growth failure is common in children with Crohn's disease. The effect of adalimumab (ADA), a fully human antitumor necrosis factor antagonist, on height velocity in pediatric patients with baseline (BL) linear growth impairment in the IMAgINE 1 trial is presented. METHODS: This analysis included female and male patients with growth potential (bone age ≤13 and ≤14 yr, respectively), with BL Pediatric Crohn's disease Activity Index >30, and who failed or were intolerant to conventional therapy. Patients received open-label induction ADA at weeks 0 and 2 by body weight (≥40 kg, 160 and 80 mg and <40 kg, 80 and 40 mg). At week 4, patients were randomized to double-blind high (40 or 20 mg for ≥40 kg or <40 kg) or low dose (20 or 10 mg for ≥40 kg or <40 kg) every other week ADA to week 52. Height velocity z-score was summarized at BL, week 26, and week 52 by patients with BL growth impairment (z-score ≤-1.0) or normal growth (z-score >-1.0). RESULTS: ADA therapy significantly improved and normalized growth rate at weeks 26 and 52 in patients with BL growth impairment (median z-score, BL, -3.25; week 26, -0.34; and week 52, 0.21; P < 0.001 versus BL for both), but not in patients with normal growth. Growth improvement was significantly greater at week 26 in week 4 responders to induction therapy compared with nonresponders (median z-score 0.09 versus -2.92; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: ADA treatment resulted in growth rate normalization as early as week 26 in children with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and growth impairment.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab in Pediatric Patients with Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: IMAgINE 1 assessed 52-week efficacy and safety of adalimumab in children with moderate to severe Crohn's disease. Long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab for patients who entered the IMAgINE 2 extension are reported. METHODS: Patients who completed IMAgINE 1 could enroll in IMAgINE 2. Endpoints assessed from weeks 0 to 240 of IMAgINE 2 were Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index remission (Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index ≤ 10) and response (Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index decrease ≥15 from IMAgINE 1 baseline) using observed analysis and hybrid nonresponder imputation (hNRI). For hNRI, discontinued patients were imputed as failures unless they transitioned to commercial adalimumab (with study site closure) or adult care, where last observation was carried forward. Corticosteroid-free remission in patients receiving corticosteroids at IMAgINE 1 baseline, discontinuation of immunomodulators (IMMs) in patients receiving IMMs at IMAgINE 2 baseline, and linear growth improvement were reported as observed. Adverse events were assessed for patients receiving ≥1 adalimumab dose in IMAgINE 1 and 2 through January 2015. RESULTS: Of 100 patients enrolled in IMAgINE 2, 41% and 48% achieved remission and response (hNRI) at IMAgINE 2 week 240. Remission rates were maintained by 45% (30/67, hNRI) of patients who entered IMAgINE 2 in remission. At IMAgINE 2 week 240, 63% (12/19) of patients receiving corticosteroids at IMAgINE 1 baseline achieved corticosteroid-free remission and 30% (6/20) of patients receiving IMMs at IMAgINE 2 baseline discontinued IMMs. Adalimumab treatment led to growth velocity normalization. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and safety profiles of prolonged adalimumab treatment in children with Crohn's disease were consistent with IMAgINE 1 and adult Crohn's disease adalimumab trials.

Efficacy and Safety of Escalation of Adalimumab Therapy to Weekly Dosing in Pediatric Patients with Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of adalimumab in inducing and maintaining remission in children with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease was shown in the IMAgINE 1 trial (NCT00409682). As per protocol, nonresponders or patients experiencing flare(s) on every other week (EOW) maintenance dosing could escalate to weekly dosing; we aimed to determine the therapeutic benefits of weekly dose escalation in this subpopulation. METHODS: Week 52 remission and response rates were assessed in patients who escalated to weekly dosing from their previous EOW schedule, which was according to randomized treatment dose (higher dose [HD] adalimumab [≥40 kg, 40 mg EOW; <40 kg, 20 mg EOW] or lower dose [LD; ≥40 kg, 20 mg EOW; <40 kg, 10 mg EOW]). Adverse events were reported for patients remaining on EOW dosing and patients receiving weekly dosing. RESULTS: Escalation to weekly dosing occurred in 48/95 (50.5%) patients randomized to LD and 35/93 (37.6%) patients randomized to HD adalimumab (P = 0.076). Week 52 remission and response rates were 18.8% and 47.9% for patients receiving LD adalimumab weekly and 31.4% and 57.1% for patients receiving HD adalimumab weekly, respectively (LD versus HD, P = 0.19 for remission; P = 0.41 for response). Adverse event rates were similar for patients receiving EOW and weekly adalimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly adalimumab dosing was clinically beneficial for children with Crohn's disease who experienced nonresponse or flare on EOW dosing. No increased safety risks were observed with weekly dosing.

Four-year maintenance treatment with adalimumab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: Data from ULTRA 1, 2, and 3.

OBJECTIVES: The safety and efficacy of adalimumab for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) has been reported up to week 52 from the placebo-controlled trials ULTRA (Ulcerative Colitis Long-Term Remission and Maintenance with Adalimumab) 1 and 2. Up to 4 years of data for adalimumab-treated patients from ULTRA 1, 2, and the open-label extension ULTRA 3 are presented. METHODS: Remission per partial Mayo score, remission per Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score, and mucosal healing rates were assessed in adalimumab-randomized patients from ULTRA 1 and 2 up to week 208. Corticosteroid-free remission was assessed in adalimumab-randomized patients who used corticosteroids at lead-in study baseline. Maintenance of remission per partial Mayo score and mucosal healing was assessed in patients who entered ULTRA 3 in remission per full Mayo score and with mucosal healing, respectively. As observed, last observation carried forward (LOCF) and nonresponder imputation (NRI) were used to report efficacy. Adverse events were reported for any adalimumab-treated patient. RESULTS: A total of 600/1,094 patients enrolled in ULTRA 1 or 2 were randomized to receive adalimumab and included in the intent-to-treat analyses of the studies. Of these, 199 patients remained on adalimumab after 4 years of follow-up. Rates of remission per partial Mayo score, remission per IBDQ score, mucosal healing, and corticosteroid discontinuation at week 208 were 24.7%, 26.3%, 27.7% (NRI), and 59.2% (observed), respectively. Of the patients who were followed up in ULTRA 3 (588/1,094), a total of 360 patients remained on adalimumab 3 years later. Remission per partial Mayo score and mucosal healing after ULTRA 1 or 2 to year 3 of ULTRA 3 were maintained by 63.6% and 59.9% of patients, respectively (NRI). Adverse event rates were stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Remission, mucosal healing, and improved quality of life were maintained in patients with moderately to severely active UC with long-term adalimumab therapy, for up to 4 years. No new safety signals were reported.

Adalimumab therapy is associated with reduced risk of hospitalization in patients with ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Adalimumab is effective for induction and maintenance of remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed whether adalimumab, in addition to standard UC therapy, reduced the risk for hospitalization (from all causes, from complications of UC, or from complications of UC or the drugs used to treat it) and colectomy in patients with moderate to severe UC compared with placebo. METHODS: Data were combined from patients that received induction therapy (a 160-mg dose followed by an 80-mg dose of adalimumab) or placebo in 2 trials (ULTRA 1 and ULTRA 2; n = 963). The risks of hospitalization and colectomy were compared between groups using unadjusted rates during the 8-week induction period, and patient-year-adjusted rates during 52 weeks. Statistical differences between groups were determined using the χ(2) method and Z score normal approximations. Numbers of hospitalizations were compared using Poisson regression with time offset. RESULTS: Significant reductions in risk of all-cause, UC-related, and UC- or drug-related hospitalizations (by 40%, 50%, and 47%, respectively; P < .05 for all comparisons) were observed within the first 8 weeks of adalimumab therapy compared with placebo. Significantly lower incidence rates for all-cause (0.18 vs 0.26; P = .03), UC-related (0.12 vs 0.22; P = .002), and UC- or drug-related (0.14 vs 0.24; P = .005) hospitalizations were observed during 52 weeks of adalimumab therapy compared with placebo. Rates of colectomy did not differ significantly between patients given adalimumab vs placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate to severe UC, the addition of adalimumab to standard of care treatment reduced the number of hospitalizations for any cause, as well as for UC-related and UC- or drug-related complications, compared with placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00385736 and NCT00408629.

52-week efficacy of adalimumab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who failed corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants.

BACKGROUND: The results of an open-label follow-up until week 52 of patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who participated in a double-blind placebo-controlled adalimumab induction trial (ULTRA 1, NCT00385736) are reported. METHODS: The study included adult anti-tumor necrosis factor-naive patients who completed double-blind adalimumab induction under an amended protocol (intent-to-treat [ITT]-A3 population) or any version of the protocol (ITT-E). Patients randomized to placebo received adalimumab beginning at week 8; patients randomized to adalimumab continued every other week dosing. Weekly dosing was allowed beginning at week 14 (original protocol) or week 12 (amended protocol). Clinical remission (Mayo score ≤2, no subscore >1), clinical response (decrease in Mayo score ≥3 points and ≥30% from baseline, plus decrease in rectal bleeding subscore ≥1 or absolute rectal bleeding subscore ≤1), mucosal healing (endoscopy subscore ≤1), escalation to weekly dosing, and reduction in corticosteroid use were assessed at week 52 in the pooled ITT-A3 and pooled ITT-E populations, using modified nonresponder imputation. RESULTS: Rates of clinical remission, clinical response, and mucosal healing at week 52 for the ITT-A3 population (N = 390) were 29.5%, 53.6%, and 46.7%, respectively; 38.8% of week 8 responders achieved clinical remission at week 52. Of patients using baseline corticosteroids (N = 234), 56.0% were corticosteroid-free at week 52 (26.1% in clinical remission). Results of the ITT-E population were similar. No new safety issues were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label study, adalimumab was effective for maintaining clinical remission in anti-tumor necrosis factor-naive patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who did not adequately respond to conventional therapy.

Safety and efficacy of adalimumab for moderate to severe Crohn's disease in children.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The IMAgINE 1 study (NCT00409682) evaluated the safety and efficacy of adalimumab double-blind maintenance dosing regimens following open-label induction for pediatric patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: We studied 192 patients with Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) scores >30 for whom conventional treatment was unsuccessful. Patients received open-label induction therapy with subcutaneous adalimumab at weeks 0 and 2 (160 mg and 80 mg, or 80 mg and 40 mg, for body weight ≥40 kg or <40 kg). At week 4, 188 patients were assigned to groups based on achievement of clinical response (defined as decrease in PCDAI ≥15 points from baseline; 155/188 [82.4%]) and prior exposure to infliximab (82/188 [43.6%]). Groups were given double-blind maintenance therapy with adalimumab at high (40 mg or 20 mg for body weight ≥40 kg or <40 kg; n = 93) or low doses (20 mg or 10 mg for body weight ≥40 kg or <40 kg; n = 95) every other week for 48 weeks. Clinical remission (PCDAI ≤10) at week 26 (the primary end point) was compared between groups using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusting for strata, with nonresponder imputation. Adverse events were monitored to evaluate safety. RESULTS: A total of 152 of 188 patients (80.9%) completed all 26 weeks of the study. At week 26, 63 patients (33.5%) were in clinical remission, with no significant difference between high- and low-dose groups (36/93 [38.7%] vs 27/95 [28.4%]; P = .075). No new safety signals were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab induced and maintained clinical remission of children with CD, with a safety profile comparable to that of adult patients with CD. More children who received high compared with low dose were in remission at week 26, but the difference between dose groups was not statistically significant.

Adalimumab induces and maintains mucosal healing in patients with Crohn's disease: data from the EXTEND trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated the efficacy of adalimumab for inducing and maintaining mucosal healing in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (extend the safety and efficacy of adalimumab through endoscopic healing [EXTEND]) evaluated adalimumab for induction and maintenance of mucosal healing in 135 adults with moderate to severe ileocolonic CD. The baseline degree of mucosal ulceration was documented by ileocolonoscopy. All patients received induction therapy (subcutaneous adalimumab 160/80 mg at weeks 0/2). At week 4, patients were randomly assigned to groups given 40 mg adalimumab or placebo every other week through week 52. Open-label adalimumab was given to patients with flares or no response, starting at week 8. Mucosal healing was reassessed by ileocolonoscopy at weeks 12 and 52. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of patients receiving adalimumab had mucosal healing at week 12 (the primary end point) versus 13% given placebo (P = .056). At week 52, rates of mucosal healing were 24% and 0, respectively (P < .001). Remission rates, based on the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity, were 52% for adalimumab and 28% for placebo at week 12 (P = .006) and 28% and 3%, respectively, at week 52 (P < .001). Rates of clinical remission based on the Crohn's Disease Activity Index were greater among patients given continuous adalimumab therapy versus placebo at weeks 12 (47% vs 28%; P = .021) and 52 (33% vs 9%; P = .001). Five serious (1 during induction and 4 during open-label therapy) and 3 opportunistic infections (1 in each group during double-blind therapy and 1 during open-label therapy) were reported (n = 135). CONCLUSIONS: Following induction therapy with adalimumab, patients with moderately to severely active CD who continue to receive adalimumab are more likely to achieve mucosal healing than those given placebo.

Adalimumab induces and maintains clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Adalimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. Its efficacy as maintenance therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis has not been studied in a controlled, double-blind trial. METHODS: Ulcerative colitis long-term remission and maintenance with adalimumab 2 (ULTRA 2) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of adalimumab in induction and maintenance of clinical remission in 494 patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis who received concurrent treatment with oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressants. Patients were stratified based on prior exposure to TNF-α antagonists (either had or had not been previously treated with anti-TNF-α) and randomly assigned to groups given adalimumab 160 mg at week 0, 80 mg at week 2, and then 40 mg every other week or placebo. Primary end points were remission at weeks 8 and 52. RESULTS: Overall rates of clinical remission at week 8 were 16.5% on adalimumab and 9.3% on placebo (P = .019); corresponding values for week 52 were 17.3% and 8.5% (P = .004). Among anti-TNF-α naïve patients, rates of remission at week 8 were 21.3% on adalimumab and 11% on placebo (P = .017); corresponding values for week 52 were 22% and 12.4% (P = .029). Among patients who had previously received anti-TNF agents, rates of remission at week 8 were 9.2% on adalimumab and 6.9% on placebo (P = .559); corresponding values for week 52 were 10.2% and 3% (P = .039). Serious adverse events occurred in 12% of patients given adalimumab or placebo. Serious infections developed in 1.6% of patients given adalimumab and 1.9% given placebo. In the group given adalimumab, 1 patient developed squamous cell carcinoma and 1 developed gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab was safe and more effective than placebo in inducing and maintaining clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis who did not have an adequate response to conventional therapy with steroids or immunosuppressants.

Adalimumab for induction of clinical remission in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results of a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA), a recombinant human monoclonal antibody against tumour necrosis factor α (TNF), for the induction of clinical remission in anti-TNF naïve patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: This 8-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT00385736), conducted at 94 centres in North America and Europe, enrolled ambulatory adult patients with Mayo score of ≥ 6 points and endoscopic subscore of ≥ 2 points despite treatment with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants. Under the original study protocol, 186 patients were randomised (1:1) to subcutaneous treatment with ADA160/80 (160 mg at week 0, 80 mg at week 2, 40 mg at weeks 4 and 6) or placebo. Subsequently, at the request of European regulatory authorities, the protocol was amended to include a second induction group (ADA80/40: 80 mg at week 0, 40 mg at weeks 2, 4 and 6). The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical remission (Mayo score ≤ 2 with no individual subscore >1) at week 8, assessed in 390 patients randomised (1:1:1) to ADA160/80, ADA80/40, or placebo. Safety was assessed in all enrolled patients. Patients, study site personnel, investigators, and the sponsor were blinded to treatment assignment. RESULTS: At week 8, 18.5% of patients in the ADA160/80 group (p = 0.031 vs placebo) and 10.0% in the ADA80/40 group (p = 0.833 vs placebo) were in remission, compared with 9.2% in the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred in 7.6%, 3.8% and 4.0% of patients in the placebo, ADA80/40, and ADA160/80 groups, respectively. There were two malignancies in the placebo group, none in the ADA groups. There were no cases of tuberculosis and no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: ADA160/80 was safe and effective for induction of clinical remission in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis failing treatment with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants. Clinical trial NCT00385736.